Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

“It’s still a great adventure” – exploring offshore employees’ working conditions in a qualitative study

Authors: Janika Mette, Marcial Velasco Garrido, Volker Harth, Alexandra M. Preisser, Stefanie Mache

Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the particular demands inherent to offshore work, little is known about the working conditions of employees in the German offshore wind industry. To date, neither offshore employees’ job demands and resources, nor their needs for improving the working conditions have been explored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a qualitative analysis to gain further insight into these topics.

Methods

Forty-two semi-structured telephone interviews with German offshore employees (n = 21) and offshore experts (n = 21) were conducted. Employees and experts were interviewed with regard to their perceptions of their working conditions offshore. In addition, employees were asked to identify areas with potential need for improvement. The interviews were analysed in a deductive-inductive process according to Mayring’s qualitative content analysis.

Results

Employees and experts reported various demands of offshore work, including challenging physical labour, long shifts, inactive waiting times, and recurrent absences from home. In contrast, the high personal meaning of the work, regular work schedule (14 days offshore, 14 days onshore), and strong comradeship were highlighted as job resources. Interviewees’ working conditions varied considerably, e.g. regarding their work tasks and accommodations. Most of the job demands were perceived in terms of the work organization and living conditions offshore. Likewise, employees expressed the majority of needs for improvement in these areas.

Conclusions

Our study offers important insight into the working conditions of employees in the German offshore wind industry. The results can provide a basis for further quantitative research in order to generalize the findings. Moreover, they can be utilized to develop needs-based interventions to improve the working conditions offshore.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
van der Slot A, Hader, M, de Vries, M, van den Berg, W: Think act. Offshore wind power - Takeaways from the Borssele wind farm. Munich: Roland Berger GmbH; 2016.
2.
Lüers S, Wallasch A-K, Vogelsang K. Status des Offshore-Windenergieausbaus in Deutschland. 1. Halbjahr 2017. Varel: Deutsche Windguard GmbH; 2017.
3.
4.
Schwieters N, Ull T, Meyer R: Volle Kraft aus Hochseewind. Bremerhaven, Bremen: PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (PwC); 2012.
5.
Institut für Innovation und Technik, dsn: Bericht Plattform Zukunftsberufe Offshore-Windenergie. Hamburg, Berlin: Behörde für Wirtschaft, Verkehr und Innovation; 2012.
6.
Velasco Garrido M, Mette J, Mache S, Harth V, Preisser AM. Belastungen und Gefährdungen der Beschäftigten in der Offshore-Windindustrie. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed. 2017;52:138–41.
7.
Puskeppeleit M: Medizin im Offshore-Bereich. In Maritime Medizin: Praxiswissen für Schiffsärzte und Ärzte im Offshore-Bereich. Edited by Ottoman C, Seidenstücker KH. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2015: 35-47.
8.
Preisser AM, Töpel M, Harth V. Arbeitsmedizinische Eignungsuntersuchung für Mitarbeiter auf Offshoreinstallationen – Von der DGMM-Empfehlung zur AWMF-Leitlinie. Flug u Reisemed. 2016;23:14–8.CrossRef
9.
10.
11.
Mette J, Velasco Garrido M, Preisser AM, Harth V, Mache S. Psychische Belastung von Beschäftigten in der deutschen Offshore-Windindustrie. Zbl Arbeitsmed. 2016;66:307–11.CrossRef
12.
Parkes KR. Psychosocial aspects of stress, health and safety on North Sea installations. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24:321–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Chen WQ, Wong TW, Yu TS. Mental health issues in Chinese offshore oil workers. Occup Med. 2009;59:545–9.CrossRef
14.
Brun E, Suarez A. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: Occupational safety and health in the wind energy sector. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2013.
15.
Berthelsen M, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B, Knardahl S. Shift schedules, work factors, and mental health among onshore and offshore workers in the Norwegian petroleum industry. Ind Health. 2015;53:280–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Ljosa CH, Tyssen R, Lau B. Mental distress among shift workers in Norwegian offshore petroleum industry - relative influence of individual and psychosocial work factors. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37:551–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Parkes KR. Psychosocial aspects of work and health in the North Sea oil and gas industry. Research report 002. Sudbury: University of Oxford for the Health and Safety Executive; 2002.
18.
Wadsworth EJK, Allen PH, McNamara RL, Smith AP. Fatigue and health in a seafaring population. Occup Med. 2008;58:198–204.CrossRef
19.
Chen WQ, Wong TW, Yu TS. Reliability and validity of the occupational stress scale for Chinese off-shore oil installation workers. Stress Health. 2001;17:175–83.CrossRef
20.
Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro AM, Amenta F. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. Int Marit Health. 2012;63:188–94.PubMed
21.
Gardner R. Overview and characteristics of some occupational exposures and health risks on offshore oil and gas installations. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47:201–10.PubMed
22.
Niven K, McLeod R. Offshore industry: management of health hazards in the upstream petroleum industry. Occup Med. 2009;59:304–9.CrossRef
23.
Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:499–512.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22:309–28.CrossRef
25.
Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24:285–308.CrossRef
26.
Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1:27–41.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Tveiten CK, Albrechtsen E, Heggset J, Hofmann M, Jersin E, Leira B, Norddal PK. HSE challenges related to offshore renewable energy. Report no. A18107. Trondhelm: SINTEF Technology and Society; 2011.
28.
Sneddon A, Mearns K, Flin R. Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in offshore drilling crews. Saf Sci. 2013;56:80–8.CrossRef
29.
Ulven AJ. Medical and psychological challenges in the offshore petroleum industry. Int Marit Health. 2009;60:40–2.PubMed
30.
Bjerkan AM. Health, environment, safety culture and climate – analysing the relationships to occupational accidents. J Risk Res. 2010;13:445–77.CrossRef
31.
Sutherland VJ, Cooper CL. Stress in the offshore oil and gas exploration and production industries: an organizational approach to stress control. Stress Med. 1996;12:27–34.CrossRef
32.
Ulleberg P, Rundmo T. Job stress, social support, job satisfaction and absenteeism among offshore oil personnel. Work Stress. 1997;11:215–28.CrossRef
33.
Ross JK. Offshore industry shift work – health and social considerations. Occup Med. 2009;59:310–5.CrossRef
34.
Sutherland VJ, Cooper CL. Stress prevention in the offshore oil and gas exploration and production industry. Geneva: International Labour Office; 1996.
35.
Eurofond. Working time and work–life balance in a life course perspective. Dublin: Eurofond; 2012.
36.
37.
Costa G. Shift work and occupational medicine: an overview. Occup Med. 2003;53:83–8.CrossRef
38.
Kiss P, De Meester M, Braeckman L. Differences between younger and older workers in the need for recovery after work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81:311–20.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Kirchhoefer M, Mache, S, Harth, V, Mette, J: Vereinbarkeit von Berufs- und Familienleben bei Offshore-Beschäftigten – eine Übersicht. Zbl Arbeitsmed 2017. doi:10.​1007/​s40664-017-0189-x.
40.
Rodrigues VF, Fischer FM, Brito MJ. Shift work at a modern offshore drilling rig. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2001;30:167–72.
41.
Solheim J. Coming home to work. In: Lewis J, Porter M, Shrimpton M, editors. Women, work and family in the British, Canadian and Norwegian offshore oilfields. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 1988. p. 140–62.CrossRef
42.
Håvold JI. Stress on the bridge of offshore vessels: examples from the North Sea. Saf Sci. 2015;71:160–6.CrossRef
43.
Riethmeister V, Brouwer S, van der Klink J, Bültmann U. Work, eat and sleep: towards a healthy ageing at work program offshore. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Parkes KR. Demographic and lifestyle predictors of body mass index among offshore oil industry workers: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Occup Med. 2003;53:213–21.CrossRef
45.
Horsley H, MacKenzie I. Lifestyle survey amongst North Sea oil workers. In Proceedings of the Occupational Health Offshore Conference. Edited by Gardner R. HSE Books: Sudbury; 1997. pp. 161–79.
46.
Parkes KR, Farmer E, Carnell S: Psychosocial aspects of work and health in the North Sea oil and gas industry: A survey of FPSO installations and comparison with platforms and drilling rigs. Sudbury: Health & Safety Executive; 2004.
47.
Bjerkan AM. Work and health: a comparison between Norwegian onshore and offshore employees. Work. 2011;40:125–42.PubMed
48.
49.
50.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.CrossRef
51.
52.
Opdenakker RJG. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2006;7(4):11. http://​nbn-resolving.​de/​urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604118.
Metadata
Title
“It’s still a great adventure” – exploring offshore employees’ working conditions in a qualitative study
Authors
Janika Mette
Marcial Velasco Garrido
Volker Harth
Alexandra M. Preisser
Stefanie Mache
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0179-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2017 Go to the issue

Retraction Note

Retraction Note: Assessment of the influence of whole body vibration on Cochlear function

Research

QFT-Plus: a plus in variability? – Evaluation of new generation IGRA in serial testing of students with a migration background in Germany

Research

Risk of lymphoma subtypes by occupational exposure in Southern Italy

Research

The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) – a validation study

Research

Work-related floors as injury hazards – a nationwide pilot project analyzing floors in theatres and education establishments in Germany

Study protocol

Fostering needs assessment and access to medical rehabilitation for patients with chronic disease and endangered work ability: protocol of a multilevel evaluation on the effectiveness and efficacy of a CME intervention for general practitioners