Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Human Resources for Health
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Young doctors’ preferences for payment systems: the influence of gender and personality traits

Authors: Birgit Abelsen, Jan Abel Olsen

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Activity-based payment contracts are common among doctors, but to what extent are they preferred? The aim of this paper is to elicit young doctors’ preferences for alternative payment systems before they have adapted to an existing system. We examine the existence of gender differences and the extent to which personality traits determine preferences.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of all final-year medical students and all interns in Norway examined the extent to which preferences for different payment systems depend on gender and personality traits. Data analysis relied on one-way ANOVA and multinomial logistic regression.

Results

The current activity-based payment systems were the least preferred, both in hospitals (16.6%) and in general practice (19.7%). The contrasting alternative “fixed salary” achieved similar relative support. Approximately half preferred the hybrid alternative. When certainty associated with a payment system increased, its appeal rose for women and individuals who are less prestige-oriented, risk-tolerant or effort-tolerant. Activity-based systems were preferred among status- and income-oriented respondents.

Conclusion

The vast majority of young doctors prefer payment systems that are less activity-based than the current contracts offered in the Norwegian health service. Recruitment and retention in less prestigious medical specialities might improve if young doctors could choose payment systems corresponding with their diverse preferences.
Literature
1.
Fujisawa R, Lafortune G. The remuneration of general practitioners and specialists in 14 OECD countries: what are the factors influencing variations across countries? Paris: OECD2008 Contract No.: OECD Wealth Working papers no.41.
2.
Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, et al. In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev. 2001;91:73–8.CrossRef
3.
Robinson J. Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Quar. 2001;79:149–77.CrossRef
4.
Flodgren G, Eccles M, Shepperd S, Scott A, Parmelli E, Beyer F. An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011(7. Art. No.: CD009255. DOI: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD009255.)
5.
Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, Schöffski O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy. 2013;110:115–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Schiøtz A. Distiktslegens vekst og fall. In: Lian O, Merok E, editors. Mellom nostalgi og avantgarde. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget AS; 2005. p. 20-34.
7.
Jovic E, Wallace J, Lemaire J. The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6.
8.
Heiligers P. Gender differences in medical students’ motives and career choice. Med Educ. 2012;12:1–11.
9.
Heiligers P, Hingstman L. Career preferences and the work and family balance in medicine: gender differences among medical specialists. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1235–46.CrossRef
10.
Lambert T, Davidson J, Evans J, Goldacre M. Doctors’ reasons for rejecting initial choices of specialties as long-term careers. Med Educ. 2003;37:312–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Soethout M. Career preference of medical students and career choice of recent graduates. Factors influencing the preference for a choice of a medical specialty in general and in public health in particular. Amsterdam: Department of Health Sciences. VU University Amsterdam; 2007.
12.
Jovic E, Wallace J, Lemaire J. The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians. BMC Health Services Research. 2006;6:55.
13.
Goldin C. A grand gender convergence: its last chapter. Am Econ Rev. 2014;104:1091–119.CrossRef
14.
Lee T, Cosgrove T. Engaging doctors in the health care revolution. Harv Bus Rev. 2014;92:104–11.PubMed
15.
Kann I, Biørn E, Lurås H. Competition in general practice: prescriptions to the elderly in a list patient system. J Health Econ. 2010;29:751–64.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Hunnes A, Møen J, K S. Wage structure and labor mobility in Norway 1980–1997. NBER Working Paper No. 12974. 2007;1-52.
18.
Køber T, Vigran Å. Arbeidstid blant helsepersonell – Stort omfang av deltidsarbeid. Samfunnspeilet. 2011;2:58–62.
19.
20.
Abelsen B, Olsen J. Does an activity based remuneration system attract young doctors to general practice? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(68):1–8.
21.
Romøren T, Torjesen D, Landmark B. Promoting coordination in Norwegian health care. Int J Integrated Care. 2011;11, e127.CrossRef
22.
Kruijthof C, Van Leeuwen C, Ventevogel P, Van Der Horst H, Van Staveren G. Career perspectives of women and men medical students. Med Educ. 1992;26:21–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Maiorova T. The role of gender in medical specialty choice and general practice preferences. Maastricht: Maastricht University; 2009.
24.
Dohmen T, Falk A. Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: productivity. Preferences Gender Am Econ Rev. 2011;101:556–90.CrossRef
25.
Devlin R, Sarma S. Do physician remuneration schemes matter? The case of Canadian family physicians. J Health Econ. 2008;27:1168–81.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Bowman M, Gross M. Overview of research on women in medicine - issues for public policymakers. Public Health Rep. 1986;101:513–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Vaglum P, Wiers-Jenssen J, Ekeberg O. Motivation for medical school: the relationship to gender and specialty preferences in a nationwide sample. Med Educ. 1999;33:236–42.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Soethout M. Career preference of medical students and career choice of recent graduates. Factors influencing the preference for a choice of a medical specialty in general and in public health in particular. Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam; 2007
29.
Morrison J. Influences before and during medical school on career choices. Med Educ. 2004;38(3):230–1.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
Album D, Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:182–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Album D. The prestige of diseases and medical specialities (in Norwegian). Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991;111:2127–33.PubMed
33.
Shortell S. Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Soc Sci Med. 1974;8:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Rosoff S, Leone M. The public prestige of medical specialities: overviews and undercurrents. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:321–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Hinze S. Gender and the body of medicine or at least some body parts: (Re)constructing the prestige hierarchy of medical specialities. Sociolo Quart. 1999;40:217–39.CrossRef
36.
Creed P, Searle J, ME P. Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1184–9.CrossRef
37.
Wiers-Jenssen J, Aasland O. Change in career plans during the first half of medical school (in Norwegian). Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999;119:2858–64.PubMed
38.
Morrison J. Influences before and during medical school on career choices. Med Educ. 2004;38:230–1.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
41.
Jackson D. Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised Manual. Port Huron (MI): Sigma Assessment Systems Inc.; 2004.
42.
Pearson S, Goldman L, Orav J, Pearson S, Goldman L, Orav J, et al. Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians’ risk attitudes make the difference? J Gen Int Med. 1995;10:557–64.CrossRef
43.
Robinson G. Do general practitioners’ risk-taking propensities and learning styles influence their continuing medical education preferences? Med Teach. 2002;24:71–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Baldwin R, Green J, Shaw J, Simpson D, Bird T, Cleves M. Physician risk attitudes and hospitalization of infants with bronchiolitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:142–6.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Katz D, Williams G, Brown R, Aufderheide T, Bogner T, Rahko P. Emergency physicians’ fear of malpractice in evaluating patients with possible acute cardiac ischemia. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46:525–33.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Fuglenes D, Fuglenes D, Oian P, Sønbø-Kristiansen I. Obstetricians’ choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:48. e1-.e.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Allison, P. Multiple regression. A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 1999.
48.
49.
Chan Y. Multinomial logistic regression. Singapore Med J. 2005;46:259–68.PubMed
50.
Briscoe F. Temporal flexibility and careers: the role of large-scale organizations for physicians. Industrial Labor Relations Rev. 2006;60:88–104.CrossRef
51.
Halvorsen P, Steinert S, Aaraas I. Remuneration and organization in general practice: do GPs prefer private practice or salaried positions? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30:229–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Holte J, Abelsen B, Halvorsen P, JA O. General practitioners’ altered preferences for private practice vs. salaried positions: a consequence of proposed policy regulations? MBMC Health Service Research. 2015;15. doi:doi:10.​1186/​s12913-015-0777-4.
53.
Scott A. Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ. 2001;20:329–47.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Günther O, Kürstein B, Riedel-Heller S, König H. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:212–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Jones J, Humphreys J, Adena M. Rural GPs’ ratings of initiatives designed to improve rural medical workforce recruitment and retention. Rural and remote health. 2004;4(314):1–10.
56.
Evans J, Lambert T, Goldacre M. GP recruitment and retention: a qualitative analysis of doctors’ comments about training for and working in general practice Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002;83:iii-vi, p. 1-33.
57.
Brehm J, Gates S. Working, shirking and sabotage: a bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1997.CrossRef
58.
Bøgh AL. What determines the behaviour and performance of health professionals? Public service motivation, professional norms and/or economic incentives. Int Rev Admin Sci. 2009;75:79–97.CrossRef
59.
Godager G, Wiesen D. Profit or patients’ health benefit? Exploring the heterogeneity in physician altruism. J Health Econ. 2013;32:1105–16.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Green E. Payment systems in the healthcare industry: an experimental study of physician incentives. J Econ Behav Org. 2014;106:367–78.CrossRef
61.
Allard M, Jelovac I, Léger P-T. Payment mechanism and GP self-selection: capitation versus fee for service. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2014;14:143–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Young doctors’ preferences for payment systems: the influence of gender and personality traits
Authors
Birgit Abelsen
Jan Abel Olsen
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0060-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Human Resources for Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research

Preparing for the data revolution: identifying minimum health information competencies among the health workforce

Research

How China’s new health reform influences village doctors’ income structure: evidence from a qualitative study in six counties in China

Case study

Optimizing the interprofessional workforce for centralized intake of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid disease: case study

Research

Approaches to improving the contribution of the nursing and midwifery workforce to increasing universal access to primary health care for vulnerable populations: a systematic review

Case study

Understanding and valuing the broader health system benefits of Uganda’s national Human Resources for Health Information System investment

Research

Factors influencing the career choice and retention of community mental health workers in Ghana