Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Health
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Abortion debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: textual analysis of experiential thinking and argumentation in parliamentary and layperson discussions

Authors: Anne-Mari Mustonen, Tommi Paakkonen, Esko Ryökäs, Petteri Nieminen

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ethical discussion about abortion has been polarized in Finland and the Republic of Ireland, two European countries with very different abortion legislation (liberal vs. highly restrictive). The aim of the present study was to analyze experiential thinking patterns and argumentative strategies in political and layperson debates regarding induced abortion.

Methods

The content of Finnish and Irish texts (n = 493), consisting of transcripts of parliamentary debates and online texts, such as blogs, was analyzed systematically. The texts were investigated for the aspects of experiential thinking, for selected argumentative moves and for any differences in the prevalence of these features between countries or between political vs. layperson debates.

Results

The Finnish and Irish discussions about induced abortion relied heavily on experiential thinking patterns and emotionally laden arguments instead of objective research data. This was evident in the very high prevalence of testimonials, narratives, loaded language and appeals to emotion in both political and layperson debates regardless of the country or the debater's position on abortion issue. Research data that did not support the position of the debater were relatively often omitted by confirmation bias. The Irish debaters appealed to popularity more often than the Finnish ones, while magical/religious thinking was mainly observed in the Finnish layperson discussion. The national history and the prevailing cultural and religious atmosphere of the two countries could explain these differences.

Conclusions

The abortion debate mostly reinforces the opinions of one's peer group rather than convinces the opposite party to change their position. The stalemate and continuation of the same arguments being repeated could be associated with experiential thinking and emotional argumentative strategies in both political and layperson debates.
Literature
1.
Kaposy C. Two stalemates in the philosophical debate about abortion and why they cannot be resolved using analogical arguments. Bioethics. 2012;26:84–92.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Stephens M, Jordens CFC, Kerridge IH, Ankeny RA. Religious perspectives on abortion and a secular response. J Relig Health. 2010;49:513–35.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Bloomer F, O’Dowd K. Restricted access to abortion in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: exploring abortion tourism and barriers to legal reform. Cult Health Sex. 2014;16:366–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
10.
11.
Taylor M. Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;130:93–7.CrossRef
12.
Aiken ARA, Gomperts R, Trussell J. Experiences and characteristics of women seeking and completing at-home medical termination of pregnancy through online telemedicine in Ireland and Northern Ireland: a population-based analysis. BJOG. 2016;124:1208–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Nieminen P, Lappalainen S, Ristimäki P, Myllykangas M, Mustonen A-M. Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finnish medical and nursing students and professionals. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
16.
Heino A, Gissler M. Induced abortions 2015. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare; 2016.
17.
Heino A, Gissler M, Apter D, Fiala C. Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013;18:231–3.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994;49:709–24.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
21.
22.
van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
23.
Yap A. Ad hominem fallacies, bias, and testimony. Argumentation. 2013;27:97–109.CrossRef
24.
Schonhardt-Bailey C. The congressional debate on partial-birth abortion: constitutional gravitas and moral passion. Br J Political Sci. 2008;38:383–410.CrossRef
25.
Childs S, Evans E, Webb P. “Quicker than a consultation at the hairdressers”: abortion and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. New Genet Soc. 2013;32:119–34.
26.
Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Fem Stud. 1987;13:263–92.CrossRef
27.
McNeil M. Putting the Alton Bill in context. In: Franklin S, Lury C, Stacey J, editors. Off-Centre: feminism and cultural studies. London: HarperCollins Academic; 1991. p. 149–59.
28.
Michaels MW. Fetal galaxies: some questions about what we see. In: Morgan LM, Michaels MW, editors. Fetal subjects, feminist positions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1999. p. 113–32.
29.
Boucher J. Ultrasound: a window to the womb?: Obstetric ultrasound and the abortion rights debate. J Med Humanit. 2004;25:7–19.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Walton DN. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996.
31.
Walton D. Historical origins of argumentum ad consequentiam. Argumentation. 1999;13:251–64.CrossRef
32.
Walton D. Criteria of rationality for evaluating democratic public rhetoric. In: Fontana B, Nederman CJ, Remer G, editors. Talking democracy: historical perspectives on rhetoric and democracy. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 2004. p. 295–330.
33.
Sahlane A. Argumentation and fallacy in the justification of the 2003 war on Iraq. Argumentation. 2012;26:459–88.CrossRef
34.
Nieminen P, Mustonen A-M. Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary theory. Evolution: Education and Outreach. 2014;7:11.
35.
Bennett B. Logically fallacious: the ultimate collection of over 300 logical fallacies. Sudbury: Archieboy Holdings; 2015.
36.
37.
Smyth L. Narratives of Irishness and the problem of abortion: the X case 1992. Fem Rev. 1998;no 60:61–83.CrossRef
38.
39.
Mazilu S. Strategic use of emotional terms in ethical argumentation on abortion. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria. 2008;XVI:683–95.
40.
Larsson S, Eliasson M, Klingberg Allvin M, Faxelid E, Atuyambe L, Fritzell S. The discourses on induced abortion in Ugandan daily newspapers: a discourse analysis. Reprod Health. 2015;12:58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
42.
43.
van Ditzhuijzen J, ten Have M, de Graaf R, Lugtig P, van Nijnatten CHCJ, Vollebergh WAM. Incidence and recurrence of common mental disorders after abortion: results from a prospective cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:200–6.CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
Ralph LJ, Greene Foster D, Kimport K, Turok D, Roberts SCM. Measuring decisional certainty among women seeking abortion. Contraception. 2017;95:269–78.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Mikołajczak M, Bilewicz M. Foetus or child? Abortion discourse and attributions of humanness. Br J Soc Psychol. 2015;54:500–18.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Jerit J. Survival of the fittest: rhetoric during the course of an election campaign. Polit Psychol. 2004;25:563–75.CrossRef
48.
de Londras F, Graham L. Impossible floodgates and unworkable analogies in the Irish abortion debate. Irish J Legal Studies. 2013;3:54–75.
49.
Andone C. Argumentative patterns in the political domain: the case of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. Argumentation. 2016;30:45–60.CrossRef
50.
51.
Höllinger F, Haller M, Valle-Höllinger A. Christian religion, society and the state in the modern world. Innovat Eur J Soc Sci Res. 2007;20:133–57.CrossRef
52.
Ketola K. Religiosity of Finnish people. In: Ketola K, Niemelä K, Palmu H, Salomäki H, editors. Religion in the life of Finnish people: religious upbringing, morality, happiness and tolerance with international comparison. Yhteiskuntatieteellisen tietoarkiston julkaisuja 9. Tampere: University of Tampere; 2011. p. 7–24. [in Finnish].
53.
Talonen J. Interpretation of the Bible in Finnish revivalist movements. In: Hytönen M, editor. Bible and faith of the church today. Tampere: Church Research Institute; 2004. p. 108–27. [in Finnish].
54.
Daniel K. An assessment of the Catholic charismatic renewal towards peaceful co-existence in the Roman Catholic Church. Int J Sociol Anthropol. 2010;2:171–7.
55.
56.
Murphy G. Ireland. In: Bitonti A, Harris P, editors. Lobbying in Europe: public affairs and the lobbying industry in 28 EU countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017. p. 195–205.CrossRef
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
Metadata
Title
Abortion debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: textual analysis of experiential thinking and argumentation in parliamentary and layperson discussions
Authors
Anne-Mari Mustonen
Tommi Paakkonen
Esko Ryökäs
Petteri Nieminen
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0418-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Reproductive Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

Echoes of old HIV paradigms: reassessing the problem of engaging men in HIV testing and treatment through women’s perspectives

Editorial

New era towards advancing in girls’ and women’s health and rights?

Research

Adolescent deliveries in rural Cameroon: an 8-year trend, prevalence and adverse maternofoetal outcomes

Review

What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review

Commentary

Silence sexual and reproductive health discussions and we fuel the rise of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa

Research

Evaluating implementation of the World Health Organization’s Strategic Approach to strengthening sexual and reproductive health policies and programs to address unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion