Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

How the government intervention affects the distribution of physicians in Turkey between 1965 and 2000

Author: Erdinç Ünal

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

One of the main weaknesses of the health system in Turkey is the uneven distribution of physicians. The diversity among geographical districts was huge in the beginning of the 1960s. After the 1980s, the implementation of a two-year compulsory service for newly graduated physicians is an interesting and specific experience for all countries. The aim of this study is to analyse the distribution of physicians, GPs and specialists between the years 1965-2000 and the efficiency of the strict 15 year government intervention (1981-1995).

Methods

The data used in this study includes the published data by the Ministry of Health and The State Institute of Statistics between the years 1965–2000. Covering 35 years for total physicians, GPs and specialists, Gini coefficients are calculated so as to observe the change in the distribution. In order to measure the efficiency of government intervention, Gini index belonging to the previous 15 years (first period-1965 to 1980) and the last 15 years (second period) of 1981 when the compulsory service was enacted is also analysed including the statistical tests.

Results

In 1965, the Gini for total physician is quite high (0.47), and in 2000 it decreases considerably (0.20). In 1965, the Gini for GPs and the Gini for specialists is 0.44 and 0.52, respectively and in 2000 these values decrease to 0.13 and 0.28, respectively. It is observed that, with this government intervention, the level of diversity has decreased dramatically up to 2000. Regarding to regression, the rate of decrease in Gini index in the second period is higher for the GPs than that of the specialists.

Conclusion

The inequalities in the distribution between GPs and specialists are significantly different; inequality of specialist distribution is higher than the GP. The improvement of the inequality in the physician distribution produced by the market mechanism shows a long period when it is left to its own devices. It is seen that the compulsory service policy is efficient since the physician distribution has improved significantly. The government intervention provides a faster improvement in the GP distribution.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Charles EM, Lori AT. Distributional change in physician manpower, United States, 1963–80. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(6):638–42.CrossRef Charles EM, Lori AT. Distributional change in physician manpower, United States, 1963–80. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(6):638–42.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jiang HJ, Begun JW. Dynamics of change in local physician supply: an ecological perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1525–41.PubMedCrossRef Jiang HJ, Begun JW. Dynamics of change in local physician supply: an ecological perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1525–41.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Isabel C, Paula V. Geographic distribution of physicians in Portugal. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(4):383–93.PubMedCrossRef Isabel C, Paula V. Geographic distribution of physicians in Portugal. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(4):383–93.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Farmer J, Inada H, Kajii E. Geographic distribution of primary care physicians in Japan and Britain. Health Place. 2010;16:164–6.PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto M, Inoue K, Farmer J, Inada H, Kajii E. Geographic distribution of primary care physicians in Japan and Britain. Health Place. 2010;16:164–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fülöp G, Kopetsch T, Hofstatter G, Schöpe P. Regional distribution effects of ‘needs planning’ for office-based physicians in Germany and Austria-methods and empirical findings. J Public Health. 2008;16:447–55.CrossRef Fülöp G, Kopetsch T, Hofstatter G, Schöpe P. Regional distribution effects of ‘needs planning’ for office-based physicians in Germany and Austria-methods and empirical findings. J Public Health. 2008;16:447–55.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kanchanachitra C, Lindelow M, Johnston T, Hanvoravongchai P, Lorenzo F, Huong N, et al. Human resources for health in southeast Asia: shortages, distributional challenges and international trade in health services. Lancet. 2011;377:769–81.PubMedCrossRef Kanchanachitra C, Lindelow M, Johnston T, Hanvoravongchai P, Lorenzo F, Huong N, et al. Human resources for health in southeast Asia: shortages, distributional challenges and international trade in health services. Lancet. 2011;377:769–81.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Busch L, Dale C. The changing distribution of physicians. Socio Econ Plan Sci. 1978;12(4):167–76.CrossRef Busch L, Dale C. The changing distribution of physicians. Socio Econ Plan Sci. 1978;12(4):167–76.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mistretta MJ. Differantial effects of economic factors on specialist and family physician distribution in İllions: A country-level analysis. National Rural health Assoc. 2007;23(3):215–22.CrossRef Mistretta MJ. Differantial effects of economic factors on specialist and family physician distribution in İllions: A country-level analysis. National Rural health Assoc. 2007;23(3):215–22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Newhouse JP, Williams AP, Bennett BW, Schwartz WB. Does the geographical distribution of physicians reflect market failure? Bell J Econ. 1982;13(2):493–505.CrossRef Newhouse JP, Williams AP, Bennett BW, Schwartz WB. Does the geographical distribution of physicians reflect market failure? Bell J Econ. 1982;13(2):493–505.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Newhouse JP, Williams AP, Schwartz WB, Bennett BW. The Geographic distribution of physicians: Is the conventional wisdom correct? California: The Rand Corporation Publications; 1982. Newhouse JP, Williams AP, Schwartz WB, Bennett BW. The Geographic distribution of physicians: Is the conventional wisdom correct? California: The Rand Corporation Publications; 1982.
11.
go back to reference Rosenthal MB, Zaslavsky A, Newhouse JP. The Geographic Distribution of Physicians Revisited. Health Res Educ Trust. 2005;40(6):1931–52. Rosenthal MB, Zaslavsky A, Newhouse JP. The Geographic Distribution of Physicians Revisited. Health Res Educ Trust. 2005;40(6):1931–52.
13.
go back to reference Feeley TH. Using the theory of reasoned action to model retention in rural primary care physicians. J Rural Health. 2003;19(3):245–51.PubMedCrossRef Feeley TH. Using the theory of reasoned action to model retention in rural primary care physicians. J Rural Health. 2003;19(3):245–51.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pong RW, Pitblado J. Beyond counting heads: some methodological issues in measuring geographic distribution of physicians. Can J Rural Med. 2002;7(1):12–20. Pong RW, Pitblado J. Beyond counting heads: some methodological issues in measuring geographic distribution of physicians. Can J Rural Med. 2002;7(1):12–20.
15.
go back to reference Maio FG, Linetzky B, Ferrante D, Fleischer NL. Extending the income inequality hypothesis: Ecological results from the 2005 and 2009 Argentine National Risk Factor Surveys. Global Public Health. 2012;7(6):635–47.PubMedCrossRef Maio FG, Linetzky B, Ferrante D, Fleischer NL. Extending the income inequality hypothesis: Ecological results from the 2005 and 2009 Argentine National Risk Factor Surveys. Global Public Health. 2012;7(6):635–47.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brown MC. Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: Theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(9):1243–56.PubMedCrossRef Brown MC. Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: Theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(9):1243–56.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y. Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We that Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? J Econ. 1992;54(1–3):159–78.CrossRef Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y. Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We that Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? J Econ. 1992;54(1–3):159–78.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hann M, Gravelle H. The maldistribution of general practitioners in England and Wales: 1974–2003. Br Gen Pract. 2004;54:894–8. Hann M, Gravelle H. The maldistribution of general practitioners in England and Wales: 1974–2003. Br Gen Pract. 2004;54:894–8.
20.
go back to reference Horev T, Pesis-Katz I, Mukamel DB. Trends in geographic disparities in allocation of health care resources in the US. Health Policy. 2004;68:223–32.PubMedCrossRef Horev T, Pesis-Katz I, Mukamel DB. Trends in geographic disparities in allocation of health care resources in the US. Health Policy. 2004;68:223–32.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Meliala A, Hort K, Trisnantoro L. Addressing the unequal geographic distribution of specialist doctors in Indonesia: The role of the private sector and effectiveness of current regulations. Soc Sci Med. 2013;82:30–4.PubMedCrossRef Meliala A, Hort K, Trisnantoro L. Addressing the unequal geographic distribution of specialist doctors in Indonesia: The role of the private sector and effectiveness of current regulations. Soc Sci Med. 2013;82:30–4.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yardım MS, Üner S. Geographical Disparities in the Distribution of Physicians in Turkey. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2013;12(5):487–94. Yardım MS, Üner S. Geographical Disparities in the Distribution of Physicians in Turkey. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2013;12(5):487–94.
Metadata
Title
How the government intervention affects the distribution of physicians in Turkey between 1965 and 2000
Author
Erdinç Ünal
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0131-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2015 Go to the issue