Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Head & Face Medicine 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?

Authors: Jan Hourfar, Dirk Bister, Björn Ludwig, Gero Kinzinger, Jörg Alexander Lisson

Published in: Head & Face Medicine | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to verify anecdotal evidence that the maxillary central-to-lateral occlusal height difference (OHD) of more than 0.5 mm is a feature displayed in the majority of media and to discuss its implications for individualized orthodontic treatment planning.

Methods

Photographs of smiling female models were collected from a variety of printed advertisements and allocated to 3 groups (n = 30 each): 1 dental, 2 fashion and 3 orthodontics. Group 4 used female patient images from orthodontic textbooks, assuming an OHD of 0.5 mm between maxillary central and lateral incisors. OHD was assessed by measuring the incisor height on the photographs and using average values to establish height differences.

Results

The average maxillary central-to-lateral incisor OHD differences were 1.39 mm (dental literature), 1.34 mm (fashion advertisements), 1.23 mm (orthodontics) and 0.62 mm (orthodontic textbooks) respectively. The differences between the advertisement groups were not significant (P >  0.05), but for orthodontic textbooks they were (P <  0.001).

Conclusions

Advertisers seem to prefer greater maxillary central-to-lateral OHD compared to commonly used bracket placement protocols. Therefore, discussing OHD at start of treatment is recommended; modification of commonly used bracket placement protocols may be helpful to achieve desired aesthetic outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schabel BJ, Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA, Jr.: Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009, 135:040. Schabel BJ, Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA, Jr.: Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009, 135:040.
2.
go back to reference Spear F. Cinical dilemma: too much tooth, not enough tooth - making decisions about anterior tooth position. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:93–6.CrossRef Spear F. Cinical dilemma: too much tooth, not enough tooth - making decisions about anterior tooth position. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:93–6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ritter DE, Gandini LG Jr, Pinto Ados S, Ravelli DB, Locks A. Analysis of the smile photograph. World J Orthod. 2006;7:279–85.PubMed Ritter DE, Gandini LG Jr, Pinto Ados S, Ravelli DB, Locks A. Analysis of the smile photograph. World J Orthod. 2006;7:279–85.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:155–67.PubMed Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:155–67.PubMed
5.
go back to reference McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Bracket placement with the preadjusted appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:302–11.PubMed McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. Bracket placement with the preadjusted appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:302–11.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Alexander RG. The Vari-simplex discipline. Part 1. Concept and appliance design. J Clin Orthod. 1983;17:380–92.PubMed Alexander RG. The Vari-simplex discipline. Part 1. Concept and appliance design. J Clin Orthod. 1983;17:380–92.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1318–27.CrossRef Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: a computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1318–27.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:98–111.CrossRef Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:98–111.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Machado AW, McComb RW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25:392–401.CrossRef Machado AW, McComb RW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25:392–401.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bukhary SMN, Gill DS, Tredwin CJ, Moles DR. The influence of varying maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on perceived smile aesthetics. Br Dent J. 2007;203:687–93.CrossRef Bukhary SMN, Gill DS, Tredwin CJ, Moles DR. The influence of varying maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on perceived smile aesthetics. Br Dent J. 2007;203:687–93.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Saad G. Applying evolutionary psychology in understanding the representation of women in advertisements. Psychol Market. 2004;21:593–612.CrossRef Saad G. Applying evolutionary psychology in understanding the representation of women in advertisements. Psychol Market. 2004;21:593–612.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wasylkiw L, Emms AA, Meuse R, Poirier KF. Are all models created equal? A content analysis of women in advertisements of fitness versus fashion magazines. Body Image. 2009;6:137–40.CrossRef Wasylkiw L, Emms AA, Meuse R, Poirier KF. Are all models created equal? A content analysis of women in advertisements of fitness versus fashion magazines. Body Image. 2009;6:137–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mehta A. Celebrities in Advertising. In: Jones JP, editor. The Advertising Business Operations, Creativity, Media Planning, Integrated Communications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 1999. p. 193–208.CrossRef Mehta A. Celebrities in Advertising. In: Jones JP, editor. The Advertising Business Operations, Creativity, Media Planning, Integrated Communications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 1999. p. 193–208.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2001. Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2001.
15.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.
16.
go back to reference Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP, Trevisi HJ: Behandlungskonzept der vorprogrammierten Apparatur. 1. edn. München: Elsevier; 2004. Bennett JC, McLaughlin RP, Trevisi HJ: Behandlungskonzept der vorprogrammierten Apparatur. 1. edn. München: Elsevier; 2004.
17.
go back to reference Ludwig B, Glasl B. Selbstligierende Brackets. Konzepte und Behandlung. Stuttgart - New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2009. Ludwig B, Glasl B. Selbstligierende Brackets. Konzepte und Behandlung. Stuttgart - New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2009.
18.
go back to reference Wheeler RC. Wheeler’s atlas of tooth form. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1984. Wheeler RC. Wheeler’s atlas of tooth form. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1984.
19.
go back to reference Machado AW: Influence of different parameters on smile esthetics perception as perceived by orthodontists and laypeople. [Tese de Doutorado]. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia da UNESP; 2011. Machado AW: Influence of different parameters on smile esthetics perception as perceived by orthodontists and laypeople. [Tese de Doutorado]. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia da UNESP; 2011.
20.
go back to reference King KL, Evans CA, Viana G, BeGole E, Obrez A. Preferences for vertical position of the maxillary lateral incisors. World J Orthod. 2008;9:147–54.PubMed King KL, Evans CA, Viana G, BeGole E, Obrez A. Preferences for vertical position of the maxillary lateral incisors. World J Orthod. 2008;9:147–54.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists’ and patients’ concepts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:345–52.CrossRef Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists’ and patients’ concepts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:345–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Claman L, Patton D, Rashid R. Standardized portrait photography for dental patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;98:197–205.CrossRef Claman L, Patton D, Rashid R. Standardized portrait photography for dental patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;98:197–205.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:221–36.PubMed Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:221–36.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Caballero MJ, Lumpkin JR, Madden CS. Using physical attractiveness as an advertising tool: An empirical test of the attraction phenomenon. J Advertising Res. 1989;29:16–22. Caballero MJ, Lumpkin JR, Madden CS. Using physical attractiveness as an advertising tool: An empirical test of the attraction phenomenon. J Advertising Res. 1989;29:16–22.
26.
go back to reference Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24:285–90.CrossRef Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24:285–90.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 1. Concepts and canons. Dent Update. 2008;35:102–7.CrossRef Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: 1. Concepts and canons. Dent Update. 2008;35:102–7.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Machado AW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:658–64.CrossRef Machado AW, Moon W, Gandini LG Jr. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;143:658–64.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bellamy LJ, Kokich VG, Weissman JA. Using orthodontic intrusion of abraded incisors to facilitate restoration: the technique's effects on alveolar bone level and root length. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:725–33.CrossRef Bellamy LJ, Kokich VG, Weissman JA. Using orthodontic intrusion of abraded incisors to facilitate restoration: the technique's effects on alveolar bone level and root length. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:725–33.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kajiyama K, Murakami T, Yokota S. Gingival reactions after experimentally induced extrusion of the upper incisors in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;104:36–47.CrossRef Kajiyama K, Murakami T, Yokota S. Gingival reactions after experimentally induced extrusion of the upper incisors in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;104:36–47.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Salama H, Salama M. The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13:312–33.PubMed Salama H, Salama M. The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1993;13:312–33.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Chay SH, Rabie AB. Repositioning of the gingival margin by extrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;122:95–102.CrossRef Chay SH, Rabie AB. Repositioning of the gingival margin by extrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;122:95–102.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:141–51.CrossRef Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:141–51.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference An SM, Choi SY, Chung YW, Jang TH, Kang KH. Comparing esthetic smile perceptions among laypersons with and without orthodontic treatment experience and dentists. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44:294–303.CrossRef An SM, Choi SY, Chung YW, Jang TH, Kang KH. Comparing esthetic smile perceptions among laypersons with and without orthodontic treatment experience and dentists. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44:294–303.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kanavakis G, Ludwig B, Rosa M, Zachrisson B, Hourfar J. Clinical outcomes of cases with missing lateral incisors treated with the ‘T’-Mesialslider. J Orthod. 2014;41:S33–8.CrossRef Kanavakis G, Ludwig B, Rosa M, Zachrisson B, Hourfar J. Clinical outcomes of cases with missing lateral incisors treated with the ‘T’-Mesialslider. J Orthod. 2014;41:S33–8.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rosa M, Zachrisson BU. The space-closure alternative for missing maxillary lateral incisors: an update. J Clin Orthod. 2010;44:540–9.PubMed Rosa M, Zachrisson BU. The space-closure alternative for missing maxillary lateral incisors: an update. J Clin Orthod. 2010;44:540–9.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Rosa M, Zachrisson BU. Integrating esthetic dentistry and space closure in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:221–34.PubMed Rosa M, Zachrisson BU. Integrating esthetic dentistry and space closure in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:221–34.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:132–44.CrossRef Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:132–44.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:2–11.CrossRef Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis JR. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile. Clin Orthod Res. 1998;1:2–11.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Occlusal height difference between maxillary central and lateral incisors: should aesthetic perception influence bracket placement?
Authors
Jan Hourfar
Dirk Bister
Björn Ludwig
Gero Kinzinger
Jörg Alexander Lisson
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Head & Face Medicine / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1746-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0191-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Head & Face Medicine 1/2019 Go to the issue