Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania

Authors: Peter Binyaruka, Bjarne Robberstad, Gaute Torsvik, Josephine Borghi

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Payment for performance (P4P) strategies, which provide financial incentives to health workers and/or facilities for reaching pre-defined performance targets, can improve healthcare utilisation and quality. P4P may also reduce inequalities in healthcare use and access by enhancing universal access to care, for example, through reducing the financial barriers to accessing care. However, P4P may also enhance inequalities in healthcare if providers cherry-pick the easier-to-reach patients to meet their performance targets. In this study, we examine the heterogeneity of P4P effects on service utilisation across population subgroups and its implications for inequalities in Tanzania.

Methods

We used household data from an evaluation of a P4P programme in Tanzania. We surveyed about 3000 households with women who delivered in the last 12 months prior to the interview from seven intervention and four comparison districts in January 2012 and a similar number of households in 13 months later. The household data were used to generate the population subgroups and to measure the incentivised service utilisation outcomes. We focused on two outcomes that improved significantly under the P4P, i.e. institutional delivery rate and the uptake of antimalarials for pregnant women. We used a difference-in-differences linear regression model to estimate the effect of P4P on utilisation outcomes across the different population subgroups.

Results

P4P led to a significant increase in the rate of institutional deliveries among women in poorest and in middle wealth status households, but not among women in least poor households. However, the differential effect was marginally greater among women in the middle wealth households compared to women in the least poor households (p = 0.094). The effect of P4P on institutional deliveries was also significantly higher among women in rural districts compared to women in urban districts (p = 0.028 for differential effect), and among uninsured women than insured women (p = 0.001 for differential effect). The effect of P4P on the uptake of antimalarials was equally distributed across population subgroups.

Conclusion

P4P can enhance equitable healthcare access and use especially when the demand-side barriers to access care such as user fees associated with drug purchase due to stock-outs have been reduced.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Alderman H, Lavy V. Household responses to public health services: cost and quality tradeoffs. The World Bank Research Observer. 1996;11:3–22.CrossRef
2.
Alshamsan R, Majeed A, Ashworth M, Car J, Millett C. Impact of pay for performance on inequalities in health care: systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15:178–84.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Andersen R. A behavioral model of families' use of health services. In: A behavioral model of families' use of health services; 1968.
4.
Andersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973;51:95–124.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Anselmi L, Binyaruka P, Borghi J. Understanding causal pathways within health systems policy evaluation through mediation analysis: an application to payment for performance (P4P) in Tanzania. Implement Sci. 2017;12:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963;53:941–73.
7.
Barnett AG, van der Pols JC, Dobson AJ. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:215–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Barros AJ, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, et al. Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet. 2012;379:1225–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Basinga P, Gertler PJ, Binagwaho A, et al. Effect on maternal and child health services in Rwanda of payment to primary health-care providers for performance: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2011;377:1421–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Binyaruka P, Borghi J. Improving quality of care through payment for performance: examining effects on the availability and stock-out of essential medical commodities in Tanzania. Tropical Med Int Health. 2017;22:92–102.CrossRef
11.
Binyaruka P, Patouillard E, Powell-Jackson T, et al. Effect of paying for performance on utilisation, quality, and user costs of health Services in Tanzania: a controlled before and after study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Bitler MP, Gelbach JB, Hoynes HW. What mean impacts miss: distributional effects of welfare reform experiments. Am Econ Rev. 2006;96:988–1012.CrossRef
13.
Bitler MP, Gelbach JB, Hoynes HW. Distributional impacts of the self-sufficiency project. J Public Econ. 2008;92:748–65.CrossRef
14.
Boeckxstaens P, Smedt DD, Maeseneer JD, Annemans L, Willems S. The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Boerma JT, Bryce J, Kinfu Y, Axelson H, Victora CG. Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 countdown countries. Lancet. 2008;371:1259–67.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Bonfrer I, Soeters R, Van de Poel E, et al. Introduction of performance-based financing in burundi was associated with improvements in care and quality. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014a;33:2179–87.CrossRef
17.
Bonfrer I, Van de Poel E, Van Doorslaer E. The effects of performance incentives on the utilization and quality of maternal and child care in Burundi. Soc Sci Med. 2014b;123:96–104.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Borghi J, Mayumana I, Mashasi I, et al. Protocol for the evaluation of a pay for performance programme in Pwani region in Tanzania: a controlled before and after study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Brand JE, Xie Y. Who benefits most from college? Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education. Am Sociol Rev. 2010;75:273–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Cameron AC, Miller DL. A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J Hum Resour. 2015;50:317–72.CrossRef
21.
CSDH. 2008. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.
22.
Djebbari H, Smith J. Heterogeneous impacts in PROGRESA. J Econ. 2008;145:64–80.CrossRef
23.
Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the quality and outcomes framework. Lancet. 2008;372:728–36.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, Schoffski O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy. 2013;110:115–30.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Ellis RP, McGuire TG. Hospital response to prospective payment: moral hazard, selection, and practice-style effects. J Health Econ. 1996;15:257–77.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Engineer CY, Dale E, Agarwal A, et al. Effectiveness of a pay-for-performance intervention to improve maternal and child health services in Afghanistan: a cluster-randomized trial. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:451–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19:69–79.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data--or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38:115–32.PubMed
30.
Fort AL, Kothari MT, Abderrahim N. Postpartum care: levels and determinants in developing countries. In: USAID; Calverton. Maryland: Macro International Inc.; 2006.
31.
Fritsche G, Soeters R, Meessen B. Performance-based financing toolkit. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2014.CrossRef
32.
33.
Gertler P, Locay L, Sanderson W. Are user fees regressive?: the welfare implications of health care financing proposals in Peru. J Econ. 1987;36:67–88.CrossRef
34.
Gertler P, Vermeersch C. Using performance incentives to improve health outcomes. In: NBER working paper no. 19046; 2013.
35.
Gillam SJ, Siriwardena AN, Steel N. Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10:461–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Gravelle H, Sutton M, Ma A. 2008. Doctor behaviour under a pay for performance contract: further evidence from the quality and outcomes framework. CHE Research Paper 34.
37.
Gwatkin DR. How much would poor people gain from faster progress towards the millennium development goals for health? Lancet. 2005;365:813–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Heckman JJ, Smith J, Clements N. Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts. Rev Econ Stud. 1997;64:487–535.CrossRef
39.
Idd A, Yohana O, Maluka SO. Implementation of pro-poor exemption policy in Tanzania: policy versus reality. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2013;28:e298–309.CrossRef
40.
Ireland M, Paul E, Dujardin B. Can performance-based financing be used to reform health systems in developing countries? Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:695–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA. Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2010.
42.
Kontopantelis E, Buchan I, Reeves D, Checkland K, Doran T. Relationship between quality of care and choice of clinical computing system: retrospective analysis of family practice performance under the UK's quality and outcomes framework. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):1–11.CrossRef
43.
Kruk ME, Mbaruku G, Rockers PC, Galea S. User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania. Tropical Med Int Health. 2008;13:1442–51.CrossRef
44.
Kutzin J. Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: concepts and implications for policy. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:602–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence? Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:839–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Lannes L, Meessen B, Soucat A, Basinga P. Can performance-based financing help reaching the poor with maternal and child health services? The experience of rural Rwanda. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2016;31:309–48.CrossRef
47.
Le Grand J. Equity versus efficiency: the elusive trade-off. Ethics. 1990;100:554–68.CrossRef
48.
Li J, Hurley J, DeCicca P, Buckley G. Physician response to pay-for-performance: evidence from a natural experiment. Health Econ. 2014;23:962–78.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Litvack JI, Bodart C. User fees plus quality equals improved access to health care: results of a field experiment in Cameroon. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37:369–83.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Lu C, Chin B, Lewandowski JL, et al. Towards universal health coverage: an evaluation of Rwanda Mutuelles in its first eight years. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39282.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Markovitz AA, Ryan AM. Pay-for-performance: disappointing results or masked heterogeneity? Med Care Res: Rev; 2016.
52.
53.
54.
Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TA, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Mayumana I, Borghi J, Anselmi L, Mamdani M, Lange S. Effects of payment for performance on accountability mechanisms: evidence from Pwani, Tanzania. Soc Sci Med. 2017;179:61–73.CrossRefPubMed
56.
McIntyre D, Thiede M, Birch S. Access as a policy-relevant concept in low- and middle-income countries. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4:179–93.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Meessen B, Soucat A, Sekabaraga C. Performance-based financing: just a donor fad or a catalyst towards comprehensive health-care reform? Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:153–6.CrossRefPubMed
58.
59.
NBS. Tanzania population and housing census: population distribution by administrative areas 2012. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS); 2013.
60.
O'Neill J, Tabish H, Welch V, et al. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:56–64.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:265–72.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Priedeman Skiles M, Curtis SL, Basinga P, Angeles G. An equity analysis of performance-based financing in Rwanda: are services reaching the poorest women? Health Policy Plan. 2013;28:825–37.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Renmans D, Holvoet N, Orach CG, Criel B. Opening the 'black box' of performance-based financing in low- and lower middle-income countries: a review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:1297–309.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1448–54.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Rosenthal MB, Fernandopulle R, Song HR, Landon B. Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23:127–41.CrossRef
66.
Rosenthal MB, Frank RG. What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:135–57.CrossRefPubMed
67.
68.
Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:812–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(9):Cd008451.
70.
Sekabaraga C, Diop F, Soucat A. Can innovative health financing policies increase access to MDG-related services? Evidence from Rwanda. Health Policy Plan. 2011;Suppl 2(26):ii52–62.
71.
Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:244–60.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Skiles MP, Curtis SL, Basinga P, Angeles G, Thirumurthy H. The effect of performance-based financing on illness, care-seeking and treatment among children: an impact evaluation in Rwanda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:375.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Soeters R, Peerenboom PB, Mushagalusa P, Kimanuka C. Performance-based financing experiment improved health care in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30:1518–27.CrossRef
74.
Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Social determinants of health. In: Discussion paper 2 (policy and practice); 2010.
75.
TDHS. Tanzania demographic and health survey 2010. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS); 2011.
76.
TDHS. Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey 2015–16. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS); 2016.
77.
Van de Poel E, Flores G, Ir P, O'Donnell O. Impact of performance-based financing in a low-resource setting: a decade of experience in Cambodia. Health Econ. 2016;25:688–705.CrossRefPubMed
78.
79.
Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Van der Burg H, et al. Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US. J Health Econ. 2000;19:553–83.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, et al. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Victora CG, Barros AJ, Axelson H, et al. How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 countdown to 2015 countries: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet. 2012;380:1149–56.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Victora CG, Requejo JH, Barros AJ, et al. Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet. 2016;387:2049–59.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21:459–68.CrossRefPubMed
84.
85.
WHO. Equitable access to essential medicines: a framework for collective action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
86.
WHO. The world health report: health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
87.
WHO. Handbook on health inequality monitoring: with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
88.
Witter S, Fretheim A, Kessy FL, Lindahl AK. Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(2):Cd007899.
89.
Witter S, Toonen J, Meessen B, et al. Performance-based financing as a health system reform: mapping the key dimensions for monitoring and evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
90.
Metadata
Title
Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania
Authors
Peter Binyaruka
Bjarne Robberstad
Gaute Torsvik
Josephine Borghi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0728-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research

Trends in health resource disparities in primary health care institutions in Liaoning Province in Northeast China

Research

Inequalities in the geographic distribution of hospital beds and doctors in traditional Chinese medicine from 2004 to 2014

Research

Socialization, legitimation and the transfer of biomedical knowledge to low- and middle-income countries: analyzing the case of emergency medicine in India

Research

Disparities in cervical screening participation: a comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population

Research

Unequal distribution of health human resource in mainland China: what are the determinants from a comprehensive perspective?

Research

Socioeconomic inequalities in newborn care during facility and home deliveries: a cross sectional analysis of data from demographic surveillance sites in rural Bangladesh, India and Nepal