Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

An exploratory study of what happens to women who are denied abortions in Cape Town, South Africa

Authors: Jane Harries, Caitlin Gerdts, Mariette Momberg, Diana Greene Foster

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the change in legal status of abortion in South Africa in 1996, barriers to access remain. Stigma associated with abortion provision and care, privacy concerns, and negative provider attitudes often discourage women from seeking legal abortion services and sometimes force women outside of the legal system.
What happens when women present for abortion at a designated abortion facility and are denied abortions due to gestational limits or other factors–is unknown. Whether women seek care at referral facilities, seek illegal abortion, or carry pregnancies to term has never been documented. This study, part of a multi-country Global Turnaway Study, explored the experiences of women after denial of legal abortion services.

Methods

Qualitative research methods were used to collect data at two non-governmental organization health care facilities providing abortion services. In depth interviews were held with women 2 to 3 months after they were denied an abortion. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

The most common reason for being turned away was due to gestational age over 12 weeks with some women denied abortions that day because they did not have enough money to pay for the procedure. Almost all women were extremely upset at being denied an abortion on the day that they visited the health care facility. Some women were so distressed that they openly discussed the option of seeking an illegal provider or exploring the possibility of securing another health care professional who would assist them.

Conclusions

Despite South Africa’s liberal abortion law and the relatively widespread availability of abortion services in urban settings, women in South Africa are denied abortion services largely due to being beyond the legal limits to obtain an abortion. A high proportion of women who were initially denied an abortion at legal facilities went on to seek options for pregnancy termination outside of the legal system through internet searches--some of which could have led to unsafe abortion practices. Further efforts should be directed towards informing women in all communities about the availability of free services in the public sector and educating them about the dangers of unsafe methods of pregnancy termination.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jewkes R, Rees H. Dramatic decline in abortion related mortality due to the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act. S Afr Med J. 2005;95(4):250.PubMed Jewkes R, Rees H. Dramatic decline in abortion related mortality due to the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act. S Afr Med J. 2005;95(4):250.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Constant D, Grossman D, Lince N, Harries J. Self- induction of abortion among women accessing second trimester abortion services in the public sector, Western Cape, South Africa: an exploratory study. S Afr Med. 2014;104(4):302–5.CrossRef Constant D, Grossman D, Lince N, Harries J. Self- induction of abortion among women accessing second trimester abortion services in the public sector, Western Cape, South Africa: an exploratory study. S Afr Med. 2014;104(4):302–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Orner P, De Bruyn M, Harries J, Cooper D. A qualitative exploration of HIV- positive pregnant women’s decision-making regarding abortion in Cape Town, South Africa. SAHARA J. 2010;7(2):44–51.CrossRefPubMed Orner P, De Bruyn M, Harries J, Cooper D. A qualitative exploration of HIV- positive pregnant women’s decision-making regarding abortion in Cape Town, South Africa. SAHARA J. 2010;7(2):44–51.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Harries J, Orner P, Gabriel M, Mitchell E. Delays in seeking an abortion in the second trimester: a qualitative study in South Africa. Reprod Health. 2007;4:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harries J, Orner P, Gabriel M, Mitchell E. Delays in seeking an abortion in the second trimester: a qualitative study in South Africa. Reprod Health. 2007;4:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Trueman KA, Magwentshu M. Abortion in a progressive legal environment: the need for vigilance in protecting and promoting access to safe abortion services in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):397–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trueman KA, Magwentshu M. Abortion in a progressive legal environment: the need for vigilance in protecting and promoting access to safe abortion services in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):397–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Jewkes R, Gumede T, Westaway M, Dickson K, Brown H, Rees H. Why are women still aborting outside designated facilities in metropolitan South Africa? BJOG. 2005;112(9):1236–42.CrossRefPubMed Jewkes R, Gumede T, Westaway M, Dickson K, Brown H, Rees H. Why are women still aborting outside designated facilities in metropolitan South Africa? BJOG. 2005;112(9):1236–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Harries J, Cooper D, Strebel A, Colvin CJ. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harries J, Cooper D, Strebel A, Colvin CJ. Conscientious objection and its impact on abortion service provision in South Africa: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA, Jones RK, Barar RE, Foster DG. Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1687–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Upadhyay UD, Weitz TA, Jones RK, Barar RE, Foster DG. Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(9):1687–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Gerdts C, DePiñeres T, Hajri S, Harries J, Hossain A, Puri M, et al. Denial of abortion in legal settings. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;0:1–3. doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100999. Gerdts C, DePiñeres T, Hajri S, Harries J, Hossain A, Puri M, et al. Denial of abortion in legal settings. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;0:1–3. doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100999.
11.
go back to reference Harries J, Lince N, Constant D, Hargey A, Grossman D. The challenges of offering public second trimester abortion services in South Africa: Healthcare providers’ perspectives. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(2):197–208.CrossRefPubMed Harries J, Lince N, Constant D, Hargey A, Grossman D. The challenges of offering public second trimester abortion services in South Africa: Healthcare providers’ perspectives. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(2):197–208.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Turner KL, Hyman AG, Gabriel MC. Clarifying values and transforming attitudes to improve access to second trimester abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(31):108–16.CrossRefPubMed Turner KL, Hyman AG, Gabriel MC. Clarifying values and transforming attitudes to improve access to second trimester abortion. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(31):108–16.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Harrison A, Montgomery E, Lurie M, Wilkinson D. Barriers to implementing South Africa’s Termination of Pregnancy Act in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(4):424–31.CrossRefPubMed Harrison A, Montgomery E, Lurie M, Wilkinson D. Barriers to implementing South Africa’s Termination of Pregnancy Act in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(4):424–31.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Varkey SJ. Abortion services in South Africa: available yet not accessible to all. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;26(2):87–8.CrossRef Varkey SJ. Abortion services in South Africa: available yet not accessible to all. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;26(2):87–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An exploratory study of what happens to women who are denied abortions in Cape Town, South Africa
Authors
Jane Harries
Caitlin Gerdts
Mariette Momberg
Diana Greene Foster
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0014-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Reproductive Health 1/2015 Go to the issue