Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Scenarios for population health inequalities in 2030 in Europe: the EURO-HEALTHY project experience

Authors: António Alvarenga, Carlos A. Bana e Costa, Carme Borrell, Pedro Lopes Ferreira, Ângela Freitas, Liliana Freitas, Mónica D. Oliveira, Teresa C. Rodrigues, Paula Santana, Maria Lopes Santos, Ana C. L. Vieira

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health inequalities have been consistently reported across and within European countries and continue to pose major challenges to policy-making. The development of scenarios regarding what could affect population health (PH) inequalities across Europe in the future is considered critical. Scenarios can help policy-makers prepare and better cope with fast evolving challenges.

Objective

This paper describes the three 2030 time-horizon scenarios developed under the EURO-HEALTHY project, depicting the key factors that may affect the evolution of PH inequalities across European regions.

Methods

A three-stage socio-technical approach was applied: i) identification of drivers (key factors expected to affect the evolution of PH inequalities across European regions until 2030) – this stage engaged in a Web-Delphi process a multidisciplinary panel of 51 experts and other stakeholders representing the different perspectives regarding PH inequalities; ii) generation of scenario structures – different drivers’ configurations (i.e. their hypotheses for evolution) were organized into coherent scenario structures using the Extreme-World Method; and iii) validation of scenario structures and generation of scenario narratives. Stages ii) and iii) were conducted in two workshops with a strategic group of 13 experts with a wide view about PH inequalities. The scenario narratives were elaborated with the participants’ insights from both the Web-Delphi process and the two workshops, together with the use of evidence (both current and future-oriented) on the different areas within the PH domain.

Results

Three scenarios were developed for the evolution of PH inequalities in Europe until 2030: ‘Failing Europe’ (worst-case but plausible picture of the future), ‘Sustainable Prosperity’ (best-case but plausible picture of the future), and an interim scenario ‘Being Stuck’ depicting a ‘to the best of our knowledge’ evolution. These scenarios show the extent to which a combination of Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental drivers shape future health inequalities, providing information for European policy-makers to reflect upon whether and how to design robust policy solutions to tackle PH inequalities.

Conclusions

The EURO-HEALTHY scenarios were designed to inform both policy design and appraisal. They broaden the scope, create awareness and generate insights regarding the evolution of PH inequalities across European regions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Commission. Health inequalities in the EU — Final report of a consortium. Consortium lead: Sir Michael Marmot: European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers; 2013. https://doi.org/10.2772/34426. European Commission. Health inequalities in the EU — Final report of a consortium. Consortium lead: Sir Michael Marmot: European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers; 2013. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2772/​34426.
2.
go back to reference Volkery A, Ribeiro T. Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2009;76(9):1198–207.CrossRef Volkery A, Ribeiro T. Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2009;76(9):1198–207.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wepner B, Giesecke S. Drivers, trends and scenarios for the future of health in Europe. Impressions from the FRESHER project. Eur J Futur Res. 2018;6(1):38–48. Wepner B, Giesecke S. Drivers, trends and scenarios for the future of health in Europe. Impressions from the FRESHER project. Eur J Futur Res. 2018;6(1):38–48.
4.
go back to reference Meyer R. Comparison of scenarios on futures of European food chains. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(11):540–5.CrossRef Meyer R. Comparison of scenarios on futures of European food chains. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(11):540–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Misuraca G, Broster D, Centeno C. Digital Europe 2030: Designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy making. Gov Inf Q. 2012;29:S121–S31.CrossRef Misuraca G, Broster D, Centeno C. Digital Europe 2030: Designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy making. Gov Inf Q. 2012;29:S121–S31.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mikko D, Raija K, Leena I-S, Seija J. Anticipating Alternative Futures for the Platform Economy. Technol Innov Manag Rev. 2017;7(9):6–16.CrossRef Mikko D, Raija K, Leena I-S, Seija J. Anticipating Alternative Futures for the Platform Economy. Technol Innov Manag Rev. 2017;7(9):6–16.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gambelli D, Vairo D, Zanoli R. Exploiting Qualitative Information for Decision Support in Scenario Analysis. J Decis Syst. 2010;19(4):407–22.CrossRef Gambelli D, Vairo D, Zanoli R. Exploiting Qualitative Information for Decision Support in Scenario Analysis. J Decis Syst. 2010;19(4):407–22.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Reed MS, Kenter J, Bonn A, Broad K, Burt TP, Fazey IR, et al. Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manag. 2013;128(Supplement C):345–62.CrossRef Reed MS, Kenter J, Bonn A, Broad K, Burt TP, Fazey IR, et al. Participatory scenario development for environmental management: A methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manag. 2013;128(Supplement C):345–62.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Masum H, Ranck J, Singer PA. Five promising methods for health foresight. Foresight. 2010;12(1):54–66.CrossRef Masum H, Ranck J, Singer PA. Five promising methods for health foresight. Foresight. 2010;12(1):54–66.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vollmar HC, Ostermann T, Redaelli M. Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care - a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:10.CrossRef Vollmar HC, Ostermann T, Redaelli M. Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care - a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:10.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Santana P, editor. Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2017. Santana P, editor. Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2017.
12.
go back to reference Kindig D, Stoddart G. What is population health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(3):380–3.CrossRef Kindig D, Stoddart G. What is population health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(3):380–3.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Santana P, Costa C, Freitas Â, Stefanik I, Quintal C, Bana e Costa C, et al. Atlas of population health in European Union regions. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2017.CrossRef Santana P, Costa C, Freitas Â, Stefanik I, Quintal C, Bana e Costa C, et al. Atlas of population health in European Union regions. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2017.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stefanik I, Freitas Â, Doetsch J, Santana P. Involving key stakeholders in the EURO-HEALTHY. In: Santana P, editor. Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press; 2017. p. 60–3. Stefanik I, Freitas Â, Doetsch J, Santana P. Involving key stakeholders in the EURO-HEALTHY. In: Santana P, editor. Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press; 2017. p. 60–3.
15.
go back to reference Orlowski SK, Lawn S, Venning A, Winsall M, Jones GM, Wyld K, et al. Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015;2(2):e12.CrossRef Orlowski SK, Lawn S, Venning A, Winsall M, Jones GM, Wyld K, et al. Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions. JMIR Hum Factors. 2015;2(2):e12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scott V, Stern R, Sanders D, Reagon G, Mathews V. Research to action to address inequities: the experience of the Cape Town Equity Gauge. Int J Equity Health. 2008;7(1):6.CrossRef Scott V, Stern R, Sanders D, Reagon G, Mathews V. Research to action to address inequities: the experience of the Cape Town Equity Gauge. Int J Equity Health. 2008;7(1):6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.CrossRef Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:325–50.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pauly B, Martin W, Perkin K, van Roode T, Kwan A, Patterson T, et al. Critical considerations for the practical utility of health equity tools: a concept mapping study. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:48.CrossRef Pauly B, Martin W, Perkin K, van Roode T, Kwan A, Patterson T, et al. Critical considerations for the practical utility of health equity tools: a concept mapping study. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17:48.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A. A review of scenario planning. Futures. 2013;46:23–40.CrossRef Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A. A review of scenario planning. Futures. 2013;46:23–40.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Goodwin P, Wright G. Scenario planning: an alternative way of dealing with uncertainty. In: Wiley J, Sons L, editors. Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. 3rd ed; 2004. Goodwin P, Wright G. Scenario planning: an alternative way of dealing with uncertainty. In: Wiley J, Sons L, editors. Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. 3rd ed; 2004.
21.
go back to reference Linstone HA, Turoff M. Introduction. In: Turoff HALM, editor. The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1975. p. 3–12. Linstone HA, Turoff M. Introduction. In: Turoff HALM, editor. The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1975. p. 3–12.
23.
go back to reference Boy GA. The group elicitation method for participatory design and usability testing. Interactions. 1997;4(2):27–33.CrossRef Boy GA. The group elicitation method for participatory design and usability testing. Interactions. 1997;4(2):27–33.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R. Fundamentals of strategy: Pearson Education; 2009. Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R. Fundamentals of strategy: Pearson Education; 2009.
25.
go back to reference Sundmacher L, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Busse R. The wider determinants of inequalities in health: a decomposition analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10(1):30.CrossRef Sundmacher L, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Busse R. The wider determinants of inequalities in health: a decomposition analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10(1):30.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Futures IA. Public Health 2030: A Scenario Exploration. Alexandria: Institute for Alternative Futures; 2014. Futures IA. Public Health 2030: A Scenario Exploration. Alexandria: Institute for Alternative Futures; 2014.
27.
go back to reference Forum WE, editor. Sustainable Health Systems: Visions, Strategies, Critical Uncertainties and Scenarios. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2013. Forum WE, editor. Sustainable Health Systems: Visions, Strategies, Critical Uncertainties and Scenarios. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2013.
28.
go back to reference Hoeymans N, Van Loon A, Van den Berg M, Harbers M, Hilderink H, Van Oers J, et al. A healthier Netherlands: Key findings from the dutch 2014 public health status and foresight report. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2014. Hoeymans N, Van Loon A, Van den Berg M, Harbers M, Hilderink H, Van Oers J, et al. A healthier Netherlands: Key findings from the dutch 2014 public health status and foresight report. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM); 2014.
29.
go back to reference European Commission S-G. White Paper on the Future of Europe - Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. Brussels: Belgium European Commission; 2017. European Commission S-G. White Paper on the Future of Europe - Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. Brussels: Belgium European Commission; 2017.
30.
31.
go back to reference Bana e Costa C, Freitas L, Oliveira M, Rodrigues T, Vieira A. Devising and testing a novel methodology for the evaluation of policies under European population health scenarios. In: Santana P, editor. Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press; 2017. p. 85–7. Bana e Costa C, Freitas L, Oliveira M, Rodrigues T, Vieira A. Devising and testing a novel methodology for the evaluation of policies under European population health scenarios. In: Santana P, editor. Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press; 2017. p. 85–7.
32.
go back to reference Wack P. Uncharted waters ahead. Business Harvard Review. 1985;63(5):73–89. Wack P. Uncharted waters ahead. Business Harvard Review. 1985;63(5):73–89.
33.
go back to reference Wack P. Shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Review. 1985;63(6):139–50. Wack P. Shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Review. 1985;63(6):139–50.
34.
go back to reference Kosow H, Gaßner R. Methods of future and scenario analysis: overview, assessment, and selection criteria: German Development Institute; 2008. Kosow H, Gaßner R. Methods of future and scenario analysis: overview, assessment, and selection criteria: German Development Institute; 2008.
Metadata
Title
Scenarios for population health inequalities in 2030 in Europe: the EURO-HEALTHY project experience
Authors
António Alvarenga
Carlos A. Bana e Costa
Carme Borrell
Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Ângela Freitas
Liliana Freitas
Mónica D. Oliveira
Teresa C. Rodrigues
Paula Santana
Maria Lopes Santos
Ana C. L. Vieira
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1000-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue