Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 2/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda

Authors: Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Ligia Paina, Ahmed Bumba, Godfrey Mulekwa, Dinah Nakiganda-Busiku, Htet Nay Lin Oo, Suzanne Namusoke Kiwanuka, Asha George, David H. Peters

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Special Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approaches is important for guiding local decision-making, promoting the implementation of effective interventions and addressing emerging issues in the course of implementation. In this article, we explore how participatory M&E approaches helped to identify key design and implementation issues and how they influenced stakeholders’ decision-making in eastern Uganda.

Method

The data for this paper is drawn from a retrospective reflection of various M&E approaches used in a maternal and newborn health project that was implemented in three districts in eastern Uganda. The methods included qualitative and quantitative M&E techniques such as  key informant interviews, formal surveys and supportive supervision, as well as participatory approaches, notably participatory impact pathway analysis.

Results

At the design stage, the M&E approaches were useful for identifying key local problems and feasible local solutions and informing the activities that were subsequently implemented. During the implementation phase, the M&E approaches provided evidence that informed decision-making and helped identify emerging issues, such as weak implementation by some village health teams, health facility constraints such as poor use of standard guidelines, lack of placenta disposal pits, inadequate fuel for the ambulance at some facilities, and poor care for low birth weight infants. Sharing this information with key stakeholders prompted them to take appropriate actions. For example, the sub-county leadership constructed placenta disposal pits, the district health officer provided fuel for ambulances, and health workers received refresher training and mentorship on how to care for newborns.

Conclusion

Diverse sources of information and perspectives can help researchers and decision-makers understand and adapt evidence to contexts for more effective interventions. Supporting districts to have crosscutting, routine information generating and sharing platforms that bring together stakeholders from different sectors is therefore crucial for the successful implementation of complex development interventions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Bell JS, Marais D. Participatory training in monitoring and evaluation for maternal and newborn health programmes. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7:192–202. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p192. Bell JS, Marais D. Participatory training in monitoring and evaluation for maternal and newborn health programmes. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7:192–202. doi:10.​5539/​gjhs.​v7n2p192.
5.
10.
go back to reference Cousins JB, Earl LM. The Case for Participatory Evaluation: Theory, Research, Practice. London: Falmer; 1995. Cousins JB, Earl LM. The Case for Participatory Evaluation: Theory, Research, Practice. London: Falmer; 1995.
11.
go back to reference Weaver L, Cousins JB. Unpacking the participatory process. J Multidiscip Eval. 2004;1:19–40. Weaver L, Cousins JB. Unpacking the participatory process. J Multidiscip Eval. 2004;1:19–40.
12.
go back to reference Estrella M, Gaventa J. Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review. Economic development projects. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex; 1998. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. Estrella M, Gaventa J. Who Counts Reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: A Literature Review. Economic development projects. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex; 1998. doi:10.​1017/​CBO9781107415324​.​004.
13.
go back to reference Rath S, Nair N, Tripathy PK, Barnett S, Rath S, Mahapatra R, et al. Explaining the impact of a women’s group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010;10:25. doi:10.1186/1472-698X-10-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rath S, Nair N, Tripathy PK, Barnett S, Rath S, Mahapatra R, et al. Explaining the impact of a women’s group led community mobilisation intervention on maternal and newborn health outcomes: the Ekjut trial process evaluation. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010;10:25. doi:10.​1186/​1472-698X-10-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Kusters K, Buck L, de Graaf M, Minang P, van Oosten C, Zagt R. Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Environ Manage. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y. Kusters K, Buck L, de Graaf M, Minang P, van Oosten C, Zagt R. Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Environ Manage. 2017. doi:10.​1007/​s00267-017-0847-y.
18.
go back to reference Smits PA, Champagne F. An assessment of the theoretical underpinnings of practical participatory evaluation. Am J Eval. 2008;29:427–42.CrossRef Smits PA, Champagne F. An assessment of the theoretical underpinnings of practical participatory evaluation. Am J Eval. 2008;29:427–42.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cousins JB, Chouinard JA. Evaluation and Society: Participatory Evaluation up Close: An Integration of Research-Based Knowledge. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, Inc.; 2012. Cousins JB, Chouinard JA. Evaluation and Society: Participatory Evaluation up Close: An Integration of Research-Based Knowledge. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, Inc.; 2012.
21.
go back to reference Mark MM. Evaluation’s future: furor, futile, or fertile? Am J Eval. 2001;22:457–79.CrossRef Mark MM. Evaluation’s future: furor, futile, or fertile? Am J Eval. 2001;22:457–79.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Uganda Bureau of Statistics. 2014 Statistical Abstract. Kampala: UBOS; 2014. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. 2014 Statistical Abstract. Kampala: UBOS; 2014.
26.
go back to reference Pain L, Wilkinson A, Tetui M, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Barman D, Ahmed T, et al. Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda. Health Res Policy Syst. (12961-15-S2-S4 in this issue) Pain L, Wilkinson A, Tetui M, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Barman D, Ahmed T, et al. Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda. Health Res Policy Syst. (12961-15-S2-S4 in this issue)
28.
go back to reference Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Ghosh U, Brahmachari R, Paina L. Engaging stakeholders: lessons from the use of participatory tools for improving maternal and child care health services. Health Res Policy Syst. (12961-15-S2-S3 in this issue) Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Ghosh U, Brahmachari R, Paina L. Engaging stakeholders: lessons from the use of participatory tools for improving maternal and child care health services. Health Res Policy Syst. (12961-15-S2-S3 in this issue)
29.
go back to reference Kisakye AN, Kananura RM, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Bua J, Akulume M, Namazzi G, et al. Effect of support supervision on maternal and newborn health services and practices in Rural Eastern Uganda Effect of support supervision on maternal and newborn health services and practices in Rural Eastern Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(sup4):1345496. doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1345496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kisakye AN, Kananura RM, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Bua J, Akulume M, Namazzi G, et al. Effect of support supervision on maternal and newborn health services and practices in Rural Eastern Uganda Effect of support supervision on maternal and newborn health services and practices in Rural Eastern Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(sup4):1345496. doi:10.​1080/​16549716.​2017.​1345496.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Camden C, Swaine B, Tétreault S, Carrière M. Going beyond the identification of change facilitators to effectively implement a new model of services: lessons learned from a case example in paediatric rehabilitation. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:247–60. doi:10.3109/17518423.2011.577049.CrossRefPubMed Camden C, Swaine B, Tétreault S, Carrière M. Going beyond the identification of change facilitators to effectively implement a new model of services: lessons learned from a case example in paediatric rehabilitation. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:247–60. doi:10.​3109/​17518423.​2011.​577049.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Addington D, Kyle T, Soni D, Wang J. Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: systematic review. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56:1322–31.PubMedPubMedCentral Addington D, Kyle T, Soni D, Wang J. Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: systematic review. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56:1322–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Braithwaite RL, McKenzie RD, Pruitt V, Holden KB, Katrina Aaron M, Chavone Hollimon M. Community-based participatory evaluation: the health start approach. Health Promot Pract. 2013;10:54–6. doi:10.1177/1524839912443241. Braithwaite RL, McKenzie RD, Pruitt V, Holden KB, Katrina Aaron M, Chavone Hollimon M. Community-based participatory evaluation: the health start approach. Health Promot Pract. 2013;10:54–6. doi:10.​1177/​1524839912443241​.
38.
go back to reference Muriisa RK. Decentralisation in Uganda: prospects for improved service delivery. Africa Dev. 2008;XXXIII:83–95. Muriisa RK. Decentralisation in Uganda: prospects for improved service delivery. Africa Dev. 2008;XXXIII:83–95.
39.
go back to reference Bashaasha B, Mangheni MN, Nkonya E. Decentralization and Rural Service Delivery in Uganda. Washington, DC: IFPRI; 2011. Bashaasha B, Mangheni MN, Nkonya E. Decentralization and Rural Service Delivery in Uganda. Washington, DC: IFPRI; 2011.
41.
go back to reference Kothari A, Rudman D, Dobbins M, Rouse M, Sibbald S, Edwards N. The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2012;7:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kothari A, Rudman D, Dobbins M, Rouse M, Sibbald S, Edwards N. The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2012;7:20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda
Authors
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura
Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho
Ligia Paina
Ahmed Bumba
Godfrey Mulekwa
Dinah Nakiganda-Busiku
Htet Nay Lin Oo
Suzanne Namusoke Kiwanuka
Asha George
David H. Peters
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue Special Issue 2/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0274-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 2/2017 Go to the issue