Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Fertility | Research

Successful pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis by NGS for a carrier of complex chromosome rearrangements

Authors: Jian Ou, Chuanchun Yang, Xiaoli Cui, Chuan Chen, Suyan Ye, Cai Zhang, Kai Wang, Jianguo Chen, Qin Zhang, Chunfeng Qian, Guangguang Fang, Wenyong Zhang

Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The study is aimed to provide prediction for fertility risk in the setting of assisted reproduction for a woman with complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs).

Methods

We implemented a robust approach, which combined whole-genome low-coverage mate-pair sequencing (WGL-MPS), junction-spanning PCR and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) method to provide accurate chromosome breakpoint junctional sequences in the embryo selection process in the setting of assisted reproduction for a couple with recurrent abortions due to CCRs.

Result

WGL-MPS was applied to a female carrying CCRs which consisted of 9 breakpoints and 1 cryptic deletion related to fertility risks. Sequencing data provided crucial information for designing junction-spanning PCR and PGT-A process, which was performed on the 11 embryos cultivated. One embryo was considered qualified for transplanting, which carried the exact same CCRs as the female carrier, whose phenotype was normal. The amniotic fluid was also investigated by WGL-MPS and karyotyping at 19 weeks’ gestation, which verified the results that the baby carried the same CCRs. A healthy baby was born at 39 weeks’ gestation by vaginal delivery.

Conclusion(s)

Our study illustrates the WGL-MPS approach combining with junction-spanning PCR and PGT-A is a powerful and practical method in the setting of assisted reproduction for couples with recurrent miscarriage due to chromosomal abnormalities, especially CCRs carriers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pai GS. G.H. Thomas, W. Mahoney, and B.R. Migeon, Complex chromosome rearrangements. Report of a new case and literature review. Clin Genet. 1980;18:436–44.CrossRef Pai GS. G.H. Thomas, W. Mahoney, and B.R. Migeon, Complex chromosome rearrangements. Report of a new case and literature review. Clin Genet. 1980;18:436–44.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kleczkowska A, Fryns JP, Van den Berghe H. Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR) and their genetic consequences. J Genet Hum. 1982;30:199–214.PubMed Kleczkowska A, Fryns JP, Van den Berghe H. Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR) and their genetic consequences. J Genet Hum. 1982;30:199–214.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Stephenson MD. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:24–9.CrossRef Stephenson MD. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:24–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sierra S, Stephenson M. Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24:17–24.CrossRef Sierra S, Stephenson M. Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24:17–24.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Escudero T, Estop A, Fischer J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:1662–9.CrossRef Escudero T, Estop A, Fischer J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:1662–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gorski JL, Kistenmacher ML, Punnett HH, Zackai EH, Emanuel BS. Reproductive risks for carriers of complex chromosome rearrangements: analysis of 25 families. Am J Med Genet. 1988;29:247–61.CrossRef Gorski JL, Kistenmacher ML, Punnett HH, Zackai EH, Emanuel BS. Reproductive risks for carriers of complex chromosome rearrangements: analysis of 25 families. Am J Med Genet. 1988;29:247–61.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, Hedon B, Sarda P. Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:476–94.CrossRef Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, Hedon B, Sarda P. Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:476–94.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Madan K. Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements: reproductive aspects. A review. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:947–63.CrossRef Madan K. Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements: reproductive aspects. A review. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A:947–63.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aristidou C, et al. Accurate breakpoint mapping in apparently balanced translocation families with discordant phenotypes using whole genome mate-pair sequencing. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169935.CrossRef Aristidou C, et al. Accurate breakpoint mapping in apparently balanced translocation families with discordant phenotypes using whole genome mate-pair sequencing. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169935.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chen W, et al. Breakpoint analysis of balanced chromosome rearrangements by next-generation paired-end sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:539–43.CrossRef Chen W, et al. Breakpoint analysis of balanced chromosome rearrangements by next-generation paired-end sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:539–43.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Le Scouarnec S, Gribble SM. Characterising chromosome rearrangements: recent technical advances in molecular cytogenetics. Heredity (Edinb). 2012;108:75–85.CrossRef Le Scouarnec S, Gribble SM. Characterising chromosome rearrangements: recent technical advances in molecular cytogenetics. Heredity (Edinb). 2012;108:75–85.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Luo A, et al. Maternal interchromosomal insertional translocation leading to 1q43-q44 deletion and duplication in two siblings. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:24.CrossRef Luo A, et al. Maternal interchromosomal insertional translocation leading to 1q43-q44 deletion and duplication in two siblings. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:24.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dong Z, et al. A robust approach for blind detection of balanced chromosomal rearrangements with whole-genome low-coverage sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:625–36.CrossRef Dong Z, et al. A robust approach for blind detection of balanced chromosomal rearrangements with whole-genome low-coverage sequencing. Hum Mutat. 2014;35:625–36.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yao H, et al. Breakpoints and deleted genes identification of ring chromosome 18 in a Chinese girl by whole-genome low-coverage sequencing: a case report study. BMC Med Genet. 2016;17:49.CrossRef Yao H, et al. Breakpoints and deleted genes identification of ring chromosome 18 in a Chinese girl by whole-genome low-coverage sequencing: a case report study. BMC Med Genet. 2016;17:49.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li L, et al. Mapping breakpoints of a familial chromosome insertion (18,7) (q22.1; q36.2q21.11) to DPP6 and CACNA2D1 genes in an azoospermic male. Gene. 2014;547:43–9.CrossRef Li L, et al. Mapping breakpoints of a familial chromosome insertion (18,7) (q22.1; q36.2q21.11) to DPP6 and CACNA2D1 genes in an azoospermic male. Gene. 2014;547:43–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa and spermatogenic cells: its biology and applications in humans and animals. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:247–88.CrossRef Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa and spermatogenic cells: its biology and applications in humans and animals. Reprod BioMed Online. 2005;10:247–88.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ou J, et al. Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Mol Cytogenet. 2015;8:105.CrossRef Ou J, et al. Identification of small segmental translocations in patients with repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage using next generation sequencing after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Mol Cytogenet. 2015;8:105.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ordulu Z, et al. Describing sequencing results of structural chromosome rearrangements with a suggested next-generation cytogenetic nomenclature. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:695–709.CrossRef Ordulu Z, et al. Describing sequencing results of structural chromosome rearrangements with a suggested next-generation cytogenetic nomenclature. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:695–709.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Toufaily MH, Roberts DJ, Westgate MN, Holmes LB. Triploidy: variation of phenotype. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145:86–95.CrossRef Toufaily MH, Roberts DJ, Westgate MN, Holmes LB. Triploidy: variation of phenotype. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145:86–95.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference De Gregori M, et al. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J Med Genet. 2007;44:750–62.CrossRef De Gregori M, et al. Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients. J Med Genet. 2007;44:750–62.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Aleksandrova N, et al. Comparison of the results of preimplantation genetic screening obtained by a-CGH and NGS methods from the same embryos. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:1–4.CrossRef Aleksandrova N, et al. Comparison of the results of preimplantation genetic screening obtained by a-CGH and NGS methods from the same embryos. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:1–4.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Baronchelli S, et al. Investigating the role of X chromosome breakpoints in premature ovarian failure. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5:32.CrossRef Baronchelli S, et al. Investigating the role of X chromosome breakpoints in premature ovarian failure. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5:32.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Scott SA, Cohen N, Brandt T, Warburton PE, Edelmann L. Large inverted repeats within Xp11.2 are present at the breakpoints of isodicentric X chromosomes in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:3383–93.CrossRef Scott SA, Cohen N, Brandt T, Warburton PE, Edelmann L. Large inverted repeats within Xp11.2 are present at the breakpoints of isodicentric X chromosomes in Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:3383–93.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fonseca AC, Bonaldi A, Bertola DR, Kim CA, Otto PA, Vianna-Morgante AM. The clinical impact of chromosomal rearrangements with breakpoints upstream of the SOX9 gene: two novel de novo balanced translocations associated with acampomelic campomelic dysplasia. BMC Med Genet. 2013;14:50.CrossRef Fonseca AC, Bonaldi A, Bertola DR, Kim CA, Otto PA, Vianna-Morgante AM. The clinical impact of chromosomal rearrangements with breakpoints upstream of the SOX9 gene: two novel de novo balanced translocations associated with acampomelic campomelic dysplasia. BMC Med Genet. 2013;14:50.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vergult S, et al. Mate pair sequencing for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in patients with intellectual disability and congenital malformations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:652–9.CrossRef Vergult S, et al. Mate pair sequencing for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in patients with intellectual disability and congenital malformations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22:652–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Successful pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis by NGS for a carrier of complex chromosome rearrangements
Authors
Jian Ou
Chuanchun Yang
Xiaoli Cui
Chuan Chen
Suyan Ye
Cai Zhang
Kai Wang
Jianguo Chen
Qin Zhang
Chunfeng Qian
Guangguang Fang
Wenyong Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00572-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2020 Go to the issue