Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire

Authors: Brett Vaughan, Sandra Grace

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Peer physical examination (PPE) is a teaching and learning strategy utilised in most health profession education programs. Perceptions of participating in PPE have been described in the literature, focusing on areas of the body students are willing, or unwilling, to examine. A small number of questionnaires exist to evaluate these perceptions, however none have described the measurement properties that may allow them to be used longitudinally. The present study undertook a Mokken scale analysis of the Peer Physical Examination Questionnaire (PPEQ) to evaluate its dimensionality and structure when used with Australian osteopathy students.

Methods

Students enrolled in Year 1 of the osteopathy programs at Victoria University (Melbourne, Australia) and Southern Cross University (Lismore, Australia) were invited to complete the PPEQ prior to their first practical skills examination class. R, an open-source statistics program, was used to generate the descriptive statistics and perform a Mokken scale analysis. Mokken scale analysis is a non-parametric item response theory approach that is used to cluster items measuring a latent construct.

Results

Initial analysis suggested the PPEQ did not form a single scale. Further analysis identified three subscales: ‘comfort’, ‘concern’, and ‘professionalism and education’. The properties of each subscale suggested they were unidimensional with variable internal structures. The ‘comfort’ subscale was the strongest of the three identified. All subscales demonstrated acceptable reliability estimation statistics (McDonald’s omega > 0.75) supporting the calculation of a sum score for each subscale.

Conclusion

The subscales identified are consistent with the literature. The ‘comfort’ subscale may be useful to longitudinally evaluate student perceptions of PPE. Further research is required to evaluate changes with PPE and the utility of the questionnaire with other health profession education programs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braunack-Mayer A. Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Med Educ. 2001;35:681–6.CrossRefPubMed Braunack-Mayer A. Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Med Educ. 2001;35:681–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wearn AM, Rees CE, Bradley P, Vnuk AK. Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Med Educ. 2008;42:1218–26.CrossRefPubMed Wearn AM, Rees CE, Bradley P, Vnuk AK. Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Med Educ. 2008;42:1218–26.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Koehler N, McMenamin C. The need for a peer physical examination policy within Australian medical schools. Med Teach. 2014;36:430–3.CrossRefPubMed Koehler N, McMenamin C. The need for a peer physical examination policy within Australian medical schools. Med Teach. 2014;36:430–3.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC. Exploring medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2004;26:86–8.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE, Bradley P, McLachlan JC. Exploring medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2004;26:86–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chen J, Yip A, Lam C, Patil N. Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Med Teach. 2011;33:e528–40.CrossRefPubMed Chen J, Yip A, Lam C, Patil N. Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Med Teach. 2011;33:e528–40.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rees CE, Wearn A, Vnuk A, Sato T. Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;4:103–21.CrossRef Rees CE, Wearn A, Vnuk A, Sato T. Medical students’ attitudes towards peer physical examination: findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;4:103–21.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Consorti G, Zurlo J. Evaluation of the acceptability of peer physical examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Consorti F, Mancuso R, Piccolo A, Consorti G, Zurlo J. Evaluation of the acceptability of peer physical examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Wearn A, Rees CE, Bhoopatkar H, Bradley P, Lam C, McLachlan J, Patil N, Sato T, Vnuk A. What not to Touch': medical students from six schools report on peer physical examination in clinical skills and anatomy learning. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2008;10:24–5. Wearn A, Rees CE, Bhoopatkar H, Bradley P, Lam C, McLachlan J, Patil N, Sato T, Vnuk A. What not to Touch': medical students from six schools report on peer physical examination in clinical skills and anatomy learning. Focus Health Prof Educ. 2008;10:24–5.
10.
go back to reference Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H, Mathew T, Stewart L. Exploration of the attitudes of nursing students to peer physical examination and physical examination of patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:884–8.CrossRefPubMed Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H, Mathew T, Stewart L. Exploration of the attitudes of nursing students to peer physical examination and physical examination of patients. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33:884–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference O'Neill P, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman T. Medical students' willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Med Teach. 1998;20:433-437. O'Neill P, Larcombe C, Duffy K, Dorman T. Medical students' willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Med Teach. 1998;20:433-437.
12.
go back to reference Chang E, Power D. Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other? Acad Med. 2000;75:384–9.CrossRefPubMed Chang E, Power D. Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other? Acad Med. 2000;75:384–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rees CE, Bradley P, Collett T, McLachlan J. "over my dead body?": the influence of demographics on students' willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2005;27:599–605.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE, Bradley P, Collett T, McLachlan J. "over my dead body?": the influence of demographics on students' willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Med Teach. 2005;27:599–605.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Baillie L, Curzio J. A survey of first year student nurses' experiences of learning blood pressure measurement. Nurse Educ Pract. 2009;9:61–71.CrossRefPubMed Baillie L, Curzio J. A survey of first year student nurses' experiences of learning blood pressure measurement. Nurse Educ Pract. 2009;9:61–71.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tolsgaard MG, Rasmussen MB, Bjorck S, Gustafsson A, Ringsted CV. Medical students' perception of dyad practice. Perspectives in Medical Education. 2014;3:500–7.CrossRef Tolsgaard MG, Rasmussen MB, Bjorck S, Gustafsson A, Ringsted CV. Medical students' perception of dyad practice. Perspectives in Medical Education. 2014;3:500–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Barnette J, Kreitter C, Schuldt S. Student attitudes towards same-gender versus mixed-gender partnering in practicing physical examination skills. Eval Health Prof. 2000;23:360–70.CrossRef Barnette J, Kreitter C, Schuldt S. Student attitudes towards same-gender versus mixed-gender partnering in practicing physical examination skills. Eval Health Prof. 2000;23:360–70.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Redford D, Klein T. Informed consent in the nursing skills laboratory: an exploratory study. Nursing Education. 2003;42:131–3. Redford D, Klein T. Informed consent in the nursing skills laboratory: an exploratory study. Nursing Education. 2003;42:131–3.
18.
go back to reference Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Med Educ. 2006;40:957–64.CrossRefPubMed Wearn A, Bhoopatkar H. Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Med Educ. 2006;40:957–64.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Pols J, Boendermaker P, Muntinghe H. Incidence of and sequels to medical problems discovered in medical students during study-related activities. Med Educ. 2003;37:889–94.CrossRefPubMed Pols J, Boendermaker P, Muntinghe H. Incidence of and sequels to medical problems discovered in medical students during study-related activities. Med Educ. 2003;37:889–94.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hilton P, Barrett D. An investigation into students' performance of invasive and non-invasive procedures on each other in classroom settings. Nurse Educ Pract 2009;9:45-52. Hilton P, Barrett D. An investigation into students' performance of invasive and non-invasive procedures on each other in classroom settings. Nurse Educ Pract 2009;9:45-52.
21.
go back to reference Wismeijer AA, Sijtsma K, van Assen MA, Vingerhoets AJ. A comparative study of the dimensionality of the self-concealment scale using principal components analysis and Mokken scale analysis. J Pers Assess. 2008;90:323–34.CrossRefPubMed Wismeijer AA, Sijtsma K, van Assen MA, Vingerhoets AJ. A comparative study of the dimensionality of the self-concealment scale using principal components analysis and Mokken scale analysis. J Pers Assess. 2008;90:323–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference New V d ALA. Developments in Mokken scale analysis in R. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–27. New V d ALA. Developments in Mokken scale analysis in R. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–27.
25.
go back to reference Stochl J, Jones PB, Croudace TJ. Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:1–16.CrossRef Stochl J, Jones PB, Croudace TJ. Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:1–16.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mokken RJ. A theory and procedure of scale analysis: with applications in political research, vol. 1: Walter de Gruyter; 1971.CrossRef Mokken RJ. A theory and procedure of scale analysis: with applications in political research, vol. 1: Walter de Gruyter; 1971.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sijtsma K, Meijer RR, van der Ark LA. Mokken scale analysis as time goes by: an update for scaling practitioners. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;50:31–7.CrossRef Sijtsma K, Meijer RR, van der Ark LA. Mokken scale analysis as time goes by: an update for scaling practitioners. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;50:31–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sijtsma K, Van der Ark LA. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017;70:137–58.CrossRefPubMed Sijtsma K, Van der Ark LA. A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017;70:137–58.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kuijpers RE, Van der Ark LA, Croon MA. Standard errors and confidence intervals for scalability coefficients in Mokken scale analysis using marginal models. Sociol Methodol. 2013;43:42–69.CrossRef Kuijpers RE, Van der Ark LA, Croon MA. Standard errors and confidence intervals for scalability coefficients in Mokken scale analysis using marginal models. Sociol Methodol. 2013;43:42–69.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Straat JH, van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K. Using conditional association to identify locally independent item sets. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. 2016;12:117.CrossRef Straat JH, van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K. Using conditional association to identify locally independent item sets. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. 2016;12:117.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW. Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory. Psychometrika. 1987;52:79–97.CrossRef Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW. Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory. Psychometrika. 1987;52:79–97.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74:145–54.CrossRef Revelle W, Zinbarg RE. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika. 2009;74:145–54.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70:123–33.CrossRef Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70:123–33.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zinbarg RE, Yovel I, Revelle W, RP MD. Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: a comparison of estimators for ωh. Appl Psychol Meas. 2006;30:121–44.CrossRef Zinbarg RE, Yovel I, Revelle W, RP MD. Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: a comparison of estimators for ωh. Appl Psychol Meas. 2006;30:121–44.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Green SB, Yang Y. Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale. Psychometrika. 2009;74:121–35.CrossRef Green SB, Yang Y. Commentary on coefficient alpha: a cautionary tale. Psychometrika. 2009;74:121–35.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hermsen LA, Leone SS, Smalbrugge M, Knol DL, van der Horst HE, Dekker J. Exploring the aggregation of four functional measures in a population of older adults with joint pain and comorbidity. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hermsen LA, Leone SS, Smalbrugge M, Knol DL, van der Horst HE, Dekker J. Exploring the aggregation of four functional measures in a population of older adults with joint pain and comorbidity. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Ligtvoet R, Van der Ark LA, te Marvelde JM, Sijtsma K. Investigating an invariant item ordering for polytomously scored items. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70:575–98.CrossRef Ligtvoet R, Van der Ark LA, te Marvelde JM, Sijtsma K. Investigating an invariant item ordering for polytomously scored items. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70:575–98.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Bradley PA. Don’t want to show fellow students my naughty bits: medical students’ anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and far-East Asia. Med Teach. 2009;31:921–7.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE, Wearn AM, Vnuk AK, Bradley PA. Don’t want to show fellow students my naughty bits: medical students’ anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and far-East Asia. Med Teach. 2009;31:921–7.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Rees CE. The influence of gender on student willingness to engage in peer physical examination: the practical implications of feminist theory of body image. Med Educ. 2007;41:801–7.CrossRefPubMed Rees CE. The influence of gender on student willingness to engage in peer physical examination: the practical implications of feminist theory of body image. Med Educ. 2007;41:801–7.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Outram S, Nair BR. Peer physical examination: time to revisit. Med J Aust. 2008;189:274–6.PubMed Outram S, Nair BR. Peer physical examination: time to revisit. Med J Aust. 2008;189:274–6.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Grace S, Innes E, Patton N, Stockhausen L. Ethical experiential learning in medical, nursing and allied health education: a narrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;51:23–33.CrossRefPubMed Grace S, Innes E, Patton N, Stockhausen L. Ethical experiential learning in medical, nursing and allied health education: a narrative review. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;51:23–33.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire
Authors
Brett Vaughan
Sandra Grace
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0176-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2018 Go to the issue