Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems

Authors: Lukas Roth, Daniel Bempong, Joseph B. Babigumira, Shabir Banoo, Emer Cooke, David Jeffreys, Lombe Kasonde, Hubert G. M. Leufkens, John C. W. Lim, Murray Lumpkin, Gugu Mahlangu, Rosanna W. Peeling, Helen Rees, Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda, Andy Stergachis, Mike Ward, Jude Nwokike

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Access to quality-assured medical products improves health and save lives. However, one third of the world’s population lacks timely access to quality-assured medicines while estimates indicate that at least 10% of medicine in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are substandard or falsified (SF), costing approximately US$ 31 billion annually. National regulatory authorities are the key government institutions that promote access to quality-assured medicines and combat SF medical products but despite progress, regulatory capacity in LMICs is still insufficient. Continued and increased investment in regulatory system strengthening (RSS) is needed. We have therefore reviewed existing global normative documents and resources and engaged with our networks of global partners and stakeholders to identify three critical challenges being faced by NRAs in LMICs that are limiting access to medical products and impeding detection of and response to SF medicines. The challenges are; implementing value-added regulatory practices that best utilize available resources, a lack of timely access to new, quality medical products, and limited evidence-based data to support post-marketing regulatory actions. To address these challenges, we have identified seven focused strategies; advancing and leveraging convergence and reliance initiatives, institutionalizing sustainability, utilizing risk-based approaches for resource allocation, strengthening registration efficiency and timeliness, strengthening inspection capacity and effectiveness, developing and implementing risk-based post-marketing quality surveillance systems, and strengthening regulatory management of manufacturing variations. These proposed solutions are underpinned by 13 focused recommendations, which we believe, if financed, technically supported and implemented, will lead to stronger health system and as a consequence, positive health outcomes.
Footnotes
1
For the purposes of this article, the definition of access encompasses physical accessibility (availability within reasonable reach of those who need them), financial affordability (ability to pay without financial hardship), and acceptability (willingness to seek medical products when needed) [1].
 
2
For the purposes of this article, the definition of medical products includes medicines, biologics, vaccines, and medical devices.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Evans DB, Hsu J, Boerma T. Universal health coverage and universal access. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:546–546A.CrossRef Evans DB, Hsu J, Boerma T. Universal health coverage and universal access. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:546–546A.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hogerzeil HV, Mirza Z. The world medicines situation 2011: access to essential medicines as part of the right to health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Hogerzeil HV, Mirza Z. The world medicines situation 2011: access to essential medicines as part of the right to health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
3.
go back to reference A study on the public health and socioeconomic impact of substandard and falsified medical products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. A study on the public health and socioeconomic impact of substandard and falsified medical products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
4.
go back to reference Countering the Problem of Falsified and Substandard Drugs. Gostin LO, Buckley GJ. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2013. 376 p. Countering the Problem of Falsified and Substandard Drugs. Gostin LO, Buckley GJ. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2013. 376 p.
5.
go back to reference Regulatory system strengthening for medical products. WHO; 2014 24 May. Contract No: World Health Assembly 67.20. Regulatory system strengthening for medical products. WHO; 2014 24 May. Contract No: World Health Assembly 67.20.
6.
go back to reference Towards Access 2030. WHO medicines and health products Programme strategic framework 2016–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization. p. 2017. Towards Access 2030. WHO medicines and health products Programme strategic framework 2016–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization. p. 2017.
7.
go back to reference Wirtz V, Hogerzeil H, Gray A, Bigdeli M, de Joncheere C, Ewen M, et al. Essential medicine for universal health coverage. Lancet Commission. 2017;389:403–76.CrossRef Wirtz V, Hogerzeil H, Gray A, Bigdeli M, de Joncheere C, Ewen M, et al. Essential medicine for universal health coverage. Lancet Commission. 2017;389:403–76.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference UN Commission on Life-Saving Commodities for Women and Children. New York: United Nations; 2012. UN Commission on Life-Saving Commodities for Women and Children. New York: United Nations; 2012.
9.
go back to reference Buckley GJ, Riviere JE, Gostin LO. What to do about unsafe medicines? BMJ. 2013;347:1–2. Buckley GJ, Riviere JE, Gostin LO. What to do about unsafe medicines? BMJ. 2013;347:1–2.
10.
go back to reference USAID’s Vision for Health System Strengthening: 2015-2019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Agency for International Development; 2015. USAID’s Vision for Health System Strengthening: 2015-2019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Agency for International Development; 2015.
11.
go back to reference Ensuring Safe Foods and Medical Products Through Stronger Regulatory Systems Abroad. Riviere JE, Buckley GJ. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2012. 366 p. Ensuring Safe Foods and Medical Products Through Stronger Regulatory Systems Abroad. Riviere JE, Buckley GJ. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2012. 366 p.
12.
go back to reference Luigetti R, Bachmann P, Cooke E, Salmonson T. Regulatory collaboration - collaboration, not competition: developing new reliance models. WHO Drug Information. 2016;30(4):558–66. Luigetti R, Bachmann P, Cooke E, Salmonson T. Regulatory collaboration - collaboration, not competition: developing new reliance models. WHO Drug Information. 2016;30(4):558–66.
13.
go back to reference Good regulatory practices: guidelines for national regulatory authorities for medical products. WHO; 2016. Contract No.: QAS/16.686. Good regulatory practices: guidelines for national regulatory authorities for medical products. WHO; 2016. Contract No.: QAS/16.686.
15.
go back to reference Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Strauss SMJM, Schellekens H, Leufkens HGM, Egberts ACG. Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals approved in the United States and the European Union. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300(16):1887–96.CrossRef Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Strauss SMJM, Schellekens H, Leufkens HGM, Egberts ACG. Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals approved in the United States and the European Union. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300(16):1887–96.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Trotta F, Leufkens HGM, Schellens JHM, Laing R, Tafuri G. Evaluation of oncology drugs at the European medicines agency and US Food and Drug Administration: when differences have an impact on clinical practice. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2266–72.CrossRef Trotta F, Leufkens HGM, Schellens JHM, Laing R, Tafuri G. Evaluation of oncology drugs at the European medicines agency and US Food and Drug Administration: when differences have an impact on clinical practice. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2266–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference 17th International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities. WHO; 2016. Contract No.: 4. 17th International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities. WHO; 2016. Contract No.: 4.
18.
go back to reference Ward M, editor Update: Coalition of Interested Partners. 3rd Biennial Scientific Conference on Medical Products Regulation; 2017 27–28 November; Accra, Ghana. Ward M, editor Update: Coalition of Interested Partners. 3rd Biennial Scientific Conference on Medical Products Regulation; 2017 27–28 November; Accra, Ghana.
19.
go back to reference Ahonkhai V, Martins SF, Portet A, Lumpkin M, Hartman D. Speeding access to vaccines and medicines in low- and middle-income countries: a case for change a framework for optimized product market authorization. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):1–12. Ahonkhai V, Martins SF, Portet A, Lumpkin M, Hartman D. Speeding access to vaccines and medicines in low- and middle-income countries: a case for change a framework for optimized product market authorization. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):1–12.
20.
go back to reference Gwaza L, Azatyan S, Ward M, editors. Systematic capacity building through a global competency framework for regulators. 3rd Biennial Scientific Conference on Medical Products Regulation; 2017 27–28 November; Accra, Ghana. Gwaza L, Azatyan S, Ward M, editors. Systematic capacity building through a global competency framework for regulators. 3rd Biennial Scientific Conference on Medical Products Regulation; 2017 27–28 November; Accra, Ghana.
21.
go back to reference WHO. Assessment of medicines regulatory systems in sub-Saharan African countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. WHO. Assessment of medicines regulatory systems in sub-Saharan African countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
22.
go back to reference Hill S, Johnson K. Emerging challenges and opportunities in drug registration and regulation in developing countries. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre; 2004. Hill S, Johnson K. Emerging challenges and opportunities in drug registration and regulation in developing countries. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre; 2004.
23.
go back to reference WHO. WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Products - Fact Sheets for National Regulatory System (Draft Revision VI Version I). WHO; 2017. WHO. WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Products - Fact Sheets for National Regulatory System (Draft Revision VI Version I). WHO; 2017.
24.
go back to reference WHO Regulatory System Strengthening (WHO/RSS) Database for NRA Status [Internet]. WHO. 2018 [cited 13 June 2018]. WHO Regulatory System Strengthening (WHO/RSS) Database for NRA Status [Internet]. WHO. 2018 [cited 13 June 2018].
25.
go back to reference WHO Expert Committee on Specification for Pharmaceutical Preparations. WHO; 2018. Contract no.: 1010. WHO Expert Committee on Specification for Pharmaceutical Preparations. WHO; 2018. Contract no.: 1010.
26.
go back to reference Morgan SG, Yau B, Lumpkin MM. The cost of entry: an analysis of pharmaceutical registration fees in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):1–10. Morgan SG, Yau B, Lumpkin MM. The cost of entry: an analysis of pharmaceutical registration fees in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):1–10.
27.
go back to reference Kaplan WA, Laing R. Paying for pharmaceutical registration in developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 2003;18(3):237–48.CrossRef Kaplan WA, Laing R. Paying for pharmaceutical registration in developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 2003;18(3):237–48.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference African Union (AU) Model Law on Medical Products Regulation. NEPAD; 2017. African Union (AU) Model Law on Medical Products Regulation. NEPAD; 2017.
29.
go back to reference WHO Global Model regulatory framework for medical devices including in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. WHO Global Model regulatory framework for medical devices including in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
30.
go back to reference Babigumira JB, Stergachis A, Kanyok T, Evans L, Hajjou M, Nkansah PO, et al. A framework for risk-based resource allocation for pharmaceutical quality Assurance for Medicines Regulatory Authorities in low- and middle-income countries. Rockville, MD: USP; 2018. Babigumira JB, Stergachis A, Kanyok T, Evans L, Hajjou M, Nkansah PO, et al. A framework for risk-based resource allocation for pharmaceutical quality Assurance for Medicines Regulatory Authorities in low- and middle-income countries. Rockville, MD: USP; 2018.
31.
go back to reference WHO. Guidelines on quality risk management. Geneva: WHO; 2013. Contract No.: Annex 7 WHO. Guidelines on quality risk management. Geneva: WHO; 2013. Contract No.: Annex 7
32.
go back to reference Aven T. Risk Analysis, Second edition. Norway: Wiley; 2015. Aven T. Risk Analysis, Second edition. Norway: Wiley; 2015.
33.
go back to reference Enhancing Food Safety. In: Wallace RB, Oria M, editors. The role of the Food and Drug Administration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010. p. 588. Enhancing Food Safety. In: Wallace RB, Oria M, editors. The role of the Food and Drug Administration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010. p. 588.
34.
go back to reference WHO. WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Products - Fact Sheets for Registration and Marketing Authorization (Draft Revision VI Version 1). WHO; 2017. WHO. WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Products - Fact Sheets for Registration and Marketing Authorization (Draft Revision VI Version 1). WHO; 2017.
35.
go back to reference Bollyky T, Stergachis a. a strategy for improving post-market safety surveillance of drugs & vaccines in low- and middle-income countries. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Group SSW; 2013. Bollyky T, Stergachis a. a strategy for improving post-market safety surveillance of drugs & vaccines in low- and middle-income countries. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Group SSW; 2013.
36.
go back to reference Wileman H, Mishra A. Drug Lag and Key regulatory barriers in the emerging markets. Perspectives Clin Res 2010;1(2):51–56. Wileman H, Mishra A. Drug Lag and Key regulatory barriers in the emerging markets. Perspectives Clin Res 2010;1(2):51–56.
37.
go back to reference McNerney R, Peeling RW. Regulatory in vitro diagnostics landscape in Africa: update on regional activities. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(Supplement 3):135–40.CrossRef McNerney R, Peeling RW. Regulatory in vitro diagnostics landscape in Africa: update on regional activities. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(Supplement 3):135–40.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference GHTF. Principles of Medical Devices Classification. GHTF; 2012. GHTF. Principles of Medical Devices Classification. GHTF; 2012.
39.
go back to reference Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
40.
go back to reference Patients are waiting: How regulators collectiely make a difference. Present challenges and opportunities - roadmap for the future. International conference of drug regulatory authorities. WHO Drug Information; 2016. Patients are waiting: How regulators collectiely make a difference. Present challenges and opportunities - roadmap for the future. International conference of drug regulatory authorities. WHO Drug Information; 2016.
41.
go back to reference WHO. WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Products - Fact Sheets for Regulatory Inspection (Draft Revision VI Version I). WHO; 2017. p. 41. WHO. WHO Global Benchmarking Tool (GBT) for Evaluation of National Regulatory System of Medical Products - Fact Sheets for Regulatory Inspection (Draft Revision VI Version I). WHO; 2017. p. 41.
42.
go back to reference EU Medicines Agencies Network Strategy to 2020: Working together to improve health. European Medicines Agency; 2015. EU Medicines Agencies Network Strategy to 2020: Working together to improve health. European Medicines Agency; 2015.
43.
go back to reference EMA. European and US regulators agree on mutual recognition of inspections of medicines manufacturers. EMA; 2017. EMA. European and US regulators agree on mutual recognition of inspections of medicines manufacturers. EMA; 2017.
46.
go back to reference Nkansah P, Smine K, Pribluda V, Phanouvong S, Dunn C, Walfish S, et al. Guidance for Implementing Risk-Based Post-Marketing Quality Surveillance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Rockville, MD: U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. The Promoting the Quality of Mediciens Program; 2017. Nkansah P, Smine K, Pribluda V, Phanouvong S, Dunn C, Walfish S, et al. Guidance for Implementing Risk-Based Post-Marketing Quality Surveillance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Rockville, MD: U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. The Promoting the Quality of Mediciens Program; 2017.
47.
go back to reference WHO. Guidelines on the conduct of surveys of the quality of medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Contract No.: Annex 7 WHO. Guidelines on the conduct of surveys of the quality of medicines. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Contract No.: Annex 7
48.
go back to reference Report of the Sixth Meeting of the Member State Mechanism on Substandard and Falsified Medical Products. World Health Organization; 2018. Report of the Sixth Meeting of the Member State Mechanism on Substandard and Falsified Medical Products. World Health Organization; 2018.
49.
go back to reference Roth L, Nalim A, Turesson B, Krech L. Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries. BMC Globalization Health. 2018;14(43):1–19. Roth L, Nalim A, Turesson B, Krech L. Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries. BMC Globalization Health. 2018;14(43):1–19.
50.
go back to reference WHO. WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring System for substandard and falsified medical products. WHO; 2017. WHO. WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring System for substandard and falsified medical products. WHO; 2017.
51.
go back to reference Q12 Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management - Core Guideline. FDA; 2017. Q12 Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management - Core Guideline. FDA; 2017.
Metadata
Title
Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems
Authors
Lukas Roth
Daniel Bempong
Joseph B. Babigumira
Shabir Banoo
Emer Cooke
David Jeffreys
Lombe Kasonde
Hubert G. M. Leufkens
John C. W. Lim
Murray Lumpkin
Gugu Mahlangu
Rosanna W. Peeling
Helen Rees
Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda
Andy Stergachis
Mike Ward
Jude Nwokike
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0421-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Globalization and Health 1/2018 Go to the issue