Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Knowledge, attitudes, and values among physicians working with clinical genomics: a survey of medical oncologists

Authors: Peter Chow-White, Dung Ha, Janessa Laskin

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It has been over a decade since the completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP), genomic sequencing technologies have yet to become parts of standard of care in Canada. This study investigates medical oncologists’ (MOs) genomic literacy and their experiences based on their participation in a cancer genomics trial in British Columbia, Canada.

Methods

The authors conducted a survey of MOs from British Columbia, Canada (n = 31, 52.5% response rate), who are actively involved in a clinical genomics trial called Personalized Onco-Genomics (POG). The authors also measured MOs’ level of genomic knowledge and attitudes about clinical genomics in cancer medicine.

Results

The findings show a low to moderate level of genomic literacy among MOs. MOs located outside the Vancouver area (the major urban center) reported less knowledge about new genetics technologies compared to those located in the major metropolitan area (26.7 vs 73.3%, P < 0.07, Fisher exact test). Forty-two percent of all MOs thought medical training programs do not offer enough genomic training. The majority of the respondents thought genomics will have major impact on drug discovery (67.7%), and treatment selection (58%) in the next 5 years. They also thought the major challenges are cost (61.3%), patient genomic literacy (48.3%), and clinical utility of genomics (42%).

Conclusions

The data suggest a high need to increase genomic literacy among MOs and other doctors in medical school training programs and beyond, especially to physicians in regional areas who may need more educational interventions. Initiatives like POG play a critical role in the education of MOs and the integration of big data clinical genomics into cancer care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nelson NC, Keating P, Cambrosio A. On being “actionable”: clinical sequencing and the emerging contours of a regime of genomic medicine in oncology. New Genetics Society. 2013;32:405–28.CrossRef Nelson NC, Keating P, Cambrosio A. On being “actionable”: clinical sequencing and the emerging contours of a regime of genomic medicine in oncology. New Genetics Society. 2013;32:405–28.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nelkin D, Lindee S. The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2004.CrossRef Nelkin D, Lindee S. The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2004.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Evans JP, Meslin EM, Marteau TM, Caulfield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science. 2011;331:861–2.CrossRefPubMed Evans JP, Meslin EM, Marteau TM, Caulfield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science. 2011;331:861–2.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Yoon PW, Dowling N, Moore CA, Bradley L. The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med. 2007;9:665–74.CrossRefPubMed Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Yoon PW, Dowling N, Moore CA, Bradley L. The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med. 2007;9:665–74.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad Med. 2000;75(8):850–2.CrossRefPubMed Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad Med. 2000;75(8):850–2.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hofman KJ, Tambor ES, Chase GA, Geller G, Faden RR, Holtzman NA. Physicians’ knowledge of genetics and genetic tests. Acad Med. 1993;68:625–32.CrossRefPubMed Hofman KJ, Tambor ES, Chase GA, Geller G, Faden RR, Holtzman NA. Physicians’ knowledge of genetics and genetic tests. Acad Med. 1993;68:625–32.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gray SW, Hicks-Courant K, Cronin A, Rollins BJ, Weeks JC. Physicians’ attitudes about multiplex tumor genomic testing. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1317–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gray SW, Hicks-Courant K, Cronin A, Rollins BJ, Weeks JC. Physicians’ attitudes about multiplex tumor genomic testing. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1317–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Thurston VC, Wales PS, Bell MA, Torbeck L, Brokaw JJ. The current status of medical genetics instruction in US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82:441–5.CrossRefPubMed Thurston VC, Wales PS, Bell MA, Torbeck L, Brokaw JJ. The current status of medical genetics instruction in US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82:441–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Burke S, Stone A, Bedward J, Thomas H, Farndon P. A “neglected part of the curriculum” or “of limited use”? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery. Genet Med. 2006;8:109–15.CrossRefPubMed Burke S, Stone A, Bedward J, Thomas H, Farndon P. A “neglected part of the curriculum” or “of limited use”? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery. Genet Med. 2006;8:109–15.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Crane MJ, Quinn Griffin MT, Andrews CM, Fitzpatrick JJ. The level of importance and level of confidence that midwives in the United States attach to using genetics in practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57:114–9.CrossRefPubMed Crane MJ, Quinn Griffin MT, Andrews CM, Fitzpatrick JJ. The level of importance and level of confidence that midwives in the United States attach to using genetics in practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57:114–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hopp JG, Roberts LW, Hammond KAG, Cox NJ. Psychiatrists’ attitudes, knowledge, and experience regarding genetics: a preliminary study. Genet Med. 2008;10:439–49.CrossRef Hopp JG, Roberts LW, Hammond KAG, Cox NJ. Psychiatrists’ attitudes, knowledge, and experience regarding genetics: a preliminary study. Genet Med. 2008;10:439–49.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Metcalfe A, Pumphrey R, Clifford C. Hospice nurses and genetics: implications for end‐of‐life care. J Clin Nurs. 2009;19:192–207.CrossRef Metcalfe A, Pumphrey R, Clifford C. Hospice nurses and genetics: implications for end‐of‐life care. J Clin Nurs. 2009;19:192–207.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Li J, Xu T, Yashar BM. Genetics educational needs in China: physicians’ experience and knowledge of genetic testing. Genet Med. 2015;17:757–60.CrossRefPubMed Li J, Xu T, Yashar BM. Genetics educational needs in China: physicians’ experience and knowledge of genetic testing. Genet Med. 2015;17:757–60.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chen LS, Goodson P. Public health genomics knowledge and attitudes: a survey of public health educators in the United States. Genet Med. 2007;9:496–503.CrossRefPubMed Chen LS, Goodson P. Public health genomics knowledge and attitudes: a survey of public health educators in the United States. Genet Med. 2007;9:496–503.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chen LS, Kwok OM, Goodson P. US health educators’ likelihood of adopting genomic competencies into health promotion. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1651–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen LS, Kwok OM, Goodson P. US health educators’ likelihood of adopting genomic competencies into health promotion. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1651–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Martin G, Currie G, Finn R. Bringing genetics into primary care: findings from a national evaluation of pilots in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:204–11.CrossRefPubMed Martin G, Currie G, Finn R. Bringing genetics into primary care: findings from a national evaluation of pilots in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:204–11.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1995. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 1995.
19.
go back to reference Laskin J, Jones S, Aparicio S, Chia S, Ch’ng C, Deyell R, Eirew P, Fok A, Gelmon K, Ho C, Huntsman D. Lessons learned from the application of whole-genome analysis to the treatment of patients with advanced cancers. Molecular Case Studies. 2015;1:a000570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laskin J, Jones S, Aparicio S, Chia S, Ch’ng C, Deyell R, Eirew P, Fok A, Gelmon K, Ho C, Huntsman D. Lessons learned from the application of whole-genome analysis to the treatment of patients with advanced cancers. Molecular Case Studies. 2015;1:a000570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Middleton A, Morley KI, Bragin E, et al. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:21–9.CrossRefPubMed Middleton A, Morley KI, Bragin E, et al. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:21–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):1.CrossRef Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Knowledge, attitudes, and values among physicians working with clinical genomics: a survey of medical oncologists
Authors
Peter Chow-White
Dung Ha
Janessa Laskin
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0218-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Human Resources for Health 1/2017 Go to the issue