Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Use of Bayesian methods to model the SF-6D health state preference based data

Author: Samer A. Kharroubi

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conventionally, models used for health state valuation data have been frequentists. Recently a number of researchers have investigated the use of Bayesian methods in this area. The aim of this paper is to put on the map of modelling a new approach to estimating SF-6D health state utility values using Bayesian methods. This will help health care professionals in deriving better health state utilities of the original UK SF-6D for their specialized applications.

Methods

The valuation study is composed of 249 SF-6D health states valued by a representative sample of the UK population using the standard gamble technique. Throughout this paper, we present four different models, including one simple linear regression model and three random effect models. The predictive ability of these models is assessed by comparing predicted and observed mean SF-6D scores, R2/adjusted R2 and RMSE. All analyses were carried out using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation methods freely available in the specialist software WinBUGS.

Results

The random effects model with interaction model performs best under all criterions, with mean predicted error of 0.166, R2/adjusted R2 of 0.683 and RMSE of 0.218.

Conclusions

The Bayesian models provide flexible approaches to estimate mean SF-6D utility estimates, including characterizing the full range of uncertainty inherent in these estimates. We hope that this work will provide applied researchers with a practical set of tools to appropriately model outcomes in cost-effectiveness analysis.
Footnotes
1
As mentioned in Brazier et al. [11], these were addresses which contained no resident household for various reasons including: insufficient address, not traced, not yet built, derelict/demolished, business only, empty, institution only, weekend/holiday home.
 
2
The remaining 442 were non-responders. Their addresses were correct and their doors knocked on but they either were not home or said they did not want to participate.
 
3
The graphs in Figure 1 have been plotted by ordering states in terms of their predicted values rather than observed values as presented in Brazier et al. [11]. This is in line with regression analysis where the actual observations are represented by circular dots and the best fit or predicted regression line is represented by the diagonal solid line.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;1:473–83.CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;1:473–83.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brooks R, EuroQol Group. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;3:53–72.CrossRef Brooks R, EuroQol Group. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;3:53–72.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7(6):503–20.CrossRef Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7(6):503–20.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40(2):113–28.CrossRef Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40(2):113–28.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sintonen H, Richardson J. The 15-d measure of health related quality of life: reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. Melbourne: National Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 1994. Sintonen H, Richardson J. The 15-d measure of health related quality of life: reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. Melbourne: National Centre for Health Program Evaluation; 1994.
7.
go back to reference Sintonen H. The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. II. Feasibility, reliability and validity of its valuation system. Melbourne: National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Working Paper 42; 1995. Sintonen H. The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. II. Feasibility, reliability and validity of its valuation system. Melbourne: National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Working Paper 42; 1995.
8.
9.
go back to reference Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):209–24.CrossRef Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):209–24.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1115–28.CrossRef Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1115–28.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.CrossRef Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brazier JE, Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Williams GR. Estimating a preference-based single index for the impact of weight on quality of life-lite (IWQOL-lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value Health. 2004;7(4):490–8.CrossRef Brazier JE, Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Williams GR. Estimating a preference-based single index for the impact of weight on quality of life-lite (IWQOL-lite) instrument from the SF-6D. Value Health. 2004;7(4):490–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmznn RF, Pearlman RA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Mak. 1994;14:9–18.CrossRef Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmznn RF, Pearlman RA. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Mak. 1994;14:9–18.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lee PM. Bayesian statistics, an introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Arnold; 1989. Lee PM. Bayesian statistics, an introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Arnold; 1989.
15.
go back to reference Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995.
16.
go back to reference Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996.
17.
go back to reference Spiegelhatler DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, Lunn D. WinBUGS User manual: Version 1.4. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics unit; 2003. Spiegelhatler DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, Lunn D. WinBUGS User manual: Version 1.4. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics unit; 2003.
18.
go back to reference Dolan P. Modelling valuation for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:351–63.CrossRef Dolan P. Modelling valuation for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:351–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Natarajan R, Kass RE. Reference Bayesian methods for generalised linear mixed models. JASA. 2000;95:227–37.CrossRef Natarajan R, Kass RE. Reference Bayesian methods for generalised linear mixed models. JASA. 2000;95:227–37.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Sciences. 1992;7:457–72.CrossRef Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Sciences. 1992;7:457–72.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Huang IC, Frangakis C, Atkinson MJ, et al. Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: a comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease. Health Serv Res. 2008;43(1 Pt 1):327–39.PubMedPubMedCentral Huang IC, Frangakis C, Atkinson MJ, et al. Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: a comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease. Health Serv Res. 2008;43(1 Pt 1):327–39.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Lawrence WF, Fleishman JA. Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 health survey in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Mak. 2004;24(2):160–9.CrossRef Lawrence WF, Fleishman JA. Predicting EuroQoL EQ-5D preference scores from the SF-12 health survey in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Mak. 2004;24(2):160–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference McCabe C, Edlin R, Meads D, Brown C, Kharroubi SA. Constructing indirect utility functions: some observations on the principles and practice of mapping to obtain health state utilities. PharmacoEconomics. 2013;31(8):635–6414.CrossRef McCabe C, Edlin R, Meads D, Brown C, Kharroubi SA. Constructing indirect utility functions: some observations on the principles and practice of mapping to obtain health state utilities. PharmacoEconomics. 2013;31(8):635–6414.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kharroubi SA, Meads D, Edlin R, Browne C, McCabe C. Use of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods to estimate EQ-5D utility scores from EORTC QLQ data in Myeloma. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(3):351–60.CrossRef Kharroubi SA, Meads D, Edlin R, Browne C, McCabe C. Use of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods to estimate EQ-5D utility scores from EORTC QLQ data in Myeloma. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(3):351–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of Bayesian methods to model the SF-6D health state preference based data
Author
Samer A. Kharroubi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1068-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2018 Go to the issue