Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | SARS-CoV-2 | Research article

Reducing travel-related SARS-CoV-2 transmission with layered mitigation measures: symptom monitoring, quarantine, and testing

Authors: Michael A. Johansson, Hannah Wolford, Prabasaj Paul, Pamela S. Diaz, Tai-Ho Chen, Clive M. Brown, Martin S. Cetron, Francisco Alvarado-Ramy

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Balancing the control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission with the resumption of travel is a global priority. Current recommendations include mitigation measures before, during, and after travel. Pre- and post-travel strategies including symptom monitoring, antigen or nucleic acid amplification testing, and quarantine can be combined in multiple ways considering different trade-offs in feasibility, adherence, effectiveness, cost, and adverse consequences.

Methods

We used a mathematical model to analyze the expected effectiveness of symptom monitoring, testing, and quarantine under different estimates of the infectious period, test-positivity relative to time of infection, and test sensitivity to reduce the risk of transmission from infected travelers during and after travel.

Results

If infection occurs 0–7 days prior to travel, immediate isolation following symptom onset prior to or during travel reduces risk of transmission while traveling by 30–35%. Pre-departure testing can further reduce risk, with testing closer to the time of travel being optimal even if test sensitivity is lower than an earlier test. For example, testing on the day of departure can reduce risk while traveling by 44–72%. For transmission risk after travel with infection time up to 7 days prior to arrival at the destination, isolation based on symptom monitoring reduced introduction risk at the destination by 42–56%. A 14-day quarantine after arrival, without symptom monitoring or testing, can reduce post-travel risk by 96–100% on its own. However, a shorter quarantine of 7 days combined with symptom monitoring and a test on day 5–6 after arrival is also effective (97--100%) at reducing introduction risk and is less burdensome, which may improve adherence.

Conclusions

Quarantine is an effective measure to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk from travelers and can be enhanced by the addition of symptom monitoring and testing. Optimal test timing depends on the effectiveness of quarantine: with low adherence or no quarantine, optimal test timing is close to the time of arrival; with effective quarantine, testing a few days later optimizes sensitivity to detect those infected immediately before or while traveling. These measures can complement recommendations such as social distancing, using masks, and hand hygiene, to further reduce risk during and after travel.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Air travel in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:993. Air travel in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:993.
6.
go back to reference Sun X, Wandelt S, Zhang A. How did COVID-19 impact air transportation? A first peek through the lens of complex networks. J Air Transp Manag. 2020;89:101928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sun X, Wandelt S, Zhang A. How did COVID-19 impact air transportation? A first peek through the lens of complex networks. J Air Transp Manag. 2020;89:101928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Zhao S, Gao D, Zhuang Z, Chong MKC, Cai Y, Ran J, et al. Estimating the serial interval of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a statistical analysis using the public data in Hong Kong from January 16 to February 15, 2020. Front Phys. 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00347. Zhao S, Gao D, Zhuang Z, Chong MKC, Cai Y, Ran J, et al. Estimating the serial interval of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a statistical analysis using the public data in Hong Kong from January 16 to February 15, 2020. Front Phys. 2020;8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​fphy.​2020.​00347.
44.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. What is CMS’s policy regarding laboratories performing antigen tests authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use at the point of care (POC) or in patient care settings operating under a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Certificate of Waiver on asymptomatic individuals? https://www.cms.gov/files/document/clia-poc-ag-test-enforcement-discretion.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2020. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. What is CMS’s policy regarding laboratories performing antigen tests authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use at the point of care (POC) or in patient care settings operating under a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Certificate of Waiver on asymptomatic individuals? https://​www.​cms.​gov/​files/​document/​clia-poc-ag-test-enforcement-discretion.​pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2020.
46.
go back to reference Alemany A, Baró B, Ouchi D, Rodó P, Ubals M, Corbacho-Monné M, Vergara-Alert J, Rodon J, Segalés J, Esteban C, Fernández G, Ruiz L, Bassat Q, Clotet B, Ara J, Vall-Mayans M, G-Beiras C, Blanco I, Mitjà O. Analytical and clinical performance of the panbio COVID-19 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test. J Inf Secur. 2021;0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.12.033. Alemany A, Baró B, Ouchi D, Rodó P, Ubals M, Corbacho-Monné M, Vergara-Alert J, Rodon J, Segalés J, Esteban C, Fernández G, Ruiz L, Bassat Q, Clotet B, Ara J, Vall-Mayans M, G-Beiras C, Blanco I, Mitjà O. Analytical and clinical performance of the panbio COVID-19 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test. J Inf Secur. 2021;0. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jinf.​2020.​12.​033.
47.
go back to reference Pilarowski G, Lebel P, Sunshine S, Liu J, Crawford E, Marquez C, et al. The CLIAHUB Consortium, DeRisi J. Performance characteristics of a rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen detection assay at a public plaza testing site in San Francisco. J Infect Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa802. Pilarowski G, Lebel P, Sunshine S, Liu J, Crawford E, Marquez C, et al. The CLIAHUB Consortium, DeRisi J. Performance characteristics of a rapid severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigen detection assay at a public plaza testing site in San Francisco. J Infect Dis. 2021. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​infdis/​jiaa802.
57.
go back to reference Walsh KA, Jordan K, Clyne B, Rohde D, Drummond L, Byrne P, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection. J Inf Secur. 2020;81:357–71. Walsh KA, Jordan K, Clyne B, Rohde D, Drummond L, Byrne P, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection. J Inf Secur. 2020;81:357–71.
66.
go back to reference Quilty BJ, Clifford S, Group2 C nCoV working, Flasche S, Eggo RM. Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Euro Surveill. 2020;25:2000080.CrossRefPubMedCentral Quilty BJ, Clifford S, Group2 C nCoV working, Flasche S, Eggo RM. Effectiveness of airport screening at detecting travellers infected with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Euro Surveill. 2020;25:2000080.CrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Reducing travel-related SARS-CoV-2 transmission with layered mitigation measures: symptom monitoring, quarantine, and testing
Authors
Michael A. Johansson
Hannah Wolford
Prabasaj Paul
Pamela S. Diaz
Tai-Ho Chen
Clive M. Brown
Martin S. Cetron
Francisco Alvarado-Ramy
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01975-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue