Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Unravelling networks in local public health policymaking in three European countries – a systems analysis

Authors: Hilde P. E. M. Spitters, Cathrine J. Lau, Petru Sandu, Marcel Quanjel, Diana Dulf, Charlotte Glümer, Hans A. M. van Oers, Ien A. M. van de Goor

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Facilitating and enhancing interaction between stakeholders involved in the policymaking process to stimulate collaboration and use of evidence, is important to foster the development of effective Health Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) policies. Performing an analysis of real-world policymaking processes will help reveal the complexity of a network of stakeholders. Therefore, the main objectives were to unravel the stakeholder network in the policy process by conducting three systems analyses, and to increase insight into the similarities and differences in the policy processes of these European country cases.

Methods

A systems analysis of the local HEPA policymaking process was performed in three European countries involved in the ‘REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity’ (REPOPA) project, resulting in three schematic models showing the main stakeholders and their relationships. The models were used to compare the systems, focusing on implications with respect to collaboration and use of evidence in local HEPA policymaking. Policy documents and relevant webpages were examined and main stakeholders were interviewed.

Results

The systems analysis in each country identified the main stakeholders involved and their position and relations in the policymaking process. The Netherlands and Denmark were the most similar and both differed most from Romania, especially at the level of accountability of the local public authorities for local HEPA policymaking. The categories of driving forces underlying the relations between stakeholders were formal relations, informal interaction and knowledge exchange.

Conclusions

A systems analysis providing detailed descriptions of positions and relations in the stakeholder network in local level HEPA policymaking is rather unique in this area. The analyses are useful when a need arises for increased interaction, collaboration and use of knowledge between stakeholders in the local HEPA network, as they provide an overview of the stakeholders involved and their mutual relations. This information can be an important starting point to enhance the uptake of evidence and build more effective public health policies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health. Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies; 1991. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Policies and Strategies to Promote Social Equity in Health. Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies; 1991.
2.
go back to reference Kickbusch I, Buckett K. Implementing Health in All Policies. Adelaide: Department of Health, Government of South Australia; 2010. p. 1–99. Kickbusch I, Buckett K. Implementing Health in All Policies. Adelaide: Department of Health, Government of South Australia; 2010. p. 1–99.
3.
go back to reference Kickbusch I, McCann W, Sherbon T. Adelaide revisited: from healthy public policy to Health in All Policies. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMed Kickbusch I, McCann W, Sherbon T. Adelaide revisited: from healthy public policy to Health in All Policies. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Storm I, Verweij A, Van der Lucht F. Integraal gezondheidsbeleid op lokaal niveau. Wat weten we en hoe nu verder? In: RIVM Briefrapport 270161004. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM); 2011. Storm I, Verweij A, Van der Lucht F. Integraal gezondheidsbeleid op lokaal niveau. Wat weten we en hoe nu verder? In: RIVM Briefrapport 270161004. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM); 2011.
5.
go back to reference Kohl HW, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294–305.CrossRefPubMed Kohl HW, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294–305.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lavis JN, et al. Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci. 2008;3:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lavis JN, et al. Evidence-informed health policy 1 - synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence. Implement Sci. 2008;3:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lomas J. Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000;19(3):236–40.CrossRef Lomas J. Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff. 2000;19(3):236–40.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bryson JM. What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Manage Rev. 2004;6(1):21–53.CrossRef Bryson JM. What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Manage Rev. 2004;6(1):21–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hyder A, et al. Stakeholder analysis for health research: case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health. 2010;124(3):159–66.CrossRefPubMed Hyder A, et al. Stakeholder analysis for health research: case studies from low- and middle-income countries. Public Health. 2010;124(3):159–66.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference de Goede J, et al. Looking for interaction: quantitative measurement of research utilization by Dutch local health officials. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Goede J, et al. Looking for interaction: quantitative measurement of research utilization by Dutch local health officials. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Shearer JC, Dion M, Lavis JN. Exchanging and using research evidence in health policy networks: a statistical network analysis. Implement Sci. 2014;9:126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shearer JC, Dion M, Lavis JN. Exchanging and using research evidence in health policy networks: a statistical network analysis. Implement Sci. 2014;9:126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Jansen MW, et al. Collaboration between practice, policy and research in local public health in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2008;86(2-3):295–307.CrossRefPubMed Jansen MW, et al. Collaboration between practice, policy and research in local public health in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2008;86(2-3):295–307.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Walter I, Davies H, Nutley S. Increasing research impact through partnerships: evidence from outside health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(S2):58–61.CrossRefPubMed Walter I, Davies H, Nutley S. Increasing research impact through partnerships: evidence from outside health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(S2):58–61.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Contandriopoulos D, et al. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: A narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2010;88(4):444–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Contandriopoulos D, et al. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: A narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2010;88(4):444–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference de Goede J, et al. Knowledge in process? Exploring barriers between epidemiological research and local health policy development. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Goede J, et al. Knowledge in process? Exploring barriers between epidemiological research and local health policy development. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
21.
go back to reference de Leeuw E, et al. Theoretical reflections on the nexus between research, policy and practice. Crit Public Health. 2008;18(1):5–20.CrossRef de Leeuw E, et al. Theoretical reflections on the nexus between research, policy and practice. Crit Public Health. 2008;18(1):5–20.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev. 1979;39(5):426–31.CrossRef Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev. 1979;39(5):426–31.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Davies HTO, Nutley SM, Smith PC. What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2010. p. 383. Davies HTO, Nutley SM, Smith PC. What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2010. p. 383.
24.
go back to reference Daugbjerg SB, et al. Promotion of physical activity in the European region: content analysis of 27 national policy documents. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(6):805.CrossRefPubMed Daugbjerg SB, et al. Promotion of physical activity in the European region: content analysis of 27 national policy documents. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(6):805.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bull FC, et al. National policy on physical activity: the development of a policy audit tool. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(2):233–40.CrossRefPubMed Bull FC, et al. National policy on physical activity: the development of a policy audit tool. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(2):233–40.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Edwards P, Tsouros A. Promoting Physical Activity and Active Living in Urban Environments, The Role of Local Governments. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Europe; 2006. p. 66. Edwards P, Tsouros A. Promoting Physical Activity and Active Living in Urban Environments, The Role of Local Governments. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Europe; 2006. p. 66.
27.
go back to reference Hakamäki P, et al. Promotion of Physical Activity in Municipalities 2010-2014, Progress report. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culture; 2015. p. 98. Hakamäki P, et al. Promotion of Physical Activity in Municipalities 2010-2014, Progress report. Helsinki: Ministry of Education and Culture; 2015. p. 98.
28.
go back to reference Hoeijmakers M, et al. Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2007;22(2):112–21.CrossRefPubMed Hoeijmakers M, et al. Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2007;22(2):112–21.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Edelenbos J. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2005;16(3):417–46.CrossRef Edelenbos J. Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2005;16(3):417–46.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Oliver K, et al. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):453–9.CrossRef Oliver K, et al. Who runs public health? A mixed-methods study combining qualitative and network analyses. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):453–9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kok G, et al. Influencing organizations to promote health applying stakeholder theory. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(1 suppl):123S–32S.CrossRefPubMed Kok G, et al. Influencing organizations to promote health applying stakeholder theory. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(1 suppl):123S–32S.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Friedman AL, Miles S. Developing Stakeholder Theory. J Manag Stud. 2002;39(1):1–21.CrossRef Friedman AL, Miles S. Developing Stakeholder Theory. J Manag Stud. 2002;39(1):1–21.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Middleton SM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(s1):44–55.CrossRef Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Middleton SM. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(s1):44–55.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Duke RD, Geurts JLA. Policy Games for Strategic Management Pathways into the Unknown. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press; 2004. Duke RD, Geurts JLA. Policy Games for Strategic Management Pathways into the Unknown. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press; 2004.
36.
go back to reference Peters V, van de Westelaken M. Spelsimulatie - Een beknopte inleiding in het ontwerpproces. Nijmegen: Samenspraak Advies Nijmegen; 2011. Peters V, van de Westelaken M. Spelsimulatie - Een beknopte inleiding in het ontwerpproces. Nijmegen: Samenspraak Advies Nijmegen; 2011.
37.
go back to reference Stoppelenburg A, de Caluwé L, Geurts JLA. Gaming Organisatieverandering met spelsimulaties. Deventer: Kluwer; 2012. Stoppelenburg A, de Caluwé L, Geurts JLA. Gaming Organisatieverandering met spelsimulaties. Deventer: Kluwer; 2012.
38.
go back to reference Geurts JLA, Duke RD, Vermeulen PAM. Policy Gaming for Strategy and Change. Long Range Plann. 2007;40(6):535–58.CrossRef Geurts JLA, Duke RD, Vermeulen PAM. Policy Gaming for Strategy and Change. Long Range Plann. 2007;40(6):535–58.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Aro AR, et al. Integrating research evidence and physical activity policy making—REPOPA project. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(2):430–9.CrossRefPubMed Aro AR, et al. Integrating research evidence and physical activity policy making—REPOPA project. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(2):430–9.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
go back to reference Adami MF, Kiger A. The use of triangulation for completeness purposes. Nurse Res. 2005;12(4):19–29.CrossRefPubMed Adami MF, Kiger A. The use of triangulation for completeness purposes. Nurse Res. 2005;12(4):19–29.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Denzin NK. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New Brunswick: AldineTransaction; 1989. Denzin NK. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New Brunswick: AldineTransaction; 1989.
43.
go back to reference Exworthy M. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(5):318–27.CrossRefPubMed Exworthy M. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(5):318–27.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Lundin M, Öberg P. Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making. Policy Sci. 2013;47(1):25–49.CrossRef Lundin M, Öberg P. Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making. Policy Sci. 2013;47(1):25–49.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bull FC, et al. Developments in National Physical Activity Policy: an international review and recommendations towards better practice. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1):93–104.CrossRefPubMed Bull FC, et al. Developments in National Physical Activity Policy: an international review and recommendations towards better practice. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1):93–104.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Innvaer S, et al. Health policymakers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239–44.CrossRefPubMed Innvaer S, et al. Health policymakers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239–44.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference van de Goor LAM, et al. Barriers and facilitators in evidence use in public health policy. Results from a study across six EU countries. Health Policy. Accepted Jan 2017. van de Goor LAM, et al. Barriers and facilitators in evidence use in public health policy. Results from a study across six EU countries. Health Policy. Accepted Jan 2017.
48.
49.
go back to reference Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. How to do (or not to do)… A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plann. 2000;16(3):338–45.CrossRef Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. How to do (or not to do)… A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plann. 2000;16(3):338–45.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Cooke J, et al. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cooke J, et al. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Morestin F. Knowledge Sharing and Public Policies: A Representation of Influence Processes. Montréal: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy; 2015. Morestin F. Knowledge Sharing and Public Policies: A Representation of Influence Processes. Montréal: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy; 2015.
52.
go back to reference Brownson RC, et al. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(2):164–72.CrossRefPubMed Brownson RC, et al. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(2):164–72.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77404.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference Geurts JLA, Joldersma C. Methodology for participatory policy analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;128:300–10.CrossRef Geurts JLA, Joldersma C. Methodology for participatory policy analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 2001;128:300–10.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Edwards N, et al. Challenges of ethical clearance in international health policy and social sciences research: experiences and recommendations from a multi-country research programme. Public Health Rev. 2012;34(1):1–18. Edwards N, et al. Challenges of ethical clearance in international health policy and social sciences research: experiences and recommendations from a multi-country research programme. Public Health Rev. 2012;34(1):1–18.
57.
go back to reference Aarts MJ. Children, physical activity and the environment: Opportunities for multi-sector policy. Maastricht: Maastricht: Datawyse/Universitaire Pers Maastricht; 2011. Aarts MJ. Children, physical activity and the environment: Opportunities for multi-sector policy. Maastricht: Maastricht: Datawyse/Universitaire Pers Maastricht; 2011.
58.
go back to reference Hoeijmakers M. Local Health Policy Development Processes: Health Promotion and Network Perspectives on Local Health Policy-making in the Netherlands. Maastricht: University Maastricht; 2005. Hoeijmakers M. Local Health Policy Development Processes: Health Promotion and Network Perspectives on Local Health Policy-making in the Netherlands. Maastricht: University Maastricht; 2005.
59.
go back to reference van Egmond S. Science and Policy in Interaction: On Practices of Science Policy Interactions for Policy-making in Health Care. Rotterdam: Erasmus universiteit Rotterdam; 2010. van Egmond S. Science and Policy in Interaction: On Practices of Science Policy Interactions for Policy-making in Health Care. Rotterdam: Erasmus universiteit Rotterdam; 2010.
60.
go back to reference Fischer-Nielsen B. Kommunalpolitik. Copenhagen: Columbus; 2005. Fischer-Nielsen B. Kommunalpolitik. Copenhagen: Columbus; 2005.
61.
go back to reference Lundtorp S, Rasmussen M. Rigtigt kommunalt – ledelse I kommuner og amter fra reform til reform. Handelshøjskolens Forlag: Copenhagen; 2007. Lundtorp S, Rasmussen M. Rigtigt kommunalt – ledelse I kommuner og amter fra reform til reform. Handelshøjskolens Forlag: Copenhagen; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Unravelling networks in local public health policymaking in three European countries – a systems analysis
Authors
Hilde P. E. M. Spitters
Cathrine J. Lau
Petru Sandu
Marcel Quanjel
Diana Dulf
Charlotte Glümer
Hans A. M. van Oers
Ien A. M. van de Goor
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0168-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue