Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Non-communicable diseases: mapping research funding organisations, funding mechanisms and research practices in Italy and Germany

Authors: Victor Stephani, Silvia Sommariva, Anne Spranger, Oriana Ciani

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence shows that territorial borders continue to have an impact on research collaboration in Europe. Knowledge of national research structural contexts is therefore crucial to the promotion of Europe-wide policies for research funding. Nevertheless, studies assessing and comparing research systems remain scarce. This paper aims to further the knowledge on national research landscapes in Europe, focusing on non-communicable disease (NCD) research in Italy and Germany.

Methods

To capture the architecture of country-specific research funding systems, a three-fold strategy was adopted. First, a literature review was conducted to determine a list of key public, voluntary/private non-profit and commercial research funding organisations (RFOs). Second, an electronic survey was administered qualifying RFOs. Finally, survey results were integrated with semi-structured interviews with key opinion leaders in NCD research. Three major dimensions of interest were investigated – funding mechanisms, funding patterns and expectations regarding outputs.

Results

The number of RFOs in Italy is four times larger than that in Germany and the Italian research system has more project funding instruments than the German system. Regarding the funding patterns towards NCD areas, in both countries, respiratory disease research resulted as the lowest funded, whereas cancer research was the target of most funding streams. The most reported expected outputs of funded research activity were scholarly publication of articles and reports.

Conclusions

This cross-country comparison on the Italian and German research funding structures revealed substantial differences between the two systems. The current system is prone to duplicated research efforts, popular funding for some diseases and intransparency of research results. Future research will require addressing the need for better coordination of research funding efforts, even more so if European research efforts are to play a greater role.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Banchoff T. Institutions, inertia and European Union research policy. JCMS. 2002;40(1):1–21.CrossRef Banchoff T. Institutions, inertia and European Union research policy. JCMS. 2002;40(1):1–21.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen RJ. Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Res Policy. 2010;39(5):662–73.CrossRef Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen RJ. Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Res Policy. 2010;39(5):662–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brigham KB, Darlington M, Wright JS, Lewison G, Kanavos P, Durand-Zaleski I. Mapping research activity on mental health disorders in Europe: study protocol for the Mapping_NCD project. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:39.CrossRef Brigham KB, Darlington M, Wright JS, Lewison G, Kanavos P, Durand-Zaleski I. Mapping research activity on mental health disorders in Europe: study protocol for the Mapping_NCD project. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:39.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ragin CC. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkley: University of California Press; 2014. Ragin CC. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkley: University of California Press; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Cacace M, Ettelt S, Mays N, Nolte E. Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria. Health Policy. 2013;112(1):156–62.CrossRefPubMed Cacace M, Ettelt S, Mays N, Nolte E. Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria. Health Policy. 2013;112(1):156–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Viergever RF, Hendriks TC. The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Viergever RF, Hendriks TC. The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Silverman D. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2004. Silverman D. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2004.
10.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio del 20/01/2006. Definizione della modalita' di destinazione della quota pari al cinque per mille dell'imposta sul reddito delle persone fisiche, in base alla scelta del contribuente, per finalita' di volontariato, ricerca scientifica e dell'universita', ricerca sanitaria e attivita' sociali svolte dal comune di residenza. 2006. https://www.indicenormativa.it/sites/default/files/decreto.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2017. Decreto del Presidente del Consiglio del 20/01/2006. Definizione della modalita' di destinazione della quota pari al cinque per mille dell'imposta sul reddito delle persone fisiche, in base alla scelta del contribuente, per finalita' di volontariato, ricerca scientifica e dell'universita', ricerca sanitaria e attivita' sociali svolte dal comune di residenza. 2006. https://​www.​indicenormativa.​it/​sites/​default/​files/​decreto.​pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
12.
go back to reference Tediosi F, Compagni A, Vuolo E. Analisi del Sistema di Finanziamento della Ricerca Sanitaria in Italia. Milan: CERGAS - Università Bocconi; 2010. Tediosi F, Compagni A, Vuolo E. Analisi del Sistema di Finanziamento della Ricerca Sanitaria in Italia. Milan: CERGAS - Università Bocconi; 2010.
13.
go back to reference Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2014. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; 2014. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation 2014. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; 2014.
14.
go back to reference Forschungsgemeinschaft D. Forderatlas 2015: Kennzahlen zur offentlich finanzierten Forschung in Deutschland. Berlin: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.CrossRef Forschungsgemeinschaft D. Forderatlas 2015: Kennzahlen zur offentlich finanzierten Forschung in Deutschland. Berlin: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Clarke A, Gatineau M, Grimaud O, Royer-Devaux S, Wyn-Roberts N, Le Bis I, et al. A bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(Suppl_1):43–9.CrossRefPubMed Clarke A, Gatineau M, Grimaud O, Royer-Devaux S, Wyn-Roberts N, Le Bis I, et al. A bibliometric overview of public health research in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(Suppl_1):43–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference European Council. Presidency Conclusions: European Council, Lisbon, 23 and 24 March 2000. Brussels: European Council; 2000. European Council. Presidency Conclusions: European Council, Lisbon, 23 and 24 March 2000. Brussels: European Council; 2000.
23.
go back to reference Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca. Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale. 2016. http://prin.miur.it. Accessed 12 June 2016. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca. Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale. 2016. http://​prin.​miur.​it. Accessed 12 June 2016.
Metadata
Title
Non-communicable diseases: mapping research funding organisations, funding mechanisms and research practices in Italy and Germany
Authors
Victor Stephani
Silvia Sommariva
Anne Spranger
Oriana Ciani
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0249-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue