Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Human Resources for Health
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Trend and equity of general practitioners’ allocation in China based on the data from 2012–2017

Authors: Qianqian Yu, Wenqiang Yin, Dongmei Huang, Kui Sun, Zhongming Chen, Hongwei Guo, Di Wu

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

General practitioners are the gatekeepers of the health of the residents. This study aims to evaluate the trend and equity of general practitioners' allocation from 2012 to 2017 in China and provide a reference for regional health planning and rational distribution of general practitioners.

Methods

We extracted the data of general practitioners from 22 provinces, 5 autonomous regions, and 4 municipalities of mainland China. The population and geographical area were taken from the China Statistical Yearbook. The general practitioners' data were taken from the China Health Statistical Yearbook. Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and agglomeration degree were used to analyze the data.

Results

The number of general practitioners was 252,717 in 2017, which equates to 1.82 per 10,000 residents, and accounts for 7.45% of the total number of practicing (assistant) doctors. From 2012 to 2017, the population-based Gini coefficient for general practitioners reduced from 0.31 to 0.24, while the geographical area-based Gini coefficient remained unchanged at 0.73. The agglomeration degree based on population increased from 0.72 to 0.73 in the western region including Tibet (0.403) and Shaanxi (0.513). Moreover, in the eastern region the agglomeration degree reduced from 1.477 to 1.329. In the middle region it rose from 0.646 to 0.802. The agglomeration degree based on the geographical area in the western region increased from 0.270 to 0.277 while the values in Tibet, Qinghai, Xinjiang were less than 0.1. In the eastern region, it reduced from 1.447 to 1.329. It increased from 1.149 to 1.423 in the middle region.

Conclusions

The number of general practitioners has increased significantly in China. It has a fair allocation based on population. However, the equity based on geographical area is low and uneven in different regions with large regional differences. In the western region, there is an allocation shortage with respect to population and geographical area. Concerned departments should establish and improve the incentive and performance appraisal mechanisms of general practitioners. The Internet + should be used to empower their service capacity and efficiency. The educational input should be increased for the western region and government should encourage the eastern region to support the western region.
Literature
1.
Organization WH. Research for Universal Health Coverage. The World Health Report 2013. Research for universal health coverage, 2013.
2.
Qin JM, Zhang LF, Lin CM, Zhang X, Zhang YC. Scale and allocation of human resources in primary health care system in China after new medical reform. Chin Gen Pract. 2016;19(4):378–82.
3.
4.
Cheng ZQ, Ma JQ. Evolution and measures of china’s population ageing. Acad Exchange. 2018;12:101–9.
5.
Tang SL, John E, Long Q. China’s biggest, most neglected health challenge: Non-communicable diseases. Chin J Health Policy. 2013;6(10):6–11.
6.
Guo F, Zhang YH, Wan Q, Zhai TM, Chai BB, Li Y, Wang RR, Huang YX, Chen CM, Li T. Results and analysis of national health accounts in China in 2017. Chin Health Econ. 2019;38(4):5–8.
7.
Zhou ZJ. Supply-side reform: what health care should change. Hosp Manag Forum. 2016;33(12):3.
8.
Luo T. How does Britain’s general practitioner system play a role in controlling costs. China State Finance. 2019;22:19–21.
9.
Schoenmakers B, Buntinx F, Delepeleire J. What is the role of the general practitioner towards the family caregiver of a community-dwelling demented relative? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(1):31–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Sims J, Kerse NM, Naccarella L, Long H. Health promotion and older people: the role of the general practitioner in Australia in promoting healthy ageing. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008;24(4):356–9.CrossRef
11.
Yang H. Declarations from Alma-Ata and Astana: development of general practice is a top priority for achieving universal health coverage. Chin Gen Pract. 2019;22(1):1–4.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Theodorakis PN, Mantzavinis GD, Rrumbullaku L, Lionis C, Trell E. Measuring health inequalities in Albania: a focus on the distribution of general practitioners. Hum Resour Health. 2006; 4(1).
17.
Shannon GW, Cutchin MP. General practitioner distribution and population dynamics: Munich, 1950–1990. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39(1):23–38.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Wilkinson D, Symon B. Inequitable distribution of general practitioners in Australia: estimating need through the Robin Hood Index. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010;24(1):71–5.CrossRef
19.
Johnston G, Wilkinson D. Increasingly inequitable distribution of general practitioners in Australia, 1986–96. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(1):66–70.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hu WP, Yang J, Xu RL, Ni R, Meng XL, Yu EY. Equity analysis of the allocation of general practitioners in Mainland Ghina. Chin Gen Pract. 2015;18(22):2628–31.
21.
Huang Fu HH, Li HY. Research on equity of resource allocation of general practitioners in China based on the Theil index and grey prediction method. Health Econ Res. 2018;11:57–61.
22.
Zhou LL, Wang HP, Xie L, Ding H. Current situation and equity analysis of general practitioners’ resource allocation in China. Chin Gen Pract. 2017;20(19):2311–5.
23.
Zhou HL, Lan XJ, Si MS, Li ZF, Li SX. Analysis on equity of general practitioners allocation in guangxi based on concentration index and Gini Coefficient. Chin Health Econ. 2018;37(10):39–42.
24.
Cheng YM, Xu YF, Wen N, Ma X, Wang F. Distribution equity and development trend of general practitioners in Shandong Province during 2013–2016. Chin Gen Pract. 2020;23(04):414–8.
25.
Lin CM, Zhang X, Yang XQ, Qin JM. Allocation differences and fairness of community general practitioners in districts and counties of Beijing from 2011 to 2014. Chin Gen Pract. 2016;19(31):3781–5.
26.
Liang LN, Xie Y. Gini coefficient and its application expansion. J Qiqihar Univ (Philosophy & Social Science Edition). 2011;5:82–5.
27.
Li ZY, Kong XJ, Ren R. Research on the development trend of equity in health resource allocation in Liaoning province: based on Gini coefficient and Theil index. Chin Health Econ. 2013;32(4):12–4.
28.
Yuan WW, Wei FQ, Liu WW, Zhang Z, Ma J. A methodological study on the evaluation of equity in health resource allocation by agglomeration analysis. Chin Hosp Manag. 2015a;02:3–5.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
China National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health statistical yearbook 2013. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2013.
36.
China National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health statistical yearbook 2014. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2014.
37.
China National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health statistical yearbook 2015. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2015.
38.
China National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health statistical yearbook 2016. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2016.
39.
China National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health statistical yearbook 2017. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2017.
40.
China National Health and Family Planning Commission. China health statistical yearbook 2018. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2018.
41.
Mao Y, Liu JL, Yang J, Xu F, Zhang MJ. Analysis on fairness of China’s human resource allocation for health in 2011. Chin Health Econ. 2013;32(8):35–8.
42.
Organization PAH. Measuring health inequalities: Gini coefficient and concentration index. Epidemiol Bull. 2001;22(1):3–4.
43.
Yuan SW, Wei FQ, Liu WW, Zhang Z, Ma J. Methodology discussion of health resource allocation equity evaluation based on agglomeration degree. Chin Hosp Manag. 2015b;35(2):3–5.
44.
Xie HK, Wang ZF, Li NY, et al. Research on the correlation between occupational stress coping style and physical and mental health of general practitioners. Occup Health. 2017;4:456–60.
45.
Li SJ, Zhang HR, Zhu LN, Qin Y, Ma WY, Ma L. Study of general practitioners’ work pressure and work satisfaction status and its influencing factors. Chin Gen Med. 2015;18(4):387–90.
46.
Zheng YL, Yu F, Chen YL, Yu MY, Liu L, Gan Y, Li LQ, Yang YD, Lu ZX. Occupational burnout of general practitioners in China and its influencing factors. Chin Gen Pract. 2019;22(7):764–9.
47.
Meng XM, Pan XY, Dong Q. The comparative study on general practitioner training the at home and abroad. Hebei Med J. 2013;35(15):2359–60.
48.
Yao DP. Research on Urban Family Doctor Service Capacity Building under the Background of the Internet [D]. University of Science and Technology of China, 2017.
49.
Hu MD. Exploration and practice of internet + community health. Shanghai Pharm. 2016;37(11):57–60.
50.
Hao Y, Wang L, Liu XY, Yu HY, Jia HY, Guo XL. Research on IFOC model-based community home-based care service model in Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center. Chin Gen Pract. 2018;21(34):4212–6.
51.
Wang X, Yu CZ, Wang XW, Wang JJ. Analysis on the status and equity of human resource allocation in community health services in Guangdong Province. Chin Gen Pract. 2014;17(11):1323–6.
52.
Zhao B, Yang LW, Zheng N. The equity analysis of urban community health resource allocation based on Gini Coefficient and Theil Index. Chin Gen Pract. 2014;17(28):331–3303.
53.
Liu Y, Jiang GP, Ren JJ. Status quo and development strategy of general practitioners training in China. China Eng Sci. 2019;21(02):74–8.CrossRef
54.
Zeng YX. Talent is the first resource. Health Vision. 2018;3:10.
Metadata
Title
Trend and equity of general practitioners’ allocation in China based on the data from 2012–2017
Authors
Qianqian Yu
Wenqiang Yin
Dongmei Huang
Kui Sun
Zhongming Chen
Hongwei Guo
Di Wu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00561-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Human Resources for Health 1/2021 Go to the issue

Research

Health workforce strategies in response to major health events: a rapid scoping review with lessons learned for the response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Research

Uganda’s response to sexual harassment in the public health sector: from “Dying Silently” to gender-transformational HRH policy

Commentary

Harnessing the digital potential of the next generation of health professionals

Commentary

Regulating the health workforce in Europe: implications of the COVID-19 pandemic

Research

An analysis of the services provided by community health workers within an urban district in South Africa: a key contribution towards universal access to care

Research

The workforce for rehabilitation in primary health care in Brazil