Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Asia Pacific Family Medicine 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model

Authors: Ngiap Chuan Tan, Chirk Jenn Ng, Mitchell Rosemary, Khan Wahid, Lee Gan Goh

Published in: Asia Pacific Family Medicine | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary care research is at a crossroad in South Pacific. A steering committee comprising a member of WONCA Asia Pacific Regional (APR) council and the President of Fiji College of General Practitioners garnered sponsorship from Fiji Ministry of Health, WONCA APR and pharmaceutical agencies to organize the event in October 2013. This paper describes the processes needed to set up a national primary research agenda through the collaborative efforts of local stakeholders and external facilitators using a test case in South Pacific.

Method

The setting was a 2-day primary care research workshop in Fiji. The steering committee invited a team of three external facilitators from the Asia-Pacific region to organize and operationalize the workshop. The eventual participants were 3 external facilitators, 6 local facilitators, and 29 local primary care physicians, academics, and local medical leaders from Fiji and South Pacific Islands. Pre-workshop and main workshop programs were drawn up by the external facilitators, using participants’ input of research topics relating to their local clinical issues of interest. Course notes were prepared and distributed before the workshop. In the workshop, proposed research topics were shortlisted by group discussion and consensus. Study designs were proposed, scrutinized, and adopted for further research development.

Results

The facilitators reviewed the processes in setting the research agenda after the workshop and conceived the proposed 6E model. These processes can be grouped for easy reference, comprising the pre-workshop stages of “entreat”, “enlist”, “engage”, and the workshop stages of “educe”, “empower”, and “encapsulate”.

Conclusion

The 6E model to establish a research agenda is conceptually logical. Its feasibility can be further tested in its application in other situation where research agenda setting is the critical step to improve the quality of primary care.

Literature
  1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J: Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005, 83: 457–502. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  2. Regional committee for the Western pacific. World Health organization. Health systems strengthening and primary healthcare (2008). Accessed on 25 Nov 2013: http://​www.​wpro.​who.​int/​health_​systems/​wpr59R4_​primary_​health_​care_​resolution.​pdf
  3. Graham R, Wayne I, Timaima T, Rigieta N, Sisa O, Sheetal S et al. The Fiji islands health system review. (Health Systems in Transition, Vol. 1 No. 1 2011). ISBN 978 92 9061 543 9
  4. Cuboni HD, Finau SA, Wainiqolo I, Cuboni G: Fijian participation in health research: analysis of Medline publications 1965–2002. Pac Health Dialog 2004,11(1):59–78.PubMed
  5. Ali SS: Fiji National Health Systems Research Workshop report. Pac Health Dialog 2009,15(2):7–12.PubMed
  6. Green LA: Research domain in Family Medicine. Ann Fam Med 2004, 2: S23-S29. 10.1370/afm.147PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
Metadata
Title
Developing a primary care research agenda through collaborative efforts – a proposed “6E” model
Authors
Ngiap Chuan Tan
Chirk Jenn Ng
Mitchell Rosemary
Khan Wahid
Lee Gan Goh
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Asia Pacific Family Medicine / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1447-056X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-014-0017-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Asia Pacific Family Medicine 1/2014 Go to the issue