Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Assessing the implementation and influence of policies that support research and innovation systems for health: the cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania

Authors: Julius Mugwagwa, Daniel Edwards, Sylvia de Haan

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Without good policies it will be difficult to provide guidance to research and innovation systems. However, policies need to be followed through and implemented to have the desired effect. We studied the policies and strategies in place to support research and innovation systems for health in Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania, and looked at the extent to which these policies and strategies have been implemented.

Methods

We reviewed documents and reports and conducted in-depth interviews with 16 key informants representing various actors of the national research for health systems.

Results

The results illustrate that there are various policies and strategies governing research and innovation for health in the three countries. However, implementation of these policies and strategies is generally rated as being poor. The reasons highlighted for this include lack of policy coherence, lack of enforcement and accountability mechanisms, and a lack of financing for implementing the policies. These contextual factors seem to be of such importance that even the increased stakeholder involvement and political leadership, as mentioned by the interviewees, cannot guarantee policy implementation.

Conclusions

We conclude that due to the contextual realities of the study countries, there is need for greater focus on policy implementation than on developing additional policies. Government institutions should play a central role in all stages of the policy process, and should ensure implementation of defined policies. Strong mechanisms, including financing, that strengthen the position and role of government in policy coordination and the oversight of the policy process will help increase efficient and impactful implementation of research and innovation for health policies.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Hyder AA, Bloom G, Leach M, Syed SB, Peters DH. Future health systems: innovations for equity. Exploring health systems research and its influence on policy processes in low income countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hyder AA, Bloom G, Leach M, Syed SB, Peters DH. Future health systems: innovations for equity. Exploring health systems research and its influence on policy processes in low income countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Uneke C, Ogbonna A, Ezeoha A, Oyibo P, Onwe F, Ngwu B. Innovative health research group. Health system research and policy development in Nigeria: the challenges and way forward. Internet J World Health Soc Polit. 2008;6:2. Uneke C, Ogbonna A, Ezeoha A, Oyibo P, Onwe F, Ngwu B. Innovative health research group. Health system research and policy development in Nigeria: the challenges and way forward. Internet J World Health Soc Polit. 2008;6:2.
6.
go back to reference Paudel NR. A critical account of the policy implementation theories: status and reconsideration. Nepalese J Public Policy. 2009;2:36–54. Paudel NR. A critical account of the policy implementation theories: status and reconsideration. Nepalese J Public Policy. 2009;2:36–54.
8.
go back to reference Mulgan G, Albury D. Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit. London: United Kingdom Cabinet Office; 2003. Mulgan G, Albury D. Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit. London: United Kingdom Cabinet Office; 2003.
9.
go back to reference Pyka A, Cantner U, Greiner A, Kuhn T. Recent advances in neo-Schumpetarian economics: essays in honour of Horst Hanusch. USA and UK: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2009.CrossRef Pyka A, Cantner U, Greiner A, Kuhn T. Recent advances in neo-Schumpetarian economics: essays in honour of Horst Hanusch. USA and UK: Edgar Elgar Publishing; 2009.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Edquist C. Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organisations. London and Washington: Pinter; 1997. Edquist C. Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organisations. London and Washington: Pinter; 1997.
11.
go back to reference Lundvall BA. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter; 1992. Lundvall BA. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter; 1992.
12.
go back to reference Nelson R. National systems of innovation. A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. Nelson R. National systems of innovation. A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
15.
go back to reference James LP, O’M Bowman A, Goggin ML, O’Toole LJ. Public policy implementation: evolution of the field and agenda for future research. Rev Policy Res. 1987;7:200–16.CrossRef James LP, O’M Bowman A, Goggin ML, O’Toole LJ. Public policy implementation: evolution of the field and agenda for future research. Rev Policy Res. 1987;7:200–16.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Parson W. Public policy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1995. Parson W. Public policy. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1995.
17.
go back to reference Kalua FA, Awotedu A, Kamwanja LA, Saka JDK. editors. Science, technology and innovation for public health in Africa. Monograph. Pretoria: NEPAD Office of Science and Technology; 2009. Kalua FA, Awotedu A, Kamwanja LA, Saka JDK. editors. Science, technology and innovation for public health in Africa. Monograph. Pretoria: NEPAD Office of Science and Technology; 2009.
18.
go back to reference Moran M, Guzman J, Ropars AL. Neglected disease research & development: how much are we really spending? Sydney: The George Institute for Global Health; 2009. Moran M, Guzman J, Ropars AL. Neglected disease research & development: how much are we really spending? Sydney: The George Institute for Global Health; 2009.
19.
go back to reference African Union Commission – UNIDO. Pharmaceutical manufacturing plan for Africa, business plan. Addis Ababa: African Union; 2012. African Union Commission – UNIDO. Pharmaceutical manufacturing plan for Africa, business plan. Addis Ababa: African Union; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Berger M, Murugi J, Buch E, IJsselmuiden C, Moran M, Guzman J, et al. Strengthening pharmaceutical innovation in Africa. Geneva: Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) and New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD); 2010. Berger M, Murugi J, Buch E, IJsselmuiden C, Moran M, Guzman J, et al. Strengthening pharmaceutical innovation in Africa. Geneva: Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED) and New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD); 2010.
21.
go back to reference Singer P, Daar A. Commercializing African health research: building life science convergence platforms. Geneva: Global Forum Update on Research for Health; 2008. Singer P, Daar A. Commercializing African health research: building life science convergence platforms. Geneva: Global Forum Update on Research for Health; 2008.
23.
go back to reference Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 1998. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 1998.
24.
go back to reference Sabatier PA. Theories of the policy process. Colorado: Westview Press; 2007. Sabatier PA. Theories of the policy process. Colorado: Westview Press; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Assessing the implementation and influence of policies that support research and innovation systems for health: the cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania
Authors
Julius Mugwagwa
Daniel Edwards
Sylvia de Haan
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0010-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue