Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Naukan ethnobotany in post-Soviet times: lost edibles and new medicinals

Authors: Kevin A. Jernigan, Olga S. Belichenko, Valeria B. Kolosova, Darlene J. Orr

Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study focuses on health-related plant use among speakers of the critically endangered Naukan language (Inuit-Yupik-Unangan family) in the Russian Far East. The Naukan people were forced, in 1958, under Soviet consolidation, to move from their original settlement on Cape Dezhnev, leading to significant changes in spiritual worldview, subsistence, social structure, and language proficiency in the years that followed. Here, we focus on changes that elders report in their edible, medicinal, and spiritual uses of local plant species since their childhood.

Methods

The authors worked from 2014 to 2016 in the villages of Lavrentiya, Lorino, and Uelen, in the Chukotskiy district of the Chukotka autonomous region, directly adjacent to the Bering Strait. We conducted structured interviews, using an oral history approach, along with participant observation and collection of voucher specimens from the local arctic tundra. Those with Naukan names and uses represent 42 species in 25 families.

Results

Participants reported a decrease of 13% in the number of edible species that people currently harvest, from what they recall harvesting in their youth. On the other hand, the number of local species considered to be medicinal has actually increased by 225%. Current and past Naukan medicinal practices diverge in some notable ways from those of neighboring societies on the Alaskan side of the Bering Strait. Most of the spiritual significance of local plants species is remembered by only a few elders.

Conclusions

Naukan elders explained the large increase in use of medicinal plants by noting that their original concept of medicine emphasized prevention and that illnesses were often assigned a spiritual rather than physical cause. Increased integration with ethnic Russians after moving from Naukan led to the adoption not only of new plant uses, but also of an entirely different, more naturalistic way of viewing illness and treatment.
Literature
1.
Ainana LI, Zagrebin I. Edible plants used by Siberian Yupik Eskimos of Southeastern Chukotka Peninsula, Russia. Anchorage: National Park Service, Shared Beringian Heritage Program; 2014.
2.
Godovyx TV. Rasteniya v etnomeditsine Chukotki. Magadan: rossiiyskaya akademiya nauk. Dal′nevostochnoe otdelenie. Severo-Vostochnyi nauchnyi tsentr. Chukotskii filial; 2012.
3.
Jernigan K, Belichenko O, Kolosova V, Orr D, Pupynina M. A comparison of indigenous health-related plant use of the Russian and Alaskan sides of the Bering Strait. Paper presented at the 15th congress of the International Society of Ethnobiology. Kampala: Makerere University; 2016.
4.
Yamin-Pasternak S, Kliskey A, Alessa L, Pasternak I, Schweitzer P. The rotten renaissance in the Bering Strait. Curr Anthropol. 2014;55(5):000.CrossRef
5.
Svanberg I. The fortuitous ethnobotanist on ice: Frans Reinhold Kjellman (1846–1907) and his field work among the coast Chukchi at Pitlekay. In: Svanberg I, Łuczaj Ł, editors. Pioneers in European ethnobiology. Uppsala University; 2014. p. 113–30.
6.
Kjellman FR. Asiatiska Beringsunds-kustens fanerogam-flora. In: Nordenskiöld AE, editor. Vega-expeditionens vetenskapliga iakttagelser, bearbetade af deltagare i resan och andra forskare. Stockholm: F. & G. Beijers; 1882. p. 373–572.
7.
Bogoraz WG. The Chukchee: material culture. Leiden: EJ Brill; 1904.
8.
Bogoraz WG. The Chuckchee: social organization. Mem Amer Mus Nat Hist. 1907;11(Pt 3):277–733.
9.
Tixomirov BA. Dannye o poleznyx rasteniyax Eskimosov yugo-vostochnogo poberezh'ya Chukotki. Bot Zhurn. 1958;40(2):242–6.
10.
Menovshchikov GA. Dikie rasteniya v ratsione korennyx zhiteley Chukotki. Sov Etnog. 1974;2:93–9.
11.
Sokolova TG. K voprosy ob ispol’zovaniy Chukotskim naseleniem dikoy flory v rayone Mysa Dezhnyova. Magadan: Zapiski Chukotskogo Kraevedcheskogo Muzeya, Vyp. II; 1961.
12.
Mimykg Avtonova IV. Edible wild plants in our foods (Chukchi, Eskimo). Anthropol. Archeol. Eurasia. 1992;31(1):88–97.CrossRef
13.
Yamin-Pasternak S. How the devils went deaf: ethnomycology, cuisine, and perception of landscape in the Russian north, PhD thesis. Fairbanks: University of Alaska; 2007.
14.
Yamin-Pasternak S. From disgust to desire: changing attitudes toward Beringian mushrooms. Econ Bot. 2008;62(3):214–22.CrossRef
15.
16.
Dobrieva EA, Golovko EV, Jacobson SA, Krauss ME. Naukan Yupik Eskimo dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center; 2004.
17.
Bogoraz WG. The Eskimo of Siberia. The Jessup North Pacific expedition. Mem Amer Mus Nat Hist. 1913;8(4):419–53.
18.
Tein TS, Shimkin DB, Kan S. Shamans of the Siberian Eskimos. Arct Anthropol. 1994;31(1):117–25.
19.
Kerttula AM. Antler on the sea: creating and maintaining cultural group boundaries among the Chukchi, Yupik, and newcomers of Sireniki. Arct Anthropol. 1997;34(1):212–26.
20.
Krupnik I, Vakhtin N. Indigenous knowledge in modern culture: Siberian Yupik ecological legacy in transition. Arct Anthropol. 1997;34(1):236–52.
21.
22.
CAVM Team. Circumpolar arctic vegetation map. Scale 1: 7,500,000. Conservation of arctic flora and fauna (CAFF) map no. 1. Anchorage: US Fish and Wildlife Service; 2003.
23.
24.
Dorais L. Language of the Inuit: syntax, semantics, and society in the Arctic, vol. 58. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press; 2010.
25.
Jernigan K. Plants with histories: the changing ethnobotany of Iquito speakers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ec Bot. 2012;66(1):46–59.CrossRef
26.
Müller-Schwarze NK. Antes and hoy día: plant knowledge and categorization as adaptations to life in panama in the twenty-first century. Ec Bot. 2006;60(4):321–34.CrossRef
27.
Nabhan GP, Hodgson W, Fellows F. A meager living on lava and sand?: Hia Ced O’odham food resources and habitat diversity in oral and documentary histories. J Southwest. 1989;31(4):508–33.
28.
Ashton P. On the record: a practical guide to oral history. North Sydney Municipal Council; 1991.
29.
Hobsbawm E. On history from below. On history; 1997. p. 204.
30.
Heinrich M, Kufer J, Leonti M, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology: interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107(2):157–60.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Hunn ES. Ethnobiology in court: the paradoxes of relativism, authenticity, and advocacy. In: Gragson TL, Blount BG, editors. Ethnoecology: knowledge, resources, and rights. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 1999. p. 1–11.
32.
Casagrande DG. Ecology, cognition, and cultural transmission of Tzeltal Maya medicinal plant knowledge. PhD Thesis. Athens: University of Georgia; 2002.
33.
Inta A, Shengji P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Trisonthi C. A comparative study on medicinal plants used in Akha’s traditional medicine in China and Thailand, cultural coherence or ecological divergence? J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116(3):508–17.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Voeks RA. Traditions in transition: African diaspora ethnobotany in lowland South America. In: Alexiades M, editor. Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. London: Berghahn; 2009. p. 275–94.
35.
Barashkov GK. Sravnitel’naya bioximiya vodarosley. Moscow: Pishchevaya Promyshlennost; 1972.
36.
Krylov GB. Travy zhizni i ix iskateli. Novosibirsk: Zapadno-sibirskoye Knizhnoye Izdatil'stvo; 1972.
37.
Trofimov AV. O mineral’nom yode v zhivyx vodoroslyax. Moscow: VNIRO Publishing; 1938.
38.
Barnaulov OD, Pospelova ML, Benxammadi AC, Piskovatskov DV. Lekarstvennye svoystva fruktov i yagod. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'skiy Dom Petropolis; 2006.
39.
Anderson JP. Plants used by the Eskimo of the northern Bering Sea and Arctic regions of Alaska. Am J Botany. 1939;26:714–6.CrossRef
40.
Egeland GM, Charbonneau-Roberts G, Kuluguqtuq J, Kilabuk J, Okalik L, Soueida R, Kuhnlein HV. Back to the future: using traditional food and knowledge to promote a healthy future among Inuit. In: Kuhnlein HV, Erasmus B, Spigelski D, editors. The many dimensions of culture, diversity, environment and health. Rome: FAO; 2009.
41.
42.
Berlin B. Principles of ethnobiological classification. Princeton University Press; 1992.
43.
Griffin D. Ethnobotany of Alaska: a southwestern Alaska perspective. In: Selin H, editor. Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2008. p. 813–26.CrossRef
44.
Phillips O, Gentry AH. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Ec Bot. 1993;47(1):15–32.CrossRef
45.
Young SB, Hall ES. Contributions to the ethnobotany of the St. Lawrence Island Eskimo. Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska. 1969;14(2):43–53.
46.
Yurtsev BA. Floristic division of the Arctic. J Veg Sci. 1994;5(6):765–76.CrossRef
47.
Jones A. Plants that we eat: nauriat nigiñaqtaut—from the traditional wisdom of the Iñupiat elders of northwest Alaska. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press; 2010.
48.
Ager TA, Ager LP. Ethnobotany of the Eskimos of Nelson Island, Alaska. Arct Anthropol. 1980;17(1):26–48.
49.
Bennett BC, Prance GT. Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopoeia of northern South America. Econ Bot. 2000;54(1):90–102.CrossRef
50.
Janzen JM, Green EC. Continuity, change, and challenge in African medicine. In: Selin H, editor. Medicine across cultures: history and practice of medicine in non-western cultures. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2003. p. 1–26.
51.
Albuquerque UP. Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants: a study in the Caatinga vegetation of NE Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2(1):30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Reyes-García V, Marti N, McDade T, Tanner S, Vadez V. Concepts and methods in studies measuring individual ethnobotanical knowledge. J Ethnobiol. 2007;27(2):182–203.CrossRef
53.
DuBois TA, Lang JF. Johan Turi’s animal, mineral, vegetable cures and healing practices: an in-depth analysis of Sami (Saami) folk healing one hundred years ago. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Hulten E. Flora of Alaska and neighboring territories: a manual of the vascular plants. Stanford University Press; 1968.
55.
Garibaldi A. Medicinal flora of the Alaska natives. Anchorage: University of Alaska, Alaska Natural Heritage Program; 1999.
56.
Oswalt WH. A western Eskimo ethnobotany. Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska. 1957;6(1):16–36.
57.
Hakkarainen MV. Lokal’nye predstavleniya o poleznyax i lechenii (posyolok Markovo, Chukotka). PhD Thesis. European University in Saint Petersburg; 2007.
58.
Black PL, Arnason JT, Cuerrier A. Medicinal plants used by the Inuit of Qikiqtaaluk (Baffin Island, Nunavut). Botany. 2008;86(2):157–63.CrossRef
59.
DuBois TA. An introduction to shamanism: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
60.
Schultes RE, Hofmann A, Rätsch C. Plants of the gods: their sacred, healing, and hallucinogenic powers. Rochester: Healing Arts Press; 2001.
Metadata
Title
Naukan ethnobotany in post-Soviet times: lost edibles and new medicinals
Authors
Kevin A. Jernigan
Olga S. Belichenko
Valeria B. Kolosova
Darlene J. Orr
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0188-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

The socioeconomic context of the use of Euterpe precatoria Mart. and E. oleracea Mart. in Bolivia and Peru

Review

Integrating ethnobiological knowledge into biodiversity conservation in the Eastern Himalayas

Research

Diversity of use and local knowledge of wild and cultivated plants in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa

Research

Ethnobotanical studies of fodder grass resources for ruminant animals, based on the traditional knowledge of indigenous communities in Central Punjab Pakistan

Research

Knowledge, attitudes and practices in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) use and conservation in Eastern Uganda

Research

The implications of ritual practices and ritual plant uses on nature conservation: a case study among the Naxi in Yunnan Province, Southwest China