Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Commentary

Assessing the validity and reliability of self-report data on contraception use in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial

Authors: Chris Smith, Phil Edwards, Caroline Free

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A variety of different approaches to measuring contraceptive use have been used or proposed, either to assess current use or adherence over time, using subjective or objective measures. This paper reports an overview of approaches to measuring adherence to the oral contraceptive, intra-uterine device, sub-dermal implant, and injectable and describes how we assessed contraception use in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) trial in Cambodia.

Main body

We summarise and discuss advantages and disadvantages of different subjective and objective approaches to measuring adherence to the oral contraceptive, intra-uterine device, sub-dermal implant, and injectable such as self-reports, clinic records, electronic monitoring devices, clinical examination and biomarkers.
For the MOTIF trial, we did not consider it feasible to measure objective contraception use as many participants lived a long distance from the clinic and we were concerned whether it was appropriate to ask women to return to clinic for a physical examination simply to verify self-report information already provided.
We aimed to assess the validity of the four-month data with 50 participants, calculating the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported data compared with objective measurement. For the 46 valid measurements obtained, the sensitivity and specificity was 100% for self-reported contraception use compared to objective measurement but this study had some limitations. To assess reliability of self-report data we compared calendar data collected on effective contraception use at months 1–4 post-abortion, collected separately at four and 12 months. Agreement ranged from 80 to 84% with a kappa statistic ranging from 0·59 to 0·67 indicating fair to good agreement.

Conclusion

There is no perfect method of assessing contraception use and researchers designing future studies should give consideration of what to measure, for example current use or detailed patterns of use over time, and remain mindful of what will be feasible and acceptable to the study population. Although self-reported data on contraception use are considered less reliable, and prone to social desirability bias, it is often the standard approach for contraception research and provides data comparable to previous studies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01823861. Registered: March 30, 2013.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith C, Ngo T, Gold J, Edwards P, Vannak U, Sokhey L, et al. Effect of a mobile phone-based intervention on post-abortion contraception: a randomized controlled trial in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(12):842–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith C, Ngo T, Gold J, Edwards P, Vannak U, Sokhey L, et al. Effect of a mobile phone-based intervention on post-abortion contraception: a randomized controlled trial in Cambodia. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(12):842–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Stuart G, Grimes D. Social desirability bias in family planning studies: a neglected problem. Contraception. 2009;80(2):108–12.CrossRefPubMed Stuart G, Grimes D. Social desirability bias in family planning studies: a neglected problem. Contraception. 2009;80(2):108–12.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Gallo MF. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(4):7-9. Halpern V, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Gallo MF. Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(4):7-9.
4.
go back to reference Hillard PJA. Contraception: adherence? Compliance? Successful use? And how do we know? J Women’s Heal. 2010;19(12):2157–8.CrossRef Hillard PJA. Contraception: adherence? Compliance? Successful use? And how do we know? J Women’s Heal. 2010;19(12):2157–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ali M, Sadler R, Cleland J, Ngo T, Shah I. Long-term contraceptive protection, discontinuation and switching behaviour: intrauterine device (IUD) use dynamics in 14 developing countries [internet]. World Health Organisation and Marie stopes international; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/Long_term_contraceptive_protection_behaviour.pdf Ali M, Sadler R, Cleland J, Ngo T, Shah I. Long-term contraceptive protection, discontinuation and switching behaviour: intrauterine device (IUD) use dynamics in 14 developing countries [internet]. World Health Organisation and Marie stopes international; 2011. Available from: http://​www.​who.​int/​reproductiveheal​th/​publications/​family_​planning/​Long_​term_​contraceptive_​protection_​behaviour.​pdf
6.
go back to reference Goldman N, Moreno L, Westoff C. Collection of survey data on contraception: an evaluation of an experiment in Peru. Stud Fam Plan. 1989;20(3):147–57.CrossRef Goldman N, Moreno L, Westoff C. Collection of survey data on contraception: an evaluation of an experiment in Peru. Stud Fam Plan. 1989;20(3):147–57.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Strickler J, Magnani R, McCann H, Brown L, Rice J. The reliability of reporting of contraceptive behavior in DHS calendar data: evidence from Morocco. Stud Fam Plan. 1997;28(1):44–53.CrossRef Strickler J, Magnani R, McCann H, Brown L, Rice J. The reliability of reporting of contraceptive behavior in DHS calendar data: evidence from Morocco. Stud Fam Plan. 1997;28(1):44–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Centre for Communications Programs (CCP) Knowledge for Health Project. Family planning: a global handbook for providers (2011 update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2011. World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research (WHO/RHR) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Centre for Communications Programs (CCP) Knowledge for Health Project. Family planning: a global handbook for providers (2011 update). Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2011.
10.
go back to reference Hall K, O’Connell White K, Reame N, Westhoff C. Studying the use of oral contraception: a review of measurement approaches. J Women’s Heal. 2010;19(12):2203–9.CrossRef Hall K, O’Connell White K, Reame N, Westhoff C. Studying the use of oral contraception: a review of measurement approaches. J Women’s Heal. 2010;19(12):2203–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Westhoff C, Petrie K, Cremers S. Using changes in binding globulins to assess oral contraceptive compliance. Contraception. 2013;87:176–81.CrossRefPubMed Westhoff C, Petrie K, Cremers S. Using changes in binding globulins to assess oral contraceptive compliance. Contraception. 2013;87:176–81.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jay S, Durant R, Shoffitt T, Linder C, Litt I. Effect of peer counselors on adolescent compliance in use of oral contraceptives. Pediatrics. 1984;73(2):126–30.PubMed Jay S, Durant R, Shoffitt T, Linder C, Litt I. Effect of peer counselors on adolescent compliance in use of oral contraceptives. Pediatrics. 1984;73(2):126–30.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Potter L, Oakley D, Leon-Wong E, Cañamar R. Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users. Fam Plan Perspect. 1996;28(4):154–8.CrossRef Potter L, Oakley D, Leon-Wong E, Cañamar R. Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users. Fam Plan Perspect. 1996;28(4):154–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference George CF, Peveler RC, Heiliger S, Thompson C. Compliance with tricyclic antidepressants: the value of four different methods of assessment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(2):166–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral George CF, Peveler RC, Heiliger S, Thompson C. Compliance with tricyclic antidepressants: the value of four different methods of assessment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50(2):166–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Pop-Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, Zivin JG, Goldstein MP, de Walque D, et al. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS. 2011;25(6):825–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pop-Eleches C, Thirumurthy H, Habyarimana JP, Zivin JG, Goldstein MP, de Walque D, et al. Mobile phone technologies improve adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial of text message reminders. AIDS. 2011;25(6):825–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hou M, Hurwitz S, Kavanagh E, Fortin J, Goldberg A. Using daily text-message reminders to improve adherence with oral contraceptives: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(3):633–40.CrossRefPubMed Hou M, Hurwitz S, Kavanagh E, Fortin J, Goldberg A. Using daily text-message reminders to improve adherence with oral contraceptives: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(3):633–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Smith C, Vannak U, Sokhey L, Ngo TD, Gold J, Khut K, et al. MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning services (MOTIF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(427):1–9. Smith C, Vannak U, Sokhey L, Ngo TD, Gold J, Khut K, et al. MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning services (MOTIF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14(427):1–9.
Metadata
Title
Assessing the validity and reliability of self-report data on contraception use in the MObile Technology for Improved Family Planning (MOTIF) randomised controlled trial
Authors
Chris Smith
Phil Edwards
Caroline Free
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0494-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue