Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Health
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Does short message service improve focused antenatal care visit and skilled birth attendance? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Authors: Fasil Wagnew, Getenet Dessie, Animut Alebel, Henok Mulugeta, Yihalem Abebe Belay, Amanuel Alemu Abajobir

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In low resource circumstances, non-adherence for available health services is a major cause of inefficiency in health care delivery. MHealth has been projected as a possible solution to support women during pregnancy, birth and puerperium period, to increase the uptake of essential maternal services.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of short message services (SMS)on Focused Antenatal Care (FANC) visits and the attendance of skilled birth professionals in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs).

Methods

We searched a broad body of literature from electronic databases–Cochrane review, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed and Google Scholar to collect comprehensive evidence on the role of SMS on FANC visits and skilled birth attendance. We extracted data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) only. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models with inverse variance method in Review Manager (RevMan) computer software. Qualities of the included studies were determined by GRADEpro, and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool.

Results

Of the 1224 non-duplicated articles screened, only 7 RCT studies representing 8324 participants met eligibility criteria and included in this synthesis. On aggregate, there were statistically significant associations in experimental group in that pregnant mothers who received text messaging had a 174% increase in FANC visits (OR = 2.74 (95% CI: 1.41, 5.32) and 82% in skilled birth attendance (OR = 1.82 (95% CI; 1.33, 2.49). The I2 test result indicated high heterogeneity I2 = 78% (P < .001). The overall qualities of included studies were moderate, and had low risk of bias.

Conclusions

SMS has positive effects for the uptake of FANC visits and skilled birth attendance in LMICs. A short messaging service targeting pregnant woman is an invaluable, affordable intervention to improve maternal healthcare seeking behaviors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Bazile J, Rigodon J, Berman L, Boulanger VM, Maistrellis E, Kausiwa P, Yamin AE. Intergenerational impacts of maternal mortality: qualitative findings from rural Malawi. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):S1.CrossRef
3.
Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu L, Tsui AO. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: an analysis of 172 countries. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):111–25.CrossRef
4.
Wray JD. Population pressure on families: family size and child spacing; 1971.
5.
Demographic E. Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency and ICF International, 2012, vol. 7. Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central statistical agency and ORC macro; 2011.
6.
Mbuagbaw LC, Gofin R. A new measurement for optimal antenatal care: determinants and outcomes in Cameroon. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(8):1427–34.CrossRef
7.
Langlois ÉV, Miszkurka M, Zunzunegui MV, Ghaffar A, Ziegler D, Karp I. Inequities in postnatal care in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:259–270G.CrossRef
8.
Mrisho M, Obrist B, Schellenberg JA, Haws RA, Mushi AK, Mshinda H, Tanner M, Schellenberg D. The use of antenatal and postnatal care: perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in rural southern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(1):10.CrossRef
9.
Regassa N. Antenatal and postnatal care service utilization in southern Ethiopia: a population-based study. Afr Health Sci. 2011;11(3):390–97.
10.
11.
12.
World Health Organization (WHO). mHealth: new horizons forHealth throughMobile technologies: second global survey on eHealth,WHO. Switzerland: Geneva; 2011.
13.
Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, Kariri A, Karanja S, Chung MH, Jack W, Habyarimana J, Sadatsafavi M, Najafzadeh M. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1838–45.CrossRef
14.
Patrick K, Griswold WG, Raab F, Intille SS. Health and the mobile phone. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):177–81.CrossRef
15.
GSMA: African Mobile observatory driving economic and social development through mobile services. . 2011.
16.
Amoakoh-Coleman M, AB-J B, Sondaal SF, Grobbee DE, Miltenburg AS, Verwijs M, Ansah EK, Browne JL, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions targeting health care workers to improve pregnancy outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8).CrossRef
17.
18.
Serpell R, Jere-Folotiya J, Chansa-Kabali T, Munachaka J, Maumbi MN, Yalukanda C, Sampa F, Lyytinen H. A Culturally Sensitive Approach to promoting initial literacy development in Africa: ongoing and planned Research and Development at the University of Zambia’s Centre for Promotion of literacy in sub-Saharan Africa (CAPOLSA), Handbook of Applied Developmental Science in Sub-Saharan Africa. Edn: Springer; 2017. p. 313–34.CrossRef
19.
Qiang CZ, Yamamichi M, Hausman V, Altman D, Unit I. Mobile applications for the health sector, vol. 2. Washington: World Bank; 2011.
20.
Armstrong AW, Watson AJ, Makredes M, Frangos JE, Kimball AB, Kvedar JC. Text-message reminders to improve sunscreen use: a randomized, controlled trial using electronic monitoring. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(11):1230–6.CrossRef
21.
Z-w C, L-z F, L-y C, H-l D. Comparison of an SMS text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance at a health promotion center: a randomized controlled trial. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2008;9(1):34–8.CrossRef
22.
Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):56–69.CrossRef
23.
Leong KC, Chen WS, Leong KW, Mastura I, Mimi O, Sheikh MA, Zailinawati AH, Ng CJ, Phua KL, Teng CL. The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2006;23(6):699–705.CrossRef
24.
Chen H, Chai Y, Dong L, Niu W, Zhang P. Effectiveness and appropriateness of mHealth interventions for maternal and child health: systematic review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018;6(1).CrossRef
25.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2008;336(7650):924.CrossRef
26.
Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2001;323(7303):42.CrossRef
27.
Higgins J, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc. 2009;172(1):137–59.CrossRef
28.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ Br Med J. 2003;327(7414):557.CrossRef
29.
Atnafu A, Bisrat A, Kifle M, Taye B, Debebe T. Mobile health (mHealth) intervention in maternal and child health care: Evidence from resource-constrained settings: A review. Ethiop J Heal Dev (EJHD). 2016;29(3):140-53.
30.
Colaci D, Chaudhri S, Vasan A. mHealth interventions in low-income countries to address maternal health: a systematic review. Annals of global health. 2016;82(5):922–35.CrossRef
31.
Feroz A, Perveen S, Aftab W. Role of mHealth applications for improving antenatal and postnatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):704.CrossRef
32.
Mbuagbaw L, Medley N, Darzi A, Richardson M, Habiba Garga K, Ongolo-Zogo P. Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12(12).
33.
Sondaal SFV, Browne JL, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Borgstein A, Miltenburg AS, Verwijs M, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Assessing the effect of mHealth interventions in improving maternal and neonatal care in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154664.CrossRef
34.
Watterson JL, Walsh J, Madeka I. Using mHealth to improve usage of antenatal care, postnatal care, and immunization: a systematic review of the literature. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015.CrossRef
35.
Andreatta P, Debpuur D, Danquah A, Perosky J. Using cell phones to collect postpartum hemorrhage outcome data in rural Ghana. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;113(2):148–51.CrossRef
36.
Datta SS, Ranganathan P, Sivakumar KS. A study to assess the feasibility of text messaging service in delivering maternal and child healthcare messages in a rural area of Tamil Nadu, India. Australas Med J. 2014;7(4):175.CrossRef
37.
38.
Kaewkungwal J, Singhasivanon P, Khamsiriwatchara A, Sawang S, Meankaew P, Wechsart A. Application of smart phone in “better border healthcare program”: a module for mother and child care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10(1):69.CrossRef
39.
Kuo M-C, Lu Y-C, Chang P. A newborn baby care support app and system for mHealth. In: NI 2012: Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics: 2012: American medical informatics association; 2012.
40.
Oyeyemi SO, Wynn R. Giving cell phones to pregnant women and improving services may increase primary health facility utilization: a case–control study of a Nigerian project. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):8.CrossRef
41.
P. P: India vaccination pilot Progress report. Medic Mobile and Clif Bar. 2012.
42.
Watkins SC, Robinson A, Dalious M, Initiative IK. Evaluation of the Information and Communications Technology for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Project Known locally as ‘Chipatala Cha Pa Foni’(Health Center by Phone). Balaka District, Malawi: Invest in Knowledge Initiative; 2013.
43.
Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, Fabricant R, Mehl G. mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013;1(2):160–71.CrossRef
44.
Lee S, Chib A, Kim J-N. Midwives’ cell phone use and health knowledge in rural communities. J Health Commun. 2011;16(9):1006–23.CrossRef
45.
Little A, Medhanyie A, Yebyo H, Spigt M, Dinant G-J, Blanco R. Meeting community health worker needs for maternal health care service delivery using appropriate mobile technologies in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77563.CrossRef
46.
Lori JR, Munro ML, Boyd CJ, Andreatta P. Cell phones to collect pregnancy data from remote areas in Liberia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012;44(3):294–301.CrossRef
47.
Ngabo F, Nguimfack J, Nwaigwe F, Mugeni C, Muhoza D, Wilson DR, Kalach J, Gakuba R, Karema C, Binagwaho A. Designing and implementing an innovative SMS-based alert system (RapidSMS-MCH) to monitor pregnancy and reduce maternal and child deaths in Rwanda. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13.
48.
Tesfaye S, Barry D, Gobezayehu AG, Frew AH, Stover KE, Tessema H, Alamineh L, Sibley LM. Improving coverage of postnatal care in rural Ethiopia using a community-based, collaborative quality improvement approach. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(s1):S55-64. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jmwh.​12168.CrossRef
49.
Adanikin AI, Awoleke JO, Adeyiolu A. Role of reminder by text message in enhancing postnatal clinic attendance. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;126(2):179–80.CrossRef
50.
Khorshid MR, Afshari P, Abedi P. The effect of SMS messaging on the compliance with iron supplementation among pregnant women in Iran: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(4):201–6.CrossRef
51.
Ross R, Sawatphanit W, Suwansujarid T, Stidham AW, Drew BL, Creswell JW. The effect of telephone support on depressive symptoms among HIV-infected pregnant women in Thailand: an embedded mixed methods study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2013;24(5):e13–24.CrossRef
52.
Su Y, Yuan C, Zhou Z, Heitner J, Campbell B. Impact of an SMS advice programme on maternal and newborn health in rural China: study protocol for a quasi-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011016.CrossRef
53.
Tahir NM, Al-Sadat N. Does telephone lactation counselling improve breastfeeding practices?: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(1):16–25.CrossRef
54.
Bangal VB, Borawake SK, Gavhane SP, Aher KH. Use of mobile phone for improvement in maternal health: a randomized control trial. Int J Reprod, Contracept, Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(12):5458–63.CrossRef
55.
Lund S, Hemed M, Nielsen BB, Said A, Said K, Makungu M, Rasch V. Mobile phones as a health communication tool to improve skilled attendance at delivery in Zanzibar: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119(10):1256–64.CrossRef
56.
Lund S, Nielsen BB, Hemed M, Boas IM, Said A, Said K, Makungu MH, Rasch V. Mobile phones improve antenatal care attendance in Zanzibar: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):29.CrossRef
57.
Jareethum R, Titapant V, Tienthai C, Viboonchart S, Chuenwattana P, Chatchainoppakhun J. Satisfaction of healthy pregnant women receiving short message service via mobile phone for prenatal support: a randomized controlled trial. Med J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(4):458.PubMed
58.
Atnafu A, Otto K, Herbst CH. The role of mHealth intervention on maternal and child health service delivery: findings from a randomized controlled field trial in rural Ethiopia. MHealth. 2017;3.CrossRef
59.
Lau YK, Cassidy T, Hacking D, Brittain K, Haricharan HJ, Heap M. Antenatal health promotion via short message service at a midwife obstetrics unit in South Africa: a mixed methods study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):284.CrossRef
60.
Christakis NA. Social networks and collateral health effects: have been ignored in medical care and clinical trials, but need to be studied. BMJ Br Med J. 2004;329(7459):184.CrossRef
61.
Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976.
62.
Bos A, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B. Failed appointments in an orthodontic clinic. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;127(3):355–7.CrossRef
63.
McBride B, Nguyen LT, Wiljer D, Vu NC, Nguyen CK, O’Neil J. Development of a maternal, newborn and child mHealth intervention in Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam: protocol for the mMom project. JMIR research protocols. 2018;7(1).
64.
Fedha T. Impact of mobile telephone on maternal health service care: a case of Njoro division. Open J Prev Med. 2014;4(05):365.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does short message service improve focused antenatal care visit and skilled birth attendance? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Authors
Fasil Wagnew
Getenet Dessie
Animut Alebel
Henok Mulugeta
Yihalem Abebe Belay
Amanuel Alemu Abajobir
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0635-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Study protocol

The casual effect of lifestyle factors on outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques: a protocol study on Iranian infertile couples

Research

Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India

Review

Assessment of country policies affecting reproductive health for adolescents in the Philippines

Research

Quality of IVF status registration in the Estonian Medical Birth Registry: a national record linkage study

Research

Barriers and facilitators to institutional delivery in rural areas of Chitwan district, Nepal: a qualitative study

Research

Perceptions of counsellors and youth-serving professionals about sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents in Soweto, South Africa