Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal

Authors: Petra Brhlikova, Ian Harper, Madhusudan Subedi, Samita Bhattarai, Nabin Rawal, Allyson M. Pollock

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. These standards determine production rights for on-patent and off-patent medicines, and guide international procurement of medicines. We reviewed the literature on the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) on local production; a gap analysis from the literature review indicated a need for further research. Over sixty interviews were conducted with people involved in the Nepali pharmaceutical production and distribution chain from 2006 to 2009 on the GMP areas of relevance: regulatory capacity, staffing, funding and training, resourcing of GMP, inspectors’ interpretation of the rules and compliance.

Results

Although Nepal producers have increased their overall share of the domestic market, only the public manufacturer, Royal Drugs, focuses on medicines for public health programmes; private producers engage mainly in brand competition for private markets, not essential medicines. Nepali regulators and producers state that implementation of GMP standards is hindered by low regulatory capacity, insufficient training of staff in the industry, financial constraints and lack of investment for upgrading capital. The transition period to mandatory compliance with WHO GMP rules is lengthy. Less than half of private producers had WHO GMP in 2013. Producers are not directly affected by international harmonisation of standards as they do not export medicines and the Nepali regulator does not enforce the WHO standards strictly. Without an international GMP certificate they cannot tender for donor dependent health programmes.

Conclusions

In Nepal, local private manufacturers focus mainly on brand competition for private consumption not essential medicines, the government preferentially procures essential medicines from the only public producer while donor funded programmes rely on international manufacturers compliant with international GMP standards. We also found evidence of private hospitals bypassing national medicines approvals process.
Policies in support of local pharmaceutical production in developing countries as a source of essential medicines need to examine carefully how GMP regulations impact on regulators, local industry and production of essential medicines in practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. Global strategy and plan of action on public health, innovation and intellectual property. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. WHO. Global strategy and plan of action on public health, innovation and intellectual property. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Losse K, Schneider E, Spennemann C. The viability of local pharmaceutical production in Tanzania. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH; 2007. Losse K, Schneider E, Spennemann C. The viability of local pharmaceutical production in Tanzania. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH; 2007.
3.
go back to reference Chaudhuri S. The WTO and India’s Pharmaceuticals Industry: Patent Protection, TRIPS, and Developing Countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2005. Chaudhuri S. The WTO and India’s Pharmaceuticals Industry: Patent Protection, TRIPS, and Developing Countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2005.
4.
go back to reference WHO. Local production for access to medical products: developing a framework to improve public health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. WHO. Local production for access to medical products: developing a framework to improve public health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Kaplan W, Laing R. Local production of pharmaceuticals: industrial policy and access to medicines. An overview of key concepts, issues and opportunities for future research, in HNP Discussion Paper. Washington: The World Bank; 2005. Kaplan W, Laing R. Local production of pharmaceuticals: industrial policy and access to medicines. An overview of key concepts, issues and opportunities for future research, in HNP Discussion Paper. Washington: The World Bank; 2005.
6.
go back to reference UNCTAD. Investment in Pharmaceutical Production in the Least Developed Countries: A Guide for Policymakers and Investment Promotion Agencies. Geneva: United Nations; 2011. UNCTAD. Investment in Pharmaceutical Production in the Least Developed Countries: A Guide for Policymakers and Investment Promotion Agencies. Geneva: United Nations; 2011.
7.
go back to reference WHO. World Medicines Situation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. WHO. World Medicines Situation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
8.
go back to reference Kaplan WA, Ritz LS, Vitello M. Local production of medical technologies and its effect on access in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Southern Med Rev. 2011;4(2):51–61.CrossRef Kaplan WA, Ritz LS, Vitello M. Local production of medical technologies and its effect on access in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Southern Med Rev. 2011;4(2):51–61.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mujinja PG et al. Local production of pharmaceuticals in Africa and access to essential medicines: ‘urban bias’ in access to imported medicines in Tanzania and its policy implications. Glob Health. 2014;10:12.CrossRef Mujinja PG et al. Local production of pharmaceuticals in Africa and access to essential medicines: ‘urban bias’ in access to imported medicines in Tanzania and its policy implications. Glob Health. 2014;10:12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Timmermans K. Harmonization, regulation, and trade: interactions in the pharmaceutical field. Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):651–61.PubMedCrossRef Timmermans K. Harmonization, regulation, and trade: interactions in the pharmaceutical field. Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(4):651–61.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abraham J, Reed T. Trading risks for markets: the international harmonization of pharmaceuticals regulation. Health Risks Soc. 2001;3(1):113–28.CrossRef Abraham J, Reed T. Trading risks for markets: the international harmonization of pharmaceuticals regulation. Health Risks Soc. 2001;3(1):113–28.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grimes DA et al. The Good Clinical Practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical research. Lancet. 2005;366(9480):172–4.PubMedCrossRef Grimes DA et al. The Good Clinical Practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical research. Lancet. 2005;366(9480):172–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference WHO. The Impact of Implementation of ICH Guidelines in Non-ICH Countries. In: Regulatory Support Series, No. 9. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. WHO. The Impact of Implementation of ICH Guidelines in Non-ICH Countries. In: Regulatory Support Series, No. 9. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
14.
go back to reference Santhosh M, Singh A. Booklet on Access to Medicines in India. New Delhi: CLRA-Centad; 2009. Santhosh M, Singh A. Booklet on Access to Medicines in India. New Delhi: CLRA-Centad; 2009.
15.
go back to reference WHO. WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, in WHO Technical Report Series. 2011. WHO. WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, in WHO Technical Report Series. 2011.
18.
go back to reference WHO. Annex 2: WHO good manufacturing practices for active pharmaceutical ingredients in WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. WHO. Annex 2: WHO good manufacturing practices for active pharmaceutical ingredients in WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
19.
go back to reference WHO. Assessment of medicines regulatory systems in 26 sub-Saharan African countries: An overview of findings from 26 assessment reports. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. WHO. Assessment of medicines regulatory systems in 26 sub-Saharan African countries: An overview of findings from 26 assessment reports. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
20.
go back to reference GAO. Drug Safety: Better Data Management and More Inspections Are Needed to Strengthen FDA’s Foreign Drug Inspection Program. Washington, D.C: United States Government Accountability Office; 2008. GAO. Drug Safety: Better Data Management and More Inspections Are Needed to Strengthen FDA’s Foreign Drug Inspection Program. Washington, D.C: United States Government Accountability Office; 2008.
21.
go back to reference Global Fund. 6th Invitation to manufacturers of antimalarial medicines to submit an Expression of Interest (EoI) for product evaluation by Expert Review Panel (ERP). 2011. Global Fund. 6th Invitation to manufacturers of antimalarial medicines to submit an Expression of Interest (EoI) for product evaluation by Expert Review Panel (ERP). 2011.
22.
go back to reference PEPFAR. Fiscal year 2008: PEPFAR operational Plan. 2008. PEPFAR. Fiscal year 2008: PEPFAR operational Plan. 2008.
23.
go back to reference Blake S et al. U.N. Commission on Life Saving Commodities for Women and Children:Country Case Studies. 2012. [cited 2015 June 7]; Available from: http://can-mnch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Life-Saving-Commodities-New_Concept_Note1.pdf. Blake S et al. U.N. Commission on Life Saving Commodities for Women and Children:Country Case Studies. 2012. [cited 2015 June 7]; Available from: http://​can-mnch.​ca/​wp-content/​uploads/​2012/​06/​Life-Saving-Commodities-New_​Concept_​Note1.​pdf.​
24.
go back to reference Hill S, Johnson K. Emerging challenges and opportunities in drug registration and regulation in developing countries. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre; 2004. Hill S, Johnson K. Emerging challenges and opportunities in drug registration and regulation in developing countries. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre; 2004.
25.
go back to reference Brhlikova P et al. Trust and the regulation of pharmaceuticals: South Asia in a globalised world. Glob Health. 2011;7:10.CrossRef Brhlikova P et al. Trust and the regulation of pharmaceuticals: South Asia in a globalised world. Glob Health. 2011;7:10.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Meshkini AH et al. Assessment of the vaccine industry in Iran in context of accession to WTO: a survey study. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2012;20:19.CrossRef Meshkini AH et al. Assessment of the vaccine industry in Iran in context of accession to WTO: a survey study. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2012;20:19.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pinheiro ES et al. Production of antiretroviral drugs in middle- and low-income countries. Antivir Ther. 2014;19 Suppl 3:49–55.CrossRef Pinheiro ES et al. Production of antiretroviral drugs in middle- and low-income countries. Antivir Ther. 2014;19 Suppl 3:49–55.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Trouiller P, Folb P, Weerasuriya K. Legal and regulatory issues affecting drug development for neglected diseases: harmonization of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. 2001. Trouiller P, Folb P, Weerasuriya K. Legal and regulatory issues affecting drug development for neglected diseases: harmonization of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. 2001.
30.
go back to reference Trouiller P et al. The globalisation of regulatory requirements, and the development and availability of medicinal products in developing countries: quality, efficacy and safety issues. 2002. Trouiller P et al. The globalisation of regulatory requirements, and the development and availability of medicinal products in developing countries: quality, efficacy and safety issues. 2002.
31.
go back to reference UNIDO. Independent evaluation: Strengthening the local production of essential generic drugs in least developed/developing countries. Vienna: UNIDO; 2010. UNIDO. Independent evaluation: Strengthening the local production of essential generic drugs in least developed/developing countries. Vienna: UNIDO; 2010.
32.
go back to reference Guimier J-M, Lee E, Grupper M. Processes and issues for improving access to medicines: the evidence base for domestic production and greater access to medicines. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre; 2004. Guimier J-M, Lee E, Grupper M. Processes and issues for improving access to medicines: the evidence base for domestic production and greater access to medicines. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre; 2004.
33.
go back to reference WHO WHO. Prequalification: Building quality-assured manufacturing capacity in Nigeria. WHO Drug Inf. 2014;28(4):425–30. WHO WHO. Prequalification: Building quality-assured manufacturing capacity in Nigeria. WHO Drug Inf. 2014;28(4):425–30.
36.
go back to reference Dixit H. Nepal’s Quest for Health. Kathmandu: Educational Books Publishing (P) Ltd; 2000. Dixit H. Nepal’s Quest for Health. Kathmandu: Educational Books Publishing (P) Ltd; 2000.
37.
go back to reference SAWTEE. WTO and public health policy priorities for Nepal. Kathmandu: SAWTEE; 2006. SAWTEE. WTO and public health policy priorities for Nepal. Kathmandu: SAWTEE; 2006.
38.
go back to reference HSSP. Quality assurance of medicines in Nepal: identified needs for capacity enhancement. Kathmandu: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitHealth Sector Support Programme; 2012. HSSP. Quality assurance of medicines in Nepal: identified needs for capacity enhancement. Kathmandu: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitHealth Sector Support Programme; 2012.
39.
go back to reference Budhathoki S. Drug Drive: The Rising Business of Pharmaceutical Companies in Nepal, in New Business Age. 2012. Budhathoki S. Drug Drive: The Rising Business of Pharmaceutical Companies in Nepal, in New Business Age. 2012.
40.
go back to reference DDA. Department of Drug Administration: Objectives. 2007. DDA. Department of Drug Administration: Objectives. 2007.
41.
go back to reference MHP. Nepal Pharmaceutical Country Profile. 2011. MHP. Nepal Pharmaceutical Country Profile. 2011.
