Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway

Authors: Sofia Castro Lopes, Andrea Nove, Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Luc de Bernis, Martha Bokosi, Nester T. Moyo, Caroline S. E. Homer

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Education, regulation and association (ERA) are the supporting pillars of an enabling environment for midwives to provide quality care. This study explores these three pillars in the 73 low- and middle-income countries who participated in the State of the World’s Midwifery (SoWMy) 2014 report. It also examines the progress made since the previous report in 2011.

Methods

A self-completion questionnaire collected quantitative and qualitative data on ERA characteristics and organisation in the 73 countries. The countries were grouped according to World Health Organization (WHO) regions. A descriptive analysis was conducted.

Results

In 82% of the participating countries, the minimum education level requirement to start midwifery training was grade 12 or above. The average length of training was higher for direct-entry programmes at 3.1 years than for post-nursing/healthcare provider programmes at 1.9 years. The median number of supervised births that must be conducted before graduation was 33 (range 0 to 240). Fewer than half of the countries had legislation recognising midwifery as an independent profession. This legislation was particularly lacking in the Western Pacific and South-East Asia regions. In most (90%) of the participating countries, governments were reported to have a regulatory role, but some reported challenges to the role being performed effectively. Professional associations were widely available to midwives in all regions although not all were exclusive to midwives.

Conclusions

Compared with the 2011 SoWMy report, there is evidence of increasing effort in low- and middle-income countries to improve midwifery education, to strengthen the profession and to follow international ERA standards and guidelines. However, not all elements are being implemented equally; some variability persists between and within regions. The education pillar showed more systematic improvement in the type of programme and length of training. The reinforcement of regulation through the development of legislation for midwifery, a recognised definition and the strengthening of midwives’ associations would benefit the development of other ERA elements and the profession generally.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Requejo JH, Bryce J, Victora C, and the Countdown writing team. Fulfilling the health agenda for women and children. The 2014 report. UNICEF and WHO; 2014. Requejo JH, Bryce J, Victora C, and the Countdown writing team. Fulfilling the health agenda for women and children. The 2014 report. UNICEF and WHO; 2014.
2.
go back to reference UNFPA, WHO, ICM. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2014: a universal pathway. A woman’s right to health. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2014. UNFPA, WHO, ICM. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2014: a universal pathway. A woman’s right to health. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2014.
14.
go back to reference UNFPA. State of the World’s Midwifery 2011: delivering health, saving lives. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2011. UNFPA. State of the World’s Midwifery 2011: delivering health, saving lives. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 2011.
17.
go back to reference Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, David B, Dussault G, Fogstad H, et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull World Heal Organ. 2013;91:853–63.CrossRef Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, David B, Dussault G, Fogstad H, et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull World Heal Organ. 2013;91:853–63.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. A guide to nursing and midwifery education standards. 2015. WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. A guide to nursing and midwifery education standards. 2015.
21.
go back to reference International Confederation of Midwives. Twinning as a tool for strengthening midwives associations: operational manual. The Hague: International Confederation of Midwives; 2014. International Confederation of Midwives. Twinning as a tool for strengthening midwives associations: operational manual. The Hague: International Confederation of Midwives; 2014.
24.
go back to reference UNFPA. UNFPA maternal mortality update 2006. Expectation and delivery: investing in midwives and others with midwifery skills. 2006 UNFPA. UNFPA maternal mortality update 2006. Expectation and delivery: investing in midwives and others with midwifery skills. 2006
25.
go back to reference McKimm J, Newton PM, Da Silva A, Campbell J, Condon R, Kafoa B, et al. Accreditation of healthcare professionals’ education in Pacific Island countries: evidence and options. Hub Policy Briefs: UNSW HRH Knowl; 2013. McKimm J, Newton PM, Da Silva A, Campbell J, Condon R, Kafoa B, et al. Accreditation of healthcare professionals’ education in Pacific Island countries: evidence and options. Hub Policy Briefs: UNSW HRH Knowl; 2013.
Metadata
Title
A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway
Authors
Sofia Castro Lopes
Andrea Nove
Petra ten Hoope-Bender
Luc de Bernis
Martha Bokosi
Nester T. Moyo
Caroline S. E. Homer
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0134-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Human Resources for Health 1/2016 Go to the issue