Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

German version, inter- and intrarater reliability and internal consistency of the “Agitated Behavior Scale” (ABS-G) in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Authors: Stephanie Hellweg, Corina Schuster-Amft

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Agitation is frequently observed during early recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Agitated behaviour often interferes with a goal-orientated rehabilitation and can be a substantial hindrance to therapy. Despite the relatively high occurance of agitation in TBI population there is no objective assessement in German (G) available. An existing scale with excellent psychometric properties is the “Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS)” developed by Corrigan in 1989. The aim of the study was to translate the Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS) into German (ABS-G) and investigate the inter- and intrarater reliability and internal consistency in patients with moderate to severe TBI.

Methods

A formal nine-step translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure (TCCA) was applied. Subsequently a prospective observational patient study was conducted. To examine the interrater reliability and internal consistency, two therapists rated 20 patients independently after a therapy session. This procedure was repeated twice on a weekly basis. The intrarater reliability was assessed through video recordings from three patients. Nine raters scored the demonstrated behaviour on the videotape with the ABS-G independently twice within one month. The inter- and intrarater reliability were evaluated with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the quadratic weighted kappa. The internal consistency was tested with Cronbach’s alpha.

Results

Behaviour of 20 patients (18 males; mean age 41 ± 20.7; mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) cognitive score on admission 7.1 ± 4.04; mean ABS-G score at first observation 17.3 ± 2.83) was assessed threefold. Interrater reliability yielded a correlation coefficient for ABS-G total score of all 60 paired observations of r s 0.845 and a weighted Kappa of 0.738. Intrarater reliability for ABS-G total score ranged between r s 0.719 and 0.953 and showed a weighted Kappa between 0.871 and 0.953. Cronbach’s alpha indicated moderate internal consistency with 0.661.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the ABS-G is a reliable instrument for evaluating agitation in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Hereby it would be possible to monitor agitation objectively and optimise the management of agitated patients according to international recommendations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ciurli P, Formisano R, Bivona U, Cantagallo A, Angelelli P. Neuropsychiatric disorders in persons with severe traumatic brain injury: prevalence, phenomenology, and relationship with demographic, clinical, and functional features. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:116–26.CrossRefPubMed Ciurli P, Formisano R, Bivona U, Cantagallo A, Angelelli P. Neuropsychiatric disorders in persons with severe traumatic brain injury: prevalence, phenomenology, and relationship with demographic, clinical, and functional features. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:116–26.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McNett M, Sarver W, Wilczewski P. The prevalence, treatment and outcomes of agitation among patients with brain injury admitted to acute care units. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1155–62.CrossRefPubMed McNett M, Sarver W, Wilczewski P. The prevalence, treatment and outcomes of agitation among patients with brain injury admitted to acute care units. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1155–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lombard LA, Zafonte RD. Agitation After Traumatic Brain Injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:797–812.CrossRefPubMed Lombard LA, Zafonte RD. Agitation After Traumatic Brain Injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:797–812.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cummings J, Mintzer J, Brodaty H, et al. Agitation in cognitive disorders: International Psychogeriatric Association provisional consensus clinical and research definition. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27:7–17.CrossRefPubMed Cummings J, Mintzer J, Brodaty H, et al. Agitation in cognitive disorders: International Psychogeriatric Association provisional consensus clinical and research definition. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27:7–17.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ponsford J, Janzen S, McIntyre A, Bayley M, Velikonja D, Tate R. INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part I: Posttraumatic Amnesia/Delirium. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29:307–20.CrossRefPubMed Ponsford J, Janzen S, McIntyre A, Bayley M, Velikonja D, Tate R. INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part I: Posttraumatic Amnesia/Delirium. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29:307–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Baguley IJ, Cooper J, Felmingham K. Aggressive Behavior Following Traumatic Brain Injury: How Common Is Common? J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:45–56.CrossRefPubMed Baguley IJ, Cooper J, Felmingham K. Aggressive Behavior Following Traumatic Brain Injury: How Common Is Common? J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:45–56.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Singh R, Venkateshwara G, Nair KP, Khan M, Saad R. Agitation after traumatic brain injury and predictors of outcome. Brain Inj. 2013;28:334–40. Singh R, Venkateshwara G, Nair KP, Khan M, Saad R. Agitation after traumatic brain injury and predictors of outcome. Brain Inj. 2013;28:334–40.
8.
go back to reference Wolffbrandt MM, Poulsen I, Engberg AW, Hornnes N. Occurrence and severity of agitated behavior after severe traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Nurs. 2013;38:133–41.CrossRefPubMed Wolffbrandt MM, Poulsen I, Engberg AW, Hornnes N. Occurrence and severity of agitated behavior after severe traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Nurs. 2013;38:133–41.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Fugate LP, Mysiw JW, Clinchot D. Role of Agitation in Prediction of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:636–44.CrossRefPubMed Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Fugate LP, Mysiw JW, Clinchot D. Role of Agitation in Prediction of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:636–44.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nott MT, Chapparo C, Baguley IJ. Agitation following traumatic brain injury: an Australian sample. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1175–82.CrossRefPubMed Nott MT, Chapparo C, Baguley IJ. Agitation following traumatic brain injury: an Australian sample. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1175–82.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Riley GA. Stress and depression in family carers following traumatic brain injury: the influence of beliefs about difficult behaviours. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:82–8.CrossRefPubMed Riley GA. Stress and depression in family carers following traumatic brain injury: the influence of beliefs about difficult behaviours. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:82–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Amato S, Resan M, Mion L. The Feasibility, Reliability, and Clinical Utility of the Agitated Behavior Scale in Brain-Injured Rehabilitation Patients. Rehabil Nurs. 2012;37:19–24.CrossRefPubMed Amato S, Resan M, Mion L. The Feasibility, Reliability, and Clinical Utility of the Agitated Behavior Scale in Brain-Injured Rehabilitation Patients. Rehabil Nurs. 2012;37:19–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Corrigan JD. Development of a scale for assessment of agitation following traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;11:261–77.CrossRefPubMed Corrigan JD. Development of a scale for assessment of agitation following traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989;11:261–77.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Stange M, Rabold D. Reliability of the agitated behavior scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:91–6.CrossRefPubMed Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Stange M, Rabold D. Reliability of the agitated behavior scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:91–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Rating scale analysis of the agitated behavior scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:656–69.CrossRefPubMed Bogner JA, Corrigan JD, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Rating scale analysis of the agitated behavior scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:656–69.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Corrigan JD, Bogner JA. Factor structure of the Agitated Behavior Scale. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:386–92.CrossRefPubMed Corrigan JD, Bogner JA. Factor structure of the Agitated Behavior Scale. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:386–92.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. SPINE. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRefPubMed Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. SPINE. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.CrossRefPubMed Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.CrossRefPubMed Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRefPubMed Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sandel ME, Bell KR, Michaud LJ. Brain Injury Rehabilitation. 1. Traumatic Brain Injury: Prevention, Pathophysiology, and Outcome Prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:3–9.CrossRef Sandel ME, Bell KR, Michaud LJ. Brain Injury Rehabilitation. 1. Traumatic Brain Injury: Prevention, Pathophysiology, and Outcome Prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:3–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bogner J, Barrett RS, Hammond FM, et al. Predictors of Agitated Behavior During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:S274–81. e274.CrossRefPubMed Bogner J, Barrett RS, Hammond FM, et al. Predictors of Agitated Behavior During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:S274–81. e274.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Sim J, Wright C. The Kappa Statistics in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–68.PubMed Sim J, Wright C. The Kappa Statistics in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–68.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Landis J, Koch G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis J, Koch G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Streiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development ans use. Fourth edn. Oxford; Oxford University Press; 2008. Streiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development ans use. Fourth edn. Oxford; Oxford University Press; 2008.
Metadata
Title
German version, inter- and intrarater reliability and internal consistency of the “Agitated Behavior Scale” (ABS-G) in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
Authors
Stephanie Hellweg
Corina Schuster-Amft
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0511-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016 Go to the issue