Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Research article

Rehabilitation of executive function in chronic paediatric brain injury: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Anne E. Brandt, Torun G. Finnanger, Ruth E. Hypher, Torstein B. Rø, Eva Skovlund, Stein Andersson, Kari Risnes, Jan Stubberud

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Impaired executive functions (EFs, i.e., purposeful, goal-directed behaviour) cause significant disability after paediatric acquired brain injury (pABI) warranting efficient interventions. Goal Management Training (GMT) is a metacognitive protocol proven effective for executive dysfunction in adults. This pre-registered, blinded, parallel-randomized controlled trial evaluated efficacy of a paediatric adaptation (pGMT) compared to a psychoeducative control (paediatric Brain Health Workshop, pBHW) to improve EF.

Methods

Children aged 10 to 17 years with pABI (e.g., traumatic brain injury, brain tumour), ≥ 1 year post-onset or ended treatment, with parent-reported EF complaints were eligible. Participants were randomized (computer-algorithm) to either group-based pGMT (n = 38) or pBHW (n = 38). The active control was tailored to keep non-specific factors constant. Thus, both treatments comprised of 7 sessions at hospitals over 3 consecutive weeks, followed by 4 weeks of telephone counselling of participants, parents, and teachers. Parent-reported daily life EF, assessed by the questionnaire Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF; Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) and Metacognition Index (MI)), were co-primary outcomes 6 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included neuropsychological tests and a complex naturalistic task (Children’s Cooking Task).

Results

Seventy-three participants (96%) completed allocated interventions and 71 (93%) attended the 6-month follow-up. The results demonstrated no significant difference in effectiveness for the two interventions on parent-reported EF: For BRIEFBRI, mean (SD) raw score for pGMT was 42.7 (8.8) and 38.3 (9.3) for pBHW. Estimated difference was − 2.3 (95% CI − 5.1 to 0.6). For BRIEFMI, the corresponding results were 80.9 (20.4) for GMT and 75.5 (19.3) for pBHW. Estimated difference was − 1.4 (95% CI −8.5 to 5.8). In performance-based tests, pGMT was associated with improved inhibition and executive attention, while pBHW was associated with fewer errors in the naturalistic task.

Conclusions

In pABI, metacognitive training (pGMT) did not demonstrate additional effectiveness on parent-reported daily life EF at 6-month follow-up, when compared to a psychoeducative control. Both interventions were well-tolerated and demonstrated distinct improvements at different EF assessment levels. To conclude on pGMT efficacy, larger studies are needed, including further investigation of appropriate assessment levels and possible differences in effect related to treatment duration, developmental factors, and injury characteristics.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov, NCT0321534211, 11 July 2017
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. World health statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. WHO. World health statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
6.
go back to reference Gioia G, Isquith, P., & Guy, S.: Assessment of executive functions in children with neurological impairment. In: Psychological and developmental assessment: children with disabilities and chronic conditions. Edited by Rosenthal RSS. New York: The Guildford Press; 2001: 317–356. Gioia G, Isquith, P., & Guy, S.: Assessment of executive functions in children with neurological impairment. In: Psychological and developmental assessment: children with disabilities and chronic conditions. Edited by Rosenthal RSS. New York: The Guildford Press; 2001: 317–356.
19.
go back to reference Stamenova V, Levine B. Effectiveness of goal management training(R) in improving executive functions: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018:1–31. Stamenova V, Levine B. Effectiveness of goal management training(R) in improving executive functions: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018:1–31.
21.
go back to reference Robertson IH, Garavan H. Vigilant attention. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004. p. 631–40. Robertson IH, Garavan H. Vigilant attention. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2004. p. 631–40.
24.
go back to reference Tornas S, Lovstad M, Solbakk AK, Schanke AK, Stubberud J. Goal management training combined with external cuing as a means to improve emotional regulation, psychological functioning, and quality of life in patients with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):1841–1852.e1843.CrossRef Tornas S, Lovstad M, Solbakk AK, Schanke AK, Stubberud J. Goal management training combined with external cuing as a means to improve emotional regulation, psychological functioning, and quality of life in patients with acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):1841–1852.e1843.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Burgess P. Theory and methodology in executive function research. In: Rabbitt P, editor. Methodology of frontal executive function. Hove: Psychology Press; 1997. p. 81–116. Burgess P. Theory and methodology in executive function research. In: Rabbitt P, editor. Methodology of frontal executive function. Hove: Psychology Press; 1997. p. 81–116.
41.
go back to reference WHO. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
42.
go back to reference Robertson IH, & Levine, B.: Attention and arousal in neurorehabilitation. In: Principles of frontal lobe function. Edited by Knight DTSRT. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013: 742–749. Robertson IH, & Levine, B.: Attention and arousal in neurorehabilitation. In: Principles of frontal lobe function. Edited by Knight DTSRT. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013: 742–749.
47.
go back to reference Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2000. Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2000.
48.
50.
go back to reference Tornas S, Lovstad M, Solbakk AK, Evans J, Endestad T, Hol PK, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functions in patients with chronic acquired brain injury with goal management training, external cuing, and emotional regulation: a randomized controlled trial. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016;22(4):436–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715001344.CrossRefPubMed Tornas S, Lovstad M, Solbakk AK, Evans J, Endestad T, Hol PK, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functions in patients with chronic acquired brain injury with goal management training, external cuing, and emotional regulation: a randomized controlled trial. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016;22(4):436–52. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​S135561771500134​4.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living. New York: Dell Publishing; 1990. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living. New York: Dell Publishing; 1990.
59.
go back to reference Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children - fifth edition. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2014. Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children - fifth edition. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2014.
60.
go back to reference Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system: examiners manual: psychological corporation; 2001. Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system: examiners manual: psychological corporation; 2001.
61.
go back to reference Conners C. Conners continuous performance test 3rd edition™(Conners CPT 3™) manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc; 2014. Conners C. Conners continuous performance test 3rd edition™(Conners CPT 3™) manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc; 2014.
82.
go back to reference Campbell JM, & Hammond, RK.: Best practices in rating scale assessment of children’s behavior. In: Best practices in school psychology: data-based and collaborative decision making. edn. Edited by Thomas PLHA. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.; 2014: 287-304. Campbell JM, & Hammond, RK.: Best practices in rating scale assessment of children’s behavior. In: Best practices in school psychology: data-based and collaborative decision making. edn. Edited by Thomas PLHA. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.; 2014: 287-304.
83.
go back to reference McConaughy SH, & Ritter, DR.: Best practices in multimethod assessment of emotional and behavioral disorders. . In: Best practices in school psychology: data-based and collaborative decision making. edn. Edited by Thomas PLHA. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.; 2014: 367-389. McConaughy SH, & Ritter, DR.: Best practices in multimethod assessment of emotional and behavioral disorders. . In: Best practices in school psychology: data-based and collaborative decision making. edn. Edited by Thomas PLHA. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.; 2014: 367-389.
84.
go back to reference Posner MI, DiGirolamo GJ. Executive attention: conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1998. pp. 401–423. Posner MI, DiGirolamo GJ. Executive attention: conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1998. pp. 401–423.
Metadata
Title
Rehabilitation of executive function in chronic paediatric brain injury: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Anne E. Brandt
Torun G. Finnanger
Ruth E. Hypher
Torstein B. Rø
Eva Skovlund
Stein Andersson
Kari Risnes
Jan Stubberud
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02129-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue