Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Public Health | Research

Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: utilization and benefits at the national and state levels

Authors: Diana Bowser, Bryan Patenaude, Manjiri Bhawalkar, Denizhan Duran, Peter Berman

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) is used to understand the distribution of health care utilization and spending in comparison to income distribution. The results can illustrate how effectively governments allocate limited resources towards meeting the needs of the poor. In analyzing the distribution of public spending on inpatient, outpatient, and deliveries, this paper represents the most recent BIA completed in India.

Methods

In order to conduct the BIA statistical analysis for this project, 2014 utilization data from the most recently completed Indian National Sample Survey (NSS) was used. Unit costs were estimated for primary care, hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, and deliveries. Concentration curves and concentration indices were estimated both at the national and state levels. Analyses were reported for overall utilization, as well as for the gross and net benefits for inpatient, outpatient, and deliveries.

Results

According to the results, utilization of government inpatient and delivery services is pro-poor. When gross and net benefits are included in the analysis, services become more equal and less pro-poor. Gross benefits, which are measured with state-level unit costs, are virtually equal for all services. Although there are some pro-poor gross benefits trends for national outpatient services, the results also show that the equality of national gross benefits trends hides a significant disparity across Indian States. While a number of Indian States have outpatient gross benefits that are pro-poor, few show pro-poor benefits for inpatient and delivery services. Net benefits, which considers both unit costs for each respective service, and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, trend similarly to gross benefits. In addition, those who use public facilities spend considerable OOP to supplement government services.

Conclusions

This BIA reveals that government spending on public health care has not resulted in significantly pro-poor services. While some progress has been made relative to deliveries and outpatient services, inpatient stays are not pro-poor. In addition, national results mask significant disparities across Indian states.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
go back to reference Acharya D, Vaidyanathan G, Muraleedharan V, Dheenadayalan D, Dash U. Do the poor benefit from public spending on healthcare in India? Results from benefit (utilisation) incidence analysis in Tamil Nadu and Orissa. London: The Consortium for Research on Equitable Health Systems. (201):1–38. Acharya D, Vaidyanathan G, Muraleedharan V, Dheenadayalan D, Dash U. Do the poor benefit from public spending on healthcare in India? Results from benefit (utilisation) incidence analysis in Tamil Nadu and Orissa. London: The Consortium for Research on Equitable Health Systems. (201):1–38.
16.
go back to reference O’Donnell O, O’Neill S, Van Ourti T, Walsh B. Conindex: estimation of concentration indices. Stata J. 2016;16(1):112–38.CrossRef O’Donnell O, O’Neill S, Van Ourti T, Walsh B. Conindex: estimation of concentration indices. Stata J. 2016;16(1):112–38.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Berman PA. Rethinking health care systems: private health care provision in India. World Dev:17. Berman PA. Rethinking health care systems: private health care provision in India. World Dev:17.
20.
go back to reference Davoodi HR, Tiongson ER, Asawanuchit SS. How Useful Are Benefit Incidence Analyses of Public Education and Health Spending. IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/How-Useful-Are-Benefit-Incidence-Analyses-of-Public-Education-and-Health-Spending-16940. Published 2003. Accessed 23 Nov 2018. Davoodi HR, Tiongson ER, Asawanuchit SS. How Useful Are Benefit Incidence Analyses of Public Education and Health Spending. IMF. https://​www.​imf.​org/​en/​Publications/​WP/​Issues/​2016/​12/​30/​How-Useful-Are-Benefit-Incidence-Analyses-of-Public-Education-and-Health-Spending-16940.​ Published 2003. Accessed 23 Nov 2018.
Metadata
Title
Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: utilization and benefits at the national and state levels
Authors
Diana Bowser
Bryan Patenaude
Manjiri Bhawalkar
Denizhan Duran
Peter Berman
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0921-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue