Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Doping knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Ugandan athletes’: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Haruna Muwonge, Robert Zavuga, Peninnah Aligawesa Kabenge

Published in: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the development of advanced drug testing systems, both deliberate and inadvertent doping in sports is increasing in elite, amateur and school sports. As a result, alternative approaches that seek to influence an athlete’s attitudes are needed to address the growing doping concerns that threaten both the health and well being of the athlete as well as the legitimacy of the sport. Therefore, the current study set out to establish the doping attitudes, knowledge and practices of professional Ugandan athletes, gathering information that may guide the design of more efficient doping prevention programs.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 384 professional Ugandan athletes from four contact team sports (basketball, football, handball and rugby) and two individual sports (athletics and cycling). An Interviewer administered questionnaire used contained; questions about the doping behavior, the performance enhancement attitude scale (PEAS), and doping use belief (DUB) statements.

Results

Approximately 60 % of the athletes reported familiarity with information on doping and that most of this information came from fellow colleagues (41.9 %), individual or team coaches (29.7 %) or the media (15.6 %). However, nearly 80 % of these athletes could not correctly define doping. The overall mean PEAS score, a measure of doping attitudes, for all study participants was 39.8 ± 14.8. Female athletes (PEAS: 41.1 ± 15.1), athletes with a prior doping history (PEAS: 44.1 ± 15.6) and athletes from the sport of athletics (PEAS: 56.6 ± 17.4) had higher mean PEAS scores than their respective counterparts. Regarding doping behaviors/practices, 9.3 % of the study participants had been offered a doping agent at some point, although only 3.9 % of the athletes acknowledged recent use.

Conclusions

The confessed use of doping agents in this study was low, which may suggest that fewer athletes use doping agents in Uganda. However, there is still an urgent need for educational anti-doping programs to address the knowledge gaps observed amongst athletes in this study. Modifying the existing Physical education curriculum for inclusion of more content about doping in sport could provide the basis for doping prevention programs amongst amateur athletes in Ugandan primary and secondary schools.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference de Hon O, Kuipers H, van Bottenburg M. Prevalence of doping Use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods. Sports Med. 2015;45(1):57–69.CrossRefPubMed de Hon O, Kuipers H, van Bottenburg M. Prevalence of doping Use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods. Sports Med. 2015;45(1):57–69.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pielke Jr R. Gather data to reveal true extent of doping in sport. Nature: Int Weekly J Sci. 2015;517(7536):529.CrossRef Pielke Jr R. Gather data to reveal true extent of doping in sport. Nature: Int Weekly J Sci. 2015;517(7536):529.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gibson O. Drugs in sport: Wada says doping and organised crime 'too big to manage'. In: theguardian. London (UK): Guardian News and Media Limited; 2013. Gibson O. Drugs in sport: Wada says doping and organised crime 'too big to manage'. In: theguardian. London (UK): Guardian News and Media Limited; 2013.
5.
go back to reference World Anti-doping Agency (WADA). Anti-Doping Testing figures. In: World anti-doping Agency, editor. 2013 Anti-Doping Testing Figures Report. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-doping Agency; 2013. World Anti-doping Agency (WADA). Anti-Doping Testing figures. In: World anti-doping Agency, editor. 2013 Anti-Doping Testing Figures Report. Montreal, Canada: World Anti-doping Agency; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Sottas PE, Robinson N, Fischetto G, Dolle G, Alonso JM, Saugy M. Prevalence of blood doping in samples collected from elite track and field athletes. Clin Chem. 2011;57(5):762–9.CrossRefPubMed Sottas PE, Robinson N, Fischetto G, Dolle G, Alonso JM, Saugy M. Prevalence of blood doping in samples collected from elite track and field athletes. Clin Chem. 2011;57(5):762–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sagoe D, Molde H, Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. The global epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(5):383–98.CrossRefPubMed Sagoe D, Molde H, Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. The global epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(5):383–98.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ewen C. Sports doping: racing just to keep up. Nature: News Feature. 2011;475:283–5.CrossRef Ewen C. Sports doping: racing just to keep up. Nature: News Feature. 2011;475:283–5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference World Anti-doping Agency (WADA). Annual Report. Montreal, Canada: WADA; 2014. p. 4–5. World Anti-doping Agency (WADA). Annual Report. Montreal, Canada: WADA; 2014. p. 4–5.
10.
go back to reference Morente-Sanchez J, Zabala M. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Med. 2013;43(6):395–411.CrossRefPubMed Morente-Sanchez J, Zabala M. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Med. 2013;43(6):395–411.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ntoumanis N, Ng JY, Barkoukis V, Backhouse S. Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping Use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(11):1603–24.CrossRefPubMed Ntoumanis N, Ng JY, Barkoukis V, Backhouse S. Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping Use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(11):1603–24.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nolte BS K, Fletcher L, Krüger PE. Doping in sport: attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of competitive high-school athletes in Gauteng province. South African J Sports Med. 2014;26(3):81–6.CrossRef Nolte BS K, Fletcher L, Krüger PE. Doping in sport: attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of competitive high-school athletes in Gauteng province. South African J Sports Med. 2014;26(3):81–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, Palmu P, Pietila K, Helenius I. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(10):842–6.CrossRefPubMed Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, Palmu P, Pietila K, Helenius I. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27(10):842–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brand R, Wolff W, Thieme D. Using response-time latencies to measure athletes' doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9(1):36.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Brand R, Wolff W, Thieme D. Using response-time latencies to measure athletes' doping attitudes: the brief implicit attitude test identifies substance abuse in bodybuilders. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014;9(1):36.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Peretti-Watel P, Pruvost J, Guagliardo V, Guibbert L, Verger P, Obadia Y. Attitudes à l’égard du dopage parmi les jeunes sportifs de la région PACA. Sci Sports. 2005;20(1):33–40.CrossRef Peretti-Watel P, Pruvost J, Guagliardo V, Guibbert L, Verger P, Obadia Y. Attitudes à l’égard du dopage parmi les jeunes sportifs de la région PACA. Sci Sports. 2005;20(1):33–40.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kish L. Survey Sampling. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1965. Kish L. Survey Sampling. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1965.
17.
go back to reference Petróczi A, Aidman E. Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: review of the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale. Psychol Sport Exercise. 2009;10(3):390–6.CrossRef Petróczi A, Aidman E. Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: review of the psychometric properties of the performance enhancement attitude scale. Psychol Sport Exercise. 2009;10(3):390–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Petróczi A. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy C7 - 34. 2007;2(1):1–15.CrossRef Petróczi A. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy C7 - 34. 2007;2(1):1–15.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference World anti-doping Agency. World Anti-Doping Code. In: Doping Control: Definition of doping. Montreal, Quebec: World Anti-doping Agency; 2009. p. 18–25. World anti-doping Agency. World Anti-Doping Code. In: Doping Control: Definition of doping. Montreal, Quebec: World Anti-doping Agency; 2009. p. 18–25.
20.
go back to reference Erdman KA, Fung TS, Doyle-Baker PK, Verhoef MJ, Reimer RA. Dietary supplementation of high-performance Canadian athletes by age and gender. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(6):458–64.CrossRefPubMed Erdman KA, Fung TS, Doyle-Baker PK, Verhoef MJ, Reimer RA. Dietary supplementation of high-performance Canadian athletes by age and gender. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17(6):458–64.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Waddington I, Malcolm D, Roderick M, Naik R. Drug use in english professional football. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:4.CrossRef Waddington I, Malcolm D, Roderick M, Naik R. Drug use in english professional football. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:4.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sajber D, Rodek J, Escalante Y, Olujic D, Sekulic D. Sport nutrition and doping factors in swimming; parallel analysis among athletes and coaches. Coll Antropol. 2013;2:179–86. Sajber D, Rodek J, Escalante Y, Olujic D, Sekulic D. Sport nutrition and doping factors in swimming; parallel analysis among athletes and coaches. Coll Antropol. 2013;2:179–86.
24.
go back to reference Somerville SJ, Lewis M, Kuipers H. Accidental breaches of the doping regulations in sport: is there a need to improve the education of sportspeople? Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(8):512–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Somerville SJ, Lewis M, Kuipers H. Accidental breaches of the doping regulations in sport: is there a need to improve the education of sportspeople? Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(8):512–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Manouchehri J, Farshad T, Farideh Ashraf G. Variance analysis: doping attitude, doping behavior and sport orientation in elite martial artists european. J Exp Biol. 2013;3(1):62–7. Manouchehri J, Farshad T, Farideh Ashraf G. Variance analysis: doping attitude, doping behavior and sport orientation in elite martial artists european. J Exp Biol. 2013;3(1):62–7.
26.
go back to reference Kraus SJ. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1995;21(1):58–75.CrossRef Kraus SJ. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1995;21(1):58–75.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sas-Nowosielski K, Swiatkowska L. Goal orientations and attitudes toward doping. Int J Sports Med. 2008;29(7):607–12.CrossRefPubMed Sas-Nowosielski K, Swiatkowska L. Goal orientations and attitudes toward doping. Int J Sports Med. 2008;29(7):607–12.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lazuras L, Barkoukis V, Rodafinos A, Tzorbatzoudis H. Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010;32(5):694–710.PubMed Lazuras L, Barkoukis V, Rodafinos A, Tzorbatzoudis H. Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes: a social cognition approach. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010;32(5):694–710.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lentillon-Kaestner V, Ohl F. Can we measure accurately the prevalence of doping? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):1600–0838.CrossRef Lentillon-Kaestner V, Ohl F. Can we measure accurately the prevalence of doping? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):1600–0838.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Petroczi A, Mazanov J, Nepusz T, Backhouse SH, Naughton DP. Comfort in big numbers: does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement? J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3(19):1745–6673. Petroczi A, Mazanov J, Nepusz T, Backhouse SH, Naughton DP. Comfort in big numbers: does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement? J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3(19):1745–6673.
Metadata
Title
Doping knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Ugandan athletes’: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Haruna Muwonge
Robert Zavuga
Peninnah Aligawesa Kabenge
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1747-597X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0033-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 1/2015 Go to the issue