Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Priorities for family building among patients and partners seeking treatment for infertility

Authors: Elizabeth A. Duthie, Alexandra Cooper, Joseph B. Davis, Jay Sandlow, Katherine D. Schoyer, Estil Strawn, Kathryn E. Flynn

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Infertility treatment decisions require people to balance multiple priorities. Within couples, partners must also negotiate priorities with one another. In this study, we assessed the family-building priorities of couples prior to their first consultations with a reproductive specialist.

Methods

Participants were couples who had upcoming first consultations with a reproductive specialist (N = 59 couples (59 women; 59 men)). Prior to the consultation, couples separately completed the Family-Building Priorities Tool, which tasked them with ranking from least to most important 10 factors associated with family building. We describe the highest (top three) and lowest (bottom three) priorities, the alignment of priorities within couples, and test for differences in prioritization between men and women within couples (Wilcoxon signed rank test).

Results

Maintaining a close and satisfying relationship with one’s partner was ranked as a high priority by majorities of men and women, and in 25% of couples, both partners ranked this factor as their most important priority for family building. Majorities of men and women also ranked building a family in a way that does not make infertility obvious to others as a low priority, and in 27% of couples, both partners ranked this factor as the least important priority for family building. There were also differences within couples that involved either men or women ranking a particular goal more highly than their partners. More women ranked two factors higher than did their partners: 1) that I become a parent one way or another (p = 0.015) and 2) that I have a child in the next year or two (p < 0.001), whereas more men ranked 4 factors higher than their partners: 1) that our child has [woman’s] genes (p = 0.025), 2) that our child has [man’s] genes (p < 0.001), 3) that I maintain a close relationship with my partner (p = 0.034), and 4) that I avoid side effects from treatment (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Clinicians who support patients in assessing available family-building paths should be aware that: (1) patients balance multiple priorities as a part of, or beside, becoming a parent; and (2) patients and their partners may not be aligned in their prioritization of achieving parenthood. For infertility patients who are in relationships, clinicians should encourage the active participation of both partners as well as frank discussions about each partner’s priorities for building their family.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Manser M, Brown M. Marriage and household decision-making: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev. 1980;21(1):31–44.CrossRef Manser M, Brown M. Marriage and household decision-making: a bargaining analysis. Int Econ Rev. 1980;21(1):31–44.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Becker GS. A theory of marriage: part I. J Polit Econ. 1973;81(4):813–46.CrossRef Becker GS. A theory of marriage: part I. J Polit Econ. 1973;81(4):813–46.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Becker GS. A theory of marriage: part II. J Polit Econ. 1974;82(2):S11–26.CrossRef Becker GS. A theory of marriage: part II. J Polit Econ. 1974;82(2):S11–26.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gottman J, Notarius C, Markman H, Bank S, Yoppi B, Rubin ME. Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34(1):14–23.CrossRef Gottman J, Notarius C, Markman H, Bank S, Yoppi B, Rubin ME. Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34(1):14–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Godwin DD, Scanzoni J. Couple consensus during marital joint decision-making: a context, process, outcome model. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51(4):943–56.CrossRef Godwin DD, Scanzoni J. Couple consensus during marital joint decision-making: a context, process, outcome model. J Marriage Fam. 1989;51(4):943–56.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shornack LL. Exchange theory and the family. Int Soc Sci Rev. 1986;61(2):51–60. Shornack LL. Exchange theory and the family. Int Soc Sci Rev. 1986;61(2):51–60.
9.
go back to reference Rank MR, LeCroy CW. Toward a multiple perspective in family theory and practice: the case of social exchange theory, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory. Fam Relat. 1983;32(3):441–8.CrossRef Rank MR, LeCroy CW. Toward a multiple perspective in family theory and practice: the case of social exchange theory, symbolic interactionism, and conflict theory. Fam Relat. 1983;32(3):441–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hill W, Scanzoni J. An approach for assessing marital decision-making processes. J Marriage Fam. 1982;44(4):927–41.CrossRef Hill W, Scanzoni J. An approach for assessing marital decision-making processes. J Marriage Fam. 1982;44(4):927–41.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McDonald GW. Structural exchange and marital interaction. J Marriage Fam. 1981;43(4):825–39.CrossRef McDonald GW. Structural exchange and marital interaction. J Marriage Fam. 1981;43(4):825–39.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Challiol H, Mignonac K. Relocation decision‐making and couple relationships: a quantitative and qualitative study of dual‐earner couples. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(3):247–74.CrossRef Challiol H, Mignonac K. Relocation decision‐making and couple relationships: a quantitative and qualitative study of dual‐earner couples. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(3):247–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Davis HL. Decision making within the household. J Consum Res. 1976;2(4):241–60.CrossRef Davis HL. Decision making within the household. J Consum Res. 1976;2(4):241–60.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kulczycki A. Husband-wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey. Int Fam Plan Perspec. 2008;34(3):127–37.CrossRef Kulczycki A. Husband-wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey. Int Fam Plan Perspec. 2008;34(3):127–37.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harvey SM, Beckman LJ, Browner CH, Sherman CA. Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: an exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin. J Sex Res. 2002;39(4):284–91.CrossRefPubMed Harvey SM, Beckman LJ, Browner CH, Sherman CA. Relationship power, decision making, and sexual relations: an exploratory study with couples of Mexican origin. J Sex Res. 2002;39(4):284–91.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Miller WB, Millstein SG, Pasta DJ. The measurement of childbearing motivation in couples considering the use of assisted reproductive technology. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2008;54(1):8–32.CrossRefPubMed Miller WB, Millstein SG, Pasta DJ. The measurement of childbearing motivation in couples considering the use of assisted reproductive technology. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2008;54(1):8–32.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Langdridge D, Connolly K, Sheeran P. Reasons for wanting a child: a network analytic study. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2000;18(4):321–38.CrossRef Langdridge D, Connolly K, Sheeran P. Reasons for wanting a child: a network analytic study. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2000;18(4):321–38.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Phillips E, Elander J, Montague J. Managing multiple goals during fertility treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol. 2014;19(4):531–43.CrossRefPubMed Phillips E, Elander J, Montague J. Managing multiple goals during fertility treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol. 2014;19(4):531–43.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Thompson EH, Woodward JT, Stanton AL. Dyadic goal appraisal during treatment for infertility: how do different perspectives relate to partners’ adjustment? Int J Behav Med. 2012;19(3):252–9.CrossRefPubMed Thompson EH, Woodward JT, Stanton AL. Dyadic goal appraisal during treatment for infertility: how do different perspectives relate to partners’ adjustment? Int J Behav Med. 2012;19(3):252–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Langdridge D, Sheeran P, Connolly K. Understanding the reasons for parenthood. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2005;23(2):121–33.CrossRef Langdridge D, Sheeran P, Connolly K. Understanding the reasons for parenthood. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2005;23(2):121–33.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cassidy T, Sintrovani P. Motives for parenthood, psychosocial factors and health in women undergoing IVF. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2008;26(1):4–17.CrossRef Cassidy T, Sintrovani P. Motives for parenthood, psychosocial factors and health in women undergoing IVF. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2008;26(1):4–17.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ford M. Navigating the Land of IF. Berkeley: Seal Press; 2009. Ford M. Navigating the Land of IF. Berkeley: Seal Press; 2009.
23.
go back to reference Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2004. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2004.
24.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, Dewalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, Dewalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Pfeifer S, Butts S, Fossum G, Gracia C, La Barbera A, Mersereau J, Odem R, Paulson R, Penzias A, Pisarska M, Rebar R, Reindollar R, Rosen M, Sandlow J, Vernon M. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):52–8.CrossRef Pfeifer S, Butts S, Fossum G, Gracia C, La Barbera A, Mersereau J, Odem R, Paulson R, Penzias A, Pisarska M, Rebar R, Reindollar R, Rosen M, Sandlow J, Vernon M. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):52–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Katz P, Showstack J, Smith JF, Nachtigall RD, Millstein SG, Wing H, Eisenberg ML, Pasch LA, Croughan MS, Adler N. Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):915–21.CrossRefPubMed Katz P, Showstack J, Smith JF, Nachtigall RD, Millstein SG, Wing H, Eisenberg ML, Pasch LA, Croughan MS, Adler N. Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):915–21.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Van Empel IWH, Dancet EAF, Koolman XHE, Nelen WLDM, Stolk EA, Sermeus W, D’Hooghe TM, Kremer JAM. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):584–93.CrossRefPubMed Van Empel IWH, Dancet EAF, Koolman XHE, Nelen WLDM, Stolk EA, Sermeus W, D’Hooghe TM, Kremer JAM. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):584–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Priorities for family building among patients and partners seeking treatment for infertility
Authors
Elizabeth A. Duthie
Alexandra Cooper
Joseph B. Davis
Jay Sandlow
Katherine D. Schoyer
Estil Strawn
Kathryn E. Flynn
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0311-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Reproductive Health 1/2017 Go to the issue