Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Development of a rapid point-of-care patient reported outcome measure for cataract surgery in India

Authors: Joshua R. Ehrlich, Charlie Frank, Josiah Smiley, Hong-Gam Le, Sanil Joseph, Stephen G. Schilling, Brian C. Stagg, Joshua D. Stein, R. D. Ravindran, Aravind Haripriya

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For patient undergoing cataract surgery in India, existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are either not culturally relevant, have not been adequately validated, or are too long to be used in a busy clinical setting. We sought to develop and validate a brief and culturally relevant point-of-care PRO measure to address this need.

Methods

Twelve items from the Indian Visual Functioning Questionnaire (IND-VFQ) were selected based on preliminary data. Patients 18 years and older were prospectively recruited at Aravind Eye Care System in Madurai, India. Clinical and sociodemographic data were collected and the 12-item short-form IND-VFQ (SF-IND-VFQ) was administered pre- and post-operatively to 225 patients; Factor analysis and Rasch modeling was performed to assess its psychometric properties.

Results

One item that did not fit a unidimensional scale and had poor fit with the Rasch model was eliminated from the questionnaire. The remaining 11 items represented a single construct (no residual correlations> 0.1) and were largely unaffected by differential item functioning. Five items had disordered thresholds resolved by collapsing the response scale from four to three categories. The survey had adequate reliability (0.80) and good construct (infit range, 0.77–1.29; outfit range, 0.56–1.30) and content (item separation index, 5.87 logits) validity. Measurement precision was fair (person separation index, 1.97). There was evidence that items were not optimally targeted to patients’ visual ability (preoperatively, − 1.92 logits; overall, − 3.41 logits), though the survey measured a very large effect (Cohen’s d 1.80). In a subset of patients, the average time to complete the questionnaire was 2 min 6.3 s.

Conclusions

The SF-IND-VFQ is a valid, reliable, sensitive, and rapidly administered point-of-care PRO measure to assess changes in visual functioning in patients undergoing cataract surgery in India.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes — harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:105–8.CrossRefPubMed Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes — harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:105–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dang A, Mendon S. The role of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in healthcare policy making. Syst Rev Pharm. 2015;6:1.CrossRef Dang A, Mendon S. The role of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in healthcare policy making. Syst Rev Pharm. 2015;6:1.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Sharkey P, Cassard SD, et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:630–8.CrossRefPubMed Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Sharkey P, Cassard SD, et al. The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:630–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Stenevi U, Pesudovs K. The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:718–23.CrossRefPubMed Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Stenevi U, Pesudovs K. The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:718–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pesudovs K, Gothwal VK, Wright T, Lamoureux EL. Remediating serious flaws in the National eye Institute visual function questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:718–32.CrossRefPubMed Pesudovs K, Gothwal VK, Wright T, Lamoureux EL. Remediating serious flaws in the National eye Institute visual function questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:718–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mangione CM, Orav EJ, Lawrence MG, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Goldman L. Prediction of visual function after cataract surgery. A prospectively validated model. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960. 1995;113:1305–11.CrossRef Mangione CM, Orav EJ, Lawrence MG, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Goldman L. Prediction of visual function after cataract surgery. A prospectively validated model. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960. 1995;113:1305–11.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gupta SK, Viswanath K, Thulasiraj RD, Murthy GVS, Lamping DL, Smith SC, et al. The development of the Indian vision function questionnaire: field testing and psychometric evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:621–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta SK, Viswanath K, Thulasiraj RD, Murthy GVS, Lamping DL, Smith SC, et al. The development of the Indian vision function questionnaire: field testing and psychometric evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:621–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Nutheti R, Shamanna BR, Nirmalan PK, Keeffe JE, Krishnaiah S, Rao GN, et al. Impact of impaired vision and eye disease on quality of life in Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4742–8.CrossRefPubMed Nutheti R, Shamanna BR, Nirmalan PK, Keeffe JE, Krishnaiah S, Rao GN, et al. Impact of impaired vision and eye disease on quality of life in Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4742–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fletcher A, Vijaykumar V, Selvaraj S, Thulasiraj RD, Ellwein LB. The Madurai intraocular lens study. III: visual functioning and quality of life outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:26–35.CrossRefPubMed Fletcher A, Vijaykumar V, Selvaraj S, Thulasiraj RD, Ellwein LB. The Madurai intraocular lens study. III: visual functioning and quality of life outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:26–35.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Fenwick E, Balasubramaniam B, Ramani RV, Holz FG, et al. The impact of successful cataract surgery on quality of life, household income and social status in South India. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Fenwick E, Balasubramaniam B, Ramani RV, Holz FG, et al. The impact of successful cataract surgery on quality of life, household income and social status in South India. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Khan A, Amitava AK, Rizvi SAR, Siddiqui Z, Kumari N, Grover S. Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:496–500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan A, Amitava AK, Rizvi SAR, Siddiqui Z, Kumari N, Grover S. Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:496–500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Murthy GVS, Gupta SK, Thulasiraj RD, Viswanath K, Donoghue EM, Fletcher AE. The development of the Indian vision function questionnaire: questionnaire content. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:498–503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murthy GVS, Gupta SK, Thulasiraj RD, Viswanath K, Donoghue EM, Fletcher AE. The development of the Indian vision function questionnaire: questionnaire content. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:498–503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Holz FG, Balasubramaniam B, Ramani RV, Lamoureux EL, et al. The impact of the severity of vision loss on vision-related quality of life in India: an evaluation of the IND-VFQ-33. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6081–8.CrossRefPubMed Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Holz FG, Balasubramaniam B, Ramani RV, Lamoureux EL, et al. The impact of the severity of vision loss on vision-related quality of life in India: an evaluation of the IND-VFQ-33. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6081–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Abingdon-on-Thames, U.K.: Routledge; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Abingdon-on-Thames, U.K.: Routledge; 1988.
15.
go back to reference Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:328. Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:328.
17.
go back to reference Massof RW. Understanding Rasch and item response theory models: applications to the estimation and validation of interval latent trait measures from responses to rating scale questionnaires. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18:1–19.CrossRefPubMed Massof RW. Understanding Rasch and item response theory models: applications to the estimation and validation of interval latent trait measures from responses to rating scale questionnaires. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18:1–19.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cappelleri JC, Jason Lundy J, Hays RD. Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clin Ther. 2014;36:648–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cappelleri JC, Jason Lundy J, Hays RD. Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clin Ther. 2014;36:648–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Petrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, Coon CD. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2015;18:25–34.CrossRef Petrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, Coon CD. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2015;18:25–34.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wright B, Linacre J. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370. Wright B, Linacre J. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.
21.
go back to reference Wright BD, Stone M. Measurement essentials. Wilmington: Wide Range Inc.; 1999. Wright BD, Stone M. Measurement essentials. Wilmington: Wide Range Inc.; 1999.
22.
go back to reference Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association; 2004. Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association; 2004.
23.
go back to reference Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–74.CrossRef Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–74.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2012;21:1305–14.CrossRef Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2012;21:1305–14.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kroenke K, Monahan PO, Kean J. Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:1085–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kroenke K, Monahan PO, Kean J. Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:1085–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, Elliott DB. The activities of daily vision scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2892–9.CrossRefPubMed Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, Elliott DB. The activities of daily vision scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2892–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference McAlinden C, Gothwal VK, Khadka J, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2374–81.CrossRefPubMed McAlinden C, Gothwal VK, Khadka J, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2374–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a rapid point-of-care patient reported outcome measure for cataract surgery in India
Authors
Joshua R. Ehrlich
Charlie Frank
Josiah Smiley
Hong-Gam Le
Sanil Joseph
Stephen G. Schilling
Brian C. Stagg
Joshua D. Stein
R. D. Ravindran
Aravind Haripriya
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0855-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2018 Go to the issue