42.
go back to reference Jeffery R. Tracing Pharmaceuticals in South Asia: Project Design and Basic Data. 2010. [cited 2015 June 7]; Available from: http://www.csas.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/49244/Tracing_Pharmaceuticals_in_South_Asia_WP2010.pdf. Jeffery R. Tracing Pharmaceuticals in South Asia: Project Design and Basic Data. 2010. [cited 2015 June 7]; Available from: http://​www.​csas.​ed.​ac.​uk/​_​_​data/​assets/​pdf_​file/​0005/​49244/​Tracing_​Pharmaceuticals_​in_​South_​Asia_​WP2010.​pdf.​
43.
go back to reference Thapa. Editorial: GMP Certification for Assuring the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products. Drug Bull Nepal. 2004;16(1):3–4. Thapa. Editorial: GMP Certification for Assuring the Quality of Pharmaceutical Products. Drug Bull Nepal. 2004;16(1):3–4.
44.
go back to reference DDA. Regulatory news. Drug Bulletin of Nepal. 2012;24(1) DDA. Regulatory news. Drug Bulletin of Nepal. 2012;24(1)
45.
go back to reference Shrestha B et al. Nepal National Health Accounts, 2006/2007 - 2008/2009. Kathmandu: Health Economics and Financing Unit, Ministry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal; 2012. Shrestha B et al. Nepal National Health Accounts, 2006/2007 - 2008/2009. Kathmandu: Health Economics and Financing Unit, Ministry of Health and Population, Government of Nepal; 2012.
46.
go back to reference Mosites E, et al. Nepal zinc case study. University of Washington Global Health START Program; 2012 ect.org/sites/default/files/resources/Nepal_Zinc%20Case%20Study_0.pdf. Mosites E, et al. Nepal zinc case study. University of Washington Global Health START Program; 2012 ect.org/sites/default/files/resources/Nepal_Zinc%20Case%20Study_0.pdf.
47.
go back to reference Toledo E. USP DQI Good Manufacturing Practices Assessment for Manufacturers of Zinc Sulfate Tablets and Chlorhexidine Kathmandu, Nepal; January 14–22, 2008. Rockville, Maryland: United States Pharmacopeia: Submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Development by the United States Pharmacopeia Drug Quality and Information Program; 2009. Toledo E. USP DQI Good Manufacturing Practices Assessment for Manufacturers of Zinc Sulfate Tablets and Chlorhexidine Kathmandu, Nepal; January 14–22, 2008. Rockville, Maryland: United States Pharmacopeia: Submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Development by the United States Pharmacopeia Drug Quality and Information Program; 2009.
48.
go back to reference Palaian S, Mishra P. Role of drug and therapeutics committee towards drug safety–experiences from western Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005;3(1):79–80. Palaian S, Mishra P. Role of drug and therapeutics committee towards drug safety–experiences from western Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005;3(1):79–80.
49.
go back to reference Shakya B. Nepal: Exports of Ayurvedic Herbal Remedies and SPS Issues. In: Gallagher P, Low P, Stoler A, editors. Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Shakya B. Nepal: Exports of Ayurvedic Herbal Remedies and SPS Issues. In: Gallagher P, Low P, Stoler A, editors. Managing the Challenges of WTO Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
50.
go back to reference Morimoto K et al. Promoting GMP implementation: developing training materials for the international audience. Qual Assur. 2003;10(1):11–27.PubMed Morimoto K et al. Promoting GMP implementation: developing training materials for the international audience. Qual Assur. 2003;10(1):11–27.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Harper I, Rawal N, Subedi M. Disputing distribution: ethics and pharmaceutical regulation in Nepal. Studies Nepali Hist Soc. 2011;16(1):1–39. Harper I, Rawal N, Subedi M. Disputing distribution: ethics and pharmaceutical regulation in Nepal. Studies Nepali Hist Soc. 2011;16(1):1–39.
Metadata
Title
Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
Authors
Petra Brhlikova
Ian Harper
Madhusudan Subedi
Samita Bhattarai
Nabin Rawal
Allyson M. Pollock
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Globalization and Health 1/2015 Go to the issue