Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research

European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine – an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study

Authors: Klaus Doktor, Maria Lind Vilholm, Aldis Hardardóttir, Henrik Wulff Christensen, Jens Lauritsen

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Commission of the European Communities has published guidelines to be used as a gold standard for quality assessment of diagnostic radiographic images. Image quality and radiation dose must be monitored and optimally balanced for diagnostic purposes on patients. The objective of the current study was to assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility in less experienced observers using the proposed European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in a quality assessment of lumbar spine radiographs in primary chiropractic practice in Denmark.

Methods

Two observers initially evaluated lumbar spine radiographs randomly selected from fifty chiropractic clinics, all connected to the national PACS server (KirPACS) in Denmark. All evaluations were performed twice by both observers using a four-week interval and for compliance with the European Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was calculated using kappa statistics. In the interpretation of the kappa coefficient, the standards for strength of agreement reported by Landis and Koch were followed.

Results

The strength of the inter-observer agreement of general image quality at baseline ranged from moderate agreement (k = 0.47) to substantial agreement (k = 0.68). After four weeks, the inter-observer agreement still ranged from moderate agreement (k = 0.59) to substantial agreement (k = 0.71), but with increased agreement for both kappa coefficients. In relation to intra-observer agreement of general image quality, the strength for observer A ranged from moderate (k = 0.58) to substantial (k = 0.72) and the strength for observer B overall was substantial (k = 0.63–0.75).

Conclusion

The European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images are considered a gold-standard and used in a method for quality assurance within the Danish chiropractic profession. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreements in this study, using the CEC-criteria, were found mostly acceptable. With appropriate attention to clear understanding of the individual criteria and sufficient training, this method is found to be reliable, even using less experienced observers, to carry out Diagnostic Radiographic Image Quality-assurance in primary care settings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Danish Chiropractor Association. KiroFAKTA 2016. Danish Chiropractor Association. KiroFAKTA 2016.
2.
go back to reference Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics. 2016. Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics. 2016.
3.
go back to reference Carmichael JHE, Maccia C, Moores BM, Oestmann JW, Schbilla H, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images: EU publication EUR 16260; 2000. Carmichael JHE, Maccia C, Moores BM, Oestmann JW, Schbilla H, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images: EU publication EUR 16260; 2000.
4.
go back to reference Maccia C, Moores BM, Wall BF. The 1991 CEC trial on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images: detailed results and findings; 1996. Maccia C, Moores BM, Wall BF. The 1991 CEC trial on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images: detailed results and findings; 1996.
5.
go back to reference Gonzalez L, Vano E, Oliete S, Manrique J, Hernáez JM, et al. Report of an image quality and dose audit according to directive 97/43/Euratom at Spanish private radiodiagnostics facilities. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:186–92.CrossRef Gonzalez L, Vano E, Oliete S, Manrique J, Hernáez JM, et al. Report of an image quality and dose audit according to directive 97/43/Euratom at Spanish private radiodiagnostics facilities. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:186–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sundhedsstyrelsen. Bekendtgørelse om medicinske røntgenanlæg til undersøgelse af patienter, nr. 975 af 16. december 1998. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Bekendtgørelse om medicinske røntgenanlæg til undersøgelse af patienter, nr. 975 af 16. december 1998.
10.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363–74.CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Inah GB, Akintomide AO, Edim EE, Nzotta C, Egbe NO. A study of pelvic radiography image quality in a Nigirian teaching hospital based on the Commission of European Communities (CEC) criteria. South Afr Radiogr. 2013;51:15–9. Inah GB, Akintomide AO, Edim EE, Nzotta C, Egbe NO. A study of pelvic radiography image quality in a Nigirian teaching hospital based on the Commission of European Communities (CEC) criteria. South Afr Radiogr. 2013;51:15–9.
14.
go back to reference Tesselaar E, Dahlström N, Sandborg M. Clinical audit of image quality in radiology using visual grading characteristics analysis. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:340–6.CrossRef Tesselaar E, Dahlström N, Sandborg M. Clinical audit of image quality in radiology using visual grading characteristics analysis. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;169:340–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG, Wilmink JT. Reliability of lumbar spine radiograph Reading by chiropractors. Spine. 1997;22(11):1235–41.CrossRef Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG, Wilmink JT. Reliability of lumbar spine radiograph Reading by chiropractors. Spine. 1997;22(11):1235–41.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Taylor JAM, Clopton P, Bosch E, Miller K, Marcellis S. Interpretation of abnormal Lumbosakral spine radiographs - a test comparing students, clinicians, radiology residents and radiologists in medicine and chiropractic. Spine. 1995;20:1147–53.CrossRef Taylor JAM, Clopton P, Bosch E, Miller K, Marcellis S. Interpretation of abnormal Lumbosakral spine radiographs - a test comparing students, clinicians, radiology residents and radiologists in medicine and chiropractic. Spine. 1995;20:1147–53.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference de Zoete A, Assendelft WJ, Algra PR, Oberman WR, Vanderschueren GM, Bezemer PD. Reliability and validity of lumbosacral spine radiograph reading by chiropractors, chiropractic radiologists, and medical radiologists. Spine. 2002;27(17):1926–33.CrossRef de Zoete A, Assendelft WJ, Algra PR, Oberman WR, Vanderschueren GM, Bezemer PD. Reliability and validity of lumbosacral spine radiograph reading by chiropractors, chiropractic radiologists, and medical radiologists. Spine. 2002;27(17):1926–33.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine – an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study
Authors
Klaus Doktor
Maria Lind Vilholm
Aldis Hardardóttir
Henrik Wulff Christensen
Jens Lauritsen
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0241-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2019 Go to the issue