Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries

Authors: Zubin Shroff, Bhupinder Aulakh, Lucy Gilson, Irene A. Agyepong, Fadi El-Jardali, Abdul Ghaffar

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ‘Sponsoring National Processes for Evidence-Informed Policy Making in the Health Sector of Developing Countries’ program was launched by the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, in July 2008. The program aimed to catalyse the use of evidence generated through health policy and systems research in policymaking processes through (1) promoting researchers and policy advocates to present their evidence in a manner that is easy for policymakers to understand and use, (2) creating mechanisms to spur the demand for and application of research evidence in policymaking, and (3) increased interaction between researchers, policy advocates, and policymakers. Grants ran for three years and five projects were supported in Argentina, Bangladesh, Cameroon, Nigeria and Zambia. This paper seeks to understand why projects in some settings were perceived by the key stakeholders involved to have made progress towards their goals, whereas others were perceived to have not done so well. Additionally, by comparing experiences across five countries, we seek to illustrate general learnings to inform future evidence-to-policy efforts in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods

We adopted the theory of knowledge translation developed by Jacobson et al. (J Health Serv Res Policy 8(2):94–9, 2003) as a framing device to reflect on project experiences across the five cases. Using data from the projects’ external evaluation reports, which included information from semi-structured interviews and quantitative evaluation surveys of those involved in projects, and supplemented by information from the projects’ individual technical reports, we applied the theoretical framework with a partially grounded approach to analyse each of the cases and make comparisons.

Results and conclusion

There was wide variation across projects in the type of activities carried out as well as their intensity. Based on our findings, we can conclude that projects perceived as having made progress towards their goals were characterized by the coming together of a number of domains identified by the theory. The domains of Jacobson’s theoretical framework, initially developed for high-income settings, are of relevance to the low- and middle-income country context, but may need modification to be fully applicable to these settings. Specifically, the relative fragility of institutions and the concomitantly more significant role of individual leaders point to the need to look at leadership as an additional domain influencing the evidence-to-policy process.
Literature
1.
Dobrow M, Goel G, Upshur R. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:207–17.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Oxman A, Lavis J, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7 Suppl 1:S1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
5.
6.
Uneke C, Aulakh B, Ezeoha A, Ndukwe C, Onwe F. Bridging the divide between research and policy in Nigeria: The role of a health policy advisory committee. J Public Health Policy. 2012;33:423–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Kasonde J, Campbell S. Creating a knowledge translation platform: nine lessons from the Zambia Forum for Health Research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
El-Jardali F, Lavis J, Moat K, Pantoja T, Ataya N. Capturing lessons learned from evidence-to-policy initiatives through structured reflection. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(1):20–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7(4):239–44.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S. The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Harries U, Elliot H, Higgins A. Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS: Exploring the interface between research and the commissioning process. J Public Health Med. 1999;21:29–36.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Macintyre S, Chalmers I, Horton R, Smith R. Using evidence to inform health policy: Case Study. Br Med J. 2001;322:222–5.CrossRef
15.
Lavis J, Ross S, Hurley J, Hohenadel J, Stoddard G, Woodward C, et al. Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Jewell C, Bero L. Developing good taste in evidence: facilitators of and hindrances to evidence informed health policymaking in state government. Milbank Q. 2008;86(2):177–208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Sauerborn R, Nitayarumphong S, Gerhardus A. Strategies to enhance the use of health systems research for health sector reform. Trop Med Int Health. 1999;4(12):827–35.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Varkevisser C, Mwaluko G, Le Grand A. Research in action: the training approach of the Joint Health Systems Research Project for the Southern African Region. Health Policy Plan. 2001;16(3):281–91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Pappaioanou M, Malison M, Wilkins K, Otto B, Goodman R, Churchill R, et al. Strengthening capacity in developing countries for evidence-based public health: the data for decision-making project. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(10):1925–37.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hyder A, Corluka A, Winch P, El-Shinnawy A, Ghassany H, Malekafzali H, et al. National policy-makers speak out: are researchers giving them what they need? Health Policy Plan. 2011;26(1):73–82.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Cheung A, Lavis JN, Hamandi A, El-Jardali F, Sachs J, Sewankambo N. Climate for evidence-informed health systems: a print media analysis in 44 low-and middle-income countries that host knowledge-translation platforms. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9(7):10.
22.
23.
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Call for proposals: supporting national processes for evidence-informed policy in the health sectors of developing countries. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
24.
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Fellowship programme on monitoring and evaluation methodology for evidence-to-policy initiatives. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
25.
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Evidence-informed policy making - an analysis of approaches under the Sponsoring National Processes and Enhancing Capacity to Apply Research Programs. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
26.
Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(2):94–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Caplan N. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci. 1979;22:459–70.CrossRef
28.
Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
30.
Centro de Implementacion de Politicas Publicas Para el Equidad y el Crecimiento. Promoting the generation of coordinated provincial health protection: a collective process. Final Technical Report. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC; 2011.
31.
International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh. Bridging the know-do gap: strategies to enhance the capacity to apply health policy and systems research into evidence-informed policy in Bangladesh. Dhaka: ICDDR,B; 2011.
32.
Centre for the Development of Best Practices in Health. Final technical report. EIP Grant No. 49. Yaounde: CDBPH; 2011.
33.
Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990;13(1):3–21.CrossRef
34.
Gilson L, Kalyalya D, Kuchler F, Lake S, Oranga H, Ouendo M. Strategies for promoting equity: experience with community financing in three African countries. Health Policy. 2001;58(1):37–67.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Gilson L, Doherty J, Lake S, McIntyre D, Mwikisa C, Thomas S. The SAZA study: implementing health financing reform in South Africa and Zambia. Health Policy Plann. 2003;18(1):31–46.CrossRef
36.
World Health Organization. Health policy and systems research: a methodology reader. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
37.
38.
Metadata
Title
Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries
Authors
Zubin Shroff
Bhupinder Aulakh
Lucy Gilson
Irene A. Agyepong
Fadi El-Jardali
Abdul Ghaffar
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0059-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research

Capacity for conducting systematic reviews in low- and middle-income countries: a rapid appraisal

Research

An analysis of national collaboration with Spanish researchers abroad in the health sciences

Commentary

INA-RESPOND: a multi-centre clinical research network in Indonesia

Research

SDH-NET: a South–North-South collaboration to build sustainable research capacities on social determinants of health in low- and middle-income countries

Research

Using conjoint analysis to develop a system to score research engagement actions by health decision makers

Commentary

Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy