Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services

Authors: Trisha Greenhalgh, Rob Procter, Joe Wherton, Paul Sugarhood, Sue Hinder, Mark Rouncefield

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We sought to define quality in telehealth and telecare with the aim of improving the proportion of patients who receive appropriate, acceptable and workable technologies and services to support them living with illness or disability.

Methods

This was a three-phase study: (1) interviews with seven technology suppliers and 14 service providers, (2) ethnographic case studies of 40 people, 60 to 98 years old, with multi-morbidity and assisted living needs and (3) 10 co-design workshops. In phase 1, we explored barriers to uptake of telehealth and telecare. In phase 2, we used ethnographic methods to build a detailed picture of participants’ lives, illness experiences and technology use. In phase 3, we brought users and their carers together with suppliers and providers to derive quality principles for assistive technology products and services.

Results

Interviews identified practical, material and organisational barriers to smooth introduction and continued support of assistive technologies. The experience of multi-morbidity was characterised by multiple, mutually reinforcing and inexorably worsening impairments, producing diverse and unique care challenges. Participants and their carers managed these pragmatically, obtaining technologies and adapting the home. Installed technologies were rarely fit for purpose. Support services for technologies made high (and sometimes oppressive) demands on users. Six principles emerged from the workshops. Quality telehealth or telecare is 1) ANCHORED in a shared understanding of what matters to the user; 2) REALISTIC about the natural history of illness; 3) CO-CREATIVE, evolving and adapting solutions with users; 4) HUMAN, supported through interpersonal relationships and social networks; 5) INTEGRATED, through attention to mutual awareness and knowledge sharing; 6) EVALUATED to drive system learning.

Conclusions

Technological advances are important, but must be underpinned by industry and service providers following a user-centred approach to design and delivery. For the ARCHIE principles to be realised, the sector requires: (1) a shift in focus from product (‘assistive technologies’) to performance (‘supporting technologies-in-use’); (2) a shift in the commissioning model from standardised to personalised home care contracts; and (3) a shift in the design model from ‘walled garden’, branded products to inter-operable components that can be combined and used flexibly across devices and platforms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lewin D, Adshead S, Glennon B, Williamson B, Moore T, Damodaran L, et al. Assisted living technologies for older and disabled people in 2030. A final report to Ofcom. London: Plum Consulting; 2010. p. 2010. Lewin D, Adshead S, Glennon B, Williamson B, Moore T, Damodaran L, et al. Assisted living technologies for older and disabled people in 2030. A final report to Ofcom. London: Plum Consulting; 2010. p. 2010.
2.
go back to reference Cohen SA. A review of demographic and infrastructural factors and potential solutions to the physician and nursing shortage predicted to impact the growing US elderly population. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15:352–62.CrossRefPubMed Cohen SA. A review of demographic and infrastructural factors and potential solutions to the physician and nursing shortage predicted to impact the growing US elderly population. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15:352–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008:33–40. Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008:33–40.
5.
go back to reference Commission to the European Parliament European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Ageing well in the information society: an i2010 initiative. Action plan on information and communication technologies and ageing. Brussels: European Union; 2007. Commission to the European Parliament European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Ageing well in the information society: an i2010 initiative. Action plan on information and communication technologies and ageing. Brussels: European Union; 2007.
7.
go back to reference Oudshoorn N. Who cares? Telecare technoloiges and the transformation of healthcare. London: Routledge; 2010. Oudshoorn N. Who cares? Telecare technoloiges and the transformation of healthcare. London: Routledge; 2010.
8.
go back to reference Percival J, Hanson J. Big brother or brave new world? Telecare and its implications for older people’s independence and social inclusion. Crit Soc Policy. 2009;12:358. Percival J, Hanson J. Big brother or brave new world? Telecare and its implications for older people’s independence and social inclusion. Crit Soc Policy. 2009;12:358.
9.
go back to reference Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T. Whole System Demonstrator trial: policy, politics, and publication ethics. BMJ. 2012;345:e5280.CrossRefPubMed Greenhalgh T. Whole System Demonstrator trial: policy, politics, and publication ethics. BMJ. 2012;345:e5280.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dourish P, Bell G. Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011.CrossRef Dourish P, Bell G. Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mort M, Roberts C, Pols J, Domenech M, Moser I. Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expect. 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12109. Mort M, Roberts C, Pols J, Domenech M, Moser I. Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expect. 2013. doi:10.1111/hex.12109.
13.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.CrossRefPubMed Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Oudshoorn N. Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.CrossRef Oudshoorn N. Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pols J. Care at a distance: on the closeness of technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2012. Pols J. Care at a distance: on the closeness of technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2012.
16.
go back to reference Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Dewsbury G, Hinder S, et al. Designing assisted living technologies ‘in the wild’: preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Dewsbury G, Hinder S, et al. Designing assisted living technologies ‘in the wild’: preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Procter R, Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9:1–9. Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Procter R, Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9:1–9.
18.
go back to reference Procter R, Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Rouncefield M, Hinder S. The day-to-day co-production of ageing in place. Computer-Supported Co-op Work (CSCW). 2014;23:245–67.CrossRef Procter R, Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Rouncefield M, Hinder S. The day-to-day co-production of ageing in place. Computer-Supported Co-op Work (CSCW). 2014;23:245–67.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Merleau-Ponty M: Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1945/1962. Merleau-Ponty M: Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1945/1962.
20.
go back to reference Heidegger M. Being and time (Translated by E. Robinson and J. Macquarrie). New York: Harper and Row; 1962. Heidegger M. Being and time (Translated by E. Robinson and J. Macquarrie). New York: Harper and Row; 1962.
21.
go back to reference Pickard S. A new political anatomy of the older body? An examination of approaches to illness in old age in primary care. Ageing Soc. 2012;1:1–24. Pickard S. A new political anatomy of the older body? An examination of approaches to illness in old age in primary care. Ageing Soc. 2012;1:1–24.
22.
go back to reference Pickard S, Rogers A. Knowing as practice: self-care in the case of chronic multi-morbidities. Soc Theory Health. 2012;10:101–20.CrossRef Pickard S, Rogers A. Knowing as practice: self-care in the case of chronic multi-morbidities. Soc Theory Health. 2012;10:101–20.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sayer A. Why things matter to people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef Sayer A. Why things matter to people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Madison DS. Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2011. Madison DS. Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2011.
25.
go back to reference Star SL. Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: working on the fringes. Scand J Inf Syst. 2002;14:107–22. Star SL. Infrastructure and ethnographic practice: working on the fringes. Scand J Inf Syst. 2002;14:107–22.
26.
go back to reference Oudshoorn N. How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare. Soc Stud Sci. 2012;42:121–42.CrossRefPubMed Oudshoorn N. How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare. Soc Stud Sci. 2012;42:121–42.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Brittain K, Corner L, Robinson L, Bond J. Ageing in place and technologies of place: the lived experience of people with dementia in changing social, physical and technological environments. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32:272–87.CrossRefPubMed Brittain K, Corner L, Robinson L, Bond J. Ageing in place and technologies of place: the lived experience of people with dementia in changing social, physical and technological environments. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32:272–87.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007. Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing; 2007.
30.
go back to reference Dewsbury G, Sommerville I, Bagnall P, Rouncefield M, Onditi V. Software co-design with older people. In: Designing Accessible Technology. London: Springer; 2006. p. 199–208.CrossRef Dewsbury G, Sommerville I, Bagnall P, Rouncefield M, Onditi V. Software co-design with older people. In: Designing Accessible Technology. London: Springer; 2006. p. 199–208.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Robert GB. Participatory action research: using experience-based co-design to improve the quality of healthcare services. In: Understanding and Using Health Experiences – improving patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Robert GB. Participatory action research: using experience-based co-design to improve the quality of healthcare services. In: Understanding and Using Health Experiences – improving patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
32.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990.
34.
go back to reference Dourish P, Bellotti V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work. New York: ACM; 1992. p. 107–14. Dourish P, Bellotti V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work. New York: ACM; 1992. p. 107–14.
35.
go back to reference Spence PR, Reddy M. Beyond expertise seeking: a field study of the informal knowledge practices of healthcare IT teams. Computer-Supported Coop Work (CSCW). 2012;21:283–315.CrossRef Spence PR, Reddy M. Beyond expertise seeking: a field study of the informal knowledge practices of healthcare IT teams. Computer-Supported Coop Work (CSCW). 2012;21:283–315.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hyde P, Harris C, Boaden R. Pro-social organisational behaviour of health care workers. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24:3115–30.CrossRef Hyde P, Harris C, Boaden R. Pro-social organisational behaviour of health care workers. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24:3115–30.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Argyris C. Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2002;1:206–18.CrossRef Argyris C. Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2002;1:206–18.CrossRef
38.
39.
go back to reference Hartswood M, Procter RN, Rouchy P, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Working IT out in medical practice: IT systems design and development as co-realisation. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:392–7.PubMed Hartswood M, Procter RN, Rouchy P, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Working IT out in medical practice: IT systems design and development as co-realisation. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42:392–7.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Mort M, Roberts C, Callén B. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35:799–812.CrossRefPubMed Mort M, Roberts C, Callén B. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35:799–812.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Hughes J, King V, Rodden T, Andersen H. Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work: 1994. New York: ACM; 1994. p. 429–39. Hughes J, King V, Rodden T, Andersen H. Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work: 1994. New York: ACM; 1994. p. 429–39.
42.
go back to reference Dourish P. What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2004;8:19–30.CrossRef Dourish P. What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2004;8:19–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services
Authors
Trisha Greenhalgh
Rob Procter
Joe Wherton
Paul Sugarhood
Sue Hinder
Mark Rouncefield
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue