Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Short report

Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?

Authors: Christina W. Schnohr, Inese Gobina, Teresa Santos, Joanna Mazur, Mujgan Alikasifuglu, Raili Välimaa, Maria Corell, Curt Hagquist, Paola Dalmasso, Yeva Movseyan, Franco Cavallo, Saskia van Dorsselaer, Torbjørn Torsheim

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The Health Behavior in School-aged Children is a cross-national study collecting data on social and health indicators on adolescents in 43 countries. The study provides comparable data on health behaviors and health outcomes through the use of a common protocol, which have been a back bone of the study sine its initiation in 1983. Recent years, researchers within the study have noticed a questionable comparability on the widely used item on self-rated health. One of the four response categories to the item “Would you say your health is….?” showed particular variation, as the response category “Fair” varied from 20 % in Latvia and Moldova to 3–4 % in Bulgaria and Macedonia. A qualitative mini-survey of the back-translations showed that the response category “Fair” had a negative slant in 25 countries, a positive slant in 10 countries and was considered neutral in 9 countries. This finding indicates that there are what may be called semantic issues affecting comparability in international studies, since the same original word (in an English original) is interpreted differently across countries and cultures. The paper test and discuss a few possible explanations to this, however, only leaving to future studies to hold a cautious approach to international comparisons if working with the self-rated health item with four response categories.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benjamins MR, Hummer RA, Eberstein IW, Nam CB. Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: an analysis of cause-specific mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1297–306.CrossRefPubMed Benjamins MR, Hummer RA, Eberstein IW, Nam CB. Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: an analysis of cause-specific mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1297–306.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37.CrossRefPubMed Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Roberts C, Currie CE, Samdal O, Currie D, Smith R, Maes L. Measuring the health and health behaviours of adolescents through cross-national survey research: recent developments in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. J Public Health. 2007;15:179–86.CrossRef Roberts C, Currie CE, Samdal O, Currie D, Smith R, Maes L. Measuring the health and health behaviours of adolescents through cross-national survey research: recent developments in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. J Public Health. 2007;15:179–86.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schnohr CW, Molcho M, Rasmussen M, Samdal O, de Looze M, Levin K, et al. Trend analyses in the health behaviour in school-aged children study: methodological considerations and recommendations. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25 Suppl 2:7–12.CrossRefPubMed Schnohr CW, Molcho M, Rasmussen M, Samdal O, de Looze M, Levin K, et al. Trend analyses in the health behaviour in school-aged children study: methodological considerations and recommendations. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25 Suppl 2:7–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mensah Y, Chen H. Global clustering of countries by culture – an extension of the GLOBE study. 2013. Mensah Y, Chen H. Global clustering of countries by culture – an extension of the GLOBE study. 2013.
6.
go back to reference Harkness J. In pursuit of quality: issues for cross-national survey research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 1999;2:125–40.CrossRef Harkness J. In pursuit of quality: issues for cross-national survey research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 1999;2:125–40.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lynn P. Developing quality standards for cross-national survey research: five approaches. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2003;6:323–36.CrossRef Lynn P. Developing quality standards for cross-national survey research: five approaches. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2003;6:323–36.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Semantics bias in cross-national comparative analyses: is it good or bad to have “fair” health?
Authors
Christina W. Schnohr
Inese Gobina
Teresa Santos
Joanna Mazur
Mujgan Alikasifuglu
Raili Välimaa
Maria Corell
Curt Hagquist
Paola Dalmasso
Yeva Movseyan
Franco Cavallo
Saskia van Dorsselaer
Torbjørn Torsheim
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0469-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016 Go to the issue