Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Impact of telephone nursing education program for equity in healthcare

Authors: Anna T. Höglund, Marianne Carlsson, Inger K. Holmström, Elenor Kaminsky

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Swedish Healthcare Act prescribes that healthcare should be provided according to needs and with respect for each person’s human dignity. The goal is equity in health for the whole population. In spite of this, studies have revealed that Swedish healthcare is not always provided equally. This has also been observed in telephone nursing.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate if and how an educational intervention can improve awareness of equity in healthcare among telephone nurses.

Methods

The study had a quasi-experimental design, with one intervention group and one control group. A base-line measurement was performed before an educational intervention and a follow-up measurement was made afterwards in both groups, using a study specific questionnaire in which fictive persons of different age, gender and ethnicity were assessed concerning, e.g., power over one’s own life, quality of life and experience of discrimination. The educational intervention consisted of a web-based lecture, literature and a seminar, covering aspects of inequality in healthcare related to gender, age and ethnicity, and gender and intersectionality theories as explaining models for these conditions.

Results

The results showed few significant differences before and after the intervention in the intervention group. Also in the control group few significant differences were found in the second measurement, although no intervention was performed in that group. The reason might be that the instrument used was not sensitive enough to pick up an expected raised awareness of equity in healthcare, or that solely the act of filling out the questionnaire can create a sort of intervention effect. Fictive persons born in Sweden and of young age were assessed to have a higher Good life-index than the fictive persons born outside Europe and of higher age in all assessments.

Conclusion

The results are an imperative that equity in healthcare still needs to be educated and discussed in different healthcare settings. The intervention and questionnaire were designed to fit telephone nurses, but could easily be adjusted to suit other professional groups, who need to increase their awareness of equity in healthcare.
Literature
1.
Smirthwaite G. (O)jämställdhet i hälsa och vård: en genusmedicinsk kunskapsöversikt. (In English: (In)-equity in health and heath care: a systematic review of gender medicine. Stockholm: Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (SKL); 2014.
2.
Osika I, Evengård B, Waernulf L, Nyberg F. Tvättsäcksprojektet – Genusskillnader in på bara skinnet. (In English: The laundry basket project: Gender differences under your skin). Lakartidningen. 2005;40(102):2846–51.
3.
4.
Höglund AT, Holmström I. “It’s easier to talk to a woman”. Aspects of gender in Swedish telenursing. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2979–86.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Kaminsky E, Carlsson M, Höglund AT, Holmström I. Paediatric health calls to Swedish telenurses: a descriptive study of content and outcome. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:454–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Colett A, Kent W, Swain S. The role of a telephone helpline in provision of patient information. Nursing Standards. 2006;19:41–4.CrossRef
7.
Swedin B. Vårdråd direkt: Sjukvårdsrådgivningar i samverkan. Slutrapport från Utredningen om nationellt samordnad sjukvårdsrådgivning, (In English: Healthcare direct: Telephone nursing in collaboration. Final report from the national inquiry into coordinated telephone nursing). Stockholm: Landstingsförbundet; 2003.
8.
Kaminsky E, Rosenqvist U, Holmström I. Telenurses’ understanding of work: detective or educator? J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(2):382–90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Fredriksson M. Between equity and local autonomy: A governance dilemma in Swedish Healthcare. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2012.
10.
Jonvallen P, Berg E, Barry J. The development of contract research organisations in Sweden: healthcare, privatisation and neo-liberalism. N Technol Work Employ. 2011;26:196–209.CrossRef
11.
Diefenbach T. New Public Management in public sector organizations: the dark side of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’. Public Adm. 2009;87(4):892–909.CrossRef
12.
Andersson Bäck M. Conceptions, conflicts and contradictions at the introduction of a Swedish health call centre, Thesis. Sweden: University of Gothenburg; 2008.
13.
Jennett PA, Hall AL, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, et al. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9:311–0.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Knowles E, O’Cathain A, Morrell J, Munro JF, Nicholl JP. NHS Direct and nurses – opportunity or monotony? Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39:857–66.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Hakimnia R, Carlsson M, Holmström IK, Höglund AT. Exploring the communication between telenurse and caller – A critical discourse analysis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014;24(9):242–55.
16.
Hakimnia R, Carlsson M, Höglund AT, Holmström IK. Doing gender in the context of telenursing. Analyses of authentic calls to a telenursing site in Sweden. Clinical Nursing Studies. 2015;3(2):24–30.
17.
Östlin P. Gender Inequalities in Health: The Significance of Work. In: Wamala SP, Lynch J, editors. Gender and Social Inequalities in Health. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2002. p. 43–65.
18.
Goode J, Hanlon G, Luff D, O’Cathain A, Strangleman T, Greatbatch D. Male callers to NHS Direct: the assertive carer, the new dad and the reluctant patient. Health. 2004;8:311–28.PubMed
19.
Cooper D, Arnold E, Smith G, Hollyoak V, Chinemana F. The effect of deprivation, age and sex on NHS Direct call rates. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(513):287–91.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Hsu W-C, Bath PA, Large S, Williams S. Older people’s use of NHS Direct. Age Ageing. 2011;40:335–40.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Knowles E, Munro J, O’Cathain A, Nicholl J. Equity of access to healthcare. Evidence from NHS Direct in the UK. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12:262–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Shah SM, Cook DG. Socio-economic determinants of casualty and NHS Direct use. J Public Health. 2008;30:75–81.CrossRef
23.
Waqas U, Theivendra A, Sood V, Vasireddy A, Maryon-Davis A. Men and older people are less likely to use NHS Direct. Br Med J. 2003;326:710.CrossRef
24.
Rubin, G. The traffic in women. Notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex. Reprinted in Nicholson L. (Ed.) (1997) The Second Wave. A Reader in Feminist Theory. New York & London: Routledge; 1975. p. 27–62.
25.
Hirdman Y. Genussystemet – Reflexioner kring kvinnors sociala underordning. (In English: The gender system. Reflections on women’s social subordination), Kvinnovetenskaplig Tidskrift. 1988. p. 49–63.
26.
27.
Connell RW. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995.
28.
Connell RW. Gender and Power. Oxford: Polity Press; 2003.
29.
Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic masculinity, rethinking the concept. Gend Soc. 2005;19:829–59.CrossRef
30.
Schippers M. Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory Soc. 2007;36:85–102.CrossRef
31.
Lyons AC. Masculinities, femininities, behaviour and health. Soc Personal Psychol. 2009;3:394–412.
32.
Saltonstall R. Healthy bodies, social bodies: men’s and women’s concepts and practices of health in everyday life. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:7–14.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Addis ME, Mahalik JR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003;58:5–14.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Courtenay WH. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1385–401.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Noone JH, Stephens C. Men, masculine identities, and healthcare utilisation. Sociol Health Illn. 2008;30:711–25.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Schofield T, Connell RW, Walker L, Wood JF, Butland DL. Understanding men’s health illness: a gender-relations approach to policy, research and practice. J Am Coll Heal. 2000;48:247–56.CrossRef
37.
38.
Macintyre S, Hunt K. Socioeconomic position, gender and health. How do they interact? J Health Psychol. 1997;2:315–34.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Dressel P, Minkler M, Yen I. Gender, race, class and aging: advances and opportunities. Int J Health Serv. 1997;27:579–600.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Weber L, Parrah-Medina D. Intersectionality and women’s health: charting a path to eliminating health disparities. In: Segal MT, Demos V, Kronenfeld JJ, editors. Gender Perspectives on Health and Medicine (Advances in Gender Research, Volume 7). New York: Emerald Group; 2003. p. 181–230.CrossRef
41.
Dworkin SL. Who is epidemiologically fathomable in the HIV/ AIDS epidemic? Gender, sexuality and intersectionality in public health. Cult Health Sex. 2005;7:615–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1712–20.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Wamala SP, Merlo J, Boström G. Perceived discrimination, socioeconomic disadvantage and refraining from seeking medical treatment in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:409–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Carlsson, M., Höglund, AT., Kamisky, E., Holmström, IK. (Manuscript) Exploration of equity in healthcare – A survey with an intersectional perspective.
45.
Holmström, I., Kaminsky, E., Höglund, AT., Carlsson, M. (Manuscript) Student nurses’ awareness of equity in healthcare – An intersectional perspective.
46.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:979–83.CrossRef
47.
Risman BJ. Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1998.
48.
Ejd, M. (ed.). Genusyrsel och normuppror. En antologi om vård, värderingar och jämställda löner. (In English: Gender Vertigo and Norm Revolution. An Anthology on Care, Values and Equal Payment). Göteborg: Vårdförbundet. Göteborgstryckeriet; 2013.
49.
Russell S. An overview of adult learning processes. Urol Nurs. 2006;26(5):347–52.
50.
Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Androgogy versus Pedagogy. New York: New York Association Press; 1970.
51.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrica. 1951;16(3):297–334.CrossRef
52.
Nunnally JC. Assessment of Reliability in Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1978.
53.
Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Association. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2008.
54.
Statistics Sweden. Statistical Data Base. Statistical Yearbook of Sweden. 2015.
55.
56.
Verdonk P, Benschop Y, De Haes H, Lagro-Janssen T. From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(1):135–52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of telephone nursing education program for equity in healthcare
Authors
Anna T. Höglund
Marianne Carlsson
Inger K. Holmström
Elenor Kaminsky
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0447-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research

Evaluation of performance and impacts of maternal and child health hospital services using Data Envelopment Analysis in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China: a comparison study among poverty and non-poverty county level hospitals

Research

Burden of cumulative risk factors associated with non-communicable diseases among adults in Uganda: evidence from a national baseline survey

Research

Is the distribution of care quality provided under pay-for-performance equitable? Evidence from the Advancing Quality programme in England

Research

Parental migration and smoking behavior of left-behind children: evidence from a survey in rural Anhui, China

Research

The impact of the Great Recession on mental health and its inequalities: the case of a Southern European region, 1997–2013

Research

Assessing equity in benefit distribution of government health subsidy in 2012 across East China: benefit incidence analysis