Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Barriers to utilisation of antenatal care services in South Sudan: a qualitative study in Rumbek North County

Authors: Calistus Wilunda, Chiara Scanagatta, Giovanni Putoto, Francesca Montalbetti, Giulia Segafredo, Risa Takahashi, Serge André Mizerero, Ana Pilar Betrán

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Access to adequate antenatal care (ANC) is critical in ensuring a good maternal health and in preventing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. South Sudan has one of the world’s poorest health indicators due to a fragile health system and a combination of socio-cultural, economic, and political factors. This study was conducted to identify barriers to utilisation of ANC services in Rumbek North County.

Methods

Using a qualitative design, data were collected through 14 focus group discussions with 169 women and 45 men and 12 key informant interviews with community leaders, staff working in health facilities, and the staff of the County Health Department. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results

The perceived barriers to ANC utilisation were categorised as follows: 1) Issues related to access to health facilities and lack of resources. These included long distance to health facilities, lack of means of transportation to the health facilities, floods and poor roads, and demand for payment for health care at some health facilities; 2) The influence of the socio-cultural context and conflict including heavy burden of domestic chores, the negative influence of husbands who were reluctant to allow their wives to attend ANC, and insecurity; 3) Perceptions about pregnancy including misperceptions about the benefits of ANC and low perceived risk of pregnancy-related complications; and 4) Perceptions about the quality of care and the efficacy of medical treatment.

Conclusions

This study identified a myriad of factors deeply entrenched in the society, which prevent women from utilising ANC services. It also elicits broad aspects of interconnectedness among the barriers. To ensure effectiveness, strategies to improve utilisation of ANC in the study area and in similar contexts need to take into account the barriers identified by this study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Improving Birth Outcomes. Improving Birth Outcomes: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Improving Birth Outcomes. Improving Birth Outcomes: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003.
3.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
4.
go back to reference Ministry of Health, National Bureau of Statistics. The Republic of South Sudan: the Sudan Household Health Survey 2010. Juba: National Bureau of Statistics; 2010. Ministry of Health, National Bureau of Statistics. The Republic of South Sudan: the Sudan Household Health Survey 2010. Juba: National Bureau of Statistics; 2010.
6.
go back to reference Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Health. Health Sector Development Plan 2012–2016. Juba: Ministry of Health; 2012. Republic of South Sudan Ministry of Health. Health Sector Development Plan 2012–2016. Juba: Ministry of Health; 2012.
7.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. Basic Package of Health and Nutrition Services For Southern Sudan. Juba: Government of Southern Sudan; 2009. Ministry of Health. Basic Package of Health and Nutrition Services For Southern Sudan. Juba: Government of Southern Sudan; 2009.
8.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. The Reproductive Health Policy. Juba: Ministry of Health, Government of the Republic of South Sudan; 2013. Ministry of Health. The Reproductive Health Policy. Juba: Ministry of Health, Government of the Republic of South Sudan; 2013.
11.
12.
go back to reference National Bureau of Statistics. South Sudan Statistical Yearbook 2011. Juba: National Bureau of Statistics; 2011. National Bureau of Statistics. South Sudan Statistical Yearbook 2011. Juba: National Bureau of Statistics; 2011.
17.
go back to reference BBC Media Action. Understanding knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices around reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health in South Sudan. London: BBC Media Action; 2013. BBC Media Action. Understanding knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices around reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health in South Sudan. London: BBC Media Action; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Barriers to utilisation of antenatal care services in South Sudan: a qualitative study in Rumbek North County
Authors
Calistus Wilunda
Chiara Scanagatta
Giovanni Putoto
Francesca Montalbetti
Giulia Segafredo
Risa Takahashi
Serge André Mizerero
Ana Pilar Betrán
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0327-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Reproductive Health 1/2017 Go to the issue