Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Correspondence

Data sharing from pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical studies: audit of data availability

Authors: Ashley M. Hopkins, Andrew Rowland, Michael J. Sorich

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Clinical trial transparency is important to participants, trialists, publishers, and regulators, and there have been recent major policy changes by the pharmaceutical industry regarding clinical study data sharing. However, it is unknown if these changes are enabling independent researchers to access participant-level data from prominent contemporary clinical trials sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry 2 years after publication of the primary results.

Main text

PubMed and ClinicalTrials.​gov were searched to identify clinical trials of medicines sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry and first published between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2015 in the top 10 general and internal medical journals by impact factor. For each clinical trial, the eligibility of independent researchers to request participant-level data was identified via the sponsor having a data sharing policy/process and a positive response to an enquiry.
Fifty-six publications reporting on 61 industry-sponsored clinical trials were identified, of which 32 (52%) had a public data sharing policy/process and 9 (15%) were confirmed eligible for data sharing. Industry sponsors within the top 25 by global sales were more likely to have a data sharing policy (93% vs 10%), and there was a trend towards increased data sharing eligibility (23% vs 4%). Twenty-six studies were explicitly confirmed as ineligible for data sharing. The two most common data sharing policy conditions that prevented sharing of data for published results were the exclusion of studies that had ongoing follow-up of the published results and the exclusion of studies of medicines that have not yet achieved regulatory approval in the USA and the European Union.

Conclusions

Fifteen percent of the sampled clinical trials were available for data sharing 2 years after publication of primary results of the trial. Key issues limiting data sharing include a large proportion of industry sponsors who do not have a data sharing policy/process, and data sharing policy conditions that exclude access on the basis of ongoing follow-up and regulatory activity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonini S, Eichler H-G, Wathion N, Rasi G. Transparency and the European Medicines Agency — sharing of clinical trial data. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2452–5.CrossRef Bonini S, Eichler H-G, Wathion N, Rasi G. Transparency and the European Medicines Agency — sharing of clinical trial data. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2452–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nisen P, Rockhold F. Access to patient-level data from GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):475–8.CrossRef Nisen P, Rockhold F. Access to patient-level data from GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):475–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kiley R, Peatfield T, Hansen J, Reddington F. Data sharing from clinical trials — a research funder’s perspective. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1990–2.CrossRef Kiley R, Peatfield T, Hansen J, Reddington F. Data sharing from clinical trials — a research funder’s perspective. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1990–2.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goldacre B. The WHO joint statement from funders on trials transparency. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;357:j2816.CrossRef Goldacre B. The WHO joint statement from funders on trials transparency. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;357:j2816.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bloom T, Ganley E, Winker M. Data access for the open access literature: PLOS's data policy. PLOS Med. 2014;11(2):e1001607.CrossRef Bloom T, Ganley E, Winker M. Data access for the open access literature: PLOS's data policy. PLOS Med. 2014;11(2):e1001607.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taichman DB, Sahni P, Pinborg A, Peiperl L, Laine C, James A, Hong S-T, Haileamlak A, Gollogly L, Godlee F, et al. Data sharing statements for clinical trials — a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2277–9.CrossRef Taichman DB, Sahni P, Pinborg A, Peiperl L, Laine C, James A, Hong S-T, Haileamlak A, Gollogly L, Godlee F, et al. Data sharing statements for clinical trials — a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2277–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mello MM, Lieou V, Goodman SN. Clinical trial participants’ views of the risks and benefits of data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2202–11.CrossRef Mello MM, Lieou V, Goodman SN. Clinical trial participants’ views of the risks and benefits of data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2202–11.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference El Emam K, Rodgers S, Malin B. Anonymising and sharing individual patient data. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h1139. El Emam K, Rodgers S, Malin B. Anonymising and sharing individual patient data. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;350:h1139.
12.
go back to reference Geifman N, Bollyky J, Bhattacharya S, Butte AJ. Opening clinical trial data: are the voluntary data-sharing portals enough? BMC Med. 2015;13(1):280.CrossRef Geifman N, Bollyky J, Bhattacharya S, Butte AJ. Opening clinical trial data: are the voluntary data-sharing portals enough? BMC Med. 2015;13(1):280.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tucker K, Branson J, Dilleen M, Hollis S, Loughlin P, Nixon MJ, Williams Z. Protecting patient privacy when sharing patient-level data from clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):77.CrossRef Tucker K, Branson J, Dilleen M, Hollis S, Loughlin P, Nixon MJ, Williams Z. Protecting patient privacy when sharing patient-level data from clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):77.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sudlow R, Branson J, Friede T, Morgan D, Whately-Smith C. EFSPI/PSI working group on data sharing: accessing and working with pharmaceutical clinical trial patient level datasets — a primer for academic researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):73.CrossRef Sudlow R, Branson J, Friede T, Morgan D, Whately-Smith C. EFSPI/PSI working group on data sharing: accessing and working with pharmaceutical clinical trial patient level datasets — a primer for academic researchers. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):73.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bierer BE, Li R, Barnes M, Sim I. A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2411–3.CrossRef Bierer BE, Li R, Barnes M, Sim I. A global, neutral platform for sharing trial data. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2411–3.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ohmann C, Banzi R, Canham S, Battaglia S, Matei M, Ariyo C, Becnel L, Bierer B, Bowers S, Clivio L, et al. Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018647.CrossRef Ohmann C, Banzi R, Canham S, Battaglia S, Matei M, Ariyo C, Becnel L, Bierer B, Bowers S, Clivio L, et al. Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e018647.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Merson L, Gaye O, Guerin PJ. Avoiding data dumpsters — toward equitable and useful data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2414–5.CrossRef Merson L, Gaye O, Guerin PJ. Avoiding data dumpsters — toward equitable and useful data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2414–5.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hollis S, Fletcher C, Lynn F, Urban HJ, Branson J, Burger HU, Tudur Smith C, Sydes MR, Gerlinger C. Best practice for analysis of shared clinical trial data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):76.CrossRef Hollis S, Fletcher C, Lynn F, Urban HJ, Branson J, Burger HU, Tudur Smith C, Sydes MR, Gerlinger C. Best practice for analysis of shared clinical trial data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):76.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Strom BL, Buyse ME, Hughes J, Knoppers BM. Data sharing — is the juice worth the squeeze? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(17):1608–9.CrossRef Strom BL, Buyse ME, Hughes J, Knoppers BM. Data sharing — is the juice worth the squeeze? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(17):1608–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference The International Consortium of Investigators for Fairness in Trial Data Sharing. Toward fairness in data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):405–7.CrossRef The International Consortium of Investigators for Fairness in Trial Data Sharing. Toward fairness in data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):405–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bierer BE, Crosas M, Pierce HH. Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(17):1684–7.CrossRef Bierer BE, Crosas M, Pierce HH. Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(17):1684–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Strom BL, Buyse M, Hughes J, Knoppers BM. Data sharing, year 1 — access to data from industry-sponsored clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(22):2052–4.CrossRef Strom BL, Buyse M, Hughes J, Knoppers BM. Data sharing, year 1 — access to data from industry-sponsored clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(22):2052–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Goldacre B, Lane S, Mahtani KR, Heneghan C, Onakpoya I, Bushfield I, Smeeth L. Pharmaceutical companies’ policies on access to trial data, results, and methods: audit study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;j3334:358. Goldacre B, Lane S, Mahtani KR, Heneghan C, Onakpoya I, Bushfield I, Smeeth L. Pharmaceutical companies’ policies on access to trial data, results, and methods: audit study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;j3334:358.
26.
go back to reference Drazen JM. Sharing individual patient data from clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(3):201–2.CrossRef Drazen JM. Sharing individual patient data from clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(3):201–2.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Naudet F, Sakarovitch C, Janiaud P, Cristea I, Fanelli D, Moher D, Ioannidis JPA. Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018;360:k400.CrossRef Naudet F, Sakarovitch C, Janiaud P, Cristea I, Fanelli D, Moher D, Ioannidis JPA. Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018;360:k400.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Loder E. Data sharing: making good on promises. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018:360, k710. Loder E. Data sharing: making good on promises. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018:360, k710.
29.
go back to reference Murugiah K, Ritchie JD, Desai NR, Ross JS, Krumholz HM. Availability of clinical trial data from industry-sponsored cardiovascular trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(4):e003307.CrossRef Murugiah K, Ritchie JD, Desai NR, Ross JS, Krumholz HM. Availability of clinical trial data from industry-sponsored cardiovascular trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(4):e003307.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Data sharing from pharmaceutical industry sponsored clinical studies: audit of data availability
Authors
Ashley M. Hopkins
Andrew Rowland
Michael J. Sorich
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1154-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue