Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Commentary

The State of the World’s Midwifery 2021 report: findings to drive global policy and practice

Authors: Andrea Nove, Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Martin Boyce, Sarah Bar-Zeev, Luc de Bernis, Geeta Lal, Zoë Matthews, Million Mekuria, Caroline S. E. Homer

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

The third global State of the World’s Midwifery report (SoWMy 2021) provides an updated evidence base on the sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn and adolescent health (SRMNAH) workforce. For the first time, SoWMy includes high-income countries (HICs) as well as low- and middle-income countries. This paper describes the similarities and differences between regions and income groups, and discusses the policy implications of these variations. SoWMy 2021 estimates a global shortage of 900,000 midwives, which is particularly acute in low-income countries (LICs) and in Africa. The shortage is projected to improve only slightly by 2030 unless additional investments are made. The evidence suggests that these investments would yield important returns, including: more positive birth experiences, improved health outcomes, and inclusive and equitable economic growth. Most HICs have sufficient SRMNAH workers to meet the need for essential interventions, and their education and regulatory environments tend to be strong. Upper-middle-income countries also tend to have strong policy environments. LICs and lower-middle-income countries tend to have a broader scope of practice for midwives, and many also have midwives in leadership positions within national government. Key regional variations include: major midwife shortages in Africa and South-East Asia but more promising signs of growth in South-East Asia than in Africa; a strong focus in Africa on professional midwives (rather than associate professionals: the norm in many South-East Asian countries); heavy reliance on medical doctors rather than midwives in the Americas and Eastern Mediterranean regions and parts of the Western Pacific; and a strong educational and regulatory environment in Europe but a lack of midwife leaders at national level. SoWMy 2021 provides stakeholders with the latest data and information to inform their efforts to build back better and fairer after COVID-19. This paper provides a number of policy responses to SoWMy 2021 that are tailored to different contexts, and suggests a variety of issues to consider in these contexts. These suggestions are supported by the inclusion of all countries in the report, because it is clear which countries have strong SRMNAH workforces and enabling environments and can be viewed as exemplars within regions and income groups.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
SoWMy 2021 used International Standard Classification of Occupations codes to define the SRMNAH workforce—see Additional file 1: Table S1 for details.
 
2
SoWMy 2021 uses the term “SRMNAH doctors” to refer to general practitioners, obstetricians/gynaecologists and paediatricians: the three types of doctor most likely to provide SRMNAH interventions.
 
3
Health worker density is the number of health workers per head of population.
 
4
The phrase “leadership position” was defined as referring to a number of management, supervisory and executive titles, including: Chief Midwife, Midwife Advisor, national Midwife Director, maternal advisory position.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations Population Fund, International Confederation of Midwives, World Health Organization. State of the world's midwifery 2021. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2021. United Nations Population Fund, International Confederation of Midwives, World Health Organization. State of the world's midwifery 2021. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2021.
2.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
3.
go back to reference United Nations Population Fund. World Health Organization, International Confederation of Midwives. State of the world’s midwifery: delivering health, saving lives. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2011. United Nations Population Fund. World Health Organization, International Confederation of Midwives. State of the world’s midwifery: delivering health, saving lives. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2011.
4.
go back to reference United Nations Population Fund, World Health Organization, International Confederation of Midwives: State of the world's midwifery: a universal pathway. A woman's right to health. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2014. United Nations Population Fund, World Health Organization, International Confederation of Midwives: State of the world's midwifery: a universal pathway. A woman's right to health. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2014.
5.
go back to reference Oliver K, Parolin Z. Assessing the policy and practice impact of an international policy initiative: the State of the World’s Midwifery 2014. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:499.CrossRef Oliver K, Parolin Z. Assessing the policy and practice impact of an international policy initiative: the State of the World’s Midwifery 2014. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:499.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nove A, Friberg IK, de Bernis L, McConville F, Moran AC, Najjemba M, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Tracy S, Homer CSE. Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e24–32.CrossRef Nove A, Friberg IK, de Bernis L, McConville F, Moran AC, Najjemba M, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Tracy S, Homer CSE. Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e24–32.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference World Health Organization. United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Children’s Fund, International Confederation of Midwives. Strengthening quality midwifery education for universal health coverage 2030: framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. World Health Organization. United Nations Population Fund, United Nations Children’s Fund, International Confederation of Midwives. Strengthening quality midwifery education for universal health coverage 2030: framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
Metadata
Title
The State of the World’s Midwifery 2021 report: findings to drive global policy and practice
Authors
Andrea Nove
Petra ten Hoope-Bender
Martin Boyce
Sarah Bar-Zeev
Luc de Bernis
Geeta Lal
Zoë Matthews
Million Mekuria
Caroline S. E. Homer
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00694-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Human Resources for Health 1/2021 Go to the issue