Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Debate

From hype to reality: data science enabling personalized medicine

Authors: Holger Fröhlich, Rudi Balling, Niko Beerenwinkel, Oliver Kohlbacher, Santosh Kumar, Thomas Lengauer, Marloes H. Maathuis, Yves Moreau, Susan A. Murphy, Teresa M. Przytycka, Michael Rebhan, Hannes Röst, Andreas Schuppert, Matthias Schwab, Rainer Spang, Daniel Stekhoven, Jimeng Sun, Andreas Weber, Daniel Ziemek, Blaz Zupan

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Personalized, precision, P4, or stratified medicine is understood as a medical approach in which patients are stratified based on their disease subtype, risk, prognosis, or treatment response using specialized diagnostic tests. The key idea is to base medical decisions on individual patient characteristics, including molecular and behavioral biomarkers, rather than on population averages. Personalized medicine is deeply connected to and dependent on data science, specifically machine learning (often named Artificial Intelligence in the mainstream media). While during recent years there has been a lot of enthusiasm about the potential of ‘big data’ and machine learning-based solutions, there exist only few examples that impact current clinical practice. The lack of impact on clinical practice can largely be attributed to insufficient performance of predictive models, difficulties to interpret complex model predictions, and lack of validation via prospective clinical trials that demonstrate a clear benefit compared to the standard of care. In this paper, we review the potential of state-of-the-art data science approaches for personalized medicine, discuss open challenges, and highlight directions that may help to overcome them in the future.

Conclusions

There is a need for an interdisciplinary effort, including data scientists, physicians, patient advocates, regulatory agencies, and health insurance organizations. Partially unrealistic expectations and concerns about data science-based solutions need to be better managed. In parallel, computational methods must advance more to provide direct benefit to clinical practice.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Vogenberg FR, Isaacson Barash C, Pursel M. Personalized medicine: part 1: evolution and development into theranostics. P T. 2010;35:560–76.PubMedPubMedCentral Vogenberg FR, Isaacson Barash C, Pursel M. Personalized medicine: part 1: evolution and development into theranostics. P T. 2010;35:560–76.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Beaulieu-Jones BK, Orzechowski P, Moore JH. Mapping Patient Trajectories using Longitudinal Extraction and Deep Learning in the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2018;23:123–32.PubMed Beaulieu-Jones BK, Orzechowski P, Moore JH. Mapping Patient Trajectories using Longitudinal Extraction and Deep Learning in the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2018;23:123–32.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Choi E, Bahadori MT, Schuetz A, Stewart WF, Sun J. Doctor AI: predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks. JMLR Workshop Conf Proc. 2016;56:301–18.PubMedPubMedCentral Choi E, Bahadori MT, Schuetz A, Stewart WF, Sun J. Doctor AI: predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks. JMLR Workshop Conf Proc. 2016;56:301–18.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Gönen M. Statistical aspects of gene signatures and molecular targets. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009;3(2 Suppl):S19–21.PubMedPubMedCentral Gönen M. Statistical aspects of gene signatures and molecular targets. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009;3(2 Suppl):S19–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Hara S, Hayashi K. Making Tree Ensembles Interpretable: A Bayesian Model Selection Approach. In: Storkey A, Perez-Cruz F, editors. Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics: PMLR; 2018. p. 77–85. Hara S, Hayashi K. Making Tree Ensembles Interpretable: A Bayesian Model Selection Approach. In: Storkey A, Perez-Cruz F, editors. Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics: PMLR; 2018. p. 77–85.
47.
go back to reference Kohavi R, Longbotham R. Online Controlled Experiments and A/B Testing. In: Sammut C, Webb GI, editors. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Boston: Springer; 2016. p. 1–8. Kohavi R, Longbotham R. Online Controlled Experiments and A/B Testing. In: Sammut C, Webb GI, editors. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Boston: Springer; 2016. p. 1–8.
56.
go back to reference Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
57.
go back to reference Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R. Causation, Prediction and Search. Second edition. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2000. Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R. Causation, Prediction and Search. Second edition. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2000.
58.
go back to reference Chickering DM. Learning equivalence classes of bayesian-network structures. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2002;2:445–98. Chickering DM. Learning equivalence classes of bayesian-network structures. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2002;2:445–98.
59.
go back to reference Shimizu S, Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A, Kerminen A. A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J Mach Learn Res. 2006;7:2003–30. Shimizu S, Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A, Kerminen A. A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J Mach Learn Res. 2006;7:2003–30.
62.
go back to reference Aliferis CF, Statnikov A, Tsamardinos I, Mani S, Koutsoukos XD. Local Causal and Markov Blanket Induction for Causal Discovery and Feature Selection for Classification Part I: Algorithms and Empirical Evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2010;11 Jan:171–234. Aliferis CF, Statnikov A, Tsamardinos I, Mani S, Koutsoukos XD. Local Causal and Markov Blanket Induction for Causal Discovery and Feature Selection for Classification Part I: Algorithms and Empirical Evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2010;11 Jan:171–234.
67.
go back to reference Mogk G, Mrziglod T, Schuppert A. Application of hybrid models in chemical industry. In: European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering-12, 35th European Symposium of the Working Party on Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier; 2002. p. 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-7946(02)80183-3. Mogk G, Mrziglod T, Schuppert A. Application of hybrid models in chemical industry. In: European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering-12, 35th European Symposium of the Working Party on Computer Aided Process Engineering. Elsevier; 2002. p. 931–936. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1570-7946(02)80183-3.
Metadata
Title
From hype to reality: data science enabling personalized medicine
Authors
Holger Fröhlich
Rudi Balling
Niko Beerenwinkel
Oliver Kohlbacher
Santosh Kumar
Thomas Lengauer
Marloes H. Maathuis
Yves Moreau
Susan A. Murphy
Teresa M. Przytycka
Michael Rebhan
Hannes Röst
Andreas Schuppert
Matthias Schwab
Rainer Spang
Daniel Stekhoven
Jimeng Sun
Andreas Weber
Daniel Ziemek
Blaz Zupan
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1122-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue