Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening services in Korea, 1998–2012

Authors: Sujin Kim, Jongnam Hwang

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to examine how income-related inequalities in screening services for gastric and colorectal cancer in Korea have changed over the past decades, along with the implementation of the national cancer screening program, and also to quantify each contribution from various socio-demographic factors income-related inequalities with respect to these cancer screening services.

Methods

Three cycles (1998, 2005, and 2010–2012) of Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) were utilized. To measure income-related inequalities in the use of gastric and colorectal cancer, individuals over the age of 40 and the age of 50 were included respectively, and the Concentration Index (CI) was calculated for each cycle. To identify and quantify contribution from each socio-demographic factor, decomposition of the CIs was conducted.

Results

Throughout this study, CIs and horizontal inequity indices (HIs) steadily but consistently decreased, suggesting that inequalities and inequities in participation in gastric and colorectal cancer screening were weakened after the implementation of the national public cancer screening program. Decomposition analyses revealed that whereas decreases in inequalities mostly stemmed from income and educational levels; higher income and better education levels are still major contributors to the observed inequalities that influence participation in cancer screening services in Korea.

Conclusion

Our empirical findings suggest that, although the policy of reducing out-of-pocket payment for cancer screening may contribute to the observed decreases in inequality, it alone is not likely to completely eliminate inequality. Further research is required to identify barriers that prevent people with lower socioeconomic status from participation in cancer screening, which allows equal access for equal need.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
WHO: National cancer control programmes- Policies and managerial guidelines. WHO ed., 2nd edition: World Health Organization 2002.
2.
McKinnon B, Harper S, Moore S. Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries. Int J Public Health. 2011;56:139–52.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M, Rosso S, Bielska-Lasota M, Coebergh JW, et al. Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:773–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Provenzale D, Gray RN. Colorectal cancer screening and treatment: review of outcomes research. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004:45–55.
5.
Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2137–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lee H, Min BH, Lee JH, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, et al. Survival outcome associated with the screening interval for gastric cancer in Korea. Digestion. 2011;84:142–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Palencia L, Espelt A, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Puigpinos R, Pons-Vigues M, Pasarin MI, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:757–65.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Lee K, Lim HT, Hwang SS, Chae DW, Park SM. Socio-economic disparities in behavioural risk factors for cancer and use of cancer screening services in Korean adults aged 30 years and older: the Third Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005 (KNHANES III). Public Health. 2010;124:698–704.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Whynes DK, Frew EJ, Manghan CM, Scholefield JH, Hardcastle JD. Colorectal cancer, screening and survival: the influence of socio-economic deprivation. Public Health. 2003;117:389–95.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hao Y, Jemal A, Zhang X, Ward EM. Trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates by age, race/ethnicity, and indices of access to medical care, 1995–2004 (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:1855–63.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Katz SJ, Hofer TP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage: breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. JAMA. 1994;272:530–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
De Maio FG, Linetzky B, Ferrante D. Changes in the social gradients for Pap smears and mammograms in Argentina: evidence from the 2005 and 2009 National Risk Factor Surveys. Public Health. 2012;126:821–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Lee M, Park EC, Chang HS, Kwon JA, Yoo KB, Kim TH. Socioeconomic disparity in cervical cancer screening among Korean women: 1998–2010. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:553.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
Puddu M, Demarest S, Tafforeau J. Does a national screening programme reduce socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use? Int J Public Health. 2009;54:61–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Puigpinos-Riera R, Serral G, Pons-Vigues M, Palencia L, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Borrell C. Evolution of inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening in Barcelona: population surveys 1992, 2001, and 2006. J Womens Health. 2011;20:1721–7.CrossRef
16.
Tabuchi T, Hoshino T, Nakayama T, Ito Y, Ioka A, Miyashiro I, et al. Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:972–83.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare. National cancer screening programmes guidelines. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2006.
18.
Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK. Trends in cancer screening rates among korean men and women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004–2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45:86–94.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
Choi KS, Jun JK, Lee HY, Hahm MI, Oh JH, Park EC. Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Korea: a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:265.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare. Trend in the uptake of cancer screening: adults over the age of 19. Seoul: Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2013.
21.
Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang M-j, Kim Y, Kim K, Choi S, et al. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J of Epidemiology. 2014;43:69–77.CrossRef
22.
Korea Centres for Disease and Control and Prevention (KCDC): The fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data User Guide. KCDC 2012.
23.
Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E, Watanabe N. On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. J Econom. 2003;112:207–23.CrossRef
24.
van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X, the OECD Health Equity Research Group. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ. 2006;174:177–83.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Heo J, Hwang J. Income-related Inequalitiesin cancer screening in Korea: using Concentration Index (CI) and decomposition of CI. Health Soc Welfare Rev. 2014;34:59–81.CrossRef
27.
Solmi F, Von Wagner C, Kobayashi LC, Raine R, Wardle J, Morris S. Decomposing socio-economic inequality in colorectal cancer screening uptake in England. Soc Sci Med. 2015;134:76–86.CrossRefPubMed
28.
O’Donnell O, van Dooslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data : A Guide to Techniques and Their Impementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2008.
29.
Haper SL, Lynch J. Methods for measuring cancer disparities : using data relevant to healthy people 2010 cancer-related objectives. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2005.
30.
O’Donnell O, van Dooslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Chapter 8. The Concentration Index. In: Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data : A Guide to Techniques and Their Impementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2008. p. 95–108.
31.
32.
Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ. 2005;14:429–32.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Devaux M. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16:21–33.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Hajizadeh M, Karen Campbell M, Sarma S. Socioeconomic inequalities in adult obesity risk in Canada: trends and decomposition analyses. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:203–21.CrossRefPubMed
35.
O’Donnell O, van Doorslear E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Chapter 15. Measuring and explaining inequity in health service delivery. In: Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data : A Guide to Techniques and Their Impementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2008. p. 177–86.
36.
37.
Hwang J, Rudnisky C, Bowen S, Johnson JA. Income-related inequalities in visual impairment and eye screening services in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdv185.
38.
Kwon S. Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage. Health Policy Plan. 2009;24:63–71.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Devaux M, De Looper M. Income-related inequalities in health service utilisation in 19 OECD countries, 2008–2009. OECD Health Working Papers No. 58, OECD Publishng 2012.
40.
von Wagner C, Baio G, Raine R, Snowball J, Morris S, Atkin W, et al. Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:712–8.CrossRef
41.
42.
Carrieri V, Wuebker A. Assessing inequalities in preventive care use in Europe. Health Policy. 2013;113:247–57.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Sabates R, Feinstein L. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Britain. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2998–3010.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Wardle J, McCaffery K, Nadel M, Atkin W. Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:249–61.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Stimpson JP, Pagan JA, Chen LW. Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care. Health Aff. 2012;31:2747–54.CrossRef
46.
Finney Rutten LJ, Nelson DE, Meissner HI. Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987–2000). Prev Med. 2004;38:258–68.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Peipins LA, Soman A, Berkowitz Z, White MC. The lack of paid sick leave as a barrier to cancer screening and medical care-seeking: results from the National Health Interview Survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:520.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
48.
Kim S, Kwon S, Subramanina SV. Has the National Cancer Screening Program reduced income inequalities in screening attendance in South Korea? Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26:1617–25.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Rakowski W, Meissner H, Vernon SW, Breen N, Rimer B, Clark MA. Correlates of repeat and recent mammography for women ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2093–101.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Hesse B. Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:147–56.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Bao Y, Fox SA, Escarce JJ. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in the discussion of cancer screening: “between-” versus “within-” physician differences. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:950–70.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
52.
Tefft N, Kageleiry A. State-level unemployment and the utilization of preventive medical services. Health Ser Res. 2014;49:186–205.CrossRef
53.
54.
Pace LE, Keating NL. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. JAMA. 2014;311:1327–35.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening services in Korea, 1998–2012
Authors
Sujin Kim
Jongnam Hwang
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0319-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research

Exploring levers and barriers to accessing primary care for marginalised groups and identifying their priorities for primary care provision: a participatory learning and action research study

Research

Health and healthcare access among Zambia’s female prisoners: a health systems analysis

Research

Improving health related quality of life among rural hypertensive patients through the integrative strategy of health services delivery: a quasi-experimental trial from Chongqing, China

Research

The effect of the Family Health Strategy on usual source of care in Brazil: data from the 2013 National Health Survey (PNS 2013)

Research

Low level of attention to health inequalities in prevention planning activities of the Italian Regions

Research

Are differential consumption patterns in health-related behaviours an explanation for persistent and widening social inequalities in health in England?