Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Co-production in practice: how people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services

Authors: Joseph Wherton, Paul Sugarhood, Rob Procter, Sue Hinder, Trisha Greenhalgh

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The low uptake of telecare and telehealth services by older people may be explained by the limited involvement of users in the design. If the ambition of ‘care closer to home’ is to be realised, then industry, health and social care providers must evolve ways to work with older people to co-produce useful and useable solutions.

Method

We conducted 10 co-design workshops with users of telehealth and telecare, their carers, service providers and technology suppliers. Using vignettes developed from in-depth ethnographic case studies, we explored participants’ perspectives on the design features of technologies and services to enable and facilitate the co-production of new care solutions. Workshop discussions were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results

Analysis revealed four main themes. First, there is a need to raise awareness and provide information to potential users of assisted living technologies (ALTs). Second, technologies must be highly customisable and adaptable to accommodate the multiple and changing needs of different users. Third, the service must align closely with the individual’s wider social support network. Finally, the service must support a high degree of information sharing and coordination.

Conclusions

The case vignettes within inclusive and democratic co-design workshops provided a powerful means for ALT users and their carers to contribute, along with other stakeholders, to technology and service design. The workshops identified a need to focus attention on supporting the social processes that facilitate the collective efforts of formal and informal care networks in ALT delivery and use.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Doll H, Bower P, et al. Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole systems demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study); nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f653.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Doll H, Bower P, et al. Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole systems demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study); nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f653.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandex JL, Beecham J, Shashivadan P, Cartwright M, et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (whole system demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study); nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f1035.CrossRefPubMed Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandex JL, Beecham J, Shashivadan P, Cartwright M, et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (whole system demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study); nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f1035.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J, Knapp M, Rogers A, Sanders C, et al. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: The whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:403–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J, Knapp M, Rogers A, Sanders C, et al. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: The whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:403–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Eccles A. The complexities of technology-based care. Telecare as perceived by care practitioners. Issues in Social Science. 2013. doi:10.5296/iss.v1i1.4464. Eccles A. The complexities of technology-based care. Telecare as perceived by care practitioners. Issues in Social Science. 2013. doi:10.5296/iss.v1i1.4464.
5.
go back to reference Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandeze J, Beecham J, Hirani S, Beynon M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age and Ageing. 2014. doi:10.1093/ageing/afu067. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandeze J, Beecham J, Hirani S, Beynon M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age and Ageing. 2014. doi:10.1093/ageing/afu067.
6.
go back to reference Department of Health. Research and development work relating to assistive technology 2012–2013. London UK: Department of Health; 2013. Department of Health. Research and development work relating to assistive technology 2012–2013. London UK: Department of Health; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2, e001574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2, e001574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Gaver W, Dunne A, Pacenti E. Design: cultural probes. Interact: New Visions Hum Comput Interact. 1999;6:21–9.CrossRef Gaver W, Dunne A, Pacenti E. Design: cultural probes. Interact: New Visions Hum Comput Interact. 1999;6:21–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Dewsbury G, Hinder S, et al. Designing assisted living technologies ‘in the wild’: preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Dewsbury G, Hinder S, et al. Designing assisted living technologies ‘in the wild’: preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.CrossRefPubMed Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Procter R, Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Rouncefield M, Hinder S. The day-to-day co-production of ageing in place. CSCW. 2014;23:245–67.PubMedPubMedCentral Procter R, Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Rouncefield M, Hinder S. The day-to-day co-production of ageing in place. CSCW. 2014;23:245–67.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Clemensen J, Larsen SB, Kyng M, Kirkevold M. Participatory design in health sciences: using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:122–30.CrossRefPubMed Clemensen J, Larsen SB, Kyng M, Kirkevold M. Participatory design in health sciences: using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:122–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Robert GB. Participatory action research – using experience-based co-design to improve the quality of healthcare services. In: Ziebland S, Coulter A, Calabrese JD, Locock L, editors. Understanding and Using Health Experiences – improving patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Robert GB. Participatory action research – using experience-based co-design to improve the quality of healthcare services. In: Ziebland S, Coulter A, Calabrese JD, Locock L, editors. Understanding and Using Health Experiences – improving patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
15.
go back to reference Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007. Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007.
16.
go back to reference Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Co-realisation: evolving IT artefacts by design. In: Ackerman M, Erickson T, Halverson C, Kellogg W, editors. Resources, Co-Evolution and Artefacts. Berlin: Springer; 2008. Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Co-realisation: evolving IT artefacts by design. In: Ackerman M, Erickson T, Halverson C, Kellogg W, editors. Resources, Co-Evolution and Artefacts. Berlin: Springer; 2008.
17.
go back to reference Muller MJ, Druin A. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: Jacko J, Sears A, editors. Handbook of HCI. Mathway, NJ: Eribaum; 2010. p. 1051–68. Muller MJ, Druin A. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In: Jacko J, Sears A, editors. Handbook of HCI. Mathway, NJ: Eribaum; 2010. p. 1051–68.
18.
go back to reference Bodker S, Iversen OS. Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI. 2002; New York:ACM:11–18 Bodker S, Iversen OS. Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI. 2002; New York:ACM:11–18
19.
go back to reference Barrett J, Kirk S. Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:621–9.CrossRefPubMed Barrett J, Kirk S. Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:621–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lindsay S, Jackson D, Schofield G, Olivier P. Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proceedings of CHI. 2012, New York: ACM Lindsay S, Jackson D, Schofield G, Olivier P. Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proceedings of CHI. 2012, New York: ACM
21.
go back to reference Lines L, Hone KS. Eliciting user requirements with older adults – lessons from the design of an interactive domestic alarm. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2004;3:141–8.CrossRef Lines L, Hone KS. Eliciting user requirements with older adults – lessons from the design of an interactive domestic alarm. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2004;3:141–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rice M, Carmichael A. Factors facilitating or impeding older adults’ creative contributions in the collaborative design of a novel DTV-based application. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2011. doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0262-8. Rice M, Carmichael A. Factors facilitating or impeding older adults’ creative contributions in the collaborative design of a novel DTV-based application. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2011. doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0262-8.
23.
go back to reference Beck E, Obrist M, Bernhaupt R, Tscheligi M. Instant card technique: how and why to apply in user-centered design. In: Proceedings of PDC’08. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2008. p. 162–5. Beck E, Obrist M, Bernhaupt R, Tscheligi M. Instant card technique: how and why to apply in user-centered design. In: Proceedings of PDC’08. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2008. p. 162–5.
24.
go back to reference Muller MJ, Kuhn S. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM 1993, 36:24- Muller MJ, Kuhn S. Participatory design. Communications of the ACM 1993, 36:24-
25.
go back to reference Picking R, Robinet A, Grout V, McGinn J, Roy A, Ellis S, et al. Case study using a methodological approach to developing user interfaces for elderly and disabled people. Comput J. 2010;53:842–59.CrossRef Picking R, Robinet A, Grout V, McGinn J, Roy A, Ellis S, et al. Case study using a methodological approach to developing user interfaces for elderly and disabled people. Comput J. 2010;53:842–59.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Suri JF, Marsh M. Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:151–7.CrossRefPubMed Suri JF, Marsh M. Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Appl Ergon. 2000;31:151–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Muller MJ. Layered participatory analysis: new developments in the CARD technique. In: Proceedings of CHI. 2001. New York: ACM:90–97 Muller MJ. Layered participatory analysis: new developments in the CARD technique. In: Proceedings of CHI. 2001. New York: ACM:90–97
28.
go back to reference Newell AF, Carmichael A, Morgan M, Dickinson A. The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interact Comput. 2006;18:996–1011.CrossRef Newell AF, Carmichael A, Morgan M, Dickinson A. The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interact Comput. 2006;18:996–1011.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics in qualitative research. London: Sage; 1990. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics in qualitative research. London: Sage; 1990.
30.
go back to reference Dourish P, Bellotti V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of CSCW. 1992. New York: ACM:107–114 Dourish P, Bellotti V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of CSCW. 1992. New York: ACM:107–114
31.
go back to reference Spence P, Reddy M. Beyond Expertise Seeking: A field study of the informal knowledge practices of healthcare IT teams. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12. 2012;21:283–31 Spence P, Reddy M. Beyond Expertise Seeking: A field study of the informal knowledge practices of healthcare IT teams. In: Proceedings of CSCW’12. 2012;21:283–31
32.
go back to reference van den Heuvel E, Jowitt F, McIntyre A. Awareness, requirements and barriers to use of assistive technology designed to enable independence of people suffering from dementia. Technol Disabil. 2012;24:139–48. van den Heuvel E, Jowitt F, McIntyre A. Awareness, requirements and barriers to use of assistive technology designed to enable independence of people suffering from dementia. Technol Disabil. 2012;24:139–48.
33.
go back to reference Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Hinder S, Procter R, Greenhalgh T. Technology as system innovation: application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9:79–87.CrossRefPubMed Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Hinder S, Procter R, Greenhalgh T. Technology as system innovation: application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9:79–87.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Burrow S, Brooks D. AT dementia: an information resource on assistive technologies that support the independence of people with dementia. Dementia. 2012;11:553–7.CrossRef Burrow S, Brooks D. AT dementia: an information resource on assistive technologies that support the independence of people with dementia. Dementia. 2012;11:553–7.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Gibson G, Newton L, Prtichard G, Finch T, Brittain K, Robinson L. The provision of assistive technology products and services for people with dementia living in the United Kingdom. Dementia. 2014. doi:10.1177/1471301214532643 Gibson G, Newton L, Prtichard G, Finch T, Brittain K, Robinson L. The provision of assistive technology products and services for people with dementia living in the United Kingdom. Dementia. 2014. doi:10.1177/1471301214532643
38.
go back to reference Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.CrossRef Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Brown JS, Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ Sci. 1991;2:40–57.CrossRef Brown JS, Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ Sci. 1991;2:40–57.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Orr J. Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. New York: ILR Press; 1996. Orr J. Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. New York: ILR Press; 1996.
41.
go back to reference Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Cunningham F, Georgiou A, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. 2011;11:273. Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Cunningham F, Georgiou A, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. 2011;11:273.
42.
go back to reference Cabitza F, Simone C. Renovated myths for the development of socially embedded technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.5577; 2012 Cabitza F, Simone C. Renovated myths for the development of socially embedded technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.5577; 2012
44.
go back to reference Covington H. Caring presence: delineation of a concept for holistic nursing. J Holist Nurs. 2003;21:301.CrossRefPubMed Covington H. Caring presence: delineation of a concept for holistic nursing. J Holist Nurs. 2003;21:301.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Halldorsdottir S. The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: introduction of a synthesized theory from the patient’s perspective. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;22:643–52.CrossRef Halldorsdottir S. The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: introduction of a synthesized theory from the patient’s perspective. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;22:643–52.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Hyde P, Harris C, Boaden R. Pro-social organisational behaviour of health workers. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24:3115–30.CrossRef Hyde P, Harris C, Boaden R. Pro-social organisational behaviour of health workers. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24:3115–30.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Kolowitz B, Lauro GR, Venturella J, Georgiev Y, Barone M. Clinical social networking: a new revolution in provider communication and delivery of clinical information across providers of care? J Digit Imaging. 2014;27:192–9.CrossRefPubMed Kolowitz B, Lauro GR, Venturella J, Georgiev Y, Barone M. Clinical social networking: a new revolution in provider communication and delivery of clinical information across providers of care? J Digit Imaging. 2014;27:192–9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Triantafyllidis AK, Koutkias VG, Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N. A pervasive health system integrating patient monitoring, status logging, and social sharing. IEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013;17:30–7.CrossRef Triantafyllidis AK, Koutkias VG, Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N. A pervasive health system integrating patient monitoring, status logging, and social sharing. IEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013;17:30–7.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Schmidt K, Bannon L. Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work. CSCW. 1992;1:7–40. Schmidt K, Bannon L. Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work. CSCW. 1992;1:7–40.
50.
go back to reference Bradner E. Social affordance of computer-mediated communication technology: understanding adoption. In: Proceedings of CHI EA. 2001. New York: ACM: 67–68 Bradner E. Social affordance of computer-mediated communication technology: understanding adoption. In: Proceedings of CHI EA. 2001. New York: ACM: 67–68
51.
go back to reference Reddy M, Dourish P, Pratt W. Coordinating heterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care. In: Proceedings of ECSCW. 2001. Netherlands: Springer:239–258 Reddy M, Dourish P, Pratt W. Coordinating heterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care. In: Proceedings of ECSCW. 2001. Netherlands: Springer:239–258
Metadata
Title
Co-production in practice: how people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services
Authors
Joseph Wherton
Paul Sugarhood
Rob Procter
Sue Hinder
Trisha Greenhalgh
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0271-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue