Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment

Authors: Margaret L. Prust, Aniset Kamanga, Lupenshyo Ngosa, Courtney McKay, Chilweza Musonda Muzongwe, Mazuba Tamara Mukubani, Roy Chihinga, Ronald Misapa, Jan Willem van den Broek, Nikhil Wilmink

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas, limit the delivery of health services in Zambia. Policymakers and researchers co-created this study to identify potential non-monetary employment incentives and assess their cost-effectiveness to attract and retain public sector health workers to the rural areas of Zambia.

Methods

The study consisted of two key phases: a discrete choice experiment (DCE), preceded by a qualitative component to inform DCE questionnaire development. Firstly, in qualitative interviews with 25 health workers and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 253 health students, participants were asked to discuss job attributes and potential incentives that would influence their job choices. Based on this exercise and in consultation with policymakers, job attributes were selected for inclusion in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire. Secondly, this questionnaire, consisting of hypothetical job “choice sets,” was presented to 474 practicing health workers and students. A conditional logit regression model was applied to the data from this DCE questionnaire to estimate preferences for various job attributes. Using administrative data, we estimated the cost of implementing potential attraction and retention strategies per health worker year worked.

Results

Although health workers preferred urban jobs to rural jobs (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11–1.75), employment incentives influenced health workers’ decision to choose rural jobs. If superior housing was offered in a rural area compared to a basic housing allowance in an urban job, participants would be five times as likely to choose the rural job (OR 5.04, 95% CI 4.12–6.18). Education incentives and facility-based improvements also increased the likelihood of rural job uptake. Housing benefits were estimated to have the lowest total costs per health worker year worked, and offer high value in terms of cost per percentage point increase in rural job uptake.

Conclusions

Non-monetary incentives such as housing, education, and facility improvements can be important motivators of health worker choice of location and could mitigate rural health workforce shortages. These results can provide valuable insight into the types of job attributes and incentives that are most likely to be effective in attracting and retaining health workers in rural areas.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Central Statistical Office (CSO). Census of Zambia. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2010. Central Statistical Office (CSO). Census of Zambia. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Ministry of Health of Zambia. Human resources for health planning & development strategy framework. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2017. Ministry of Health of Zambia. Human resources for health planning & development strategy framework. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2017.
3.
go back to reference Ministry of Health of Zambia. National human resources for health strategic plan 2018–2024. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2018. Ministry of Health of Zambia. National human resources for health strategic plan 2018–2024. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2018.
4.
go back to reference Ministry of Health of Zambia. Zambia health worker retention scheme guidelines. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2010. Ministry of Health of Zambia. Zambia health worker retention scheme guidelines. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2010.
5.
go back to reference Ministry of Health of Zambia. Zambian Health Workers Retention Scheme: measuring the effect on health system deliverables. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2010. Ministry of Health of Zambia. Zambian Health Workers Retention Scheme: measuring the effect on health system deliverables. Lusaka: Government of Zambia; 2010.
12.
go back to reference Wilson NW, Couper ID, De Vries E, Reid S, Fish T, Marais BJA. Critical review of interventions to redress the inequitable distribution of healthcare professionals to rural and remote areas. Rural Remote Health. 2009;9(2):1060 Epub 2009 Jun 12.PubMed Wilson NW, Couper ID, De Vries E, Reid S, Fish T, Marais BJA. Critical review of interventions to redress the inequitable distribution of healthcare professionals to rural and remote areas. Rural Remote Health. 2009;9(2):1060 Epub 2009 Jun 12.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
Authors
Margaret L. Prust
Aniset Kamanga
Lupenshyo Ngosa
Courtney McKay
Chilweza Musonda Muzongwe
Mazuba Tamara Mukubani
Roy Chihinga
Ronald Misapa
Jan Willem van den Broek
Nikhil Wilmink
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Human Resources for Health 1/2019 Go to the issue