Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Access to abortion under the heath exception: a comparative analysis in three countries

Authors: Stephanie A. Küng, Blair G. Darney, Biani Saavedra-Avendaño, Patricia A. Lohr, Laura Gil

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite Britain, Colombia, and some Mexican states sharing a health exception within their abortion laws, access to abortion under the health exception varies widely. This study examines factors that result in heterogeneous application of similar health exception laws and consequences for access to legal abortion. Our research adds to previous literature by comparing implementation of similar abortion laws across countries to identify strategies for full implementation of the health exception.

Methods

We conducted a cross-country comparative descriptive study synthesizing data from document and literature review, official abortion statistics, and interviews with key informants. We gathered information on the use and interpretation of the health exception in the three countries from peer-reviewed literature, court documents, and grey literature. We next extracted public and private abortion statistics to understand the application of the law in each setting. We used a matrix to synthesize information and identify key factors in the use of the law. We conducted in-depth interviews with doctors and experts familiar with the health exception laws in each country and analyzed the qualitative data based on the previously identified factors.

Results

The health exception is used broadly in Britain, somewhat in Colombia, and very rarely in Mexican states. We identified five factors as particularly salient to application of the health exception in each setting: 1) comprehensiveness of the law including explicit mention of mental health, 2) a strong public health sector that funds abortion, 3) knowledge of and attitudes toward the health exception law, including guidelines for physicians in providing abortion, 4) dissemination of information about the health exception law, and 5) a history of court cases that protect women and clarify the health exception law.

Conclusions

The health exception is a valuable tool for expanding access to legal abortion. Differences in the use of the health exception as an indication for legal abortion result in wide access for women in Britain to nearly no access in Mexican states. Our findings highlight the difference between theoretical and real access to legal abortion. The interpretation and application of the health exception law are pivotal to expanding real access to abortion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shah IH, Åhman E, Ortayli N. Access to safe abortion: progress and challenges since the 1994 international conference on population and development (ICPD). Contraception. 2014;90(6, Supplement):S39–48.CrossRefPubMed Shah IH, Åhman E, Ortayli N. Access to safe abortion: progress and challenges since the 1994 international conference on population and development (ICPD). Contraception. 2014;90(6, Supplement):S39–48.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Rossier C, Gerdts C, Tençalp Ö, Johnson BR Jr, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Rossier C, Gerdts C, Tençalp Ö, Johnson BR Jr, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Singh S. Global consequences of unsafe abortion. Women's Health (Lond Engl). 2010;6(6):849–60.CrossRef Singh S. Global consequences of unsafe abortion. Women's Health (Lond Engl). 2010;6(6):849–60.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Levin C, Grossman D, Berdichevsky K, Diaz C, Aracena B, Garcia SG, Goodyear L. Exploring the costs and economic consequences of unsafe abortion in Mexico City before legalisation. Reproductive Health Matters. 2009;17(33):120–32.CrossRefPubMed Levin C, Grossman D, Berdichevsky K, Diaz C, Aracena B, Garcia SG, Goodyear L. Exploring the costs and economic consequences of unsafe abortion in Mexico City before legalisation. Reproductive Health Matters. 2009;17(33):120–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Prada E, Singh SS, Remez L, Villarreal C. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Colombia: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2011. Prada E, Singh SS, Remez L, Villarreal C. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Colombia: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2011.
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva, Switzerland; 2011. World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. Geneva, Switzerland; 2011.
8.
go back to reference British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Britain's abortion law: what it says, and why. Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire; 2013. British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Britain's abortion law: what it says, and why. Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Ruibal A. Movement and counter movement: a history of abortion law reform and the backlash in Colombia 2006-2014. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(44):42–51.CrossRefPubMed Ruibal A. Movement and counter movement: a history of abortion law reform and the backlash in Colombia 2006-2014. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(44):42–51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos. NOM-046-SSA2–2005. vol. NOM-046-SSA2–2005. Mexico; 2016. Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos. NOM-046-SSA2–2005. vol. NOM-046-SSA2–2005. Mexico; 2016.
11.
go back to reference GIRE. Niñas y Mujeres Sin Justicia: Derechos Reproductivos en México. México, D.F.; 2015. GIRE. Niñas y Mujeres Sin Justicia: Derechos Reproductivos en México. México, D.F.; 2015.
12.
go back to reference Becker D, Diaz Olavarrieta C. Decriminalization of abortion in Mexico City: the effects on women's reproductive rights. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:590–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Becker D, Diaz Olavarrieta C. Decriminalization of abortion in Mexico City: the effects on women's reproductive rights. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:590–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Juarez F, Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I, Wulf D. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Mexico: causes and consequences. New York; 2013. Juarez F, Singh S, Maddow-Zimet I, Wulf D. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Mexico: causes and consequences. New York; 2013.
18.
go back to reference WHO. Constitution of the World Health Organization, vol. In: Fourty-fifth edition; 2006. WHO. Constitution of the World Health Organization, vol. In: Fourty-fifth edition; 2006.
19.
go back to reference United Kingdom Department of Health. Guidance in Relation to Requirements of the Abortion Act 1967. Sexual health policy team, public health directorate. London; 2014. United Kingdom Department of Health. Guidance in Relation to Requirements of the Abortion Act 1967. Sexual health policy team, public health directorate. London; 2014.
20.
go back to reference Dantés OG, Sesma S, Becerril VM, Knaul FM, Arreola H, Frenk J. Sistema de salud de México. Salud Pública México. 2011;53(supl 2):S220–32. Dantés OG, Sesma S, Becerril VM, Knaul FM, Arreola H, Frenk J. Sistema de salud de México. Salud Pública México. 2011;53(supl 2):S220–32.
21.
go back to reference Guerrero R, Gallego AI, Becerril-Montekio V, Vásquez J. Sistema de salud de Colombia. Salud Pública México. 2011;53(supl 2):S144–55. Guerrero R, Gallego AI, Becerril-Montekio V, Vásquez J. Sistema de salud de Colombia. Salud Pública México. 2011;53(supl 2):S144–55.
22.
go back to reference Women's Link Worldwide. Lo Que Hay Que Saber Sobre el Aborto Legal (2006-2013); 2013. Women's Link Worldwide. Lo Que Hay Que Saber Sobre el Aborto Legal (2006-2013); 2013.
23.
go back to reference Singh S, Sedgh G, Bankole A, Hussain R. Making abortion services accessible in the wake of legal reforms: a framework and six case studies. New York, NY; 2012. Singh S, Sedgh G, Bankole A, Hussain R. Making abortion services accessible in the wake of legal reforms: a framework and six case studies. New York, NY; 2012.
24.
go back to reference Becker D, García SG, Larsen U. Knowledge and opinions about abortion law among Mexican youth. International Perspectives. 2002;28(4):205–13. Becker D, García SG, Larsen U. Knowledge and opinions about abortion law among Mexican youth. International Perspectives. 2002;28(4):205–13.
25.
go back to reference García-Nuñez NN, Atienzo EE, Dayananda I, Walker D. Legislación, conocimientos y actitudes de profesionales médicos en relación al aborto en México. Salud Colectiva. 2013;9(2):235–46.CrossRefPubMed García-Nuñez NN, Atienzo EE, Dayananda I, Walker D. Legislación, conocimientos y actitudes de profesionales médicos en relación al aborto en México. Salud Colectiva. 2013;9(2):235–46.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Paine J, Noriega RT, Puga AL. Using litigation to defend women prosecuted for abortion in Mexico: challenging state laws and the implications of recent court judgments. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(44):61–9.CrossRefPubMed Paine J, Noriega RT, Puga AL. Using litigation to defend women prosecuted for abortion in Mexico: challenging state laws and the implications of recent court judgments. Reprod Health Matters. 2014;22(44):61–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Fuentes V. Proyecta Corte Despenalizar el Aborto. Reforma. Mexico; 2016. Fuentes V. Proyecta Corte Despenalizar el Aborto. Reforma. Mexico; 2016.
28.
go back to reference Velez ACG. 'The health Exception': a means of expanding access to legal abortion. Reproductive Health Matters. 2012;20(40):22–9.CrossRef Velez ACG. 'The health Exception': a means of expanding access to legal abortion. Reproductive Health Matters. 2012;20(40):22–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Grossman D, Grindlay K, Burns B. Public funding for abortion where broadly legal. Contraception. 2016;94:453–60.CrossRefPubMed Grossman D, Grindlay K, Burns B. Public funding for abortion where broadly legal. Contraception. 2016;94:453–60.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference The Harvard Law Review Association. Whole Woman's health v. Hellerstedt. Harvard Law Review. 2016;130(1):397–406. The Harvard Law Review Association. Whole Woman's health v. Hellerstedt. Harvard Law Review. 2016;130(1):397–406.
31.
go back to reference Amado ED, García MCC, Cristancho KR, Salas EP, Hauzeur EB. Obstacles and challenges following the partial decriminalisation of abortion in Colombia. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(36):118–26.CrossRefPubMed Amado ED, García MCC, Cristancho KR, Salas EP, Hauzeur EB. Obstacles and challenges following the partial decriminalisation of abortion in Colombia. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(36):118–26.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Assifi AR, Berger B, Tunçalp Ö, Khosla R, Geanatra B. Women's awareness and knowledge of abortion Laws: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(3) Assifi AR, Berger B, Tunçalp Ö, Khosla R, Geanatra B. Women's awareness and knowledge of abortion Laws: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(3)
33.
go back to reference Sheldon S. The decriminalisation of abortion: an argument for modernisation. Oxf J Leg Stud. 2015;36(2):334–65.CrossRef Sheldon S. The decriminalisation of abortion: an argument for modernisation. Oxf J Leg Stud. 2015;36(2):334–65.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference United Nations Population Division. Abortion policies: a global review; 2002. United Nations Population Division. Abortion policies: a global review; 2002.
35.
go back to reference Women's Link Worldwide. C-355/2006 y su reglamentación: Preguntas y respuestas sobre el margo legal vigente del aborto en Colombia. Colombia. Women's Link Worldwide. C-355/2006 y su reglamentación: Preguntas y respuestas sobre el margo legal vigente del aborto en Colombia. Colombia.
36.
go back to reference Lamas M. La despenalización del aborto en México. In: Nueva Sociedad 2009; Marzo-Abril; 2009. Lamas M. La despenalización del aborto en México. In: Nueva Sociedad 2009; Marzo-Abril; 2009.
37.
go back to reference Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Codigos Penales. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Codigos Penales. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
38.
go back to reference Bristow J. Introduction. In: Britain's Abortion Law: What it says, and why. EDN Stratford-upon-Avon: British Pregnancy Advisory Service; 2013. Bristow J. Introduction. In: Britain's Abortion Law: What it says, and why. EDN Stratford-upon-Avon: British Pregnancy Advisory Service; 2013.
40.
go back to reference Gobierno del Distrito Federal. Decreto por el que se expide la ley de los derechos de las personas jóvenes en la Ciudad de México. 154 Bis. Ciudad de México; 2015. Gobierno del Distrito Federal. Decreto por el que se expide la ley de los derechos de las personas jóvenes en la Ciudad de México. 154 Bis. Ciudad de México; 2015.
41.
go back to reference Halfmann D. Historical priorities and the responses of Doctors' associations to abortion reform. Soc Probl. 2003;50(4):567–91.CrossRef Halfmann D. Historical priorities and the responses of Doctors' associations to abortion reform. Soc Probl. 2003;50(4):567–91.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Prevención del aborto inseguro en Colombia. Protocolo para el sector salud. In: Bogotá; 2014. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Prevención del aborto inseguro en Colombia. Protocolo para el sector salud. In: Bogotá; 2014.
44.
go back to reference Lee E. Recent myths and misunderstandings about the abortion law. In: Britain's Abortion Law: What it says, and why. EDN Stratford-upon-Avon: British Pregnancy Advisory; 2013. Lee E. Recent myths and misunderstandings about the abortion law. In: Britain's Abortion Law: What it says, and why. EDN Stratford-upon-Avon: British Pregnancy Advisory; 2013.
45.
go back to reference Secretaria Distrital de Salud de Bogotá. Atenciones Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo. 2015. Secretaria Distrital de Salud de Bogotá. Atenciones Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo. 2015.
Metadata
Title
Access to abortion under the heath exception: a comparative analysis in three countries
Authors
Stephanie A. Küng
Blair G. Darney
Biani Saavedra-Avendaño
Patricia A. Lohr
Laura Gil
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0548-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue