Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research

Gendered effects of pay for performance among family physicians for chronic disease care: an economic evaluation in a context of universal health coverage

Authors: Neeru Gupta, René Lavallée, James Ayles

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite increasing popularity among health organizations of pay for performance (P4P) for the provision of comprehensive care for chronic non-communicable diseases, evidence of its effectiveness in improving health system outcomes is weak. An important void in the evidence base is whether there are gendered differences in P4P uptake and in related outcomes amenable to healthcare improvement. This study assesses the gender-specific effects of P4P among family physicians on diabetes healthcare costs in a context of universal health coverage.

Methods

We use population-based linked longitudinal administrative datasets on chronic disease cases, physician billings, hospital discharge abstracts, and physician and resident registries in the province of New Brunswick, Canada. We estimate the effects of introduction of a P4P scheme on excess public healthcare costs among cohorts of adult diabetes patients using propensity score-adjusted difference-in-differences regressions stratified by physician’s gender.

Results

We observed greater male physician uptake of incentive payments, seemingly exacerbating gender gaps in professional remuneration. Regression results indicated P4P did not lead to improved outcomes in terms of preventing hospitalization costs among patients, only measurable increases in compensation for both the male and female physician workforce.

Conclusions

While P4P was not attributed in this study to reduced hospital burden and enhanced sustainability of healthcare financing, incentive payments were found to be related to earning gaps by physician’s gender. Decision-makers should consider that benefits of P4P be monitored not only for patient metrics but also for provider metrics in terms of gender equality especially given feminization of primary care medical workforces.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lavallée R, Hanvoravongchai P, Gupta N. Use of population census data for gender analysis of the health workforce. In: Dal Poz MR, Gupta N, et al., editors. Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health. Geneva: World Health Organization, World Bank, and United States Agency for International Development; 2009. p. 103–11. Lavallée R, Hanvoravongchai P, Gupta N. Use of population census data for gender analysis of the health workforce. In: Dal Poz MR, Gupta N, et al., editors. Handbook on monitoring and evaluation of human resources for health. Geneva: World Health Organization, World Bank, and United States Agency for International Development; 2009. p. 103–11.
4.
go back to reference Tannenbaum C, Voss P, et al. Gender, work, and aging. Can J Aging. 2016;35(3):405–11.CrossRef Tannenbaum C, Voss P, et al. Gender, work, and aging. Can J Aging. 2016;35(3):405–11.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Baker LC. Differences in earnings between male and female physicians. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:960–4.CrossRef Baker LC. Differences in earnings between male and female physicians. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:960–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
9.
go back to reference de Bruin SR, Baan CA, Struijs JN. Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:272.CrossRef de Bruin SR, Baan CA, Struijs JN. Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:272.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elovainio R. Performance incentives for health in high-income countries: key issues and lessons learned. World Health Report (2010) Background Paper No. 32. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Elovainio R. Performance incentives for health in high-income countries: key issues and lessons learned. World Health Report (2010) Background Paper No. 32. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
11.
go back to reference Scheffler RM. Pay for performance (P4P) programs in health services: what is the evidence? World Health Report (2010) Background Paper No. 31. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Scheffler RM. Pay for performance (P4P) programs in health services: what is the evidence? World Health Report (2010) Background Paper No. 31. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
12.
go back to reference Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:247.CrossRef Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:247.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rudkjøbinga A, Vrangbaek K, Birk HO, Andersen JS, Krasnik A. Evaluation of a policy to strengthen case management and quality of diabetes care in general practice in Denmark. Health Policy. 2015;119(8):1023–30.CrossRef Rudkjøbinga A, Vrangbaek K, Birk HO, Andersen JS, Krasnik A. Evaluation of a policy to strengthen case management and quality of diabetes care in general practice in Denmark. Health Policy. 2015;119(8):1023–30.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lavergne MR, Law MR, Peterson S, et al. A population based analysis of incentive payments to primary care physicians for the care of patients with complex disease. CMAJ. 2016;188(15):e375–83.CrossRef Lavergne MR, Law MR, Peterson S, et al. A population based analysis of incentive payments to primary care physicians for the care of patients with complex disease. CMAJ. 2016;188(15):e375–83.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hsieh HM, Gu SM, Shin SJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a diabetes pay-for-performance program in diabetes patients with multiple chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133163.CrossRef Hsieh HM, Gu SM, Shin SJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a diabetes pay-for-performance program in diabetes patients with multiple chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133163.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pandya A, Doran T, Zhu J, et al. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK. BMC Med. 2018;16:135.CrossRef Pandya A, Doran T, Zhu J, et al. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK. BMC Med. 2018;16:135.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Greene J. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(4):1415–32.CrossRef Greene J. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(4):1415–32.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Department of Health. Profiles on health: Diabetes mellitus in New Brunswick. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick; 2016. Department of Health. Profiles on health: Diabetes mellitus in New Brunswick. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick; 2016.
23.
go back to reference Department of Health. New Brunswick physicians’ manual. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick; 2016. Department of Health. New Brunswick physicians’ manual. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick; 2016.
24.
go back to reference Department of Health. A comprehensive diabetes strategy for New Brunswickers, 2011–15. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick; 2011. Department of Health. A comprehensive diabetes strategy for New Brunswickers, 2011–15. Fredericton: Government of New Brunswick; 2011.
25.
go back to reference Chen G, Khan N, Walker R, Quan H. Validating ICD coding algorithms for diabetes mellitus from administrative data. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;89:189–95.CrossRef Chen G, Khan N, Walker R, Quan H. Validating ICD coding algorithms for diabetes mellitus from administrative data. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;89:189–95.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud. 1998;65(2):261–94.CrossRef Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev Econ Stud. 1998;65(2):261–94.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stuart EA, Haiden A, et al. Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014;14(4):166–82.CrossRef Stuart EA, Haiden A, et al. Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014;14(4):166–82.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Villa JM. Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata J. 2016;16(1):52–71.CrossRef Villa JM. Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata J. 2016;16(1):52–71.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference ESSENCE on Health Research. Six practices to strengthen evaluation of global health research for development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. ESSENCE on Health Research. Six practices to strengthen evaluation of global health research for development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
31.
go back to reference Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.CrossRef Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supply, distribution and migration of physicians in Canada, 2016: historical data. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2018. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supply, distribution and migration of physicians in Canada, 2016: historical data. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2018.
33.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information. National health expenditure trends, 1975 to 2018. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2018. Canadian Institute for Health Information. National health expenditure trends, 1975 to 2018. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2018.
34.
go back to reference Scott A, Sivey P, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD008451. Scott A, Sivey P, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:CD008451.
35.
go back to reference LeBlanc E, Bélanger M, et al. Influence of a pay-for-performance program on glycemic control in patients living with diabetes by family physicians in a Canadian province. Can J Diabetes. 2016;41(2):190–6.CrossRef LeBlanc E, Bélanger M, et al. Influence of a pay-for-performance program on glycemic control in patients living with diabetes by family physicians in a Canadian province. Can J Diabetes. 2016;41(2):190–6.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Global Health Workforce Network. Gender and equity in the health and social care workforce: consultative draft report. Gender equity hub working paper. Geneva: Women in Global Health and World Health Organization; 2018. Global Health Workforce Network. Gender and equity in the health and social care workforce: consultative draft report. Gender equity hub working paper. Geneva: Women in Global Health and World Health Organization; 2018.
Metadata
Title
Gendered effects of pay for performance among family physicians for chronic disease care: an economic evaluation in a context of universal health coverage
Authors
Neeru Gupta
René Lavallée
James Ayles
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0378-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Human Resources for Health 1/2019 Go to the issue