Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC International Health and Human Rights
Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Human rights’ interdependence and indivisibility: a glance over the human rights to water and sanitation

Authors: Priscila Neves-Silva, Giselle Isabele Martins, Léo Heller

Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In 1948 the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was drawn up. The content of this document was further reflected two treaties, the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. To try to maintain the interrelationship between the rights contained in each document, the idea that all rights are interdependent and indivisible was stressed. Based on this vision, this study aimed to explore the extent to which the violation of the human rights to water and sanitation interferes with the guarantee of other rights, addressing the principles of interdependence and indivisibility.

Methods

For that, 24 homeless, in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, were interviewed. Individual and group interviews were carried out in addition to participant observation. The content analysis was used in order to analyze the data collected.

Results

The research found that violation of the rights to water and sanitation promotes violation of other rights, such as health and education rights, strengthening the view of rights’ interdependence and indivisibility.

Conclusion

It is important to affirm that the protection of human rights must be consolidated at an operational and normative level, aligned to concepts of indivisibility and interdependence as it has been proposed for approximately seven decades.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Baets A. History of human rights. International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral. Sciences. 2015;2(11):367–74.
2.
Trindade AAC. The interdependence of all human rights – obstacles and challenges to their implementation: UNESCO; 1998.
3.
Minkler L, Sweeney S. On the invisibility and interdependence of basic rights in developing countries. Hum Rights Q. 2011;33:351–96.CrossRef
4.
UN. United Nations. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. Geneva: United Nations; 1993.
5.
Neier A. Social and economic rights: a critique. Human Rights Brief. 2006;13(2):1–3.
6.
Roth K. Defending economic, social and cultural rights: practical issues faced by international human rights organization. Hum Rights Q. 2004;26(1):63–73.CrossRef
7.
Nickel JW. Rethinking indivisibility: towards a theory of supporting relations between human rights. Hum Rights Q. 2008;30(4):984–1001.CrossRef
8.
Feinberg J. The nature and value of rights. J Value lnq. 1970;4(4):243–60.CrossRef
9.
Coop D. The right to an adequate standard of living: justice, autonomy and the basic needs. Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation. 1992;9(1):231–26.CrossRef
10.
Sen A. Development as Freedom. New York: First Anchor Books Edition; 2000.
11.
Sen A. Elements of a theory of human right. Philos Public Aff. 2004;32(4):316–56.CrossRef
12.
Payne M. Henry Shue on Basic Rights. Essays in Philosophy: 2008; 9(2):1–3.
13.
Shue H. Basic rights: subsistence, affluence and US foreign policy. United Kindow: Princeton University Press; 1996.
14.
Quane HA. Further dimension to the interdependence and indivisibility of human rights? Recent developments concerning the rights of indigenous peoples. Harvard Hum Rights J. 2012;(25):49–83.
15.
UNGA. United Nations General Assembly. Human Right to Water and Sanitation. UN Document A/RES/64/292. Geneva:UNGA; 2010.
16.
OHCHR. Office of the High Commissioner for human rights. General comment no. 15: the right to water (arts. 11 and 12 of the covenant). Geneva: OHCHR; 2010.
17.
UN. United Nation. Human right to safe drinking water and sanitation. Geneva: United Nations; 2015.
18.
WHO/UNICEF Joint monitoring program for water supply and sanitation. Progress on drinking water and sanitation. Update 2017. Geneva: WHO,2017.
19.
UN. United Nations. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . Geneva: United Nations.2015.
20.
UN. United Nations. Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context. In: United Nations. Geneve; 2015.
21.
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada IPEA. Texto para discussão estimativa da população em situação de rua no Brasil. In: Brasília: Rio de Janeiro: Ipea; 2016.
22.
Walters V. Urban homelessness and the right to water and sanitation: experiences from India’s cities. Water Policy. 2014;16:755–72.CrossRef
23.
Uddin SMN, et al. Water sanitation and hygiene for homeless people. J Water Health. 2016;14(1):47–51.CrossRef
24.
Neves-Silva P, Heller L. “We only have access as a favor, don’t we?” The perception of homeless population on the human rights to water and sanitation. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2018;34(3):e00024017.CrossRef
25.
Minayo MCS. O desafio do conhecimento. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Editora:Hucitec; 2014.
26.
27.
PBH. Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte. Terceiro censo da População em Situação de Rua e Migrantes; 2014.
28.
29.
Fontanella BJB, Ricas J, Turato ER. Amostragem por saturação em pesquisas qualitativas em saúde: contribuições teóricas. Cad Saúde Pública. 2008;24(1):17–27.CrossRef
30.
Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições. 2011:70.
31.
Kaufmann D. Human rights and governance: the empirical challenge: World Bank Institute; 2004.
32.
Leblang D, Milner WT, Poe SC. Security rights, subsistence rights, and liberties: a theoretical survey of the empirical landscape. Hum Rights Q. 1999;21(2):403–43.CrossRef
33.
Sen A. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1999.
34.
Health FP. Human rights, and pathologies of power: the new war on the poor. Berkeley, CA. London: University of California Press; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Human rights’ interdependence and indivisibility: a glance over the human rights to water and sanitation
Authors
Priscila Neves-Silva
Giselle Isabele Martins
Léo Heller
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC International Health and Human Rights / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-698X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-019-0197-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Impact of health insurance status among migrants from sub-Saharan Africa on access to health care and HIV testing in Germany: a participatory cross-sectional survey

Research article

Coping with ill-health: health care facility, chemist or medicinal plants? Health-seeking behaviour in a Kenyan wetland

Research article

Health care providers’ and mothers’ perceptions about the medicalization of female genital mutilation or cutting in Egypt: a cross-sectional qualitative study

Research article

Sex work stigma and non-disclosure to health care providers: data from a large RDS study among FSW in Brazil

Study protocol

The MuSeS project: a mixed methods study to increase understanding of the role of settlement and multicultural services in supporting migrant and refugee women experiencing violence in Australia

Research article

Health of Syrian unaccompanied asylum seeking adolescents (UASA) at first medical examination in Germany in comparison to UASA from other world regions