Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Wenzhe Qin, Lingzhong Xu, Jiajia Li, Long Sun, Gan Ding, Hui Shao, Ningze Xu

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Government health subsidy (GHS) is an effective tool to improve population health in China. Ensuring an equitable allocation of GHS, particularly among the poorer socio-economic groups, is a major goal of China’s healthcare reform.
The paper aims to explore how GHS was allocated across different socioeconomic groups, and how well the overall health system was performing in terms of the allocation of subsidy for different types of health services.

Methods

Data from China’s National Health Services Survey (NHSS) in 2013 were used. Benefit incidence analysis (BIA) was applied to examine if GHS was equally distributed across income quintile. Benefit incidence was presented as each quintile’s percentage share of total benefits, and the concentration index (CI) and Kakwani index (KI) were calculated. Health benefits from three types of healthcare services (primary health care, outpatient and inpatient services) were analyzed, separated into urban and rural populations. In addition, the distribution of benefits was compared to the distribution of healthcare need (measured by self-reported illness and chronic disease) across income quintiles.

Results

In urban populations, the CI value of GHS for primary care was negative. (− 0.14), implying an allocation tendency toward poor region; the CI values of outpatient and inpatient services were both positive (0.174 and 0.194), indicating allocation tendencies toward rich region. Similar allocation pattern was observed in rural population, with pro-poor tendency of primary care service (CI = − 0.082), and pro-rich tendencies of outpatient (CI = 0.153) and inpatient services (CI = 0.203). All the KI values of three health services in urban and rural populations were negative (− 0.4991,-0.1851 and − 0.1651; − 0.482, − 0.247and − 0.197), indicating that government health subsidy was progressive and contributed to the narrowing of economic gap between the poor and rich.

Conclusions

The inequitable distribution of GHS in China exited in different healthcare services; however, the GHS benefit is generally progressive. Future healthcare reforms in China should not only focus on expanding the coverage, but also on improving the equity of distribution of healthcare benefits.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization, as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, pp. 19–22 (June 1946): signed on 22 July 1946 by the Representatives of 61 States,(Official Records of the World Health Organization, No. 2 p. 100) and Enterd into Force on 7 April 1948. 1948. https://​en.​wikipedia.​org/​wiki/​World_​Health_​Organization.
2.
Kieny M P, Evans D B. Universal health coverage. 2013.
3.
World Health Organization. Strategizing national health in the 21st century: A handbook[M]. World Health Organization, 2016.
4.
Lindelow M, Araujo E C. Universal health coverage for inclusive and sustainable development. 2014.
5.
Hu S, Tang S, Liu Y, et al. Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2008;372(9652):1846–53.CrossRefPubMed
6.
World Health Organization. World health statistics 2011[M]. World Health Organization, 2011.
7.
O'donnell O, Van D E, Rannan-Eliya R P, et al. The incidence of public spending on healthcare: comparative evidence from Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 2007, 21(1): 93–123.
8.
O’donnell O, Van DE, Rannan-Eliya RP, et al. Who pays for health care in Asia? J Health Econ. 2008;27(2):460–75.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Halasa Y, Nassar H, Zaky H. Benefit-incidence analysis of government spending on Ministry of Health outpatient services in Jordan. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(5):467.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Meng Q, Xu L, Zhang Y, et al. Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):805–14.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Yip WC-M, Hsiao WC, Chen W, et al. Early appraisal of China's huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Deaton A, Zaidi S. Guidelines for constructing consumption aggregates for welfare analysis. World Bank Publications, 2002.
14.
Wagstaff A, O'donnell O, Van D E, et al. Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. World Bank Publications, 2007.
15.
Castro F, Dayton J, Demery L, et al. Public spending on health Care in Africa: do the poor benefit?'. Bulletin of the World Health Organization Canadá, 2000.
16.
Aaron H, Mcguire M. Public goods and income distribution. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1970:907–20.
17.
Meerman J. Public expenditure in Malaysia: who benefits and why[M]: Oxford University Press; 1979.
18.
Van De Walle D, Nead K. Public spending and the poor: theory and evidence[M]: World Bank Publications; 1995.
19.
Hillemeier MM, Lanza ST, Landale NS, et al. Measuring early childhood health and health disparities: a new approach. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(10):1852–61.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Tiongson M E, Davoodi M H R, Asawanuchit S S. How useful are benefit incidence analyses of public education and health spending[M]. International Monetary Fund, 2003.
21.
Si L, Chen M, Palmer AJ. Has equity in government subsidy on healthcare improved in China? Evidence from the China’s National Health Services Survey. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Glick P, Razakamanantsoa M. The distribution of education and health services in Madagascar over the 1990s: increasing progressivity in an era of low growth. J Afr Econ. 2006;15(3):399–433.CrossRef
23.
Chen M, Fang G, Wang L, et al. Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119840.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Sahn DE, Younger SD. Expenditure incidence in Africa: microeconomic evidence. Fisc Stud. 2000;21(3):329–47.CrossRef
25.
Tangcharoensathien V, Patcharanarumol W, Ir P, et al. Health-financing reforms in Southeast Asia: challenges in achieving universal coverage. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):863–73.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Kwon S. Health care financing in Asia: key issues and challenges. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011;23(5):651–61.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Committee Communist Party of China Central. Opinions of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council on Deepening the Health Care System Reform. Beijing: Government of the People’s Republic of China, 2009.
28.
Khan JAM, Ahmed S, Maclennan M, et al. Benefit incidence analysis of healthcare in Bangladesh–equity matters for universal health coverage. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(3):359–65.PubMed
29.
Chen M, Palmer AJ, Si L. Assessing equity in benefit distribution of government health subsidy in 2012 across East China: benefit incidence analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Mills A, Ataguba JE, Akazili J, et al. Equity in financing and use of health care in Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania: implications for paths to universal coverage. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):126–33.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Mcintyre D, Ataguba JE. How to do (or not to do)… a benefit incidence analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2010;26(2):174–82.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Sauerborn R, Nougtara A, Hien M, et al. Seasonal variations of household costs of illness in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(3):281–90.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Mcintyre D, Gilson L, Valentine N, et al. Equity of health sector revenue generation and allocation: a south African case study. Washington DC: Partnerships for Health Reform; 1998.
34.
Makinen M, Waters H, Rauch M, et al. Inequalities in health care use and expenditures: empirical data from eight developing countries and countries in transition. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):55–65.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
He AJ, Wu S. Towards universal health coverage via social health insurance in China: systemic fragmentation, reform imperatives, and policy alternatives[J]. Applied health economics and health policy. 2017;15(6):707–16.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Tang S, Meng Q, Chen L, et al. Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1493–501.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Wagstaff A, Bilger M, Buisman L R, et al. Who benefits from government health spending and why? A global assessment. 2014.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Wenzhe Qin
Lingzhong Xu
Jiajia Li
Long Sun
Gan Ding
Hui Shao
Ningze Xu
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0775-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research

Street-level workers’ inadequate knowledge and application of exemption policies in Burkina Faso jeopardize the achievement of universal health coverage: evidence from a cross-sectional survey

Research

Racial and cultural minority experiences and perceptions of health care provision in a mid-western region

Research

Patterns of Medicare-funded primary health and specialist consultations in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians in the two years before hospitalisation for ischaemic heart disease

Review

What is known about pathways to mental health care for Australian Aboriginal young people?: a narrative review

Research

Detecting spatio-temporal mortality clusters of European countries by sex and age

Research

The impact of rural residence and HIV infection on poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in a large urban hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis