Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study

Authors: Kazuyo Machiyama, John B. Casterline, Joyce N. Mumah, Fauzia Akhter Huda, Francis Obare, George Odwe, Caroline W. Kabiru, Sharifa Yeasmin, John Cleland

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Unmet need for family planning points to the gap between women’s reproductive desire to avoid pregnancy and contraceptive behaviour. An estimated 222 million women in low- and middle-income countries have unmet need for modern contraception. Despite its prevalence, there has been little rigorous research during the past fifteen years on reasons for this widespread failure to implement childbearing desires in contraceptive practice. There is demographic survey data on women’s self-reported reasons for non-use, but these data provide limited insight on the full set of possible obstacles to use, and one may doubt the meaningfulness of explanations provided by non-users alone. To rectify this evidence gap, this study will gather extensive information on women’s perceptions of contraception (generic and method-specific) and their past contraceptive experience, and it will allow for more complexity in fertility preferences than is standard in demographic surveys.

Methods

A multi-site cohort study will be conducted in urban Kenya, rural Kenya, and rural Bangladesh. In each setting trained fieldworkers will recruit and interview 2600 women, with participants re-interviewed at 12 and 18 months. Data will be collected using a questionnaire whose development was informed by a review of existing literature and instruments from past studies in both developed and developing countries. Dozens of experts in the field were consulted as the instrument was developed. The questionnaire has three main components: a sub-set of Demographic and Health Survey items measuring socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive history, and sexual activity; additional questions on prospective and retrospective fertility preferences designed to capture ambivalence and uncertainty; and two large blocks of items on (i) generic concerns about contraception and (ii) method-specific attributes. The method-specific items encompass eight modern and traditional methods.

Discussion

Policy and programmes intended to reduce unmet need for contraception in developing countries should be informed by clear understanding of the causes of this phenomenon to better reflect the population needs and to more effectively target planning and investments. To this end, this study will field an innovative instrument in Kenya and Bangladesh. The information to be collected will support a rigorous assessment of reasons for unmet need for family planning.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Casterline JB, Sinding SW. Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Popul Dev Rev. 2000;26(4):691–723.CrossRef Casterline JB, Sinding SW. Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Popul Dev Rev. 2000;26(4):691–723.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M. Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2006;37(2):87–98.CrossRefPubMed Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M. Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2006;37(2):87–98.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Casterline JB, Perez AE, Biddlecom AE. Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines. Stud Fam Plann. 1997;28(3):173–91.CrossRefPubMed Casterline JB, Perez AE, Biddlecom AE. Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines. Stud Fam Plann. 1997;28(3):173–91.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Tsui AO, Ochoa LH. Service proximity as a determinant of contraceptive behavior: evidence from cross-national studies of survey data. In: Phillips JF, Ross JA, editors. The role of family planning programs as a fertility determinant. London: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 222–56. Tsui AO, Ochoa LH. Service proximity as a determinant of contraceptive behavior: evidence from cross-national studies of survey data. In: Phillips JF, Ross JA, editors. The role of family planning programs as a fertility determinant. London: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 222–56.
8.
go back to reference Molyneaux JW, Gertler PJ. The impact of targeted family planning programs in Indonesia. Popul Dev Rev. 2000;26(Suppl):61–85. Molyneaux JW, Gertler PJ. The impact of targeted family planning programs in Indonesia. Popul Dev Rev. 2000;26(Suppl):61–85.
9.
go back to reference Casterline JB, Sathar Z, Haque M. Obstacles to contraceptive use in Pakistan: a study in Punjab. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;26(Suppl):61–85. Casterline JB, Sathar Z, Haque M. Obstacles to contraceptive use in Pakistan: a study in Punjab. Stud Fam Plann. 2001;26(Suppl):61–85.
10.
go back to reference Rutenberg N, Watkins SC. The buzz outside the clinics: conversations and contraception in Nyanza province, Kenya. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;28(4):290–307.CrossRef Rutenberg N, Watkins SC. The buzz outside the clinics: conversations and contraception in Nyanza province, Kenya. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;28(4):290–307.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bankole A, Westoff CF. The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco. J Biosoc Sci. 1998;30(4):439–55.CrossRefPubMed Bankole A, Westoff CF. The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: evidence from Morocco. J Biosoc Sci. 1998;30(4):439–55.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Casterline JB, El-Zanaty F, El-Zeini LO. Unmet need and unintended fertility: longitudinal evidence from Upper Egypt. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003;29(4):158–66.CrossRefPubMed Casterline JB, El-Zanaty F, El-Zeini LO. Unmet need and unintended fertility: longitudinal evidence from Upper Egypt. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003;29(4):158–66.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bradley SEK, Croft TN, Fishel JD, Westoff CF. Revising unmet need for family planning. DHS Analytical Studies. No. 25. Calverton: ICF Macro; 2012. Bradley SEK, Croft TN, Fishel JD, Westoff CF. Revising unmet need for family planning. DHS Analytical Studies. No. 25. Calverton: ICF Macro; 2012.
18.
19.
go back to reference Koenig MA, Acharya R, Singh S. Do current measurement approaches underestimate levels of unwanted childbearing? Evidence from rural India. Popul Stud. 2006. doi:10.1080/00324720600895819. Koenig MA, Acharya R, Singh S. Do current measurement approaches underestimate levels of unwanted childbearing? Evidence from rural India. Popul Stud. 2006. doi:10.​1080/​0032472060089581​9.
20.
go back to reference Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Orr MG, Finer LB, Speizer I. Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Stud Fam Plann. 2009;40(2):87–100.CrossRefPubMed Santelli JS, Lindberg LD, Orr MG, Finer LB, Speizer I. Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Stud Fam Plann. 2009;40(2):87–100.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Barrett G, Wellings K. What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(4):545–57.CrossRefPubMed Barrett G, Wellings K. What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(4):545–57.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Aiken AR, Westhoff CL, Trussell J, Castano PM. Comparison of a timi ng-based measure of unintended pregnancy and the London measure of unplanned pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016. doi:10.1363/48e11316. Aiken AR, Westhoff CL, Trussell J, Castano PM. Comparison of a timi ng-based measure of unintended pregnancy and the London measure of unplanned pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016. doi:10.​1363/​48e11316.
26.
go back to reference Bongaarts J, Bruce J. The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services. Stud Fam Plann. 1995;26(2):57–75.CrossRefPubMed Bongaarts J, Bruce J. The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services. Stud Fam Plann. 1995;26(2):57–75.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Westoff CF, Bankole A. Unmet need: 1990–1994. DHS comparative studies. Calverton: Macro International; 1995. Westoff CF, Bankole A. Unmet need: 1990–1994. DHS comparative studies. Calverton: Macro International; 1995.
30.
go back to reference United Nations. Chapter 5 Fertility preferences and contraceptive use. In: Levels and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 1998. New York: United Nations; 1999. p. 103–34. United Nations. Chapter 5 Fertility preferences and contraceptive use. In: Levels and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 1998. New York: United Nations; 1999. p. 103–34.
31.
32.
go back to reference Dixon-Mueller R, Germain A. Stalking the elusive “unmet need” for family planning. Stud Fam Plann. 1992;23(5):330–5.CrossRefPubMed Dixon-Mueller R, Germain A. Stalking the elusive “unmet need” for family planning. Stud Fam Plann. 1992;23(5):330–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Population Council. Conceptualizing and measuring unintended pregnancy and birth: moving the field forward. STEP UP meeting report. Accra: Population Council; 2015. Population Council. Conceptualizing and measuring unintended pregnancy and birth: moving the field forward. STEP UP meeting report. Accra: Population Council; 2015.
36.
go back to reference Westoff CF. Desired number of children: 2000–2008. DHS Comparative Reports. No.25. Calverton: ICF Macro; 2010. Westoff CF. Desired number of children: 2000–2008. DHS Comparative Reports. No.25. Calverton: ICF Macro; 2010.
37.
go back to reference Machiyama K, Cleland J. Insights into unmet need in Senegal. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2013. Machiyama K, Cleland J. Insights into unmet need in Senegal. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2013.
39.
go back to reference Barden-O’Fallon J, Speizer I. What differentiates method stoppers from switchers? contraceptive discontinuation and switching among Honduran women. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2011. doi:10.1363/3701611. Barden-O’Fallon J, Speizer I. What differentiates method stoppers from switchers? contraceptive discontinuation and switching among Honduran women. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2011. doi:10.​1363/​3701611.
40.
go back to reference Gueye A, Speizer IS, Corroon M, Okigbo CC. Belief in family planning myths at the individual and community levels and modern contraceptive use in urban Africa. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015. doi:10.1363/4119115.PubMedPubMedCentral Gueye A, Speizer IS, Corroon M, Okigbo CC. Belief in family planning myths at the individual and community levels and modern contraceptive use in urban Africa. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015. doi:10.​1363/​4119115.PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Marston C, Renedo A, Nyaaba G, Machiyama KPT. Understanding fertility regulation strategies among educated women in Accra. STEP UP Research Report. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2016. Marston C, Renedo A, Nyaaba G, Machiyama KPT. Understanding fertility regulation strategies among educated women in Accra. STEP UP Research Report. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2016.
43.
go back to reference Bailey C. Hormonal contraceptives, duration of use and the experience of side effects in Southern Ghana. Paper presented at XXVII IUSSP International Population Conference: 26–31 August 2013 2013; Busan, Republic of Korea; 2013. Bailey C. Hormonal contraceptives, duration of use and the experience of side effects in Southern Ghana. Paper presented at XXVII IUSSP International Population Conference: 26–31 August 2013 2013; Busan, Republic of Korea; 2013.
46.
go back to reference Bradley SEK, Schwandt HM, Khan S. Levels, trends, and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation. DHS Analytical Studies. Calverton: ICF Macro; 2009. Bradley SEK, Schwandt HM, Khan S. Levels, trends, and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation. DHS Analytical Studies. Calverton: ICF Macro; 2009.
47.
go back to reference El-Zanaty F, Way AA, Kishor S, Casterline JB. Egypt in-depth study on reasons for nonuse of family planning. Cairo: National Population Council; 1999. El-Zanaty F, Way AA, Kishor S, Casterline JB. Egypt in-depth study on reasons for nonuse of family planning. Cairo: National Population Council; 1999.
48.
go back to reference Khan R, Kerry LDM, Quamrun N, Sultana M. The men are away: pregnancy risk and family planning needs among women with a migrant husband in Barisal, Bangladesh. DHS Further Analysis Reports. No 98. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Rockville, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), ICF International; 2016. Khan R, Kerry LDM, Quamrun N, Sultana M. The men are away: pregnancy risk and family planning needs among women with a migrant husband in Barisal, Bangladesh. DHS Further Analysis Reports. No 98. Dhaka, Bangladesh and Rockville, Maryland, USA: National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), ICF International; 2016.
49.
go back to reference Ban B, Karki S, Shrestha A, Hodgins S. Spousal separation and interpretation of contraceptive use and unmet need in rural Nepal. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012. doi:10.1363/3804312.PubMed Ban B, Karki S, Shrestha A, Hodgins S. Spousal separation and interpretation of contraceptive use and unmet need in rural Nepal. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012. doi:10.​1363/​3804312.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Bankole A, Audam S. Fertility preferences and contraceptive use among couples in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr Popul Stud. 2011;25(2):556–86. Bankole A, Audam S. Fertility preferences and contraceptive use among couples in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr Popul Stud. 2011;25(2):556–86.
51.
go back to reference Baschieri A, Cleland J, Floyd S, Dube ALN, Msona A, Molesworth A, French N. Reproductive preferences and contraceptive use: a comparison of monogamous and polygamous couples in Northern Malawi. J Biosoc Sci. 2013. doi:10.1017/S0021932012000569.PubMed Baschieri A, Cleland J, Floyd S, Dube ALN, Msona A, Molesworth A, French N. Reproductive preferences and contraceptive use: a comparison of monogamous and polygamous couples in Northern Malawi. J Biosoc Sci. 2013. doi:10.​1017/​S002193201200056​9.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Beguy D, Elung’ata P, Mberu B, Oduor C, Wamukoya M, Nganyi B, Ezeh A. Health & demographic surveillance system profile: the Nairobi urban health and demographic surveillance system (NUHDSS). Int J Epidemiol. 2015. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu251.PubMed Beguy D, Elung’ata P, Mberu B, Oduor C, Wamukoya M, Nganyi B, Ezeh A. Health & demographic surveillance system profile: the Nairobi urban health and demographic surveillance system (NUHDSS). Int J Epidemiol. 2015. doi:10.​1093/​ije/​dyu251.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). The 2009 Kenya Population and Housing Census Report: Volume 1C—Population Distribution by Age, Sex and Administrative Units. Nairobi, Kenya 2010. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). The 2009 Kenya Population and Housing Census Report: Volume 1C—Population Distribution by Age, Sex and Administrative Units. Nairobi, Kenya 2010.
54.
go back to reference Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health, National AIDS Control Council, Kenya Medical Research Institute, National Council for Population and Development, ICF International. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Calverton: KNBS and ICF Macro; 2015. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Health, National AIDS Control Council, Kenya Medical Research Institute, National Council for Population and Development, ICF International. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Calverton: KNBS and ICF Macro; 2015.
55.
go back to reference National AIDS Control Council. Kenya AIDS Response Progress Report 2014: progress towards zero. Nairobi: National AIDS Control Council; 2014. National AIDS Control Council. Kenya AIDS Response Progress Report 2014: progress towards zero. Nairobi: National AIDS Control Council; 2014.
56.
go back to reference icddr,b. Registration of health and demographic events 2014. Scientific Report. No.133. Dhaka: icddr, b; 2016. icddr,b. Registration of health and demographic events 2014. Scientific Report. No.133. Dhaka: icddr, b; 2016.
57.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003.CrossRef Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: protocol for a multi-site cohort study
Authors
Kazuyo Machiyama
John B. Casterline
Joyce N. Mumah
Fauzia Akhter Huda
Francis Obare
George Odwe
Caroline W. Kabiru
Sharifa Yeasmin
John Cleland
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0268-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Reproductive Health 1/2017 Go to the issue