Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Does a biomedical research centre affect patient care in local hospitals?

Authors: Catherine A Lichten, Grace Marsden, Alexandra Pollitt, Vasiliki Kiparoglou, Keith M Channon, Jon Sussex

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Biomedical research can have impacts on patient care at research-active hospitals. We qualitatively evaluated the impact of the Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (Oxford BRC), a university-hospital partnership, on the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare in local hospitals. Effectiveness and efficiency are conceptualised in terms of impacts perceived by clinicians on the quality, quantity and costs of patient care they deliver.

Methods

First, we reviewed documentation from Oxford BRC and literature on the impact of research activity on patient care. Second, we interviewed leaders of the Oxford BRC’s research to identify the direct and indirect impacts they expected their activity would have on local hospitals. Third, this information was used to inform interviews with senior clinicians responsible for patient care at Oxford’s acute hospitals to discover what impacts they observed from research generally and from Oxford BRC’s research work specifically. We compared and contrasted the results from the two sets of interviews using a qualitative approach. Finally, we identified themes emerging from the senior clinicians’ responses, and compared them with an existing taxonomy of mechanisms through which quality of healthcare may be affected in research-active settings.

Results

We were able to interview 17 research leaders at the Oxford BRC and 19 senior clinicians at Oxford’s acute hospitals. The research leaders identified a wide range of beneficial impacts that they expected might be felt at local hospitals as a result of their research activity. They expected the impact of their research activity on patient care to be generally positive. The senior clinicians responsible for patient care at those hospitals presented a more mixed picture, identifying many positive impacts, but also a smaller number of negative impacts, from research activity, including that of the Oxford BRC. We found the existing taxonomy of benefit types to be helpful in organising the findings, and propose modifications to further improve its usefulness.

Conclusions

Impacts from research activity on the effectiveness and efficiency of patient care at the local acute hospitals, as perceived by senior clinicians, were more often beneficial than harmful. The Oxford BRC contributed to those impacts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Her Majesty’s Treasury. A review of UK health research funding: Sir David Cooksey. London: HMT; 2006. Her Majesty’s Treasury. A review of UK health research funding: Sir David Cooksey. London: HMT; 2006.
3.
go back to reference Dzau V, Ackerly C, Sutton-Wallace P, et al. The role of academic health science systems in the transformation of medicine. Lancet. 2010;375:949–53.CrossRefPubMed Dzau V, Ackerly C, Sutton-Wallace P, et al. The role of academic health science systems in the transformation of medicine. Lancet. 2010;375:949–53.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Health Economics Research Group, Office of Health Economics, RAND Europe. Medical research: what’s it worth? Estimating the economic benefits from medical research in the UK. London: UK Evaluation Forum; 2008. Health Economics Research Group, Office of Health Economics, RAND Europe. Medical research: what’s it worth? Estimating the economic benefits from medical research in the UK. London: UK Evaluation Forum; 2008.
6.
go back to reference King’s College London, Digital Science. The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact: an initial analysis of Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 impact case studies. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England; 2015. King’s College London, Digital Science. The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact: an initial analysis of Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 impact case studies. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England; 2015.
7.
go back to reference Marjanovic S, Soper B, Shehabi A, Celia C, Reding A, Ling T. Changing the translational landscape: a review of the impacts of Biomedical Research Centres in England. Cambridge: RAND Europe; 2009. Marjanovic S, Soper B, Shehabi A, Celia C, Reding A, Ling T. Changing the translational landscape: a review of the impacts of Biomedical Research Centres in England. Cambridge: RAND Europe; 2009.
8.
go back to reference Innovation B, Team G. BioScience 2015: improving national health, increasing national wealth. A Report to Government by the Bioscience Innovation and Growth Team. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2003. Innovation B, Team G. BioScience 2015: improving national health, increasing national wealth. A Report to Government by the Bioscience Innovation and Growth Team. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2003.
9.
go back to reference Confederation NHS. Being a good research partner: the virtues and rewards. Briefing. London: NHS Confederation; 2010. Confederation NHS. Being a good research partner: the virtues and rewards. Briefing. London: NHS Confederation; 2010.
10.
go back to reference Hanney S, Boaz A, Soper B, Jones T. Engagement in research: an innovative three-stage review of the benefits for health-care performance. Health Services Delivery Research. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2013. Hanney S, Boaz A, Soper B, Jones T. Engagement in research: an innovative three-stage review of the benefits for health-care performance. Health Services Delivery Research. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2013.
12.
go back to reference Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2016. Ahead of print. doi:10.1071/AH15180. Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2016. Ahead of print. doi:10.​1071/​AH15180.
13.
go back to reference Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q. 1990;35(1):128–52.CrossRef Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q. 1990;35(1):128–52.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hanney S, Castle-Clarke S, Grant J, Guthrie S, Henshall C, Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Pistollato M, Pollitt A, Sussex J, Wooding S. How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy and practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hanney S, Castle-Clarke S, Grant J, Guthrie S, Henshall C, Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Pistollato M, Pollitt A, Sussex J, Wooding S. How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy and practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Neumann PJ, Jacobson PD, Palmer JA. Measuring the value of public health systems: the disconnect between health economists and public health practitioners. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(12):2173–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Neumann PJ, Jacobson PD, Palmer JA. Measuring the value of public health systems: the disconnect between health economists and public health practitioners. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(12):2173–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Does a biomedical research centre affect patient care in local hospitals?
Authors
Catherine A Lichten
Grace Marsden
Alexandra Pollitt
Vasiliki Kiparoglou
Keith M Channon
Jon Sussex
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0163-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue