Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

A pilot study on patient-related costs and factors associated with the cost of specialist palliative care in the hospital: first steps towards a patient classification system in Germany

Authors: Christian Becker, Reiner Leidl, Eva Schildmann, Farina Hodiamont, Claudia Bausewein

Published in: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Specialist palliative care in the hospital addresses a heterogeneous patient population with complex care needs. In Germany, palliative care patients are classified based on their primary diagnosis to determine reimbursement despite findings that other factors describe patient needs better. To facilitate adequate resource allocation in this setting, in Australia and in the UK important steps have been undertaken towards identifying drivers of palliative care resource use and classifying patients accordingly. We aimed to pioneer patient classification based on determinants of resource use relevant to specialist palliative care in Germany first, by calculating the patient-level cost of specialist palliative care from the hospital’s perspective, based on the recorded resource use and, subsequently, by analysing influencing factors.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of consecutive patients who had an episode of specialist palliative care in Munich University Hospital between 20 June and 4 August, 2016. To accurately reflect personnel intensity of specialist palliative care, aside from administrative data, we recorded actual use of all involved health professionals’ labour time at patient level. Factors influencing episode costs were assessed using generalized linear regression and LASSO variable selection.

Results

The study included 144 patients. Mean costs of specialist palliative care per palliative care unit episode were 6542€ (median: 5789€, SE: 715€) and 823€ (median: 702€, SE: 31€) per consultation episode. Based on multivariate models that considered both variables recorded at beginning and at the end of episode, we identified factors explaining episode cost including phase of illness, Karnofsky performance score, and type of discharge.

Conclusions

This study is an important step towards patient classification in specialist palliative care in Germany as it provides a feasible patient-level costing method and identifies possible starting points for classification. Application to a larger sample will allow for meaningful classification of palliative patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kruse A. The special requirements of old age in terms of dying. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017;60(1):18–25.CrossRef Kruse A. The special requirements of old age in terms of dying. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017;60(1):18–25.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scholten N, et al. The size of the population potentially in need of palliative care in Germany—an estimation based on death registration data. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15:29.CrossRef Scholten N, et al. The size of the population potentially in need of palliative care in Germany—an estimation based on death registration data. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15:29.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Simon ST, et al. Population, mortality and place of death in Germany (1950–2050)—implications for end-of-life care in the future. Public Health. 2012;126(11):937–46.CrossRef Simon ST, et al. Population, mortality and place of death in Germany (1950–2050)—implications for end-of-life care in the future. Public Health. 2012;126(11):937–46.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference May P, Normand C, Morrison RS. Economic impact of hospital inpatient palliative care consultation: review of current evidence and directions for future research. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(9):1054–63.CrossRef May P, Normand C, Morrison RS. Economic impact of hospital inpatient palliative care consultation: review of current evidence and directions for future research. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(9):1054–63.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eagar K, et al. The Australian National sub-acute and non-acute patient classification (AN-SNAP): report of the national sub-acute and non-acute casemix classification study. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong; 1997. Eagar K, et al. The Australian National sub-acute and non-acute patient classification (AN-SNAP): report of the national sub-acute and non-acute casemix classification study. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong; 1997.
7.
go back to reference Eagar K, et al. An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: lessons and policy implications of a national study. Palliat Med. 2004;18(3):227–33.CrossRef Eagar K, et al. An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: lessons and policy implications of a national study. Palliat Med. 2004;18(3):227–33.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference NHS England. Developing a new approach to palliative care funding guidance for using the adult palliative care currency. 2017. NHS England. Developing a new approach to palliative care funding guidance for using the adult palliative care currency. 2017.
9.
go back to reference Leidl R, Rodrigues J. Concepts to classify patients by disease severity and resource needs. In: Leidl R, Potthoff P, Schwefel D, editors. European approaches to patient classification systems. Berlin: Springer; 1990. p. 9–21.CrossRef Leidl R, Rodrigues J. Concepts to classify patients by disease severity and resource needs. In: Leidl R, Potthoff P, Schwefel D, editors. European approaches to patient classification systems. Berlin: Springer; 1990. p. 9–21.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eagar K. The Australian National sub-acute and non-acute patient casemix classification. Aust Health Rev. 1999;22(3):180–96.CrossRef Eagar K. The Australian National sub-acute and non-acute patient casemix classification. Aust Health Rev. 1999;22(3):180–96.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eagar K, Green J, Gordon R. An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: technical development and results. Palliat Med. 2004;18(3):217–26.CrossRef Eagar K, Green J, Gordon R. An Australian casemix classification for palliative care: technical development and results. Palliat Med. 2004;18(3):217–26.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Guo P, et al. Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020071.CrossRef Guo P, et al. Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020071.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hopfe M, et al. Capturing patients’ needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:40.CrossRef Hopfe M, et al. Capturing patients’ needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:40.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Solon JA, et al. Delineating episodes of medical care. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967;57(3):401–8.CrossRef Solon JA, et al. Delineating episodes of medical care. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967;57(3):401–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eagar K. Defining an episode of care: a study of five case types. Aust Health Rev. 1997;20(3):105–19.CrossRef Eagar K. Defining an episode of care: a study of five case types. Aust Health Rev. 1997;20(3):105–19.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abernethy AP, et al. The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481]. BMC Palliat Care. 2005;4:7.CrossRef Abernethy AP, et al. The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481]. BMC Palliat Care. 2005;4:7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schildmann EK, et al. Discovering the hidden benefits of cognitive interviewing in two languages: the first phase of a validation study of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):599–610.CrossRef Schildmann EK, et al. Discovering the hidden benefits of cognitive interviewing in two languages: the first phase of a validation study of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):599–610.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Masso M, et al. Palliative care phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study. Palliat Med. 2015;29(1):22–30.CrossRef Masso M, et al. Palliative care phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study. Palliat Med. 2015;29(1):22–30.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vogl M. Hospital financing: calculating inpatient capital costs in Germany with a comparative view on operating costs and the English costing scheme. Health Policy. 2014;115(2–3):141–51.CrossRef Vogl M. Hospital financing: calculating inpatient capital costs in Germany with a comparative view on operating costs and the English costing scheme. Health Policy. 2014;115(2–3):141–51.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fisher JG, Krumwiede K. Product costing systems: finding the right approach. J Corp Acc Finance. 2012;23(3):43–51.CrossRef Fisher JG, Krumwiede K. Product costing systems: finding the right approach. J Corp Acc Finance. 2012;23(3):43–51.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference OECD. Main economic indicators, vol. 2017, issue 6. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. OECD. Main economic indicators, vol. 2017, issue 6. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.
22.
go back to reference Hesse S, Boyke J, Zapp W. Verrechnungspreisbildung am Beispiel der Radiologie. In: Zapp W, editor. Innerbetriebliche Leistungsverrechnung im Krankenhaus. Springer. 2013. p. 15–78. Hesse S, Boyke J, Zapp W. Verrechnungspreisbildung am Beispiel der Radiologie. In: Zapp W, editor. Innerbetriebliche Leistungsverrechnung im Krankenhaus. Springer. 2013. p. 15–78.
23.
go back to reference Manning WG, Basu A, Mullahy J. Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J Health Econ. 2005;24(3):465–88.CrossRef Manning WG, Basu A, Mullahy J. Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J Health Econ. 2005;24(3):465–88.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B (Methodol). 1996;58(1):267–88. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B (Methodol). 1996;58(1):267–88.
25.
go back to reference Street A, et al. How well do diagnosis-related groups explain variations in costs or length of stay among patients and across hospitals? Methods for analysing routine patient data. Health Econ. 2012;21:6–18.CrossRef Street A, et al. How well do diagnosis-related groups explain variations in costs or length of stay among patients and across hospitals? Methods for analysing routine patient data. Health Econ. 2012;21:6–18.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus (InEK). Kalkulation von Behandlungskosten Handbuch zur Anwendung in Krankenhäusern, vol. 4. Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft; 2016. Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus (InEK). Kalkulation von Behandlungskosten Handbuch zur Anwendung in Krankenhäusern, vol. 4. Düsseldorf: Deutsche Krankenhaus Verlagsgesellschaft; 2016.
27.
go back to reference Nauck F, Alt-Epping B, Benze G. The current situation of palliative medicine in Germany—clinical implications, education and research. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2015;50(1):36–46.CrossRef Nauck F, Alt-Epping B, Benze G. The current situation of palliative medicine in Germany—clinical implications, education and research. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2015;50(1):36–46.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vogl M, et al. Redefining diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for palliative care—a cross-sectional study in two German centres. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):58.CrossRef Vogl M, et al. Redefining diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for palliative care—a cross-sectional study in two German centres. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):58.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Duckett S. Aligning policy objectives and payment design in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):42.CrossRef Duckett S. Aligning policy objectives and payment design in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):42.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Amano K, et al. The determinants of patients in a palliative care unit being discharged home in Japan. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014;31(3):244–6.CrossRef Amano K, et al. The determinants of patients in a palliative care unit being discharged home in Japan. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014;31(3):244–6.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bükki J, et al. Palliative care needs, symptoms, and treatment intensity along the disease trajectory in medical oncology outpatients: a retrospective chart review. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(6):1743–50.CrossRef Bükki J, et al. Palliative care needs, symptoms, and treatment intensity along the disease trajectory in medical oncology outpatients: a retrospective chart review. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(6):1743–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A pilot study on patient-related costs and factors associated with the cost of specialist palliative care in the hospital: first steps towards a patient classification system in Germany
Authors
Christian Becker
Reiner Leidl
Eva Schildmann
Farina Hodiamont
Claudia Bausewein
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7547
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0154-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1/2018 Go to the issue